[Neurons] 2020 Neurons #55 POLITICAL THINKING

[Michael Hall]

From: L. Michael Hall   

2020 Neurons #55

October 5, 2020

Reflections on Politics #10

 

POLITICAL THINKING

 

There's are all kinds of thinking.  In the book Executive Thinking (2018) I
made a pretty extensive list of the many, many kinds and variations there
are in what we generally call "thinking."  Of courses, that book was
primarily about high quality of executive thinking that we call critical
thinking.  After that I wrote about Thinking as a Modeler (2019), then
Hypnotic Thinking (2020, and more recently have completed another work,
Humorous Thinking (2020).

 

Then there is political thinking.  While I did not formulate the book
Political Coaching (2015) in terms of the kind of thinking that an
emotionally healthy person (a self-actualizing person) would use, it is
everywhere in the book.  It is especially in chapter 7 on Political
Strategies and Skills.  What does good, healthy "political thinking" consist
of?  What is it like? 

 

A strange fact about politics is that politics are all about relationships-
how we get along with each other, how we organize ourselves, manage our
activities, allocate our resources, make decisions, etc.- this is the
subject matter of political thinking.  This is true when you are engaged in
political thinking about office politics, business politics, or national
politics.  Now behind your political thinking will be your beliefs,
assumptions, understandings, etc. about people, human nature, groups, power,
group functioning, persuasion, etc.  You will operate either from Theory X
or Theory Y of human motivation.

 

Theory X politics describes how politics has operated for thousands of
years.  It assumes that people cannot be trusted, people are not
responsible, people will naturally lie, steal, deceive, manipulate as they
work in a zero-sum game in a win/lose context.  And if you expect people to
behave that way, you will want all the control and power you can get to
control them.  You will design things so that they are dependent on you.  In
that way you can get them to do what you want them to do.  That kind of
political thinking is the problem.  It is what needs to change.

 

Theory Y political thinking is very different.  It believes that people have
a higher nature, are driven by higher being--needs for purpose, meaning,
responsibility, collaboration, contribution, ethics, excellence, etc.  This
thinking inevitably leads to a very different mind-set.  The very best and
highest form of political thinking of a self-actualizing person involves the
following:

              Synergistic thinking        - collaboration, winning minds,
building teams.

              Contextual thinking       - recognizing current environment,
trends, systems, history.

              Vision thinking                - compelling objectives,
concentrated focus, strategy.

              Value thinking                - quality values, criteria,
standards.

              Power thinking              - recognize political dynamics,
power brokers, separation of powers.

              Stability thinking            - safety in social order, rule
of law.

              Difference thinking        - diversity for richness,
productive conflict.

              Intolerance thinking      - against corruption, lies,
deceptions, scandals, violence, chaos.

              Transparent thinking     - openness, vulnerability,
authenticity.

              Integrity thinking           - fulfilling promises, trust
building.

              Diplomacy thinking        - empathy, emotional warmth,
winsome.

              Flexibility thinking          - willingness to adjust and
adapt.

              Decisive thinking            - intelligent decisions, bringing
people into the process.

Consequential T.            - anticipating political fallout, 

                                          unintended consequences.

              Negotiation thinking      - principle bargaining for win/win
relationships. 

              Long-term thinking        - how processes work over time.

              

The best political thinking entails being able to recognize the political
environment- who are the power brokers, the factors that influence thinking
and deciding, the need for collaborating, and the consequences for failure
to cooperate.  Against that environment, one then thinks in terms of goals,
objectives, visions- Who do we want to be together?  What do we want to
accomplish together?  What future do we want to co-create?

 


Differences in those objectives result in different people holding to
different agendas and therefore working to attempt to influence things so
that one's agenda can win acceptance.  Now we have a power struggle- which
is what we mostly recognize about politics.  Some want to go in one
direction; others wanting to go in another direction.  What kind of
political conversations can we create- discussion, dialogue, debate, etc.-
so that we can work through our different understandings and co-influence
each other and thereby create win/win resolutions?

 

For that kind of win/win resolutions we need an orderly and respectful way
to work through conflicts-we need productive conflicting skills.  This will
require transparency, respect, diplomacy, flexibility, long-term thinking,
consequential thinking, and integrity. [For such skills, see the chapters on
it in Group and Team Coaching, Games Great Lovers Play.]

 

As an aside, I wrote this four weeks ago, long before the first presidential
debate.  And what we had in that so-called debate was more of a shouting
match of talking points on both sides.  We also had some loaded questions by
the moderator-which if the President had gone slower and spent more time
listening, he could have heard the loaded frames and then address them.  To
have a healthy and respectful political conversations, we all need to shift
our thinking away from win/lose and focus much more on seeking first to
understand.

 

Instead of asking, "Who won the debate?" we should be asking, "Who learned
something?"  "Who gained a more empathetic understanding of his rival?"  As
long as our political thinking is based on the metaphor of scoring points,
winning a battle, defeating an enemy- our politics will be harsh, polarized,
and self-defeating.  When we shift to a metaphor of being respectful,
engaging in learning, and seeking wisdom- then our political thinking will
serve us.  This will be true for politics in the home, at work, and in the
nation.

 

 

 

 

 

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.

Executive Director, Neuro-Semantics

P.O. Box 8

Clifton CO. 81520 USA

www.neurosemantics.com  

 

To unsubscribe to Neurons, send request to meta at acsol.net 

Humor is a meta-perspective about incongruity, exaggeration, playfulness,
and even absurdity.

For a touch of humor --- see the new book --- HUMOROUS THINKING  (2020)

 

 



 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20201004/31d8d419/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 364 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20201004/31d8d419/attachment.png>