[Neurons] 2016 Neurons #59 --- Experience can be Modeled

[L. Michael Hall]

From: L. Michael Hall

2016 "Neurons" Meta Reflections - #59

December 26, 2016

Basic NLP Concepts #6

 

 

EXPERIENCE CAN BE MODELED

 

If experience is structured, and if structure is the only source of
knowledge (Korzybski), then when we see someone do something at a high
quality level or especially at a level of expertise, we can model that
experience.  We can examine that behavior or activity, explore how it is
formed, how it works internally (the inner game), and then replicate it at
least to some degree as we copy the structure.  Isn't that great news?  The
achievements and accomplishments of the best among us can be replicated and
perpetuated through the process of modeling.

 

This is a basic NLP concept.  And it was an accidental discovery.  It
occurred after young Bandler was mimicking Perls' voice and language
patterns by listening to the tapes.  He was apparently just fooling around
and having fun with copying the way Perls talked.  But then he and others
discovered, to their surprise, that he could replicate much of the results
that Perls was able to achieve.  Now that was weird! 

 

"How is this possible?" was their question.  And at first, they did not
know.  Ultimately they discovered what is today a basic NLP concept: there
is inside of every "experience" an internal structure that makes up of both
what and how a person is thinking-feeling and doing.  They first looked at
language patterns themselves.  There was something special about how Perls
dealt with language.  There were certain words that caught his attention and
that he would systematically respond to.  That led to the Meta-Model of
Language (the NLP communication model).  Then they looked at all of the
supporting activities of the use of language- one's tone, tempo, pitch,
gestures, etc.

 

Today we use five basic models of NLP to model experience.  Those following
the Meta-Model are the Strategy Model (#5, the last post), Sub-Modalities,
Meta-Programs, and Meta-States.  These are redundant models.  They all speak
of the same thing- the experience- they differ in that they view it from
different perspectives and so present different facets of the same thing.

 

Now to burst one myth.  The developers of NLP did not invent modeling.  In
fact, they took most of what they created of the Strategy model from the
blossoming Cognitive Psychology Movement.  The two persons credited with
founding that movement, Noam Chomsky and George Miller gave NLP the
Meta-Model and the TOTE model.  Interesting enough, it was John Grinder who
knew both and who even worked for Miller in his laboratory.  Miller's book,
Plans and the Structure of Behavior (1960, Miller, Galenter, Pribram)
provided the TOTE model which NLP enriched by adding to it the
representational systems. 

 

Sub-Modalities was also added and provided more details to the modeling
process.  though a mis-nomer, "sub-modalities" actually describe the
cinematic features of our representational thoughts. Sub-modalities is a
false term because they are not members of the class of a modality, instead
they operate as a classification themselves.  The three primary modalities
as modes of thinking give us the ability to code our thoughts in terms of
pictures, sounds, and sensations.  It was not until 1997 that Bob and I
discovered that the cinematic features of these sense modalities
("sub-modalities") work symbolically.  As symbols they stand for meta-level
concepts.  By these cinematic features we can make new distinctions in our
experiences because they are actually meta-modalities or meta-frames that we
can use in modeling experience.

 

How does an expert make a difference between things?  It could be in
language, it could be in representations, it could be with different
cinematic features.  How does a person face an event that one finds
disturbing?  She probably does not step into the movie, but stays out of it
just observing it from a state of interest and curiosity.  Yet distance and
association are concepts, you cannot see hear hear or feel these categories.

 

What is the difference between what you imagine as "real" and what you
imagine as "imaginary?"  Most people will code the movie in color for
"real," and as a black-and-white snapshot.  One codes it close, the other as
far off.   Recognizing that we think using these structural features gives
us the ability to replicate experiences of expertise.  Again, color is a
classification, members of the class would be red, green, blue,
black-and-white, etc.  Distance is a category, and within it are be close
and far that could be ten meters, one block away, one mile away, a thousand
miles away.  The original sub-modality model failed to distinguish
classification and members of the class.  Brightness is a category: various
degrees of light and/or dark would be members of the class.

 

This is where the Meta-States Model took modeling to an entirely new level
and opened up new dimensions for modeling.  The basic NLP idea of
identifying the internal structure of human experiences worked wonderfully
for mini-behaviors-for behaviors that occur in the moment.  So modeling
short behaviors such as getting up in the morning, making a decision,
spelling, buying, etc.-all of these immediate activities can easily be
tracked and their structure identified.  How?  Follow the representational
steps!  Watch eye accessing cues, listen for predicates, induce the person
into the state, ask questions between original trigger and final output.
It's not a "piece of cake," but it is a learnable skill.

 

All of that kind of modeling was based upon representational and linear
thinking.  But what about when a person's experience is more complex?  What
about when it involves self-reflexive moves to beliefs and then
beliefs-within-beliefs (belief systems) and when it transpires over years,
even decades?  What about strategies that include multiple strategies for
multiple actions and contingencies?  For simple states, you can ask the
person to "go into state," and then you can do "an unconscious uptake" on
the person's kinesthetics.  But for complex states, this does not work.  "Go
into the healthy state."  "Go into the leadership state."  "Go into the
entrepreneurial state."  Even forgiveness, self-esteem, resilience,
magnanimity, etc. are not simple kinesthetic states.  To model these complex
and long-term states, you need to model the self-reflexive consciousness
that governs them -and that's what you can do with the Meta-States Model.

Interested in modeling?  Then see NLP, The Study of the Structure of
Subjective Experience (Dilts, 1980), NLP Going Meta (1997), Meta-States
(2005), The Matrix Model (2016), etc.

 

 

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.

               Neuro-Semantics Executive Director 

               Neuro-Semantics International

P.O. Box 8

Clifton, CO. 81520 USA                             

               1 970-523-7877 

                    Dr. Hall's email:
<mailto:meta at acsol.net\hich\af31506\dbch\af31505\loch\f31506> meta at acsol.net


    ISNS new logo

    

What is Neuro-Semantic NLP?

Neurons:  Get your free subscription to the weekly International \Post on
Neuro-Semantics by Dr. L. Michael Hall. Subscribe at:
wwww.neurosemantics.com

 

    Coaching: For world-class Coach Training - The Meta-Coaching System,
www.neurosemantics.com/metacoaching   Meta-Coach Reflections sent every
Wednesday to the group of Licensed Meta-Coaches.
www.metacoachfoundation.org  

 

Self-Actualization: Neuro-Semantics launched the New Human Potential
Movement in 2007, for information about this, see
<http://www.self-actualizing.org/> www.self-actualizing.org  

 

NSP --- Neuro-Semantic Publications: Order books from Neuro-Semantic
website,  <http://www.neurosemantics.com/> www.neurosemantics.com  click on
Products and Services and then the Catalogue of books.  Order via paypal.  

 

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20161225/aac66def/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 10627 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20161225/aac66def/attachment-0001.jpg>