[Neurons] 2013 Meta Reflections #7

[L. Michael Hall]

From: L. Michael Hall

Meta Reflections 2013  #7

February 4, 2013

Modeling Excellence Series #3

 

 

 

MODELING:

THE MAGIC OF "HOW"

 

 

In last week's post, I highlighted the power of focusing on the how of
detailing out what is happening in the now.  For me, this was the most
exciting thing when I first discovered NLP Modeling.  By asking questions
and by closely observing people, a person could identify how any given
person is currently, at this moment, creating his or her sense of reality.
And if we can do that, then we can figure out how that reality came into
existence, operates, and can be altered.  Incredible!

 

Now in NLP Modeling, Wyatt Woodsmall (1990) was the person who first
differentiated two dimensions or levels of modeling.  He labeled them
Modeling I and Modeling II.  I think that this distinction provides a
valuable way to think about the range of the modeling that we can do.

Modeling I refers to pattern detection and transference.  This kind of
modeling detects a pattern of behavior that shows up in certain skills,
abilities, and expertise.  By explicating the patterns of behavior in the
skill or skills-the what that an expert actually does to achieve a result,
this modeling focuses on reproducing the products of the expert.  This kind
of modeling focuses on learning the sets of distinctions, procedures, and
processes which enable a person to reach a desired outcome.

 

Modeling II refers to modeling the first modeling (Modeling I).  As such, it
focuses on the how of an expert-how does the expert actually create and
perform the expertise.  It doesn't focus on the what is produced (that's the
first modeling), it focuses on the background competencies.  Now we focus on
the processes which are necessary to generate the patterns that form the
content of Modeling I.  In this modeling, we especially pay attention to the
beliefs and values that outframe the expert.  Here we attend to the
meta-programs, the contexts and frames, the meta-states, etc., all of the
higher frames.

 

I like this distinction because, as Woodsmall points out, the field of NLP
itself resulted from Modeling I, but not Modeling II.  Let me explain.  NLP
emerged from the joint venture of John Grinder and Richard Bandler as they
studied the language patterns of Fritz Perls and Virginia Satir.  First
Richard used his gift of mimicking Perls' and Satir's speech, tonal, and
language patterns.  Though untrained in psychology and psychotherapy, by
simply reproducing the "magical" effects of these communication experts, he
found that he could get many of the same results as the experts.
Incredible!  How was this possible?

 

In searching for that answer, John used Transformational Grammar and his
unique skills in that field to pull apart the "surface" structures for the
purpose of identifying the "deep" structures.  Both of them wanted to
discover how this worked.  Frank Pucelik also was a part of all of that, and
he created the context and the original group in which all of the
discoveries took place.

 


>From the theory of Transformational Grammar, the assumptions of the

Cognitive Psychology (Noam Chomsky, George Miller, George Kelly, Alfred
Korzybski, Gregory Bateson), and the coping of Perls and Satir, they
specified what "the therapeutic wizards" actually did which had the
transformative effect upon clients.  That was the original NLP modeling.

 

This adventure in modeling then gave birth to The Structure of Magic (1975/
1976) which gave us the first NLP Model.  This was originally called The
Meta-Model of Language in Therapy.   Today we just call it, The Meta-Model.
This is a model about the language behavior of Perls and Satir, that is, how
they used words in doing change work with clients.  And that then became the
central technology of NLP for modeling. 

 

The amazing thing is that with that first model, they were able to model a
great deal of the governing structure of a person's experience.  That
enabled them to peek into a person's model of the world just by listening to
the features that linguistically mark out how the person has created his or
her map.  While this is not all that's needed for modeling, it certainly
gives us a set of linguistic tools for figuring out how a piece of
subjective experience works.  It answers the how questions:

            How does a person depress himself?

            How does a person take "criticism" effective and use it for
learning?

            How does another person look out at an audience and freak out?

 

The Meta-Model gave the original co-developers of NLP numerous tools for
both understanding and replicating the person's original modeling.  Soon
thereafter, as they modeled Erickson, they began adding all kinds of
non-verbal and non-linguistic distinctions to their model, enriching the
modeling process even further.   As NLP started with Modeling I and not
Modeling II, the early NLP thinkers and trainers did not have access to the
higher level of modeling until some time later.  Nor did they seem aware of
it for some time.  Eventually this realization arose as people began asking
some basic modeling questions:

What strategy did Perls use in working with clients?

            What strategy enabled Satir to do her "magic" with families?

What strategy describes Erickson's calibration skills and use of hypnotic
language patterns?

How did any one of those wizards make decisions about what to use when?

 

Even to this day, we do not know.  We know what they produced, but not how
they produced such.  We have the results from their magic, but not the
formula that identifies the states and meta-states, the beliefs and higher
frames of mind that enabled them to operate as "wizards" in the first place.
Woodsmall (1990) writes: 

"In short, if NLP is the by-product of modeling Erickson, Perls, and Satir,
then why are we never taught how they did anything?   All we are taught is
what they did.  This means that we can imitate the powerful patterns that
they used, but we don't know how they generated and performed them to start
with.  From this it is evident that the part of NLP that is the by-product
of modeling is a by-product of Modeling I, but not of Modeling II." (p. 3)

 

As the product of Modeling I, all that we originally received in NLP was the
result of modeling.  We received the patterns and procedures which the
modelers found in Perls, Satir, and Erickson, i.e., reframing, swishing,
anchoring, collapsing anchors, etc.  We received the NLP patterns. Bandler
and Grinder gave us a legacy of dramatic processes that enable people to
change.

 

Only later was it that Bandler, Grinder, DeLozier, Bandler-Cameron, Dilts,
and Gordon begin to wonder about the modeling itself that they started to
explore the modeling processes, assumptions, patterns, etc. about modeling.

>From that came the commission from Richard and John for Robert Dilts to

write the second modeling book, NLP: Volume I.  That volume made Modeling II
available.

 

They also left their theory about change, mind, neurology, language, etc.
Of course, they did not call it "a theory."  In fact, they pulled off a big
"Sleight of Mouth" pattern as they told us that they had no theory, just a
description of what worked.  "It's a model, not a theory."  With that
mind-line, they distracted our attention and offered "the NLP
Presuppositions," telling us that they were not true, could not be proven,
but seemed like really nice "lies" that would take us to more resourceful
places.  So we just memorized them, only half aware (if that), that within
the NLP Presuppositions they had hidden away the theory of neuro-linguistic
programming.

 

 

 

L. Michael Hall, Ph.D.

                Neuro-Semantics Executive Director 

                Neuro-Semantics International

P.O. Box 8

Clifton, CO. 81520 USA                             

                1 970-523-7877 

                Dr. Hall's email:
<mailto:meta at acsol.net\hich\af31506\dbch\af31505\loch\f31506> meta at acsol.net


     

    

What is Neuro-Semantic NLP?

Neurons:  Get your free subscription to the weekly International \Post on
Neuro-Semantics by Dr. L. Michael Hall. Subscribe at:
wwww.neurosemantics.com 

 

Solutions:  Sign up for the Neuro-Semantic Newsletter ---
<http://newsletter.neurosemantics.com/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506/
hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506> newsletter.neurosemantics.com.  This
is a monthly newsletter for anyone new to Neuro-Semantics.  Femke Stuut,
Editor.

 

Coaching: For world-class Coach Training - The Meta-Coaching System:
www.meta-coaching.org and \
<http://www.metacoachfo/hich/a/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20f3150
6/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506%20undation.org/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31
506/hich/af31506/dbch/af31505/loch/f31506> www.metacoachfoundation.org.
Meta-Coach Reflections sent every Wednesday to the group of Licensed
Meta-Coaches.

 

Self-Actualization: Neuro-Semantics launched the New Human Potential
Movement in 2007, for information about this, see
<http://www.self-actualizing.org/> www.self-actualizing.org  

 

NSP --- Neuro-Semantic Publications: Order books from Neuro-Semantic
website,  <http://www.neurosemantics.com> www.neurosemantics.com  click on
Products and Services and then the Catalogue of books.  Order via paypal.  

 

 

 

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://eight.pairlist.net/pipermail/neurons/attachments/20130204/f1771179/attachment.htm>