[Neurons] 2020 Neurons #21 OH FOR MORE COMMON SENSE!

[Michael Hall]

From: L. Michael Hall 

2020 Neurons #21

May 4, 2020

Thinking for a Living Series #8

**

 

OH FOR MORE COMMON SENSE!

 

Since we all have a vested interest in actually thinking for a living, it
makes sense to develop what we call "common sense."  But what is common
sense?  Is it truly common?  If it is so common, why would we need to
develop it?

 

There's recently been a lot of lack of common sense in the "Stay at Home"
orders that various State Governors have issued.  The most outrageous has
been the Michigan Governor when she locked down and forbid people buying
garden supplies, paint, household goods, flooring, carpet, etc.  It didn't
make any sense.  How could any of that spread the virus or cause people to
be in more danger?  Simultaneously, she allowed liquor stores to stay open
and the selling of lottery tickets.   You can go get a pint of whisky and
buy a lottery ticket, but you better not be painting a room at home during
the time that you are locked down and have to stay at home!  Rational?  It
doesn't strike me as rational.  No wonder people have been, and still are,
out in protests in Michigan.  No wonder many have filed law suites against
the governor.

 

When elected officials are seen as inconsistent and as lacking "common
sense," we feel it violates our sense of rationality, our sense of "sound
prudent judgment" and "the unreflective opinions of ordinary people."  Those
are descriptions which the dictionary uses in defining "common sense."  Now
if we are to take "common sense" as being sound prudent judgment, then no
wonder it is often said that common sense is not very common!

 

Actually, for there to be common sense, you need to be using a lot of your
cognitive powers.  You have to be using a lot of the executive functions of
your frontal lobes.  That's becomes to have sound prudent judgment you have
to access information, transform it into useable data, convert the data into
information that applies in a given area, and then make intelligent
decisions based on that data and the full context.

 

Prudent judgment means that there is a clear connection between doing one
thing and experiencing the result of another thing.  For example, how does
buying garden supplies relate to containing the virus or "flattening the
curve?"  "What makes buying beer okay and paint not?"  What the protestors
have argued is that the restrictions are not rational, not consistent, and
not reasonable.  And when something isn't reasonable, then we naturally
suspect that something else is going on.  We suspect that there are other
agendas at play- perhaps personal agendas, perhaps politic agendas,
something.

 

Originally the lock-down orders and the closing of businesses was to
"flatten the curve" and the reason for that was in order to prevent the
hospitals to get overwhelmed.  We achieved that.  The hospitals have not
been overwhelmed and the medical boat, Comfort, which was sent to New York
City, only housed 200 patients with the virus.  And now, not being needed
has left.  If the purpose and design of the Stay-at-Home order has been
achieved, then why does it continue?  It seems that someone has changed the
purpose.  Now they want to prevent any spread of the virus.  Instead of
quaranteeing those most susceptible to the virus, they are still
quaranteeing everybody.  How reasonable is that?

 

Prudent judgment always has to go back to the facts and reason from the
facts.  What are the facts?  We now know that both the infection rate is
much greater than originally thought and the fatality rate is much lower
than originally anticipated.  Recent numbers indicate that 1/4 of people in
New York have been infected and even with high number of deaths, it is
between 2 and 1 percent.  50% who get the virus are asymptomatic.

 

In California, the Governor there has closed all parks- local parks and
national parks.  Now in terms of social distancing, if we can maintain 6
feet apart inside a grocery store then how is it that people cannot use
their common sense and maintain six feet, or twenty feet, of social
distancing in a park?  Besides, allowing people to go to the parks has many
other benefits- to be out in the fresh air and sunshine, to relax on a beach
with family, to get some exercise.  How then is it rational for going to a
park to be "bad" or "dangerous?"

 

Given that "common sense" is not all that common, and that we all think we
have common sense whereas others do not, how can we develop more sound
prudent judgment?  There are several things you can do to begin to develop a
sounder common sense.

First, commit yourself to the facts above any and every agenda.  Let every
judgment start with the grounding facts.  

Then consider the ever-expanding larger sets of contexts within with the
facts are embedded.  What is the context?  What context is that context
within?  This systemic thinking will identify what's relevant and what is
not.

Next, quality control your judgments.  Identify the criteria that you're
using to make the evaluation and then check if the criteria and the ecology
of the judgment.

 

 

 




 

 

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.

Executive Director, Neuro-Semantics

P.O. Box 8

Clifton CO. 81520 USA

www.neurosemantics.com

 

Latest book from Neuro-Semantics

See "special deal" sent out last week.

cid:image002.png at 01D6149D.5CB2A1C0

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20200503/084d7a37/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 360108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20200503/084d7a37/attachment-0001.png>