[Neurons] 2014 "Neurons" Meta Reflections #33

Wed Aug 20 12:45:09 EDT 2014

From: L. Michael Hall

Meta Reflections 2014 #33

August 20, 2014

THE SEMANTICS OF

"THE MEDIA" 

In the past twelve days here in the United States we have had a strange
political experience occurring.  A young man was shot and killed in Ferguson
Missouri by a police officer.  Normally, this will lead to an investigation
to find out the details and then, depending on results, would lead either to
a prosecution or the validation of the policeman's conduct.  But not here. 

Many people in Ferguson Missouri interpreted the action to be an injustice
by a policeman and so conducted a protest to say so, which is their
political right.  Normally, they would have protested walked in protest,
made their voice and perspective known, and that would have been it.  But
not here.

Somehow the event hit "the media" and suddenly the event of a single death
became a big media event.  Dozens and dozens of news media showed up, turned
on their cameras, and that fed the protest so that it went on day after day
after day.   As a consequence, that single event has dominated "the news"
here for more than a week-and-a-half.  So what began as local people
protesting a perceived injustice by the police, suddenly became a "national
issue."  Then, instead of waiting for the investigation to take place, "the
media" descended upon Ferguson Missouri so that the protesters now had a
national platform.

This then attracted other people who figured out that if they could fan the
anger of the protesters, get a mob response, and create a context where they
could loot and steal.  And that's what has happened.  This then brought in
more media to cover the looting, destruction, and rioting!  And the more the
media, the more the context where those who are criminally-minded could
unleash their desire to burn down buildings, loot stores, destroy property.
And with that more media pored in the place. 

Now I can easily believe that good people living in Ferguson Missouri began
by simply wanting to peacefully protest what they considered an injustice.
I can believe that they had good intentions and motives.  And, of course,
they have a legal right to peacefully protest.  I can just as easily believe
that most of them go home at night at a decent hour because they have jobs
to go to, families to take care of, etc.

Yet with regard to protesting, what is the purpose?  Is not the purpose to
make your point and to have your voice heard?  If that's the purpose of
protesting-to register a complaint, to get attention to an injustice, then a
question: How long should one protest?  How long is it proper for the
protests to go on?  Why is it that night after night for more than a week,
the people are still protesting?  Have they not made their point?  Have they
not registered a complaint so that there is now awareness of an injustice?
So how much longer should the protest go on?

Further, if the media's purpose is to record such, when is their job done?
When should they go home?  The other night I scanned the different news
media-CNN, Fox, ABC, NBC, etc.- and in addition to the formal media, there
were hundreds of people with cameras holding up their phones and cameras.
Why?  To record the crowds?  To catch a scene of rioting, the destruction of
property, the agitators throwing molotov cocktails at the police or at
commercial buildings?  Watching all of that, I wonder:

At what point is the media creating the context that makes the problem
worse?

At what point does the media become a big part of the problem?

If "the media" left, would the people who are inciting more anger,
hostility, and conflict also go home?

It seems to me that one of the big contributing factors to this has been the
media.  As a Neuro-Semanticist I have to ask,

"What are the semantics of the media?  What does the presence of the media
mean to people?  What does it mean to the people in Ferguson Missouri, to
the protesters, to the agitators from other places, to the looters, etc.?"

For the protesters it means that their voice and complaint is now amplified.
It means that they have a larger platform and that they have more "power" in
what they want to highlight.  To the agitators who have come in from other
places, it means they have a context in which they can create trouble and
start a "revolution."  To others it means that they can use this event to
promote a particular agenda, they can make it about race, or police
brutality, or militarization of police, or whatever agenda they have. 

The fact is-the media is political.  It is one of the political powers which
so subtly influences and controls life in the twenty-first century.
Whether we're talking about newspapers, magazines, television, cable news,
blogs, social media of Facebook or Twits, movies, Hollywood, documentaries,
video-games, etc., "the media" plays a tremendous role in our lives today.
Everybody knows this and "the media" also knows this, which is why all forms
of media spends money on expanding what they are doing.  Well, this is true
until someone suggests that "the media" contributes to some of our social
problems.  Let someone say that the media plays a role in violence, and then
we hear from "the media" that it is "just entertainment and nothing more."

The most subtle aspect of the media is how it frames things.  How it
formulates and arranges their presentations and interviews influences the
meanings that people make of things.  How it primes the situation via the
words and the metaphors they use very subtly influences the meanings and
reactions of people.  How it constructs the significance of the event shapes
how people respond. 

Now, if the media is political and exercises a lot of power in our lives in
these ways-should we not hold the media more responsible about what it does
and how it operates?

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.

                Neuro-Semantics Executive Director 

                Neuro-Semantics International

P.O. Box 8

Clifton, CO. 81520 USA                             

                1 970-523-7877 

                Dr. Hall's email:
<mailto:meta at acsol.net\hich\af31506\dbch\af31505\loch\f31506> meta at acsol.net

What is Neuro-Semantic NLP?

Neurons:  Get your free subscription to the weekly International \Post on
Neuro-Semantics by Dr. L. Michael Hall. Subscribe at:
wwww.neurosemantics.com 

    Solutions:  Sign up for the Neuro-Semantic Newsletter ---
<http://neurosemantics.com/newsletter> neurosemantics.com/newsletter. 

 This is a monthly newsletter for anyone new to Neuro-Semantics.  Femke
Stuut, Editor.

Coaching: For world-class Coach Training - The Meta-Coaching System:
www.meta-coaching.org and \
<http://www.metacoachfo/hich/a/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20f3150
6/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20undation.org/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31
506/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506> www.metacoachfoundation.org.
Meta-Coach Reflections sent every Wednesday to the group of Licensed
Meta-Coaches.

Self-Actualization: Neuro-Semantics launched the New Human Potential
Movement in 2007, for information about this, see
<http://www.self-actualizing.org/> www.self-actualizing.org  

NSP --- Neuro-Semantic Publications: Order books from Neuro-Semantic
website,  <http://www.neurosemantics.com> www.neurosemantics.com  click on
Products and Services and then the Catalogue of books.  Order via paypal.  

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://eight.pairlist.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20140820/2a6150bc/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image003.png
Type: image/png
Size: 81557 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://eight.pairlist.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20140820/2a6150bc/attachment-0001.png>