[Neurons] 2020 Neurons #62 A SUSPICIOUS ELECTION
Michael Hall
meta at acsol.net
Sun Nov 15 23:00:27 EST 2020
From: L. Michael Hall
2020 Neurons #62
November 16, 2020
Reflections on Politics #17
A SUSPICIOUS ELECTION
If you are reading this outside of the USA, you may not be aware of the
problems and controversy around the still undecided election. In the 2016
election, the democrats claimed election fraud for four years. They called
it "the Russian collusion" which led to multiple investigations but
eventually ended with all of the allegations disproved. They then tried
impeachment over a phone call, but that also failed. Now it is the
Republicans turn to claim election fraud. But this time there are lots of
factual evidence coming forth indicating the extent of the fraud- systemic
fraud.
Systemic means that the fraud was not just a single one or a singular form,
it has taken many different forms in many different states from Michigan, to
Pennsylvania, to Georgia, to Arizona, and Nevada. Already hundreds of
people have come forward reporting of instances of fraud and have signed
affidavits under penality of law. There have also been scores of whistle
blowers who have spoken out. Fraud, as the general term for any kind of
trickery, includes many different things, from not following correct
procedure which is designed to make an election fair and give equal access
to all people, to presenting invalid ballots, to forbidding transparency
etc. Here is a list of most of the fraud being reported.
There have been significant computer glitches which has
generated thousands of discrepancies; one glitch in Michigan registered 6000
votes for Trump for Biden. 47 counties used the same software.
Multiple polling places refused to allow transparency in
watching the counting as they refused to allow republican observers within a
range so they could observe.
There were problems with the mass mail-in. In PA, thousands of
ballots showed up with only one vote on it, Biden. Though there were places
for another 30 to 50 votes, none were marked. There were no "down votes" on
the rest of the ballots.
Observers of the PA counting now say that 632,000 ballots were
illegal.
Several post office workers have given testimony that they were
told to pre-date ballots.
There have been hundreds of thousands of ballots with no
checking of the signature against the registration list.
In NV, more than 300 deceased people voted; and another 600 who
no longer lived them voted.
A number of people have come forward who showed up and then were
told they had already voted, when they had not.
A Social Worker in Texas has been arrested for forging
signatures on 63 ballots that she collected form a nursing home.
Dozens of poll workers have been video-taped escorting voters
into a voting booth and going with them and voting for them while the voter
stands and passively watches "with their hands in their pockets."
The Smartmac software has been implicated as having programs
that intentionally delete files where votes for Trump were recorded.
It is a big mess and it is all very suspicious. One suspicious factor about
the election is that in the days after election day, it was in the middle of
the night (3 am) that the vote summaries suddenly changed from Trump to
Biden. It's suspicious that the contested ballots were in 10 democratic
stronghold cities. Why is that? Why refuse to let observers in so that
they can do what they are there to do- observe? Are they hiding something?
What will eventually happen is still an open question. Obviously, the
mainstream media has rushed to judgment in declaring Biden the winner, the
president-elect. Biden himself is also acting as if it is over even though
none of the states have yet certified the election. That is to occur on
Dec. 9. Instead of patiently waiting, he is using the media to cry unfair
and that Trump is preventing his transition team. Of course, it took 37
days for things to be settled in 2000 and the transition team to start.
Unless the courts overturn the count due to fraud in several states, then
Trump will lose. If he does, I think it will be due to three things.
First, the covid virus; that's who he was actually running against. Second,
the media because while he took immediate and effective action in dealing
with it, the media not only prevented that information from getting out,
they created an extremely negative semantic environment against him. With
92% of all articles and news reports being negative about Trump, that was a
big handicap that was nearly impossible for him to overcome. Third, the
fraud surrounding the mail-in ballots.
Whatever happens with the election, the strong antagonism and partisanship
that has been contaminating the political dialogue will continue. The
different political philosophies of the right and left, conservative and
progressive will continue and will create a cry for respectful communication
that seeks first to understand and then to be understood. Only that will
cure the current toxic environment.
L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.
Executive Director, Neuro-Semantics
P.O. Box 8
Clifton CO. 81520 USA
www.neurosemantics.com
To unsubscribe to Neurons, send request to meta at acsol.net
Humor is a meta-perspective about incongruity, exaggeration, playfulness,
and even absurdity.
For a touch of humor --- see the new book --- HUMOROUS THINKING (2020)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20201115/42c2ce15/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 364 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20201115/42c2ce15/attachment.png>
More information about the Neurons
mailing list