[Neurons] 2015 "Neurons" Meta Reflections #22

L. Michael Hall meta at acsol.net
Mon May 18 00:09:06 EDT 2015


From: L. Michael Hall

Meta Reflections #22

May 18, 2015

Getting Behind the Obvious #2

 

 

GETTING TO THE HIDDEN FRAMES

 

 

Behind what is explicitly said are always assumptions.  There are always
premises and presuppositions that a person simply accepts as true or real,
and as unquestioned, and even unquestionable.  These assumptions take the
form of beliefs, understandings, conclusions from experiences, myths,
stories, narratives, and so on.  These assumptive frames are typically not
only implicit, they are also unconscious.   And that means that they are
invisible to our inspection.  In the last post I noted that they are our
blind spots.

 

Now in NLP we call these assumptive frames presuppositions.  As such we even
make explicit a list of the presuppositions that govern the NLP
Communication model.  These assumptions are the working premises of the
model such as "the map is not the territory."  By making them explicit we
bring out and expose our philosophy about communication and our psychology
of human nature so that others can respond to it.   We thereby put them on
the table so that we can do not blindly believe in them, but recognize that
they are our working premises and that we may not be able to "prove" them.

 

We do the same when it comes to communication because if in talking with
each other where there are disagreements, if we cannot get to what's behind
our statements-then all we can do is present our position and argue for it.
But if we can make our assumptive frames explicit, if we can take a
meta-moment to step back and explore the kind of thinking and reasoning
which we are using in coming to our conclusions, then we can engage in a
much deeper and profound conversation, a conversation that becomes a true
dialogue which searches for meaning and understanding.

 

In Meta-Coaching, we do this by inviting a Meta-Moment.  Then we invite a
client to step back and consider numerous aspects of what's in the back of
the mind which may not be immediately conscious or visible to the person.

           Representation: How are you representing what you are thinking
about?  What representational system/s are you using?  What are the
cinematic features of that system?

           Strategy: How are you putting together what you are thinking
about?  How are you ordering the thoughts, events, awarenesses, etc.?  What
comes first, then second, third, etc.?

           Reflexivity: How are you reflecting back on any given step in
your strategy to think-and-feel about it and layer upon it additional
thoughts-and-feelings?  How many times to you layer more ideas, beliefs,
decisions, identities, permissions, prohibitions, etc.?

           Systemic: How does your system of thinking work?  Is it an open
system or closed?  Is it spinning upward or downward?

           Contexts: What meta-level contexts (frames) are you using as you
thinking about X?  What contexts are you not considering?  What invisible
contexts are you assuming but not specifying?

           Cognitive styles: How are you processing the information that
you are using?  What cognitive distortions may be present as you are
thinking?  What cognitive biases are present?

           Cognitive filters: What meta-program filters are you using as
you process the information  before you?  What kind of thinking are you
using? How appropriate is that kind of thinking for the kind of information
or experience that you're working with?

 

If all of that seems complex, you're right.  It is.  That's because what we
call "thinking" is complex and every person seems to have his or her own way
of customizing one's thinking.  This is also why getting to what's behind
the surface level statements is crucial for a thorough understanding of a
person's experience and meanings.

 

The way we get to what's behind begins by slowing the conversation down so
that we can be more reflective and mindful of what we are saying.  That's
because we can use words for more than just providing information to others.
Yes, we can use words to facilitate learning and discovery and exploration.
But words can also function to induce states that close down learning.
Words can prejudice a person so that he or she is not open to considering
anything other than what they already know.  I noted this is Meta Reflection
#15, Do You Have a Language License.

 

This is where semantically loaded words and language can actually prevent
understanding and learning.  Such "communication" can actually shut-down
communication!  What these emotionally-laden terms actually do is induce
states prejudice people so that instead of thinking, they go into a purely
reactive position.  An example of that is in last week's Meta Reflection
that's in the terminology of "racial injustice."  Just say those words about
an event and you can shut down the thinking processes of many people.
Here's an example of that.  After last week's post a reader wrote: "try
being sold as a slave ... your assumptions are weak, and totally in
conformity with radical white America." 

           "Try being sold as a slave."  So let's see, Slave Trade was
declared illegal in 1811 in the United States so who today is "sold as a
slave."  Was the reader?  That would make him more than 200 years old!  So
the reasoning goes like this: The fact that one's ancestors some 5 or more
generations ago experienced something, that makes that something relevant
today?  How does that work?  Can we never escape the past?  Is that one's
assumptions?  How many generations before one is free from it?  10?  100?
If that's the case then everybody is in the same boat!

           My assumptions are "totally in conformity with racial white
America."  So this "racial white America" has elected an African American
President and hundreds of other politicians at all levels... so when and how
will they become not "racial?"  This sounds like guilt-by-association.  If I
draw a conclusion that racists draw (if we accept that conclusion), then my
assumptions have to be wrong.  Of course that style of reasoning itself is a
cognitive distortion.

 

The frame hidden far in the back of the mind must be something like, "My
troubles today are caused by things that happened in the long distance
past."  "You can never get over the past."  "The past is deterministic of
the future."  More next time.

 

 

 

Neuro-Semantic News

·       We have begun NSTT in Mexico for the 17th Neuro-Semantic Trainers'
Training with 68 participants from many countries: Mexico, Brazil, Ecuador,
El Salvador, Guatemala, Panama, Columbia, Norway, Sweden, Netherlands,
Egypt, Australia, New Zealand, United States.

 

 

 
<https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10205577715014910&set=pcb.102055777
28855256&type=1> Colin Cox's photo.

 

 

 

 

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.

               Neuro-Semantics Executive Director 

               Neuro-Semantics International

P.O. Box 8

Clifton, CO. 81520 USA                             

               1 970-523-7877 

                    Dr. Hall's email:
<mailto:meta at acsol.net\hich\af31506\dbch\af31505\loch\f31506> meta at acsol.net


    

    

What is Neuro-Semantic NLP?

Neurons:  Get your free subscription to the weekly International \Post on
Neuro-Semantics by Dr. L. Michael Hall. Subscribe at:
wwww.neurosemantics.com 

 

    Solutions:  Sign up for the Neuro-Semantic Newsletter --- wwww.
<http://neurosemantics.com/newsletter> neurosemantics.com/newsletter. 

 This is a monthly newsletter for anyone new to Neuro-Semantics.  Femke
Stuut, Editor.

 

Coaching: For world-class Coach Training - The Meta-Coaching System:
www.meta-coaching.org and \
<http://www.metacoachfo/hich/a/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20f3150
6/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20undation.org/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31
506/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506> www.metacoachfoundation.org.
Meta-Coach Reflections sent every Wednesday to the group of Licensed
Meta-Coaches.

 

Self-Actualization: Neuro-Semantics launched the New Human Potential
Movement in 2007, for information about this, see
<http://www.self-actualizing.org/> www.self-actualizing.org  

 

NSP --- Neuro-Semantic Publications: Order books from Neuro-Semantic
website,  <http://www.neurosemantics.com> www.neurosemantics.com  click on
Products and Services and then the Catalogue of books.  Order via paypal.  

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20150517/08469d2e/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 83649 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20150517/08469d2e/attachment-0001.jpg>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.png
Type: image/png
Size: 81551 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20150517/08469d2e/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Neurons mailing list