[Neurons] 2015 "Neurons" Meta Reflections #13
L. Michael Hall
meta at acsol.net
Sun Mar 15 13:08:46 EDT 2015
From: L. Michael Hall
Meta Reflections 2015 #13
March 16, 2015
Self-Determination Theory #1
**
NEURO-SEMANTICS
AND SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY
Two dozen years ago Edward Deci and Richard Ryan created what they called,
and is now recognized as, the Self-Determination Theory. I had run across
it several times over the year, but did not read anything on this theory. I
did not until Colin Cox referred to it during his 2013 Neuro-Semantic
Conference Keynote presentation at Kaula Lumper. Then hearing him speak and
speaking with him about it, I realized I needed to study it. So I did.
They call their theory an Organismic Dialectical Perspective. To them
"organismic" means that we humans are active, growth-oriented organisms.
"Dialectical" means that there are two poles: one being to fulfil one's own
nature, the other is the tendency to go toward and fulfil our social
environments. This theory is a view of human development wherein people are
assumed to possess an active tendency toward psychological growth and
integration (Deci, 2002, p. 8). In Neuro-Semantics we call that the
self-actualization drive which we believe is in everyone and is the
experience of all people. Deci and Ryan even describe it as we do:
"actualizing human potentials."
"Endowed with an innate striving to exercise and elaborate their interests,
individuals tend naturally to seek challenges, to discover new perspectives,
and to actively internalize and transform cultural practices. By stretching
their capacities and expressing their talents and propensities, people
actualize their human potentials. Within this perspective, active growth is
complemented by a tendency toward synthesis, organization, or relative unity
of both knowledge and personality. Moreover, the integration of that which
is experienced provides the basis for a coherent sense of self- a sense of
wholeness, vitality, and integrity." (2002, Handbook of Self-Determination
Research, p. 1).
They even quote Maslow and Rogers and others in the first Human Potential
Movement and acknowledge:
"This general view of an active, integrating organism with the potential to
act from a coherent sense of self can be found in psychodynamic and
humanistic theories of personality and in cognitive theories of development.
Angyal, 1963, Maslow 1955, Rogers, 1963, (p. 1)."
What they then do with Maslow's hierarchy, however, is to reduce it and
simplify it. Personally I think they over-simplify it. They sub-sum all of
the human needs under three categories (Deci, 2002, p. 5):
Competence: To feel effective in your actions, capacities and so want
challenges to extend competence, and able to achieve goals. Do you feel
able to achieve your goals?
Relatedness: To feel connected to others, to be cared for and to care for
others, sense of belongingness, sense of community, to feel a need to
belong. Do you feel connected to others in a warm, positive and
interpersonal manner?
Autonomy: To feel that you are the origin or source of your behavior, you
act from your interests and integrated values, that you are responsible for
you, to feel a need to express your authentic self and yourself as a source
of action. Do you feel at choice and responsible for imitating your
behavior?
This changes the hierarchy of human needs which Maslow researched and
developed. It does so first by leaving out the survival level, putting
pieces of it under autonomy and competence and then entirely leaves out a
category for self and for self-actualization needs and values- the
being-values and drives. For "self," the theorists put it under all of the
categories and speak about the importance of internalizing and integrating
one's values (they call that organismic integration). But worse, it
eliminates the hierarchical nature of needs, the emergence of needs.
For the NLP Meta-Program of internal referencing versus external referencing
and for the semantic meta-program of self-identification, they speak about
people becoming ego-involved in an activity and its outcome (Korzybski calls
this "identification") then one's feelings of self-worth...
"... become hinged to their performance such that they do the activity to
prove themselves that they are good at the activity and thus are worthy
individuals." (Deci, 2002, p. 13)
We call that conditional self-esteem. And where we urge for unconditional
self-esteem, they speak about shifting to "task-involvement" that is, being
involved with a task for the task itself rather than its implications for
feelings of self-worth. In some places in the writing, they seem to confuse
self-esteem (being) with self-confidence (doing) and yet at other places in
the writing they talk about unconditional value- no conditions.
The importance of autonomy shows up in their emphasis on self-regulation.
When a person internalizes a process and brings it in from external to make
it internal, they develop self-regulation.
"The more fully a regulation is internalized, the more it becomes part of
the integrated self and the more it is the basis for self-determined
behavior." (p. 15). This requires meaning. "People must grasp its meaning
... and synthesize that meaning." (p. 20)
In this model, people "grasp" meaning, they do not create it or manage it.
>From the NLP and Neuro-Semantic perspective it is a strange thing for a
model that is supposed to promote self-determination. Now self-determination
theory centrally focuses on the reason why, the motive, behind doing
whatever you do. If you act for external reasons, instrumental reasons, for
the end-state-then it is not internal. To be self-determining requires that
a person choose to strive for their goals from out of their own values and
self-knowledge. One danger is that of self-infiltration: a person
incorporates the recommendations of an authority figure while believing they
were his ideas (p. 81). We call that the inside-out process-which is
central in Neuro-Semantics and Meta-Coaching.
When it comes to the basic needs, the authors use Maslow's language (fully
functioning, thwarting, eudaimonic, well-being, self-actualization,
vitality), and yet do not quote or refer to Maslow when they do so (Deci,
2002, pp. 22-24). I don't know why people do that. Do they think that no
one who has read Maslow will read their work and see the plagiarism?
Anyway, they do speak about the importance of experiencing "greater
organismic thriving and health" as a bottom-up process. Well-being is
enhanced in this way as it arises from the lowest need to the highest.
Autonomy is a need of tremendous value. They write that when people are
autonomous, "people experience themselves as valuable for being who they
are" rather than doing a particular activity. From there, a person can then
seek out various activities which the person values and do them for that
reason. In some of the research by Edward Deci, he discovered this:
"... rewarding people for engaging in enjoyable, fun activities decreases
their likelihood of future engagement in these activities." (2002, p. 132)
This is what Colin quoted in his Keynote when he presented a challenge to
what most of us think we know about motivation. Here is the shocker:
External rewards reduces internal motivation! Now imagine the implications
this has for parenting, for coaching, and for training. Where the writers
of this theory go next is to the problem of "social contagion." What does
that mean? It means that when you pursue an activity "for its own sake,"
this will be a compelling human phenomenon. But when you pursue an activity
for a compelling social reason, it undermines your personal autonomy and
shifts your "locus of causality" from inside to the outside. That's not
good. That will decrease your intrinsic motivation. Stunning, isn't it?
Suppose you actually wanted to reduce a person's motivation. What would you
do? The authors write this:
"...if people are induced to ascribe boredom and obligation to a task, they
are less intrinsically motivated than if they ascribe enjoyment, challenge,
and interest to the same activity. Labeling an activity as work increases
intrinsic motivation for those who held positive attitudes toward work
compared to those who do not. (p. 143)
"Deci found that rewarding people for engaging in enjoyable, fun activities
decreased their likelihood of future engagement in these activities." (p.
132)
Now we are getting to meaning (semantics). They speak about it in terms of
labels and labeling. Yet we know in Neuro-Semantics that what you attribute
to an activity operates as its classification. When you put something in a
category (the meta-stating process) you thereby set the frame by which you
understand it. That's why and how the frame determines the experience. So
what do you expect about any given activity? Will it be enjoyable or
boring? Fun or work? Be careful what you expect because your expectation
(a meta-level state and frame) will set in place a self-organizing process.
As coaches, trainers, consultants, etc., this suggests that you nurture your
client's intrinsic motivation and internalization processes by encouraging
them to take the initiative and develop their skills. This is a
non-controlling approach (rather than Rogers' non-directive approach)
because it is not being permissive or laissez-faire. To be supportive in a
way that encourages the other's autonomy is to elicit from them why an
activity is important, challenge them to step up to it, give feedback about
how they are doing, etc. For a client to be and feel autonomous he needs to
perceive his locus of causality and volitional choice. More about this in
the next post.
Reference:Edward L. Deci, Richard M. Ryan (2002). Handbook of
Self-Determinational Research, UK: University of Rochester Press.
Neuro-Semantic News
Ivan Wong from APTI has put a link to the introduction that Michael did for
the Neuro-Semantic Conference video on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QpQY0ZullKU
He has also put this and the conference link:
http://nsconf2015.wix.com/nsconf2015# <http://nsconf2015.wix.com/nsconf2015>
! on some facebook fanpage of neuro-semantics. Now is the time to get
yourself signed up and off to Hong Kong!
Ivan Wong
Asia Professional Training Institute
Tel: 2770 8886 (General) / 27708701 (Direct)
Email: ivan at apti.com.hk
Website: www.apti.com.hk <http://www.apti.com.hk/>
L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.
Neuro-Semantics Executive Director
Neuro-Semantics International
P.O. Box 8
Clifton, CO. 81520 USA
1 970-523-7877
Dr. Hall's email:
<mailto:meta at acsol.net\hich\af31506\dbch\af31505\loch\f31506> meta at acsol.net
What is Neuro-Semantic NLP?
Neurons: Get your free subscription to the weekly International \Post on
Neuro-Semantics by Dr. L. Michael Hall. Subscribe at:
wwww.neurosemantics.com
Solutions: Sign up for the Neuro-Semantic Newsletter --- wwww.
<http://neurosemantics.com/newsletter> neurosemantics.com/newsletter.
This is a monthly newsletter for anyone new to Neuro-Semantics. Femke
Stuut, Editor.
Coaching: For world-class Coach Training - The Meta-Coaching System:
www.meta-coaching.org and \
<http://www.metacoachfo/hich/a/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20f3150
6/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20undation.org/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31
506/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506> www.metacoachfoundation.org.
Meta-Coach Reflections sent every Wednesday to the group of Licensed
Meta-Coaches.
Self-Actualization: Neuro-Semantics launched the New Human Potential
Movement in 2007, for information about this, see
<http://www.self-actualizing.org/> www.self-actualizing.org
NSP --- Neuro-Semantic Publications: Order books from Neuro-Semantic
website, <http://www.neurosemantics.com> www.neurosemantics.com click on
Products and Services and then the Catalogue of books. Order via paypal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20150315/77668731/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 81552 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20150315/77668731/attachment-0001.png>
More information about the Neurons
mailing list