[Neurons] 2020 Neurons #39 FOCUSED OR ECLECTIC?

[Michael Hall]

From: L. Michael Hall   

2020 Framers #39

August 17, 2020

A Good Word for NLP series #1

 

FOCUSED OR ECLECTIC 

THAT IS THE QUESTION

 

In the 1980s I came upon Cognitive Psychology and learning it, I chose that
I would take a focused, systematic, systemic, and synergistic approach.
Previously, I had spent many years studying Psychoanalysis, then Adlerian,
Rank, then Transactional Analysis, then Rational-Emotive.  And along the
way, I had looked into various fads that arose over the years.  But once
finding Cognitive Psychology, I chose to not be eclectic.  That choice saved
me from being distracted and reactive.  I had enough of that.  Then I found
NLP and I immediately knew what I had.  I recognized that NLP was a
Cognitive model- and one that filled-in the details for Rational-Emotive and
other cognitive approaches. 

 

Now being eclectic, or eclecticism, is defined by Webster in the dictionary
in this way: "Eclectic: selecting what appears to be best in various
doctrines, methods or styles."  You can see it in the field of Coaching.
ICF proudly announces that it has adopted an eclectic approach to coaching.
As a result- you never know what you're going to get when you ask for an ICF
coach!  You could get someone trained in psychoanalysis, Adlerian
psychology, TA, Cognitive, NLP or someone with a background all sorts of New
Age hocus-pocus.  When a person operates as an eclectic, you also never know
what he may pull out of his bag of tricks or whether it has any relevance to
the issue at hand.

 

A big danger with eclecticism is that it sets you up to be highly reactive
to fads.  Any "new" thing that appears or that someone sells the person on-
suddenly it is the new magical cure.  In the field of NLP, eclecticism has
been disastrous.  People got a brief training in NLP, quickly went through
Prac. and Master Prac., maybe even Trainers and then in their impatience to
get rich or famous- they were ready to add anything and everything to NLP.
In many, many countries this has given NLP a really bad name.  Further most
of these people don't actually know what NLP is.  Because they've added so
many things to it- they do not know its essence.  They are confused when
asked, "What is NLP?"

 

I have seen so-called NLP people add DISK, Myers-Briggs, Taylor-Johnson,
Enneagram and other "personality" typing models to NLP who have no awareness
that typology completely contradicts NLP.  They think it will help them get
into an organization, and so they are desperate to adopt anything - even if
it is a denial of the NLP presuppositions.

[As an aside, if you have to use such instruments, do so.  But do so with an
awareness of what you are doing and why- to get in.  Don't confuse it with
NLP and don't become an advocate of it.  NLP has so much better tools!]

 

The eclectic approach is both fed by impatience and it will generate more
impatience.  It cause you to always be chasing after something new.
Something different.  And what does that lead to?  The lack of mastery.

 

Ah yes, mastery.  If you are serious about develop expertise in what you are
doing- then you have to patiently stay with what you have learned.  You have
to practice it regularly so that it becomes mind-to-muscled into your
neurology and trains your "intuitions" so that it becomes unconscious
intelligence.  That patience, persistence, determination, resilience and
commitment over 10 years of deliberate practice to turn basic knowledge into
expertise.

 

That's what I did.  I started my studies of NLP in 1986 and by the time I
finished my trainers training, I had read every single NLP book [of course,
that's not saying that much since there were only 30 or 40 back then!].
Then I read and studied in depth Korzybski's books, I read the books of
Bateson (multiple times), I read everything from Virginia Satir, everything
from Perls, and half a dozen books from Erickson (only the past couple years
have I read just about everything from Erickson).  When I started my first
modeling project- Resilience (1990 to 1994), and in the process discovered
the Meta-States Model.  It took 9 years of pretty concentrated study and
intense application (in doing therapy and trainings).

 

Learning one model deeply, thoroughly, systematically, and systemically
allowed me to develop some skills with NLP and open up new areas.  When I
learned NLP I immediately applied rapport, eye-accessing, predicates,
representational systems, anchoring, etc. in therapy conversations.  I did
that until 1996, then shifting to consulting, coaching and training, I
continued until 2002 when I put together Meta-Coaching as a methodology.
That was the result of 22 years of focused emphasis on NLP and Meta-States.

 

After the first 10 years, I began collaborating with Bob Bodenhamer.  What
did Bob bring to the table?  Years of focused experience in NLP!  That
amplified my own and created a new synergy.  Then with his talent for seeing
practical applications, while I was quickly reading extensively in some area
(wealth, leadership, selling, etc.), he kept saying, "We could apply that
piece to this area!"  I would have missed many of those applications if he
had not brought his complementary skills.  What make it work was that each
of us had a sense of abundance so there was never any question that we would
honor each other's contributions.

 

What's the point?  Focus on one model!  Learn it in depth, go deeper into it
and applications of it than anyone else.  By thorough, be systematic.  Give
up the shallow temptation of being eclectic.  In the long run it will not
serve you well.  It will actually undermine your expertise.

 

NLP, and especially Neuro-Semantic NLP, is still very, very rich as a model
and there are lots and lots of things yet to discover and apply.  If you
think you understand it- that is an clear indication that you do not really
understand it.   I still have lots and lots of questions about it that have
not been answered.  I still read new books and articles on NLP.  I go to
Conferences to learn from others.  We have an incredibly deep and rich model
in NLP and Neuro-Semantics-a communication model that can change the world.
It is all you need!

 

 

 

 

 

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.

Executive Director, Neuro-Semantics

P.O. Box 8

Clifton CO. 81520 USA

www.neurosemantics.com 

 

To unsubscribe write to meta at acsol.net 

 

The stunning new history of NLP--- NLP Secrets.  

Investigative Journalism which has exposed what has been kept secrets for
decades. 

http://www.neurosemantics.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/NLP-Secrets-2_sml2.
png

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20200816/1f0bd3c2/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 137551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20200816/1f0bd3c2/attachment-0001.png>