[Neurons] 2019 Neurons #50 DISTINGUISHING FRAME AND FEELING
Michael Hall
meta at acsol.net
Sun Nov 10 18:44:57 EST 2019
From: L. Michael Hall
2019 Neurons #50
November 11, 2019
How to be a
Professional Communicator #5
THE FIFTH DISTINCTION
OF A PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATOR
Distinction #5: DISTINGUISHING FRAME AND FEELING
As the sensory / evaluative distinction occurs inside your mind and differs
at different levels of experience, so does this next distinction- the frame
/ feeling distinction. And precisely because both of these distinctions are
difficult to catch, almost everyone needs specific training and practice to
become competent so that it eventually becomes intuitive. Further, because
they occur within, and because you can jump the levels in a nana second,
catching the frame / feeling distinction is a most challenging aspect of
communication. Let's begin with some definitions.
A frame refers to your internal context of evaluative judgments,
understandings, beliefs, decisions, history, values, criteria, and so on.
As an inner filter, a frame governs how you interpret things. Your frames
are your perceptual filters which you have learned over your lifetime. To
understand anything requires a frame. Without a frame, you don't know how
to interpret anything. When you set a frame, you set a classification or
category and then you can use that category to understand what is before
you.
An emotion (or feeling) refers to a response in your lower brain (amgydala,
hippocampus) and higher levels (motor cortex) which activates your
neurology. The motion generated by an emotion reflects the difference
between your mapping of the world and your experience of the world. You
feel movement and motion in your body given the ideas, beliefs, and
understandings in your mind in relation to how well do the ideas work in the
outside world and/or fit your values and criteria.
So what's the difference? A frame establishes a way to categorize things
and as you categorize something, so you feel about it. Put a statement into
the category of "insult," and lo and behold, you feel upset and insulted,
maybe angry, maybe rejected. Put the same statement into the category of
"words," and you may feel neural, curious, and/or interested.
Frame and feelings also relate systemically. Primarily, frames create
emotions. Where there is an emotion-there is a frame. It is being
generated by some meaning. Yet the circular nature of a system with many
interactive elements means that your emotions also influence your frames.
While feelings are primarily expressions of your frames, feelings can also
trigger frames. That's why just because you feel something that, in itself,
is no reason to act on it. The frame may be toxic, distorted, or wrong- and
that would make the emotion also toxic.
As mostly symptoms of your frames, emotions indicate that you may need to
update the frame or enhance your skills in relating to the world. That
gives you two ways to change what you feel. And while symptoms are
important as information, they differ from the cause (i.e., the frame).
Here's something surprising. Because emotions reflect the difference
between your mapping and experiencing of the territory, all of them are
right. They rightly weigh the difference between the two. That makes them
relative. They are relative to the mapping and the experiencing. Yet
because your mapping may be off and your neurology (health, skills,
competencies, environment, etc.) may be off, emotions invite you to discover
the factors creating how things are off and what to do to set them right.
One danger is the belief frame that says you have to "be true to your
emotions." That was the big mistake of the emotive therapies during the
1960s. They made emotion primary rather than secondary. An even bigger
mistake is to assume that "if you feel something, then it is real." Believe
that and you will become a slave to your emotions. You will then
semantically load every emotional experience.
As a professional communicator, suspend meaning when you get responses that
you don't want or understand. Doing that give you a chance to explore your
feelings and their source. Sometimes this requires that you suspend being
emotionally reactive. Recognize that while your emotions are always right,
they are not always useful, accurate, or enhancing. Sometimes you have to
acknowledge the feeling and act against it. Sometimes you have to rise up
and operate from your highest intentions and understandings rather than your
immediate reactive emotion. Sometimes you have to refuse to "take counsel"
from your emotions.
Doing this enables you to become more professional as a communicator. If
you don't, kiss it goodbye! You will personalize things, emotionalize,
minimize, maximize, exaggerate, and tormented by other cognitive
distortions. Conversely, recognizing the frame / feeling distinction
empowers you to tell the difference between your framing and your
consequential feelings. And that, in turn, allow you to manage your
emotions intelligently. Now you can bring awareness, monitoring, and
regulating to your emotions- the activities that define emotional
intelligence.
[For more, see Secrets of Personal Mastery (1999) and the training program,
APG. Also the training program, Emotional Mastery.]
L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Neuro-Semantics
P.O. Box 8
Clifton CO. 81520 USA
www.neurosemantics.com look for the special offer
Author of the stunning new history of NLP--- NLP Secrets.
Investigative Journalism which has exposed what has been kept secrets for
decades.
http://www.neurosemantics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/NLP-Secrets-2_sml2.
png
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20191110/9382733c/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 137551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20191110/9382733c/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Neurons
mailing list