[Neurons] 2015 "Neurons" Meta Reflections #5

Mon Jan 19 12:09:07 EST 2015

From: L. Michael Hall

Meta Reflections 2015  #5

January 19, 2015

CRITICAL THINKING

AND YOUR PSYCHO-LOGICS

A very common assumption which is sure to get you in trouble is assuming
that people are rational, reasonable, and logical in the same way.   Even
worse is assuming that you are rational, reasonable and logical as others
are!  Is that shocking?  I hope you find it shocking.   If you do, I also
hope you are interested in finding out what these words mean.

What are we saying and signifying when we talk about rationality?

Here is what the dictionary gives us this about rational:

"Having or exercising reason, sound judgment, or good sense; endowed with
the faculty of reason; agreeable to reason; reasonable; sensible; reckoning,
calculation, reason."

On first glance it seems that we are saying that how we are thinking is
characterized by what all rational people agree is logical and reasonable.
Yet take a moment and think about that.  That's assuming a lot, wouldn't you
say?  And, doesn't all of our experience go against it?  After all, if we
all agreed on what is rational- logical and reasonable- wouldn't we all be
pretty much of the same opinion, point of view, and values about things? 

What makes this challenging is that there are many kinds of reasoning and
ways to reason.  There are many ways to reckon, calculate, and making
judgments.  As I have been mapping out how "thinking" works in
Neuro-Semantic NLP, all the levels of "thoughts" (multi-ordinality),  the
meta-levels that we create by meta-stating, I have used Korzybski's
distinguish which he made about our human psycho-logics.

Korzybski created this distinguish by hyphenating the word "psychology."
Doing that generates "psycho-logics" and "psycho-logisticians."  This speaks
about how a person in his or her self (psyche) reasons (logics).  At the
simplest level, we reason by associating one thing with another.  It doesn't
even have to make sense, it may hardly have a strong correlation, but if a
person links one thing with another, then lo and behold, they then conclude
that they are linked and they then reckon that the things are intricately
connected. 

I wrote about the story in Mind-Lines of a little eight-year old boy who was
talking-back to his mother and just when she said, "If you talk back to your
mother, something bad will happen!" an earthquake shook the San Francisco
area causing everything to fall down-pieces of the ceiling came crashing
down, the whole house began to shake, things on shelves tumbled to the
ground.  Thereafter, within that young boy, speaking-back was associated
with a deep dread and fear.  Here's an association- an interpersonal
conflict linked to an earthquake leaving the boy with a strong associative
feeling that its bad to speak-back.  Logical?  Well, not to the outside.
But yes, to the inside experience- very logical.  For the boy, it describes
his psycho-logics.

The girl who associates eating food with being fat develops her particular
brand of psycho-logics.  Thereafter when someone tries to reason with her
that she can eat and not get fat, it doesn't make sense.  To her, it is not
logical.  Once she put "eating" into the category of "fat," that
classification began governing her way of thinking, reasoning, and
calculating.  In her psycho-logics, it makes perfect sense that if you eat,
you get fat, you lose control.

Here then is a double-bind situation for developing healthy and accurate
critical thinking skills.  If we all have developed our own internal
psycho-logics (which we have)-then our thinking itself is the problem.  So
how can we think our way to more correct and accurate thinking?  How can we
engage in a learning process to learn critical thinking skills? 

There's several aspects to the answer.  Part of the answer lies in first
recognizing and accepting the fallibility of our thinking.  Once we do that,
then we can start questioning our logics.  A great question to begin with
is: Could you be wrong?  Could you be mis-perceiving, mis-calculating,
mis-understanding?  Could there be a bias that's creating an illusion or
deception?  This begins the questioning.  The next thing to do is to expose
our pyscho-logics.

This is why we "climb the ladder of meaning," moving up the logical levels
to examine what conclusions we have drawn and the kind of thinking that we
used in drawing those conclusions.  How do we do this?  Accept and embrace
what the person says and inquire: 

Help me to understand how you came to that conclusion.  What are you
selecting to focus on?  How are you thinking about that?  What are you
assuming to be true to reason in that way?

To further help us do that we can use several list of distinctions: the
Meta-Program distinctions, the Cognitive Distortions list, and the Cognitive
Biases list.

The Meta-Program list gives us a very wide range of common thinking patterns
which we all use everyday as we process information.  All of these have
useful and very effective applications and equally, every one can be
mis-used and mis-applied.

The list of Cognitive Distortions were created by Albert Ellis and Aaron
Beck in the field of Rational-Emotive Therapy and Cognitive Therapy and
these identify childish thinking patterns which set us up for exaggeration
and misery.

The list of Cognitive Biases is a list of built-in tendencies of our brain
and nervous system for mis-perceiving, mis-understanding, distorting
information, etc.  There are a great many of these, some are of common
knowledge, some are just now being identified by new discoveries in the
Neuro-Sciences.

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.

                Neuro-Semantics Executive Director 

                Neuro-Semantics International

P.O. Box 8

Clifton, CO. 81520 USA                             

                1 970-523-7877 

                Dr. Hall's email:
<mailto:meta at acsol.net\hich\af31506\dbch\af31505\loch\f31506> meta at acsol.net

What is Neuro-Semantic NLP?

Neurons:  Get your free subscription to the weekly International \Post on
Neuro-Semantics by Dr. L. Michael Hall. Subscribe at:
wwww.neurosemantics.com 

    Solutions:  Sign up for the Neuro-Semantic Newsletter --- wwww.
<http://neurosemantics.com/newsletter> neurosemantics.com/newsletter. 

 This is a monthly newsletter for anyone new to Neuro-Semantics.  Femke
Stuut, Editor.

Coaching: For world-class Coach Training - The Meta-Coaching System:
www.meta-coaching.org and \
<http://www.metacoachfo/hich/a/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20f3150
6/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20undation.org/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31
506/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506> www.metacoachfoundation.org.
Meta-Coach Reflections sent every Wednesday to the group of Licensed
Meta-Coaches.

Self-Actualization: Neuro-Semantics launched the New Human Potential
Movement in 2007, for information about this, see
<http://www.self-actualizing.org/> www.self-actualizing.org  

NSP --- Neuro-Semantic Publications: Order books from Neuro-Semantic
website,  <http://www.neurosemantics.com> www.neurosemantics.com  click on
Products and Services and then the Catalogue of books.  Order via paypal.  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20150119/f7e9ed74/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 81552 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://pairlist8.pair.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20150119/f7e9ed74/attachment-0001.png>