[Neurons] 2024 Neurons #58 BANDLER FINALLY WISES UP
Michael Hall
meta at acsol.net
Mon Dec 30 10:24:39 EST 2024
From: L. Michael Hall
2024 Neurons #58
December 30, 2024
BANDLER FINALLY WISES UP
My first thought was that maybe he's spying on Neuro-Semantics to find out
what we're doing, so that he would then be able to be the inventor. But
that's far too paranoid of an assumption, so I rejected that one. Maybe he
has secretly been reading the Neuro-Semantics website. Anyway, what he has
been doing most recently is following very much the same line of thought and
focus that I have been doing since 2016, namely, talking about thinking. In
2016 I began writing about "The Next Big Thing" in NLP and Neuro-Semantics,
namely, critical thinking. Two years later, I published, Executive Thinking
(2018). That then led to the whole series on thinking-now going on 14
books.
1) Executive Thinking: Activating Your Highest Executive Thinking Potentials
(2018).
2) Thinking as a Modeler (2019).
3) Thinking Hypnotically (2020).
4) Hypnotic Conversations for Unleashing Potentials (2020)
5) Humorous Thinking (2020)
6) Executive Decisions: Deciding Wisely (2020)
7) Thinking Metaphorically: Becoming a Skilled Metaphorian
(2021)
8) Executive Learning: Learning How to Learn (2021)
9) Executive Wisdom: Being One of the Wise Ones (2022)
10) Inside Out: Empowered from Within (2022).
11) The Meta-Place: A Model of the Mind and Thinking Landmarks
(2023)
12) Thinking for Humans: (2024)
13) Strategic Thinking (2025)
14) Unconscious Thinking (proposed for 2025)
I found out what Bandler has been up to when I recently purchased Patterns
for Problem Solving (2023). Here Bandler devotes the first 161 pages to
reproducing his 1975 The Structure of Magic and adding in a few (very few)
comments. The book actually begins on page 162. After that he focuses on
thinking. And in doing so, he says that the Meta-Model was designed for
problem-solving. To that end, he frames things in terms of thinking:
"What the most successful therapists did ... they got people to engage in
new thinking. If you change the way you think, it changes the way you feel
and therefore changes what you're capable of doing." (iv) "The Meta-Model
is full of terrific questions that help us to think differently." (171) "Our
model enables us to effectively and decisively challenge the various biases
that originate in people's thinking when they make decisions." (178).
"Most of this is about getting people to think on purpose." (181). "The
Meta-Model provides us a way of gaining insight as to how people are
thinking and what is missing or distorted in their model of the world."
(192). "The mindset for solving problems involves thinking through the
right questions to ask." (200) "The Meta-Model is designed to enable you to
help people to think differently about their problems and uncover solutions
they couldn't see before. (211) (italics added).
What Richard and Owen present however, is only representational thinking.
That's all -the VAK. And in doing that, he makes the same mistake that NLP
has made from the beginning, namely, assuming that all thinking is
sensory-based thinking. So with beliefs and decisions, he assumes these are
pictures and self-talk which people have in their heads. That's where he
got the mistaken idea that you can change beliefs by changing the cinematic
features (sub-modalities). But you can't. Give that assumption there is
also not a single consideration for logical or meta levels at all. For him,
the problem in beliefs and decisions are the pictures and the self-talk.
That's all.
Now inasmuch as he refers to a 2019 book, Thinking on Purpose, I bought it
and, again, the only kind of thinking that is addressed there is
representational thinking. That's it. Nothing else. As if there is no
additional kind of thinking! Now true enough, in 1975 when NLP was first
introduced, the idea that we think in pictures, sounds, sensations, and
words was revolutionary and led to many processes that can quickly resolve
therapeutic and personal development issues. But that's only the beginning.
Without an awareness of the whole meta place of the mind, and the unique
meta-level structures of the thinking landmarks there (beliefs, values,
memories, anticipations, identities, metaphors, intentions, etc.), you can
only update and improve the quality of thinking at the representative level
and not at the meta-levels.
Overall, I'm delighted that one of the founders of NLP is slowly coming back
to the true nature of NLP and the Meta-Model- it is actually a thinking
model. I began suspecting that when Bob and I wrote Figuring Out People
(1997) when we detailed the thinking patterns which we call meta-programs.
So at least Bandler is moving in the right direction. And who knows, maybe
he will stumble on the idea of the self-reflexive thinking that's within
meta-states and then realize that there are many, many other kinds of
thinking.
As a footnote: He and Owen also quoted much of what I wrote in Communication
Magic (1997/ 2001) about the linguistic wars after Chomsky, but of course,
not giving any credit (50-51). Another distinction to make; he always
speaks about the "brain" and never the mind, and makes no distinction
between them. Another thing he will need to learn.
L. Michael Hall, Ph.D., Executive Director
Neuro-Semantics
738 Beaver Lodge
Grand Jct., CO. 81505 USA
1 970-523-7877
132607 NeuroSemantics Executive Learning Front Cover
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20241230/b5ae6a7d/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 8785 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20241230/b5ae6a7d/attachment-0001.jpg>
More information about the Neurons
mailing list