From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 2 01:02:48 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 00:02:48 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Suggested changes to lib-common.php/COM_isemail() Message-ID: <20030902000248.0ed51cd7.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> Hi, [Sorry if this isn't the right list for posting bugs/enhancements...] I have a fresh installation of Geeklog and all seems well. I'm running into a problem where I can't register with an address of the form username+tag at example.com. Postfix and other MTAs can be configured to deliver mail directed at username+tag to the account username. This technique is useful for sorting mail and determining where an email address was harvested from when it later gets spammed. The upshot is, COM_isemail in lib-common.php chokes on addresses containing the literal '+'. Original regex: if( eregi( "^([-_0-9a-z])+([-._0-9a-z])*@[0-9a-z]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*.[a-z]{2,3}$", $email, $check )) Suggested change: if( eregi( "^([-_0-9a-z])+([-._0-9a-z])*([+])?([-._0-9a-z])*@[0-9a-z]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*.[a-z]{2,3}$", $email, $check )) When digging into this issue, I found two more problems - some TLDs are longer than three characters (.info, .name, .coop, .aero, .museum - see http://www.icann.org/tlds/) and the final '.' before the TLD is unquoted, so it's treated as a metacharater rather than as a literal. Finally, just for code cleanliness, I think you can lose some parens since you're not using the results of $check. Suggested change (incorporating everything above): if( eregi( "^[-_0-9a-z]+[-._0-9a-z]*\\+?[-._0-9a-z]*@[0-9a-z]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*\\.[a-z]{2,6}$", $email, $check )) I've tested this and it works, correctly accepting username+something at example.museum and username+ at example.museum and correctly rejecting username+ at exampleZmuseum and username+s+omething at example.museum. I'm not sure about the last case but I've never seen an address of this form before; I'm not sure it's legal and I'm too lazy to test it. :) Regardless, if it's legal syntax, the regex is easy enough to modify to accept addresses of that form. I know, someone could easily spend a month trying to make COM_isemail identify all legal email addresses; that's not my intent. I just wanted to point out that the routine chokes on a common address variant and suggest a few fixes. I try not to point out problems in code without at least suggesting a fix. One more thing - I wasn't aware that PHP ignored case when considering subroutine names. COM_isemail is often called as COM_isEmail (see below). At some point you might want to clean that up... hth, -- Bob $ find geeklog-1.3.8-1 -type f -print | xargs egrep -i isemail geeklog-1.3.8-1/public_html/lib-common.php:function COM_isemail( $email ) geeklog-1.3.8-1/public_html/profiles.php: if (COM_isemail($authoremail)) { geeklog-1.3.8-1/public_html/admin/user.php: if (COM_isEmail($email)) { geeklog-1.3.8-1/public_html/admin/user.php: } // end if COM_isEmail($email) geeklog-1.3.8-1/public_html/usersettings.php: if (!COM_isEmail ($A['email'])) { geeklog-1.3.8-1/public_html/users.php: if (COM_isEmail($email)) { From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 2 04:20:21 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:20:21 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Suggested changes to lib-common.php/COM_isemail() In-Reply-To: <20030902000248.0ed51cd7.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> References: <20030902000248.0ed51cd7.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> Message-ID: <20030902082021.25587@smtp.haun-online.de> Bob wrote: >[Sorry if this isn't the right list for posting bugs/enhancements...] Didn't see the "Report a bug" link on geeklog.net? But it's okay to discuss problems here or on the forums before actually sending bug reports. >The upshot is, COM_isemail in lib-common.php chokes on addresses >containing the literal '+'. As the comment above that function suggests, it is known not to be strictly RFC822 compliant. Btw, I just love it when people report problems with things that I just thought about changing a few hours ago :-) I'm currently in the process of changing Geeklog's email functions so that they will use PEAR::Mail. That package includes a class to check for RFC822 compliant email addresses and I was already thinking about rewriting COM_ismail() to use that class ... >When digging into this issue, I found two more problems - some TLDs are >longer than three characters (.info, .name, .coop, .aero, .museum - see >http://www.icann.org/tlds/) Hmm, my .info addresses seem to work just fine, i.e. I can sign up with them. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.haun.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 2 12:11:13 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:11:13 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Suggested changes to lib-common.php/COM_isemail() In-Reply-To: <20030902082021.25587@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20030902000248.0ed51cd7.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> <20030902082021.25587@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20030902111113.2c9cf30b.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> Hi, On Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:20:21 +0200 geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > Bob wrote: > > >[Sorry if this isn't the right list for posting bugs/enhancements...] > > Didn't see the "Report a bug" link on geeklog.net? But it's okay to > discuss problems here or on the forums before actually sending bug reports. I'd rather have confirmation and discussion; I'd hate to have my first contact with developers be a bug report that's either wrong, well-known but as yet unfixed, or otherwise answered in the docs or a hundred identical forum or mailing list posts. And yes, I completely missed the "Report a bug" link. Oops... :/ > >The upshot is, COM_isemail in lib-common.php chokes on addresses > >containing the literal '+'. > > As the comment above that function suggests, it is known not to be > strictly RFC822 compliant. It's been a while since I've looked through RFC822; I usually refer to the example case in Jeffrey Friedl's "Mastering Regular Expressions" where he beats email address validation to death (he ends up with a 6.5K regex that still doesn't cover all the edge cases.) Also, I believe you'll find '+' is acceptable in the local part of the address according to RFC2822 and also RFC822 (superceded by 2822), at least in my brief reading of it. Prgamatically, Postfix tends to be pretty RFC-compliant; I can't imagine it promoting non-compliant behavior, at least without a lot of argument and some very solid reasoning. But this may not be important - see below. > Btw, I just love it when people report problems with things that I just > thought about changing a few hours ago :-) Great minds think alike? :) > I'm currently in the process > of changing Geeklog's email functions so that they will use PEAR::Mail. > That package includes a class to check for RFC822 compliant email > addresses and I was already thinking about rewriting COM_ismail() to use > that class ... It looks like Mail_RFC822::isValidInetAddress has the same problem with not recognizing '+' as valid, though I agree, using PEAR::Mail is a better solution, if only so you have less code to maintain. Reduce, reuse, recycle. The problem is that Mail_RFC822::parseAddressList parses well but Mail_RFC822::isValidInetAddress is too simplistic. For example, it won't match user at example.museum because it expects TLDs to match [a-z]{2,4}. Mail_RFC822 is useful for parsing address lists, removing comments in addresses, breaking addresses into mailbox and host parts, and for coarse validation, but IMO you'll still want to write your own regexes for address validation. > >When digging into this issue, I found two more problems - some TLDs are > >longer than three characters (.info, .name, .coop, .aero, .museum - see > >http://www.icann.org/tlds/) > > Hmm, my .info addresses seem to work just fine, i.e. I can sign up with them. That's probably because of the unquoted '.' before the [a-z]{2,3}. It works, but for the wrong reason. :/ Anyway, thanks again for the quick response (and all your time and effort developing Geeklog.) If you want, I'll send you my code for testing various address schemes. I'm much more of a perl programmer than a PHP hacker but I manage. -- Bob From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 2 14:17:02 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 14:17:02 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Static pages and image directory Message-ID: <001c01c3717e$688524c0$0300a8c0@sara> Hello, I have a need for some graphics in a static page. No matter where I have put them, I have not been able to reference them in my html without giving the full url. Does anyone know which directory the static page looks in for graphics, etc? Any help would be appreciated. Thanks in advance. Duane -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 2 14:57:40 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 20:57:40 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Static pages and image directory In-Reply-To: <001c01c3717e$688524c0$0300a8c0@sara> References: <001c01c3717e$688524c0$0300a8c0@sara> Message-ID: <20030902185740.31513@smtp.haun-online.de> Duane wrote: >I have a need for some graphics in a static page. No matter where I have >put them, I have not been able to reference them in my html without >giving the full url. What's wrong with the full URL? >Does anyone know which directory the static page >looks in for graphics, etc? For normal static pages, the "staticpages" directory is the current directory, so you could use to reference the little mail icon in the images directory. However, that will not work when the static page is used as a center block. So I'd suggest you either stick with the full URL or use a URL relative to the document root of your site, e.g. bye, Dirk P.S. Your post had to be approved manually - please make sure your posting from the address that you used when registering with the mailing list. -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Wed Sep 3 09:43:58 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:43:58 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] XSilver header.thtml In-Reply-To: <20030902185740.31513@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: I am having a hard time figuring out the HTML in the XSilver header.thtml file. Specifically, I don't understand what's happening in the table row between the logo image and the search box. See www.wfzimmerman.com. What I want to do is to have a large cell centered between the photo on left and the search box on right. For some reason I can't put a cell in there that will center. They all start to the right too far (see horizontal rule that illustrates). -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 2:58 PM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Static pages and image directory Duane wrote: >I have a need for some graphics in a static page. No matter where I have >put them, I have not been able to reference them in my html without >giving the full url. What's wrong with the full URL? >Does anyone know which directory the static page >looks in for graphics, etc? For normal static pages, the "staticpages" directory is the current directory, so you could use to reference the little mail icon in the images directory. However, that will not work when the static page is used as a center block. So I'd suggest you either stick with the full URL or use a URL relative to the document root of your site, e.g. bye, Dirk P.S. Your post had to be approved manually - please make sure your posting from the address that you used when registering with the mailing list. -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Sep 4 13:26:11 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:26:11 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Suggested changes to lib-common.php/COM_isemail() In-Reply-To: <20030902111113.2c9cf30b.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> References: <20030902111113.2c9cf30b.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> Message-ID: <20030904172612.31888@smtp.haun-online.de> Bob wrote: >It looks like Mail_RFC822::isValidInetAddress has the same problem with >not recognizing '+' as valid Have you thought about reporting that as a bug and/or contributing a better version? Testing for valid email addresses is a pretty standard task in a web-based application. I had actually hoped that the RFC822 class would comply with RFC(2)822, so that we don't have to reinvent the wheel ... >though I agree, using PEAR::Mail is a >better solution, if only so you have less code to maintain. Reduce, >reuse, recycle. (see above) So much for reuse :-/ >If you want, I'll send you my code for >testing various address schemes. Since it seems we can't use Mail_RCF822, I'll probably go with the regexp you already posted. We're not doing anything fancy with email addresses in Geeklog - it only needs to check if whatever the user entered could be considered an email address ... Btw, the CVS version of Geeklog now uses PEAR::Mail. See the post over on geeklog-devtalk: bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 6 11:19:02 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 11:19:02 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] center RDF block? Message-ID: Is there a way to make an RDF block appear in the center column? wfz at wfzimmerman.com 2019 Ferdon Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 phone: +1.734-327-6158 mobile:+1.734-646-6277 Zimmerblog: http://www.wfzimmerman.com See my chapter on Microsoft OneNote in FIRST LOOK MICROSOFT OFFICE -- NEW EDITION - available for purchase from Microsoft Press March 19, 2003! Author, COMPLETE GUIDE TO MICROSOFT ONENOTE - Apress and END-TO-END PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP TABLET PC EDITION - Apress -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2950 bytes Desc: not available URL: From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 6 11:35:47 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 11:35:47 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] any way to show larger images in center block? Message-ID: Any way to show larger images in center block? I'd like to be able to go a bit past the 300 pixel limit. Looks as if there's room. Another nice option would be to create an optional popup window for images. wfz at wfzimmerman.com 2019 Ferdon Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 phone: +1.734-327-6158 mobile:+1.734-646-6277 Zimmerblog: http://www.wfzimmerman.com See my chapter on Microsoft OneNote in FIRST LOOK MICROSOFT OFFICE -- NEW EDITION - available for purchase from Microsoft Press March 19, 2003! Author, COMPLETE GUIDE TO MICROSOFT ONENOTE - Apress and END-TO-END PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP TABLET PC EDITION - Apress -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2950 bytes Desc: not available URL: From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 6 11:47:53 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 17:47:53 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] any way to show larger images in center block? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030906154753.26154@smtp.haun-online.de> >Any way to show larger images in center block? I'd like to be able to go a >bit past the 300 pixel limit. Looks as if there's room. You can change the max. size in config.php. You can even let them be scaled down while keeping the original (the scaled-down version will then serve as a thumbnail for the unscaled image). See for details. bye, Dirk P.S. It would be nice if you could post in plain text, not HTML. Thank you. -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 6 13:13:39 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 10:13:39 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Plain TEXT! In-Reply-To: <20030906170002.31053.64763.Mailman@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> Message-ID: Yea, everyone pleaaaase post in plain text, not HTML. It's killing me to read 90% garbage. Would be nice if you quote posted too, and snipped out the irrelevant stuff. Thank you :) From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 6 15:12:00 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 21:12:00 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Suggested changes to lib-common.php/COM_isemail() In-Reply-To: <20030902000248.0ed51cd7.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> References: <20030902000248.0ed51cd7.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> Message-ID: <20030906191200.25523@smtp.haun-online.de> Bob wrote: >Suggested change (incorporating everything above): > > if( eregi( "^[-_0-9a-z]+[-._0-9a-z]*\\+?[-._0-9a-z]*@[0-9a-z]([- >.]?[0-9a-z])*\\.[a-z]{2,6}$", $email, $check )) While playing around with this, I noticed that it does not accept root at localhost as a valid email address, while the old/current regexp does accept it (again, probably due to the unescaped dot). >I've tested this and it works, correctly accepting >username+something at example.museum and username+ at example.museum and >correctly rejecting username+ at exampleZmuseum and >username+s+omething at example.museum. I'm not sure about the last case but >I've never seen an address of this form before; In my understanding of RFC(2)822, that last example would be valid, too. PEAR's Mail_RFC822 class accepts username+s+omething at example.org, but does not accept root at localhost :-/ >I know, someone could easily spend a month trying to make COM_isemail >identify all legal email addresses Yeah, it's a pretty complex matter. I don't care about the case with more than one '+' too much, but I think that domains without a dot should be accepted. My regexp-fu is a bit rusty, what would the correct expression be? My first idea was ...(\\.[a- z]{2,6}){0,1}$ but that accepts things like @blah.localhost ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Sep 7 14:10:44 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 11:10:44 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Using CVS In-Reply-To: <20030907170002.14544.86432.Mailman@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> Message-ID: At the risk of exposing my blatant ignorance on the subject, I would like to ask: How do I go about downloading the latest 'tarball' on CVS? I would like to experiment with Dirk's Pear work for Mail, but I am scared I will botch something up. I went to the CVS website, but that's a load to handle. Can I just download the latest release and install and go, or do I have to compile something? I am a Windows user - please be kind, I recently switched to Apache / MySQL / PHP and will one day get the balls up to go Linux or OSX Thanks. From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Sep 7 14:26:30 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 20:26:30 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Using CVS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030907182630.29133@smtp.haun-online.de> >How do I go about downloading the latest 'tarball' on CVS? Try this page (linked from the "Resources" block on geeklog.net): It should tell you all that you need to know ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 04:41:00 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 01:41:00 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] User question Message-ID: Does anyone know how to remove options within the user profile, for instance the signature box, the bio and the PGP key? I also want to remove the options within preferences for comments and privacy options. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Sep 7 15:00:34 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 21:00:34 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] User question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030907190034.3687@smtp.haun-online.de> >Does anyone know how to remove options within the user profile, for instance >the signature box, the bio and the PGP key? I also want to remove the >options within preferences for comments and privacy options. You can remove them from the template files: layout/YourTheme/preferences/ Having said that, it's probably a good idea to replace them with "hidden" fields that set the default values. For example, the "show online status" checkbox should be replaced with if you want your users to be visible in the Who's Online block (and value="" if you don't). bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Sep 7 17:12:13 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: 07 Sep 2003 17:12:13 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] any way to show larger images in center block? In-Reply-To: <20030906154753.26154@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20030906154753.26154@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <1062969133.2978.68.camel@laptop> On Sat, 2003-09-06 at 11:47, geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > You can change the max. size in config.php. You can even let them be > scaled down while keeping the original (the scaled-down version will then > serve as a thumbnail for the unscaled image). > > See for details. Is netpbm the only way to do the above? I ask because I have a new ImageMagick installed (5.5.x) and I've set the following: $_CONF['image_lib'] = 'imagemagick'; $_CONF['path_to_mogrify'] = '/usr/bin/mogrify'; $_CONF['keep_unscaled_image'] = 1; And big images get rescaled appropriately but the image is not a link to the original big image and the original image seems to be destroyed (on the server, that is) since I can't find it anywhere in ~/images/articles/ In short, is there something that needs to be changed about stock GeekLog 1.3.7 other than the above settings in config.php to make it work correctly? (Where correctly is 'scale down images, keep original, make thumbnail a link to the big image'.) I can try netbpm, I suppose, but I'm used to ImageMagick so it's what I had used first. Thanks in advance, matt -- Curmudgeon Gamer http://curmudgeongamer.com/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Sep 7 18:11:17 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 00:11:17 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] any way to show larger images in center block? In-Reply-To: <1062969133.2978.68.camel@laptop> References: <1062969133.2978.68.camel@laptop> Message-ID: <20030907221117.6383@smtp.haun-online.de> matt wrote: >In short, is there something that needs to be changed about stock >GeekLog 1.3.7 Err, yes - you need to upgrade to 1.3.8 >I can try netbpm, I suppose, but I'm used to ImageMagick so it's what I >had used first. Works for me with the current CVS version and ImageMagick 5.5.3. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 09:17:07 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 06:17:07 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] User question In-Reply-To: <20030907190034.3687@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: How do I remove the time from the stories? From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sun Sep 7 19:54:21 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: 07 Sep 2003 19:54:21 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] any way to show larger images in center block? In-Reply-To: <20030907221117.6383@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <1062969133.2978.68.camel@laptop> <20030907221117.6383@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <1062978861.2978.102.camel@laptop> On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 18:11, geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > matt wrote: > > >In short, is there something that needs to be changed about stock > >GeekLog 1.3.7 > > Err, yes - you need to upgrade to 1.3.8 Ah! Doing this now. Thanks. matt -- Curmudgeon Gamer http://curmudgeongamer.com/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 01:10:17 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 00:10:17 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Suggested changes to lib-common.php/COM_isemail() In-Reply-To: <20030904172612.31888@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20030902111113.2c9cf30b.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> <20030904172612.31888@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20030908001017.0f97a7c1.apthorpe+gl@cynistar.net> Hi, On Thu, 4 Sep 2003 19:26:11 +0200 geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > Bob wrote: > > >It looks like Mail_RFC822::isValidInetAddress has the same problem with > >not recognizing '+' as valid > > Have you thought about reporting that as a bug and/or contributing a > better version? Testing for valid email addresses is a pretty standard > task in a web-based application. I had actually hoped that the RFC822 > class would comply with RFC(2)822, so that we don't have to reinvent the > wheel ... I'm more than happy to report it or suggest a patch. I'm extremely busy with the day job and managing some theatrical productions, but I should be able to submit something a little more robust soon. Note that the class does a good job parsing the addresses into comments, hosts, local-paths, etc. It's just that the method isValidInetAddress takes a quick-and-dirty approach that is suitable for most cases. > >though I agree, using PEAR::Mail is a > >better solution, if only so you have less code to maintain. Reduce, > >reuse, recycle. > > (see above) So much for reuse :-/ Then again, if PEAR::Mail does what your original code does and it's less code for you to maintain, use it; we can work on getting PEAR::Mail to do the right thing and more people will benefit. Since I'm the one bitten by it, the burden is on me to get it fixed. ... > Btw, the CVS version of Geeklog now uses PEAR::Mail. See the post over on > geeklog-devtalk: > > Beautiful - I'm much happier with code that speaks SMTP rather than code that expects sendmail is installed locally. It comes in very handy in those unfortunate cases where I need to install code under Windows. :) Thanks again for all your work. -- Bob From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 03:29:36 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:29:36 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] User question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030908072936.30463@smtp.haun-online.de> >How do I remove the time from the stories? It's all in the templates ... Look for {story_date} in storytext.thtml, storybodytext.thtml, featuredstorytext.thtml, and featuredstorybodytext.thtml (it may be in different files for different themes). bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 13:52:38 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:52:38 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Kudos to Dirk et. al. In-Reply-To: <20030908170003.23777.92821.Mailman@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> Message-ID: I have been heavily testing, using and tweaking Geeklog the past few weeks. I must say, tremendous kudos to Dirk and the people who set this all up for creating a fantastic application. More important, I have never seen such dedication by a developer to an open source project than Dirk's incessant, passionate responses to all our questions. THANK YOU AGAIN! This project is like unforgettable food - you can FEEL the cook's passion in every bite. From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 13:57:31 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 10:57:31 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Pear / SMTP suggestions In-Reply-To: <20030908170003.23777.92821.Mailman@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> Message-ID: I don't know much about 2.0 development, but may I make the suggestion that you allow for the SMTP mail server settings to be part of the customizable settings in the config.php, but preferably, in the administration console (HTML) as a plug-in or whatever. Seems like if you are running multiple GL sites on different domains, you'd want to be able to set up the SMTP info for each domain so the site 'master' sending address is unique to that domain and that GL site Since there has been talk of running multiple GL sites from ONE codebase, and from one database, if you move the settings into a plugin or out of config.php, then you could make that single codebase cleaner. From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 14:34:21 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:34:21 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick Message-ID: I set config.php to do imagescaling using imagemagick. $_CONF['image_lib'] = 'imagemagick'; I set keep_unscaled_images to "1". It looks as if I have a valid path to mogrify since it's producing thumbnailed images. But the thumbnail's not linked to the larger image. Ideas for troubleshooting? From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 15:02:36 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:02:36 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030908190236.14326@smtp.haun-online.de> >Ideas for troubleshooting? 1) That feature requires Geeklog 1.3.8 or 1.3.8-1 2) If you upgraded from an earlier version, make sure you replaced both system/classes/upload.class.php and admin/story.php That's about all I could think of ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 16:48:21 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:48:21 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick In-Reply-To: <20030908190236.14326@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Will 1.3.8rc2 work? >Ideas for troubleshooting? 1) That feature requires Geeklog 1.3.8 or 1.3.8-1 2) If you upgraded from an earlier version, make sure you replaced both system/classes/upload.class.php and admin/story.php That's about all I could think of ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 16:56:53 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:56:53 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030908205653.20007@smtp.haun-online.de> >Will 1.3.8rc2 work? Err, yes, but why use an outdated release candidate? Geeklog 1.3.8-1 is the current version. There were no further database changes, so you can simply replace the files to upgrade ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 18:53:15 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:53:15 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick In-Reply-To: <20030908205653.20007@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Stupid q: when I upgrade, do I have to reinstall all my plugins? -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:57 PM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: RE: [geeklog-users] imagemagick >Will 1.3.8rc2 work? Err, yes, but why use an outdated release candidate? Geeklog 1.3.8-1 is the current version. There were no further database changes, so you can simply replace the files to upgrade ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 18:57:52 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 18:57:52 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick In-Reply-To: <20030908205653.20007@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: I should have said, because I am already running 1.3.8 rc2, but the linking is not working with this version ... -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 4:57 PM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: RE: [geeklog-users] imagemagick >Will 1.3.8rc2 work? Err, yes, but why use an outdated release candidate? Geeklog 1.3.8-1 is the current version. There were no further database changes, so you can simply replace the files to upgrade ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 8 19:15:19 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:15:19 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] 1.3.8rc2 to 1.3.8.1 Message-ID: I have a 1.3.8rc2 install with several plugins and corresponding tables added to my database. After I backup data and files, and set aside old.lib-custom.php, can I simply install over the existing gl files, then reset config.php? wfz at wfzimmerman.com 2019 Ferdon Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 mobile:+1.734-646-6277 Zimmerblog: http://www.wfzimmerman.com RSS: http://www.wfzimmerman.com/backend/wfzimmerman.xml Author of the chapter on Microsoft OneNote in FIRST LOOK MICROSOFT OFFICE -- NEW EDITION (Microsoft Press) COMPLETE GUIDE TO MICROSOFT ONENOTE - Apress and END-TO-END PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP TABLET PC EDITION - Apress -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2950 bytes Desc: not available URL: From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 9 04:00:42 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:00:42 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] 1.3.8rc2 to 1.3.8.1 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030909080042.17420@smtp.haun-online.de> >I have a 1.3.8rc2 install with several plugins and corresponding tables >added to my database. After I backup data and files, and set aside >old.lib-custom.php, can I simply install over the existing gl files, then >reset config.php? There were no database changes between all the 1.3.8 versions (i.e. rc1, rc2, 1.3.8, and 1.3.8-1 all operate on the same database), so replacing the files is all that you should need to do. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 9 03:57:05 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:57:05 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20030909075705.108@smtp.haun-online.de> >Stupid q: when I upgrade, do I have to reinstall all my plugins? Only if they modified any of the core Geeklog files. >I should have said, because I am already running 1.3.8 rc2, but the linking >is not working with this version ... Hmm, that functionality has been added prior to rc1 and hasn't been changed since then (and has always been working, to my knowledge) ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 9 07:58:21 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 07:58:21 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick In-Reply-To: <20030909075705.108@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: I got it working. (the feature works with HTML postings, of course ...) -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 3:57 AM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: RE: [geeklog-users] imagemagick >Stupid q: when I upgrade, do I have to reinstall all my plugins? Only if they modified any of the core Geeklog files. >I should have said, because I am already running 1.3.8 rc2, but the linking >is not working with this version ... Hmm, that functionality has been added prior to rc1 and hasn't been changed since then (and has always been working, to my knowledge) ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 13 13:58:15 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:58:15 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] User question In-Reply-To: <20030908072936.30463@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: I'm having troubles changing the loginrequired permissions. When I set it to 1 it still allows me to access everything. Also, I have set up an HTML page to have users signup or sign-in, it works great on the PC, takes me to the user.php and redirects me to index.php, but on my mac it takes me redirects me to the index.html. Any help would be really appreciated. Thanks! From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 13 13:12:41 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 10:12:41 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] User Permissions In-Reply-To: <20030913170011.4255.40900.Mailman@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> Message-ID: : I'm having troubles changing the loginrequired permissions. : When I set it to : 1 it still allows me to access everything. : Check your TOPICS settings. If you have anonymous turned on in TOPICS, then all STORIES created under those topics will also have Anon access on. Go and remove aonon from each story, set the topics to no anon, and correct groups (I usually change from Topic Admin to Story admin, so I can have users get story admin right edit stories, rather than just Topic Admin, which is fairly high security clearance) Try that, good luck. (No idea on your mac index.html question) From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 13 17:56:10 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 17:56:10 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Problem with geeklog.1.3.7sr2-gallery1.3.4.zip Message-ID: <00fc01c37a41$d81c92c0$3361a8c0@ariel> Small lesson learned... Tried installing this integration with GL 1.3.8-1 and Gallery 1.3.4-pl1 running under Redhat 8.0, Apache 2.0.40-11.7, and PHP 4.2.2 (all from Redhat RPMs). Small problem in classes/geeklog User.php and UserDB.php. Had to replace " From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 15 12:27:59 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 12:27:59 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] timeout error Message-ID: I'm getting this error when I run the referrer page from the visitor stats login Fatal error: Maximum execution time of 30 seconds exceeded in /usr/www/users/ibic/wfz/geeklog/system/classes/template.class.php on line 499 Where do I change the timeout value - is it in a visitor stats file or in GL? wfz at wfzimmerman.com 2019 Ferdon Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 mobile:+1.734-646-6277 Zimmerblog: http://www.wfzimmerman.com RSS: http://www.wfzimmerman.com/backend/wfzimmerman.xml Author of the chapter on Microsoft OneNote in FIRST LOOK MICROSOFT OFFICE -- NEW EDITION (Microsoft Press) COMPLETE GUIDE TO MICROSOFT ONENOTE - Apress and END-TO-END PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP TABLET PC EDITION - Apress -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2950 bytes Desc: not available URL: From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Sep 18 05:16:41 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 16:16:41 +0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick References: Message-ID: <00d901c37dc5$926aadc0$07007fc0@kosmojayb5m4qr> need help >>>> i have lost admins password how to recover from php files..... need help soon thanks... From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Sep 18 05:36:06 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:36:06 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] imagemagick In-Reply-To: <00d901c37dc5$926aadc0$07007fc0@kosmojayb5m4qr> Message-ID: <000501c37dc8$48be7b40$b80f07d5@Franz> Hi! Just act as if you would try to log in ... And then follow the link "Did You Forget Your Password?" You should have a valid Email dress as Admin - if not you will need to go manually into mySQL under gl_users to set it. Regards Daniel From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Sep 18 14:06:12 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 11:06:12 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Lost Password help In-Reply-To: <20030918170011.22490.50810.Mailman@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> Message-ID: If the lots password email thing does not work, you can always go edit the account in your MySQL database. Do you have access to the DB or is it hosted? I usually go in with PHPAdmin, use the web interface to browse to the gl_users table and change the PW on the admin account. Make sure you choose MD5 as the type otherwise it won't come through properly. From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Sep 25 08:51:09 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 08:51:09 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Exporting calendar data to .ics Message-ID: Hello, Do you know of a existing tool to export GL calendar data to .ics (iCalendar) format? Thanks, Jesse --- editor and writer http://uwstudent.org From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Sep 25 05:11:23 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:11:23 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Allow users to submit stories with pictures Message-ID: <000201c38344$fe1f1310$a11307d5@Franz> Hi! How do I give users the rights to submit stories with the story editor with pictures and all this features? I tried the users-access Block and also giving all rights besides root but still it does not work. What do I need to do? Thanks Daniel From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Sep 25 14:01:23 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:01:23 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Allow users to submit stories with pictures In-Reply-To: <000201c38344$fe1f1310$a11307d5@Franz> References: <000201c38344$fe1f1310$a11307d5@Franz> Message-ID: <20030925180123.30707@smtp.haun-online.de> Daniel wrote: >How do I give users the rights to submit stories with the story editor with >pictures and all this features? This feature isn't really intended to be given to "normal" users. You will need to make them a member of the Story Admin group so that they can use it (which, of course, means that they can edit other people's stories). >I tried the users-access Block and also giving all rights besides root but >still it does not work. Try telling us what exactly "does not work" ... bye, Dirk P.S. Your post to this mailing list had to be approved manually. Please make sure you're posting from the address that you used when you subscribed to the list. Since (attempted) spam to the lists is ever increasing, we may opt for auto-discarding posts from non-subscribers in the not-too-distant future ... -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Thu Sep 25 18:53:22 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 00:53:22 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Allow users to submit stories with pictures In-Reply-To: <20030925180123.30707@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <000901c383b7$d1fcdf10$f50d07d5@Franz> Hi! >>I tried the users-access Block and also giving all rights besides root >>but still it does not work. >Try telling us what exactly "does not work" ... Sometimes when I tried to post I could enter a message with pictures but when I try to submit the story I cannot and get a message that I do not have the appropriate rights. Sorry about the wrong mail address ... Regards Daniel From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Fri Sep 26 01:57:53 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 07:57:53 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Allow users to submit stories with pictures In-Reply-To: <000901c383b7$d1fcdf10$f50d07d5@Franz> References: <000901c383b7$d1fcdf10$f50d07d5@Franz> Message-ID: <20030926055753.26136@smtp.haun-online.de> Daniel wrote: >Sometimes when I tried to post I could enter a message with pictures but >when I try to submit the story I cannot and get a message that I do not have >the appropriate rights. That doesn't have anything to do with the image upload - you would get the same message without any images. The problem is that the user doesn't have access to the topic. Check the permissions of that topic and make sure the user is in the group that owns the topic. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://mypod.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Fri Sep 26 21:47:27 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 20:47:27 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Warning: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in wrong directory in /home/.charmian/tabi/geeklog-1.3.8-1/system/lib-custom.php on line 111 Message-ID: <3F74EC2F.9050801@tabi.org> What does this message mean? Warning: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in wrong directory in /home/.charmian/tabi/geeklog-1.3.8-1/system/lib-custom.php on line 111 -- Timur Tabi timur at tabi.org From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 27 04:30:25 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 10:30:25 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Warning: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in wrong directory in /home/.charmian/tabi/geeklog-1.3.8-1/system/lib-custom.php on line 111 In-Reply-To: <3F74EC2F.9050801@tabi.org> References: <3F74EC2F.9050801@tabi.org> Message-ID: <20030927083025.16687@smtp.haun-online.de> Timur Tabi wrote: >What does this message mean? > >Warning: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in wrong directory >in /home/.charmian/tabi/geeklog-1.3.8-1/system/lib-custom.php on line 111 open_basedir is a restriction that some hosting services are using. It means that access to files is restricted to certain directories. So whatever you have in line 111 in lib-custom.php, it is trying to access a file that is not in one of the allowed directories. That may be due to a wrong path. If you can't figure it out yourself, please post the relevant(!) portions of the code here. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 27 10:22:37 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:22:37 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous Message-ID: <20030927142238.23935@smtp.haun-online.de> This is a question to the users of this list regarding the cloaking of their email addresses when posting to the list. When this list was originally started, the email addresses of all posters were exposed both in the list and in the list archives. After someone complained about this (and rightly so), we switched to what we currently have: When you post to the list, your name and email adddress is replaced with geeklog-users-admin[at]lists.geeklog.net. This, however, makes the list a bit too anonymous for my tastes. As some people don't add their names to the message text, it's often hard to even know who you're talking too. As it seems, the mailing list software we're using offers another option. It would make the name and email address fully visible again on all posts to the list but not in the archives. Since all our mailing lists require subscribing, chances that someone subscribes to them only to get the email addresses are pretty low, IMHO. In the archives, such a post would look like this one: As you can see, it shows my name, but not my email address. Any objections against making that switch? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.haun.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 27 11:38:29 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 08:38:29 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030927142238.23935@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 07:22 AM, geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > Any objections against making that switch? No objections -- please switch it! It's a real pain to read and follow right now... -rob. From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 27 14:19:24 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:19:24 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3F75D4AC.7060708@abtech.org> Count my vote in favor of the change. -Vinny geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > On Saturday, September 27, 2003, at 07:22 AM, > geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > >> Any objections against making that switch? > > > No objections -- please switch it! It's a real pain to read and > follow right now... > > -rob. > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 27 17:02:13 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:02:13 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030927142238.23935@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20030927142238.23935@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <3F75FAD5.20501@tabi.org> geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > Any objections against making that switch? I object. Spammers harvest email addresses from mailing lists, because the return addresses are rarely spam-proofed. -- Timur Tabi timur at tabi.org From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 27 17:14:08 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 23:14:08 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <3F75FAD5.20501@tabi.org> References: <3F75FAD5.20501@tabi.org> Message-ID: <20030927211408.4084@smtp.haun-online.de> Timur Tabi wrote: >I object. Spammers harvest email addresses from mailing lists, because >the return addresses are rarely spam-proofed. But to do that, the spammer / harvester would need to subscribe to the mailing list. Have you ever heard of a spammer doing that, thus confirming their own email address!? Btw, if you're so concerned about being harvested, you shouldn't really put your email address in your signature as that will end up in the archive and can be harvested from there ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 27 17:23:14 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:23:14 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030927211408.4084@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <3F75FAD5.20501@tabi.org> <20030927211408.4084@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <3F75FFC2.5050601@tabi.org> geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > But to do that, the spammer / harvester would need to subscribe to the > mailing list. Have you ever heard of a spammer doing that, thus > confirming their own email address!? Yes, I have. It happens all the time. > Btw, if you're so concerned about being harvested, you shouldn't really > put your email address in your signature as that will end up in the > archive and can be harvested from there ... True. -- Timur Tabi From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Sat Sep 27 21:57:22 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:57:22 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Warning: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in wrong directory in /home/.charmian/tabi/geeklog-1.3.8-1/system/lib-custom.php on line 111 References: <3F74EC2F.9050801@tabi.org> <20030927083025.16687@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <000d01c38563$dbe23f40$6501a8c0@hvc.rr.com> Any Which Way ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 4:30 AM Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Warning: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in wrong directory in /home/.charmian/tabi/geeklog-1.3.8-1/system/lib-custom.php on line 111 > Timur Tabi wrote: > > >What does this message mean? > > > >Warning: open_basedir restriction in effect. File is in wrong directory > >in /home/.charmian/tabi/geeklog-1.3.8-1/system/lib-custom.php on line 111 > > open_basedir is a restriction that some hosting services are using. It > means that access to files is restricted to certain directories. > > So whatever you have in line 111 in lib-custom.php, it is trying to > access a file that is not in one of the allowed directories. That may be > due to a wrong path. > > If you can't figure it out yourself, please post the relevant(!) portions > of the code here. > > bye, Dirk I'm the consumate newb, but could it be because of the . in the path before charmian? From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 29 05:21:24 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:21:24 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Automatic language Message-ID: <000201c3866b$0dd40fd0$a7af07d5@Franz> Hi! I would like to have my geeklog page automatically set to the language that is set up in the browser. How can I achieve this? Is there a plugin or something? Did someone write a language block? Sometimes it can be very bad to get the browser language - like if you are in Asia in an Internet Cafe - then it must be possible to change the language on the front page. Regards Daniel From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Mon Sep 29 20:02:30 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 02:02:30 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Automatic language In-Reply-To: <000201c3866b$0dd40fd0$a7af07d5@Franz> Message-ID: <000f01c386e6$247d0900$ba0ab9d9@Franz> Hallo - it's me again! -----Original Message----- >I would like to have my geeklog page automatically set to >the language that is set up in the browser. How can I >achieve this? Is there a plugin or something? Did someone >write a language block? Sometimes it can be very bad to get >the browser language - like if you are in Asia in an >Internet Cafe - then it must be possible to change the >language on the front page. Now I did first tests to program it myself. But ... I see the difficulty in the fact that geeklog uses real language names but Browsers use shortcuts. Is there a translation table somewhere? Besides that the lines: $languages=preg_split ('/,/',getenv('HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE')); $languages=preg_replace ('/;.*/','',$languages); Should lead to success. Then something that checks through the array until it finds an existing language file. In case there is none - use the default language configured in config.php. Where do I put this to become proper geeklog? So far I would put it directly in config.php or is there a better place? Because of the above described difficulties with being abroad I would not suggest to use it as default without a language block. If I go to an English site I still want it to be English - even I am in Asia. However for me it is more useful to have it in the Browser language as people's English might be good but finding the way to "user language" is not too easy sometimes. Regards Daniel From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 01:55:25 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:55:25 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <3F75FFC2.5050601@tabi.org> References: <3F75FFC2.5050601@tabi.org> Message-ID: <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the change back to postings with real names in the headers. What about the others here? Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 02:06:08 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:06:08 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <3F75FFC2.5050601@tabi.org> <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <1064901967.22639.4.camel@ninja2> On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 22:55, geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: > So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the change back to > postings with real names in the headers. What about the others here? > Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... I'd much rather see names on the posts. It is really confusing to have them filtered out, since a lot of posters don't put their name in their messages. Hiding it in the archives is a good thing. That's the way every other list I'm on deals with it. - |Daryll From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 03:03:38 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:03:38 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Hi! I don't mind. Will the Email address also be visible? Even that is something that does not really matter (Email addresses are still cheap and fast to change) - just people will have to be informed. I always wonder why there is no newsgroup about geeklog. I like that much more and usually it is much more active than a mailing list. Also because there are way better free newsreaders for win than mail programs ... Daniel From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 06:17:22 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:17:22 +1000 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous References: <3F75FFC2.5050601@tabi.org> <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <0fb301c3873c$207916e0$0707070a@holmw2k> I watch this list (even though it is often very quiet). I don't post much because I have to make sure I remember to post from the correct "from" address. I definitely think it is better to leave addresses out of the archive. . .and I don't mind if we want them in our mailing list. But, I think we need to make sure that "replying" goes to the list instead of to individuals (by default). Later. ----- Original Message ----- From: To: Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 3:55 PM Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous > So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the change back to > postings with real names in the headers. What about the others here? > Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://www.macosx-faq.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 08:50:13 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:50:13 +0000 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <3F75FFC2.5050601@tabi.org> <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20030930124933.M66379@pigstye.net> I approve of making the change back to using real names in the headers. -- Tom Willett ---------- Original Message ----------- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net To: Sent: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:55:25 +0200 Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous > So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the change back > to postings with real names in the headers. What about the others here? > Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... > > bye, Dirk > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://www.macosx-faq.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users ------- End of Original Message ------- From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 08:53:24 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:53:24 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: I vote for putting the real names in the headers. -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 1:55 AM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the change back to postings with real names in the headers. What about the others here? Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 09:42:50 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:42:50 +0000 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous Message-ID: <200309301343.h8UDhJd08835@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> I would prefer to keep real names out. Thanks > So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the change back to > postings with real names in the headers. What about the others here? > Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://www.macosx-faq.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 10:31:19 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:31:19 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous Message-ID: <5150922C4A9FFE4DA2F658016BF9FA3C020BC9CF@lnxseamail01.internal.courtlink.com> I believe that including names/addresses in the emails is an effective way to identify the poster and to initiate off-list discussion (where appropriate). Dropping them from the archive would meet my personal privacy concerns. - Cliff G. -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 6:43 AM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous I would prefer to keep real names out. Thanks > So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the change back to > postings with real names in the headers. What about the others here? > Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://www.macosx-faq.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 10:42:49 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:42:49 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous Message-ID: <5623C8817DFC5C4CB863BB8A00E81EA50D5ED4@ex01.cruzcom.local> I concur with the opinion and reasons expressed by Cliff. In addition, list members should be able to see the originator of posts to the list, whatever the topic. Knowing the source of information is essential to reaching a reasoned evaluation of the advice or opinion that's been given. Ron S. -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 7:31 AM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: RE: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous I believe that including names/addresses in the emails is an effective way to identify the poster and to initiate off-list discussion (where appropriate). Dropping them from the archive would meet my personal privacy concerns. - Cliff G. From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 11:21:28 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:21:28 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous Message-ID: <4F7FF16DC155D311B9260090279C62F5EFD768@CYBERBROWN> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 OK. I'll chime in. I'd like to see real names on the posts... > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:55 PM > To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous > > > So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the > change back to > postings with real names in the headers. What about the others > here? Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://www.macosx-faq.de/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 7.0.4 iQA/AwUBP3mfeMrtF6HAen5cEQKdrwCg0wDr/vGi8DeiInbn/KwJJCRGBCYAoPdK gznxSR6EjC4wTJ4YE1MtilUE =1x5B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 11:24:31 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:24:31 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <4F7FF16DC155D311B9260090279C62F5EFD768@CYBERBROWN> Message-ID: <3F7967EF.21717.53BBAB@localhost> I have every email to the list since 2/02 in a pegasus database for quick look ups of possible solutions. Before I could always spot Tony or Dirk messages which more often than not held the solutions, now I have to go through each message til I find the ones I'm in need of. Needless to say at this point, I'd really appreciate it if it was done as before. Doug (aka toad) To: "'geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net'" Subject: RE: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Send reply to: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Date sent: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:21:28 -0600 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > OK. I'll chime in. I'd like to see real names on > the posts... > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net > > [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] > > Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 11:55 PM > > To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > > Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous > > > > > > So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the > > change back to > > postings with real names in the headers. What about the others > > here? Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... > > > > bye, Dirk > > > > > > -- > > http://www.haun-online.de/ > > http://www.macosx-faq.de/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-users mailing list > > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGP 7.0.4 > > iQA/AwUBP3mfeMrtF6HAen5cEQKdrwCg0wDr/vGi8DeiInbn/KwJJCRGBCYAoPdK > gznxSR6EjC4wTJ4YE1MtilUE > =1x5B > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 12:38:35 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:38:35 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-users] NewsGator plugin Message-ID: Anyone feel like writing a NewsGator plugin? Over my head . http://www.newsgator.com/plugins/ http://www.newsgator.com/plugins/developer.aspx wfz at wfzimmerman.com 2019 Ferdon Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 mobile:+1.734-646-6277 Zimmerblog: http://www.wfzimmerman.com RSS: http://www.wfzimmerman.com/backend/wfzimmerman.xml Author of the chapter on Microsoft OneNote in FIRST LOOK MICROSOFT OFFICE -- NEW EDITION (Microsoft Press) COMPLETE GUIDE TO MICROSOFT ONENOTE - Apress and END-TO-END PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR MICROSOFT WINDOWS XP TABLET PC EDITION - Apress -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 2950 bytes Desc: not available URL: From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 02:14:07 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:14:07 +0300 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <3F75FFC2.5050601@tabi.org> <20030930055525.17819@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <3F791F2F.9000702@difos.gr> geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net wrote: >So far we have 1 objection and 2 approvals of making the change back to >postings with real names in the headers. What about the others here? >Surely this list has more than four subscribers ... > >bye, Dirk > > > > No objections. Count me in. From geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net Tue Sep 30 10:41:00 2003 From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net (geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net) Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:41:00 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Making this list less anonymous In-Reply-To: <20030927142238.23935@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20030927142238.23935@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <1952399975.20030930094100@onreligion.com> Hi geeklog-users-admin, Saturday, September 27, 2003, 9:22:37 AM, you wrote: gualgn> As it seems, the mailing list software we're using offers gualgn> another option. It would make the name and email address fully gualgn> visible again on all posts to the list but not in the gualgn> archives. I think this is a good policy. -- Best, John