From websitemaster at cogeco.net Tue Oct 2 14:51:05 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:51:05 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Message-ID: <030e01cda0ce$e0dadf80$a2909e80$@cogeco.net> Hi All, I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net to the RC1. It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few small hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin updates. I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern Curve theme. The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in the Redesign wiki document. Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need to concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit. This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in multiple topics. Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the old site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I recall from before this was usually under a second) After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds for some reason. Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this mailing list so we can get it fixed. I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I also notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the site seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also use a bit of optimizing as well. Thanks Tom From websitemaster at cogeco.net Wed Oct 3 09:06:17 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2012 09:06:17 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs Message-ID: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked properly for some reason. http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems to be getting lost: http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Hi All, I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net to the RC1. It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few small hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin updates. I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern Curve theme. The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in the Redesign wiki document. Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need to concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit. This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in multiple topics. Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the old site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I recall from before this was usually under a second) After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds for some reason. Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this mailing list so we can get it fixed. I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I also notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the site seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also use a bit of optimizing as well. Thanks Tom _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Thu Oct 4 11:41:29 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 11:41:29 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous users and topics not being tracked properly. Tom Note: This does not fix bug 1486 -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked properly for some reason. http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems to be getting lost: http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Hi All, I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net to the RC1. It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few small hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin updates. I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern Curve theme. The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in the Redesign wiki document. Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need to concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit. This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in multiple topics. Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the old site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I recall from before this was usually under a second) After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds for some reason. Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this mailing list so we can get it fixed. I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I also notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the site seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also use a bit of optimizing as well. Thanks Tom _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Thu Oct 4 15:12:55 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 15:12:55 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> Okay, I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication is taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on Geeklog.net. On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and 1 forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the processing time. Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated every single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to rebuild the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published. This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are updated. I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to hear some other suggestions! Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous users and topics not being tracked properly. Tom Note: This does not fix bug 1486 -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked properly for some reason. http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems to be getting lost: http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Hi All, I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net to the RC1. It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few small hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin updates. I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern Curve theme. The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in the Redesign wiki document. Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need to concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit. This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in multiple topics. Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the old site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I recall from before this was usually under a second) After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds for some reason. Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this mailing list so we can get it fixed. I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I also notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the site seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also use a bit of optimizing as well. Thanks Tom _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From trinity93 at gmail.com Thu Oct 4 19:23:48 2012 From: trinity93 at gmail.com (Trinity) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 18:23:48 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: use cron On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom wrote: > Okay, > > I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication is > taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on > Geeklog.net. > > On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and 1 > forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the processing > time. > > Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated every > single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php > > The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the > future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to rebuild > the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published. > > This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are updated. > > I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to hear > some > other suggestions! > > Tom > > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM > To: 'Geeklog Development' > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs > > I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous > users and topics not being tracked properly. > > Tom > > Note: This does not fix bug 1486 > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM > To: 'Geeklog Development' > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs > > One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked > properly > for some reason. > > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for > Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) > > This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems to > be > getting lost: > > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is > lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) > > Tom > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM > To: 'Geeklog Development' > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 > > Hi All, > > I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net to > the RC1. > > It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few small > hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin > updates. > > I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern Curve > theme. > > The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in the > Redesign wiki document. > > Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need to > concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit. > This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements > are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in > multiple topics. > > Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the old > site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I > recall from before this was usually under a second) > > After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds > (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds > for some reason. > > Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new > indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) > > Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this > mailing list so we can get it fixed. > > I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with > Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I also > notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the site > seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also use a > bit of optimizing as well. > > Thanks > > Tom > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cordiste at free.fr Fri Oct 5 07:51:22 2012 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:51:22 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: Tom, How did you track the execution time? A solution could be to only update rss every hour. If we need more updates, we could recorde the last run time and check if story date is between now and this last run on pages where this article is display. If yes then we update the feed. Ben 2012/10/4 Tom : > Okay, > > I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication is > taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on > Geeklog.net. > > On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and 1 > forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the processing > time. > > Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated every > single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php > > The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the > future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to rebuild > the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published. > > This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are updated. > > I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to hear some > other suggestions! > > Tom > > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM > To: 'Geeklog Development' > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs > > I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous > users and topics not being tracked properly. > > Tom > > Note: This does not fix bug 1486 > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM > To: 'Geeklog Development' > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs > > One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked properly > for some reason. > > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for > Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) > > This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems to be > getting lost: > > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is > lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) > > Tom > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM > To: 'Geeklog Development' > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 > > Hi All, > > I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net to > the RC1. > > It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few small > hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin > updates. > > I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern Curve > theme. > > The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in the > Redesign wiki document. > > Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need to > concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit. > This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements > are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in > multiple topics. > > Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the old > site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I > recall from before this was usually under a second) > > After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds > (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds > for some reason. > > Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new > indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) > > Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this > mailing list so we can get it fixed. > > I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with > Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I also > notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the site > seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also use a > bit of optimizing as well. > > Thanks > > Tom > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From vfuria at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 11:28:57 2012 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 09:28:57 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: I've never tried it with PHP, but we could fork (pcntl_fork) the Content Syndication stuff so it doesn't impact the user viewing the page. Regardless, we should not be running it on every page load. -Vinny On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:51 AM, cordiste wrote: > Tom, > > How did you track the execution time? > > A solution could be to only update rss every hour. If we need more > updates, we could recorde the last run time and check if story date is > between now and this last run on pages where this article is display. > If yes then we update the feed. > > Ben > > 2012/10/4 Tom : > > Okay, > > > > I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication > is > > taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on > > Geeklog.net. > > > > On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and > 1 > > forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the > processing > > time. > > > > Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated > every > > single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php > > > > The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the > > future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to rebuild > > the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published. > > > > This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are > updated. > > > > I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to hear > some > > other suggestions! > > > > Tom > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > > Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM > > To: 'Geeklog Development' > > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs > > > > I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous > > users and topics not being tracked properly. > > > > Tom > > > > Note: This does not fix bug 1486 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > > Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM > > To: 'Geeklog Development' > > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs > > > > One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked > properly > > for some reason. > > > > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for > > Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) > > > > This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems > to be > > getting lost: > > > > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is > > lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > > Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM > > To: 'Geeklog Development' > > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 > > > > Hi All, > > > > I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net > to > > the RC1. > > > > It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few > small > > hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin > > updates. > > > > I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern > Curve > > theme. > > > > The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in > the > > Redesign wiki document. > > > > Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need > to > > concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair bit. > > This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql statements > > are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display in > > multiple topics. > > > > Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the > old > > site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if I > > recall from before this was usually under a second) > > > > After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds > > (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 seconds > > for some reason. > > > > Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new > > indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) > > > > Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this > > mailing list so we can get it fixed. > > > > I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with > > Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I > also > > notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the > site > > seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also > use a > > bit of optimizing as well. > > > > Thanks > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danstoner at gmail.com Fri Oct 5 12:38:23 2012 From: danstoner at gmail.com (Dan Stoner) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 12:38:23 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: I believe that Wordpress has some kind of "cron" system for doing this sort of thing, although I don't know the details of the implementation. - Dan Stoner On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Vincent Furia wrote: > I've never tried it with PHP, but we could fork (pcntl_fork) the Content > Syndication stuff so it doesn't impact the user viewing the page. > Regardless, we should not be running it on every page load. > > -Vinny > > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:51 AM, cordiste wrote: >> >> Tom, >> >> How did you track the execution time? >> >> A solution could be to only update rss every hour. If we need more >> updates, we could recorde the last run time and check if story date is >> between now and this last run on pages where this article is display. >> If yes then we update the feed. >> >> Ben >> >> 2012/10/4 Tom : >> > Okay, >> > >> > I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication >> > is >> > taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on >> > Geeklog.net. >> > >> > On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and >> > 1 >> > forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the >> > processing >> > time. >> > >> > Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated >> > every >> > single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php >> > >> > The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the >> > future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to >> > rebuild >> > the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published. >> > >> > This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are >> > updated. >> > >> > I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to hear >> > some >> > other suggestions! >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >> > >> > I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous >> > users and topics not being tracked properly. >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > Note: This does not fix bug 1486 >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >> > >> > One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked >> > properly >> > for some reason. >> > >> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for >> > Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) >> > >> > This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems >> > to be >> > getting lost: >> > >> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is >> > lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net >> > to >> > the RC1. >> > >> > It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few >> > small >> > hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin >> > updates. >> > >> > I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern >> > Curve >> > theme. >> > >> > The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in >> > the >> > Redesign wiki document. >> > >> > Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need >> > to >> > concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair >> > bit. >> > This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql >> > statements >> > are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display >> > in >> > multiple topics. >> > >> > Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the >> > old >> > site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if >> > I >> > recall from before this was usually under a second) >> > >> > After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds >> > (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 >> > seconds >> > for some reason. >> > >> > Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new >> > indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) >> > >> > Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this >> > mailing list so we can get it fixed. >> > >> > I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with >> > Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I >> > also >> > notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the >> > site >> > seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also >> > use a >> > bit of optimizing as well. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From websitemaster at cogeco.net Fri Oct 5 13:56:30 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 13:56:30 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <04bc01cda322$c02d9240$4088b6c0$@cogeco.net> Geeklog does have a built in cron like system as well but it can be turned off. So we could use it but we would have to make the admin aware of the issues if they turn it off. My first question is that do we need to be running this process for all the feeds (ie plugin feeds)? I think we should just be worried about articles. The plugins should manage when and if their own feeds need updating (even for future stuff). The only instance I can see where this doesn't work is the commentfeeds plugin and this would only happen if someone changed a date of an article with comments to the future (I do not see that happening at all). As far as running the process only when it is needed I thought of Ben's idea as well and think it is the simplest solution (so far) where we can keep track of the latest live article in the Geeklog vars table and then compare it every specified time period. If it has changed then we can run the process. BTW do many of you set articles to be published at a future date? Just curious because I do not since I like to send pings for my articles when they go live. >> How did you track the execution time? Nothing very scientific. I just had a bunch of echo statements all over the place to help me narrow down areas that could use some optimization. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dan Stoner Sent: October-05-12 12:38 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs I believe that Wordpress has some kind of "cron" system for doing this sort of thing, although I don't know the details of the implementation. - Dan Stoner On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Vincent Furia wrote: > I've never tried it with PHP, but we could fork (pcntl_fork) the > Content Syndication stuff so it doesn't impact the user viewing the page. > Regardless, we should not be running it on every page load. > > -Vinny > > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:51 AM, cordiste wrote: >> >> Tom, >> >> How did you track the execution time? >> >> A solution could be to only update rss every hour. If we need more >> updates, we could recorde the last run time and check if story date >> is between now and this last run on pages where this article is display. >> If yes then we update the feed. >> >> Ben >> >> 2012/10/4 Tom : >> > Okay, >> > >> > I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content >> > Syndication is taking about 50% of the execution time for creating >> > the homepage on Geeklog.net. >> > >> > On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 >> > comment and >> > 1 >> > forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the >> > processing time. >> > >> > Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be >> > updated every single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php >> > >> > The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in >> > the future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need >> > to rebuild the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now >> > been published. >> > >> > This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are >> > updated. >> > >> > I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to >> > hear some other suggestions! >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >> > >> > I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the >> > anonymous users and topics not being tracked properly. >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > Note: This does not fix bug 1486 >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >> > >> > One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked >> > properly for some reason. >> > >> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic >> > for Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous >> > Users) >> > >> > This also probably causes this bug since the session information >> > seems to be getting lost: >> > >> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic >> > selection is lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story >> > Admin) >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated >> > Geeklog.net to the RC1. >> > >> > It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a >> > few small hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and >> > forum plugin updates. >> > >> > I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new >> > Modern Curve theme. >> > >> > The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we >> > defined in the Redesign wiki document. >> > >> > Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we >> > need to concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has >> > dropped a fair bit. >> > This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql >> > statements are needed now since we have child topics and allow >> > stories to display in multiple topics. >> > >> > Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With >> > the old site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 >> > seconds. (if I recall from before this was usually under a second) >> > >> > After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 >> > seconds (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked >> > to 12 seconds for some reason. >> > >> > Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql >> > statements, new indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) >> > >> > Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on >> > this mailing list so we can get it fixed. >> > >> > I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work >> > with Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us >> > know. I also notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on >> > Geeklog.net that the site seemed to slow by a second or so. This >> > indicates the forum could also use a bit of optimizing as well. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From cordiste at free.fr Fri Oct 5 14:04:31 2012 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 20:04:31 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: I would like to test PCNTL but PCNTL functions are not available all my PHP installations :( [code] if (! function_exists('pcntl_fork')) die('PCNTL functions not available on this PHP installation'); for ($x = 1; $x < 5; $x++) { switch ($pid = pcntl_fork()) { case -1: // @fail die('Fork failed'); break; case 0: // @child: Include() misbehaving code here print "FORK: Child #{$x} preparing to nuke...n"; generate_fatal_error(); // Undefined function break; default: // @parent print "FORK: Parent, letting the child run amok...n"; pcntl_waitpid($pid, $status); break; } } print "Done! :^)nn"; [/code] Ben 2012/10/5 Dan Stoner : > I believe that Wordpress has some kind of "cron" system for doing this > sort of thing, although I don't know the details of the > implementation. > > - Dan Stoner > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Vincent Furia wrote: >> I've never tried it with PHP, but we could fork (pcntl_fork) the Content >> Syndication stuff so it doesn't impact the user viewing the page. >> Regardless, we should not be running it on every page load. >> >> -Vinny >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:51 AM, cordiste wrote: >>> >>> Tom, >>> >>> How did you track the execution time? >>> >>> A solution could be to only update rss every hour. If we need more >>> updates, we could recorde the last run time and check if story date is >>> between now and this last run on pages where this article is display. >>> If yes then we update the feed. >>> >>> Ben >>> >>> 2012/10/4 Tom : >>> > Okay, >>> > >>> > I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication >>> > is >>> > taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on >>> > Geeklog.net. >>> > >>> > On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and >>> > 1 >>> > forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the >>> > processing >>> > time. >>> > >>> > Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated >>> > every >>> > single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php >>> > >>> > The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the >>> > future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to >>> > rebuild >>> > the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published. >>> > >>> > This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are >>> > updated. >>> > >>> > I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to hear >>> > some >>> > other suggestions! >>> > >>> > Tom >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >>> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >>> > Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM >>> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >>> > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >>> > >>> > I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous >>> > users and topics not being tracked properly. >>> > >>> > Tom >>> > >>> > Note: This does not fix bug 1486 >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >>> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >>> > Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM >>> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >>> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >>> > >>> > One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked >>> > properly >>> > for some reason. >>> > >>> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for >>> > Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) >>> > >>> > This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems >>> > to be >>> > getting lost: >>> > >>> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is >>> > lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) >>> > >>> > Tom >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -----Original Message----- >>> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >>> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >>> > Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM >>> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >>> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 >>> > >>> > Hi All, >>> > >>> > I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net >>> > to >>> > the RC1. >>> > >>> > It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few >>> > small >>> > hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin >>> > updates. >>> > >>> > I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern >>> > Curve >>> > theme. >>> > >>> > The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in >>> > the >>> > Redesign wiki document. >>> > >>> > Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need >>> > to >>> > concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair >>> > bit. >>> > This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql >>> > statements >>> > are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display >>> > in >>> > multiple topics. >>> > >>> > Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the >>> > old >>> > site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if >>> > I >>> > recall from before this was usually under a second) >>> > >>> > After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds >>> > (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 >>> > seconds >>> > for some reason. >>> > >>> > Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new >>> > indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) >>> > >>> > Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this >>> > mailing list so we can get it fixed. >>> > >>> > I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with >>> > Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I >>> > also >>> > notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the >>> > site >>> > seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also >>> > use a >>> > bit of optimizing as well. >>> > >>> > Thanks >>> > >>> > Tom >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > geeklog-devel mailing list >>> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > geeklog-devel mailing list >>> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > geeklog-devel mailing list >>> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > geeklog-devel mailing list >>> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> geeklog-devel mailing list >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From cordiste at free.fr Fri Oct 5 17:08:42 2012 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 23:08:42 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: >> BTW do many of you set articles to be published at a future date? Sometime I do this >> I like to send pings for my articles when they go live Does the auto ping plugin can do something for you? (never tested) http://mystral-kk.net/filemgmt/index.php/34 Ben 2012/10/5 cordiste : > I would like to test PCNTL but PCNTL functions are not available all > my PHP installations :( > > [code] > > if (! function_exists('pcntl_fork')) die('PCNTL functions not > available on this PHP installation'); > > for ($x = 1; $x < 5; $x++) { > switch ($pid = pcntl_fork()) { > case -1: > // @fail > die('Fork failed'); > break; > > case 0: > // @child: Include() misbehaving code here > print "FORK: Child #{$x} preparing to nuke...n"; > generate_fatal_error(); // Undefined function > break; > > default: > // @parent > print "FORK: Parent, letting the child run amok...n"; > pcntl_waitpid($pid, $status); > break; > } > } > > print "Done! :^)nn"; > > [/code] > > Ben > > 2012/10/5 Dan Stoner : >> I believe that Wordpress has some kind of "cron" system for doing this >> sort of thing, although I don't know the details of the >> implementation. >> >> - Dan Stoner >> >> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Vincent Furia wrote: >>> I've never tried it with PHP, but we could fork (pcntl_fork) the Content >>> Syndication stuff so it doesn't impact the user viewing the page. >>> Regardless, we should not be running it on every page load. >>> >>> -Vinny >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:51 AM, cordiste wrote: >>>> >>>> Tom, >>>> >>>> How did you track the execution time? >>>> >>>> A solution could be to only update rss every hour. If we need more >>>> updates, we could recorde the last run time and check if story date is >>>> between now and this last run on pages where this article is display. >>>> If yes then we update the feed. >>>> >>>> Ben >>>> >>>> 2012/10/4 Tom : >>>> > Okay, >>>> > >>>> > I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content Syndication >>>> > is >>>> > taking about 50% of the execution time for creating the homepage on >>>> > Geeklog.net. >>>> > >>>> > On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 comment and >>>> > 1 >>>> > forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the >>>> > processing >>>> > time. >>>> > >>>> > Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be updated >>>> > every >>>> > single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php >>>> > >>>> > The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in the >>>> > future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need to >>>> > rebuild >>>> > the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now been published. >>>> > >>>> > This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are >>>> > updated. >>>> > >>>> > I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to hear >>>> > some >>>> > other suggestions! >>>> > >>>> > Tom >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >>>> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >>>> > Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM >>>> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >>>> > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >>>> > >>>> > I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the anonymous >>>> > users and topics not being tracked properly. >>>> > >>>> > Tom >>>> > >>>> > Note: This does not fix bug 1486 >>>> > >>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >>>> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >>>> > Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM >>>> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >>>> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >>>> > >>>> > One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked >>>> > properly >>>> > for some reason. >>>> > >>>> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic for >>>> > Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous Users) >>>> > >>>> > This also probably causes this bug since the session information seems >>>> > to be >>>> > getting lost: >>>> > >>>> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic selection is >>>> > lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story Admin) >>>> > >>>> > Tom >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >>>> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >>>> > Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM >>>> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >>>> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 >>>> > >>>> > Hi All, >>>> > >>>> > I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated Geeklog.net >>>> > to >>>> > the RC1. >>>> > >>>> > It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a few >>>> > small >>>> > hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and forum plugin >>>> > updates. >>>> > >>>> > I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new Modern >>>> > Curve >>>> > theme. >>>> > >>>> > The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we defined in >>>> > the >>>> > Redesign wiki document. >>>> > >>>> > Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we need >>>> > to >>>> > concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has dropped a fair >>>> > bit. >>>> > This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql >>>> > statements >>>> > are needed now since we have child topics and allow stories to display >>>> > in >>>> > multiple topics. >>>> > >>>> > Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With the >>>> > old >>>> > site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 seconds. (if >>>> > I >>>> > recall from before this was usually under a second) >>>> > >>>> > After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 seconds >>>> > (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked to 12 >>>> > seconds >>>> > for some reason. >>>> > >>>> > Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql statements, new >>>> > indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) >>>> > >>>> > Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on this >>>> > mailing list so we can get it fixed. >>>> > >>>> > I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work with >>>> > Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us know. I >>>> > also >>>> > notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on Geeklog.net that the >>>> > site >>>> > seemed to slow by a second or so. This indicates the forum could also >>>> > use a >>>> > bit of optimizing as well. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks >>>> > >>>> > Tom >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > geeklog-devel mailing list >>>> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>>> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > geeklog-devel mailing list >>>> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>>> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > geeklog-devel mailing list >>>> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>>> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > geeklog-devel mailing list >>>> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>>> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>>> > >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> geeklog-devel mailing list >>>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> geeklog-devel mailing list >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sat Oct 6 10:20:49 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 10:20:49 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? Message-ID: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> Hey All, I have been looking into the feeds a bit further and I am a little confused ... and have a few more questions: 1) Currently COM_rdfUpToDateCheck is being called in index.php where someone is likely viewing the homepage or topics. I am not sure why this was put here since a feed can change and it doesn't matter if a user views a topic or not. The updated smarter call to this should be moved to lib-common. function COM_rdfUpToDateCheck( $updated_type = '', $updated_topic = '', $updated_id = '' ) 2) You can pass an updated type to COM_rdfUpToDateCheck, for example 'calendar' like so. COM_rdfUpToDateCheck('calendar', $event_type, $eid); I assumed this would just update the calendar plugin feed but I am wrong. All it does is pass the variable to ALL the plugin functions plugin_feedupdatecheck_xxx. The plugin function is supposed to then use it (I am not sure how or why) because none of the core plugins or forum does. If you do specify a plugin then only all the plugin feeds are updated. If you specify article then ALL the feeds (article and plugin) are updated. Why does this work like this? Are we assuming there could be some relation so we just update everything? Why are plugins as a whole separated from articles? Should plugin_feedupdatecheck_calendar be smarter and check if it should be called or not? Or should COM_rdfUpToDateCheck use $updated_type to update only the correct plugin feeds? 3) Also with checking the timestamp of the article idea. We need to ensure that COM_rdfUpToDateCheck does update the feeds on article edits and deletes. Anyways I am not sure why COM_rdfUpToDateCheck was written the way it was when deciding what feeds to update. If someone could shed some light on this I would appreciate it. Thanks Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-05-12 1:57 PM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs Geeklog does have a built in cron like system as well but it can be turned off. So we could use it but we would have to make the admin aware of the issues if they turn it off. My first question is that do we need to be running this process for all the feeds (ie plugin feeds)? I think we should just be worried about articles. The plugins should manage when and if their own feeds need updating (even for future stuff). The only instance I can see where this doesn't work is the commentfeeds plugin and this would only happen if someone changed a date of an article with comments to the future (I do not see that happening at all). As far as running the process only when it is needed I thought of Ben's idea as well and think it is the simplest solution (so far) where we can keep track of the latest live article in the Geeklog vars table and then compare it every specified time period. If it has changed then we can run the process. BTW do many of you set articles to be published at a future date? Just curious because I do not since I like to send pings for my articles when they go live. >> How did you track the execution time? Nothing very scientific. I just had a bunch of echo statements all over the place to help me narrow down areas that could use some optimization. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dan Stoner Sent: October-05-12 12:38 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs I believe that Wordpress has some kind of "cron" system for doing this sort of thing, although I don't know the details of the implementation. - Dan Stoner On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 11:28 AM, Vincent Furia wrote: > I've never tried it with PHP, but we could fork (pcntl_fork) the > Content Syndication stuff so it doesn't impact the user viewing the page. > Regardless, we should not be running it on every page load. > > -Vinny > > > On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 5:51 AM, cordiste wrote: >> >> Tom, >> >> How did you track the execution time? >> >> A solution could be to only update rss every hour. If we need more >> updates, we could recorde the last run time and check if story date >> is between now and this last run on pages where this article is display. >> If yes then we update the feed. >> >> Ben >> >> 2012/10/4 Tom : >> > Okay, >> > >> > I have been doing some speed tests and it looks like Content >> > Syndication is taking about 50% of the execution time for creating >> > the homepage on Geeklog.net. >> > >> > On Geeklog.net we have 6 rss files. 4 are article related, 1 >> > comment and >> > 1 >> > forum. The main article and comment rss takes up the bulk of the >> > processing time. >> > >> > Looking at the code I see that these files are checked to be >> > updated every single time someone visits Geeklog.net/index.php >> > >> > The reason given is that Geeklog allows articles to be published in >> > the future and because of this, we need to check to see if we need >> > to rebuild the RDF file in the case that any such articles have now >> > been published. >> > >> > This is an expensive way to go about making sure the rss files are >> > updated. >> > >> > I have a few ideas on how to improve this ... but I would like to >> > hear some other suggestions! >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-04-12 11:41 AM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >> > >> > I updated Geeklog.net with a fix that should take care of the >> > anonymous users and topics not being tracked properly. >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > Note: This does not fix bug 1486 >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-03-12 9:06 AM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs >> > >> > One bug I noticed is that the anonymous users are not being tracked >> > properly for some reason. >> > >> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1487 (Default Topic >> > for Article with Multiple Topics is always Used for Anonymous >> > Users) >> > >> > This also probably causes this bug since the session information >> > seems to be getting lost: >> > >> > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1486 (Topic >> > selection is lost when trying to contribute a story as a Story >> > Admin) >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom >> > Sent: October-02-12 2:51 PM >> > To: 'Geeklog Development' >> > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net and Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 >> > >> > Hi All, >> > >> > I went ahead and released Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 today and updated >> > Geeklog.net to the RC1. >> > >> > It took a while (backups, copying files, etc..) but I only had a >> > few small hiccups that really just related to the commentfeed and >> > forum plugin updates. >> > >> > I also went ahead and switched over Geeklog.net to use the new >> > Modern Curve theme. >> > >> > The topics are also now updated to the new structure that we >> > defined in the Redesign wiki document. >> > >> > Besides fixing any bugs that crop up, one thing is apparent that we >> > need to concentrate on fixing soon. The speed of the site has >> > dropped a fair bit. >> > This was expected to a certain extent because more complex sql >> > statements are needed now since we have child topics and allow >> > stories to display in multiple topics. >> > >> > Speed on the Geeklog.net server is slow today for some reason. With >> > the old site I was seeing speeds on the homepage of roughly 1 to 3 >> > seconds. (if I recall from before this was usually under a second) >> > >> > After upgrading to 2.0.0rc1 I am seeing speeds of roughly 1 to 6 >> > seconds (averaging around 3) on the homepage which sometimes spiked >> > to 12 seconds for some reason. >> > >> > Obviously we need to fix this through more optimized sql >> > statements, new indexes, etc.. so the more help the better! :-) >> > >> > Also if you notice anything out of wack on Geeklog.net post it on >> > this mailing list so we can get it fixed. >> > >> > I forgot to mention that the forum has been updated as well to work >> > with Geeklog 2.0.0. If you notice any issues with it please let us >> > know. I also notice that when I enabled the upgraded forum on >> > Geeklog.net that the site seemed to slow by a second or so. This >> > indicates the forum could also use a bit of optimizing as well. >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Tom >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Oct 6 13:01:38 2012 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 19:01:38 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? In-Reply-To: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> References: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: Tom wrote: > 1) Currently COM_rdfUpToDateCheck is being called in index.php where someone > is likely viewing the homepage or topics. I am not sure why this was put > here since a feed can change and it doesn't matter if a user views a topic > or not. The updated smarter call to this should be moved to lib-common. The idea was probably that you really only need to publish a "future" article if someone is actually looking at the list of articles - and so you only need to update the feed when that happens. Not sure if that makes sense any more. However, moving the call to lib-common.php would obviously put even more load on the server since the check would then be run for every call to Geeklog, no matter what the current user is doing. > 2) You can pass an updated type to COM_rdfUpToDateCheck, for example > 'calendar' like so. > > COM_rdfUpToDateCheck('calendar', $event_type, $eid); > > I assumed this would just update the calendar plugin feed but I am wrong. > All it does is pass the variable to ALL the plugin functions > plugin_feedupdatecheck_xxx. The plugin function is supposed to then use it > (I am not sure how or why) because none of the core plugins or forum does. I think the type was really only used to figure out if we need to update all the feeds or only the feeds of a specific plugin (see the check in COM_rdfUpToDateCheck) > Or should COM_rdfUpToDateCheck use $updated_type to > update only the correct plugin feeds? Is that not what it's doing now? When you edit, say, a calendar entry (as an admin), COM_rdfUpToDateCheck('calendar') is called and only the calendar feeds are updated. That the 'calendar' bit is passed down to the plugin is really just redundant information, I think. bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sat Oct 6 13:33:14 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 13:33:14 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? In-Reply-To: References: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <051601cda3e8$aa05a810$fe10f830$@cogeco.net> >> Is that not what it's doing now? When you edit, say, a calendar entry (as an admin), COM_rdfUpToDateCheck('calendar') is called and only the calendar feeds are updated. That the 'calendar' bit is passed down to the plugin is really just redundant information, I think. No that is not what it is doing. If you pass a type it does nothing but pass it to all the plugins that have a feed. plugin_feedupdatecheck_xxx is run for every plugin regardless of what type is passed. So I will change the function to if a type is passed just run the feed(s) for that plugin. >> The idea was probably that you really only need to publish a "future" article if someone is actually looking at the list of articles - and so you only need to update the feed when that happens. Yeah I realize that and I guess it still makes sense since I assume some people must post a "future" article. What I plan to do is move the call to COM_rdfUpToDateCheck to lib_common but it will only run for articles if it needs too. I will store in Geeklog Var table the date/time of the lastest story that has been publish. If a quick check of this compared to the article table fails then COM_rdfUpToDateCheck will run for the articles and then the var table will be updated. When an article is saved/updated/deleted I will have to add an update to the var table as well. I do not plan to run it for other plugins in lib-common. Plugins can take care of that themselves. :-) If that makes sense then I will go ahead and update the code. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: October-06-12 1:02 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? Tom wrote: > 1) Currently COM_rdfUpToDateCheck is being called in index.php where > someone is likely viewing the homepage or topics. I am not sure why > this was put here since a feed can change and it doesn't matter if a > user views a topic or not. The updated smarter call to this should be moved to lib-common. The idea was probably that you really only need to publish a "future" article if someone is actually looking at the list of articles - and so you only need to update the feed when that happens. Not sure if that makes sense any more. However, moving the call to lib-common.php would obviously put even more load on the server since the check would then be run for every call to Geeklog, no matter what the current user is doing. > 2) You can pass an updated type to COM_rdfUpToDateCheck, for example > 'calendar' like so. > > COM_rdfUpToDateCheck('calendar', $event_type, $eid); > > I assumed this would just update the calendar plugin feed but I am wrong. > All it does is pass the variable to ALL the plugin functions > plugin_feedupdatecheck_xxx. The plugin function is supposed to then > use it (I am not sure how or why) because none of the core plugins or forum does. I think the type was really only used to figure out if we need to update all the feeds or only the feeds of a specific plugin (see the check in COM_rdfUpToDateCheck) > Or should COM_rdfUpToDateCheck use $updated_type to update only the > correct plugin feeds? Is that not what it's doing now? When you edit, say, a calendar entry (as an admin), COM_rdfUpToDateCheck('calendar') is called and only the calendar feeds are updated. That the 'calendar' bit is passed down to the plugin is really just redundant information, I think. bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Oct 6 15:27:25 2012 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:27:25 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? In-Reply-To: <051601cda3e8$aa05a810$fe10f830$@cogeco.net> References: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> <051601cda3e8$aa05a810$fe10f830$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <31673C66-1005-436A-86A8-10A2B7B89B7E@haun-online.de> Tom wrote: > No that is not what it is doing. If you pass a type it does nothing but pass > it to all the plugins that have a feed. plugin_feedupdatecheck_xxx is run > for every plugin regardless of what type is passed. You're right. And that doesn't make any sense. > So I will change the function to if a type is passed just run the feed(s) > for that plugin. I guess it would be enough to fix the first $sql assignment to check for (type = '$updated_type') instead of (type <> 'article') > What I plan to do is move the call to COM_rdfUpToDateCheck to lib_common but > it will only run for articles if it needs too. I will store in Geeklog Var > table the date/time of the lastest story that has been publish. If a quick > check of this compared to the article table fails then COM_rdfUpToDateCheck > will run for the articles and then the var table will be updated. When an > article is saved/updated/deleted I will have to add an update to the var > table as well. > > I do not plan to run it for other plugins in lib-common. Plugins can take > care of that themselves. :-) > > If that makes sense then I will go ahead and update the code. I'm still a little worried about a possible performance impact but if you think you've got that covered - go ahead. bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Oct 6 15:31:32 2012 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 21:31:32 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog 2.0.0rc1 Bugs In-Reply-To: <04bc01cda322$c02d9240$4088b6c0$@cogeco.net> References: <036001cda167$dfe850a0$9fb8f1e0$@cogeco.net> <040e01cda246$b907f7d0$2b17e770$@cogeco.net> <043601cda264$42af0c90$c80d25b0$@cogeco.net> <04bc01cda322$c02d9240$4088b6c0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: Tom wrote: > BTW do many of you set articles to be published at a future date? As a matter of fact, I have two articles set to be auto-published on Monday :) > Just > curious because I do not since I like to send pings for my articles when > they go live. Yeah, me too. I was actually thinking about looking into implementing an automatic ping to go with the auto-publish. I wasn't aware of the auto ping plugin that Ben mentioned - need to check that out. bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sat Oct 6 16:47:54 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 16:47:54 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? In-Reply-To: <31673C66-1005-436A-86A8-10A2B7B89B7E@haun-online.de> References: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> <051601cda3e8$aa05a810$fe10f830$@cogeco.net> <31673C66-1005-436A-86A8-10A2B7B89B7E@haun-online.de> Message-ID: <051a01cda403$dd2eee70$978ccb50$@cogeco.net> >> I'm still a little worried about a possible performance impact but if you think you've got that covered - go ahead. I think it will be okay, it will be just doing a simple check against dates for the most part (sort of how the Geeklog cron works). -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: October-06-12 3:27 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? Tom wrote: > No that is not what it is doing. If you pass a type it does nothing > but pass it to all the plugins that have a feed. > plugin_feedupdatecheck_xxx is run for every plugin regardless of what type is passed. You're right. And that doesn't make any sense. > So I will change the function to if a type is passed just run the > feed(s) for that plugin. I guess it would be enough to fix the first $sql assignment to check for (type = '$updated_type') instead of (type <> 'article') > What I plan to do is move the call to COM_rdfUpToDateCheck to > lib_common but it will only run for articles if it needs too. I will > store in Geeklog Var table the date/time of the lastest story that has > been publish. If a quick check of this compared to the article table > fails then COM_rdfUpToDateCheck will run for the articles and then the > var table will be updated. When an article is saved/updated/deleted I > will have to add an update to the var table as well. > > I do not plan to run it for other plugins in lib-common. Plugins can > take care of that themselves. :-) > > If that makes sense then I will go ahead and update the code. I'm still a little worried about a possible performance impact but if you think you've got that covered - go ahead. bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Tue Oct 9 10:49:14 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 10:49:14 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? In-Reply-To: <051a01cda403$dd2eee70$978ccb50$@cogeco.net> References: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> <051601cda3e8$aa05a810$fe10f830$@cogeco.net> <31673C66-1005-436A-86A8-10A2B7B89B7E@haun-online.de> <051a01cda403$dd2eee70$978ccb50$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <05a101cda62d$40983b30$c1c8b190$@cogeco.net> Grrr.... :-) While working on this fix I just realized why Geeklog feeds was run for all plugins in index.php and not just for articles. I think it mainly has to do with the commentfeeds plugin. This is the only way the commentfeeds plugin can currently be triggered since when a comment is created/updated/deleted no notification goes out to the plugins (and therefore it has no idea that the comment feed needs updating). I never really understood why we had a separate commentfeeds plugin and why the comment feed code was not just incorporated into Geeklog since the rest of the comment code is part of core. I think the best way around this is for me to go ahead and make comment feeds a part of core. This should be the only plugin affected since comments was the only part of core that did not have a feed. Too bad I wasted time updating the commentsfeed plugin. Anyways let me know who is for or against this change (and the reason why) Thanks Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-06-12 4:48 PM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? >> I'm still a little worried about a possible performance impact but if >> you think you've got that covered - go ahead. I think it will be okay, it will be just doing a simple check against dates for the most part (sort of how the Geeklog cron works). -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: October-06-12 3:27 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? Tom wrote: > No that is not what it is doing. If you pass a type it does nothing > but pass it to all the plugins that have a feed. > plugin_feedupdatecheck_xxx is run for every plugin regardless of what > type is passed. You're right. And that doesn't make any sense. > So I will change the function to if a type is passed just run the > feed(s) for that plugin. I guess it would be enough to fix the first $sql assignment to check for (type = '$updated_type') instead of (type <> 'article') > What I plan to do is move the call to COM_rdfUpToDateCheck to > lib_common but it will only run for articles if it needs too. I will > store in Geeklog Var table the date/time of the lastest story that has > been publish. If a quick check of this compared to the article table > fails then COM_rdfUpToDateCheck will run for the articles and then the > var table will be updated. When an article is saved/updated/deleted I > will have to add an update to the var table as well. > > I do not plan to run it for other plugins in lib-common. Plugins can > take care of that themselves. :-) > > If that makes sense then I will go ahead and update the code. I'm still a little worried about a possible performance impact but if you think you've got that covered - go ahead. bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From cordiste at free.fr Tue Oct 9 12:52:04 2012 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2012 18:52:04 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? In-Reply-To: <05a101cda62d$40983b30$c1c8b190$@cogeco.net> References: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> <051601cda3e8$aa05a810$fe10f830$@cogeco.net> <31673C66-1005-436A-86A8-10A2B7B89B7E@haun-online.de> <051a01cda403$dd2eee70$978ccb50$@cogeco.net> <05a101cda62d$40983b30$c1c8b190$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: +1 for the comment feed integration into the core Ben 2012/10/9 Tom : > Grrr.... :-) > > While working on this fix I just realized why Geeklog feeds was run for all > plugins in index.php and not just for articles. > > I think it mainly has to do with the commentfeeds plugin. This is the only > way the commentfeeds plugin can currently be triggered since when a comment > is created/updated/deleted no notification goes out to the plugins (and > therefore it has no idea that the comment feed needs updating). > > I never really understood why we had a separate commentfeeds plugin and why > the comment feed code was not just incorporated into Geeklog since the rest > of the comment code is part of core. > > I think the best way around this is for me to go ahead and make comment > feeds a part of core. This should be the only plugin affected since comments > was the only part of core that did not have a feed. > > Too bad I wasted time updating the commentsfeed plugin. Anyways let me know > who is for or against this change (and the reason why) > > Thanks > > Tom > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom > Sent: October-06-12 4:48 PM > To: 'Geeklog Development' > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? > >>> I'm still a little worried about a possible performance impact but if >>> you > think you've got that covered - go ahead. > > I think it will be okay, it will be just doing a simple check against dates > for the most part (sort of how the Geeklog cron works). > > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun > Sent: October-06-12 3:27 PM > To: Geeklog Development > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? > > Tom wrote: > >> No that is not what it is doing. If you pass a type it does nothing >> but pass it to all the plugins that have a feed. >> plugin_feedupdatecheck_xxx is run for every plugin regardless of what >> type > is passed. > > You're right. And that doesn't make any sense. > > >> So I will change the function to if a type is passed just run the >> feed(s) for that plugin. > > I guess it would be enough to fix the first $sql assignment to check for > (type = '$updated_type') instead of (type <> 'article') > > >> What I plan to do is move the call to COM_rdfUpToDateCheck to >> lib_common but it will only run for articles if it needs too. I will >> store in Geeklog Var table the date/time of the lastest story that has >> been publish. If a quick check of this compared to the article table >> fails then COM_rdfUpToDateCheck will run for the articles and then the >> var table will be updated. When an article is saved/updated/deleted I >> will have to add an update to the var table as well. >> >> I do not plan to run it for other plugins in lib-common. Plugins can >> take care of that themselves. :-) >> >> If that makes sense then I will go ahead and update the code. > > > I'm still a little worried about a possible performance impact but if you > think you've got that covered - go ahead. > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sat Oct 13 10:00:10 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 10:00:10 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds and how they are suppose to work? In-Reply-To: References: <050f01cda3cd$c8c85dd0$5a591970$@cogeco.net> <051601cda3e8$aa05a810$fe10f830$@cogeco.net> <31673C66-1005-436A-86A8-10A2B7B89B7E@haun-online.de> <051a01cda403$dd2eee70$978ccb50$@cogeco.net> <05a101cda62d$40983b30$c1c8b190$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <019101cda94b$0eedcfc0$2cc96f40$@cogeco.net> Hey All, FYI I almost have the comment feed integration stuff finished. I will be updating the repository soon. I also was checking the Geeklog error file and ran across a couple of repeating errors dealing with the listfactory class and trackbacks. I have added in the bug reports for them if anyone cares to take a look. I believe there are also a few other RC1 bugs to take care of as well. Thanks Tom From taharaxp at gmail.com Mon Oct 15 10:20:38 2012 From: taharaxp at gmail.com (Yoshinori Tahara) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 23:20:38 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager Message-ID: Hi All, I was feeling a feeling of strangeness about the Topic Manager. Why is it a list of the icon? Less information. In the activities of Tom, we got the new Topic Engine now. If so, let's also get new Topic Manager. Image: http://taharaxp.minus.com/lReHtbfuASj5K Thoughts and comments please. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen From websitemaster at cogeco.net Mon Oct 15 11:15:10 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 11:15:10 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <021d01cdaae7$de018020$9a048060$@cogeco.net> Almost anything would be better than what we have now :-) I just ran out of time and the original Topics Editor works so I just left it with the hopes someone else would update it. My original idea was to use some jQuery with a tree plugin and combine a tree and the topic edit form all on one page. This would obviously take a bit of time. I like your idea as well. I see that the topics are indented in the Topic Name column. Does that show which topics are children of other topics? Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori Tahara Sent: October-15-12 10:21 AM To: Geeklog Development Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager Hi All, I was feeling a feeling of strangeness about the Topic Manager. Why is it a list of the icon? Less information. In the activities of Tom, we got the new Topic Engine now. If so, let's also get new Topic Manager. Image: http://taharaxp.minus.com/lReHtbfuASj5K Thoughts and comments please. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Oct 15 12:53:26 2012 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 18:53:26 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> Yoshinori Tahara wrote: > Why is it a list of the icon? Less information. Not exactly a new complaint :) http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=968 > Image: > http://taharaxp.minus.com/lReHtbfuASj5K Looks nice. Topic icons are 48x48 pixels, traditionally. Would you scale them down to display them in a list? bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ From websitemaster at cogeco.net Mon Oct 15 13:41:55 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 13:41:55 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Feeds Changes committed Message-ID: <023c01cdaafc$5ef1ae30$1cd50a90$@cogeco.net> Just a note that I have updated the main repository with my latest changes dealing with comment feeds and when the article feeds are update. When I pushed the changes I had a bunch of Recipient address rejected error messages so I am not sure if the csv mailing list would get the updates. Tom From taharaxp at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 08:09:29 2012 From: taharaxp at gmail.com (Yoshinori Tahara) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 21:09:29 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> Message-ID: >> Tom wrote: > My original idea was to use some jQuery with a tree plugin and combine a > tree and the topic edit form all on one page. This would obviously take a > bit of time. We should take advantage of jQuery and Ajax more aggressively. I think it is a future issue. >> Tom wrote: > I see that the topics are indented in the Topic Name column. Does that show > which topics are children of other topics? It is as you have already guessed. >> Dirk Haun wrote: > Not exactly a new complaint :) http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=968 Thanks for the information. It was the information I was looking for. They have demonstrated that there is a need. >> Dirk Haun wrote: > Looks nice. Topic icons are 48x48 pixels, traditionally. > Would you scale them down to display them in a list? Yes, I did so. I tried some scale. 48x48, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16. As a result, my best choice was 24x24 (half size of 48x48). Thanks -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen From websitemaster at cogeco.net Tue Oct 16 09:04:04 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 09:04:04 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> Message-ID: <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> >> We should take advantage of jQuery and Ajax more aggressively. >> I think it is a future issue. Agree. What does the Expand button due in your picture? Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori Tahara Sent: October-16-12 8:09 AM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager >> Tom wrote: > My original idea was to use some jQuery with a tree plugin and combine > a tree and the topic edit form all on one page. This would obviously > take a bit of time. We should take advantage of jQuery and Ajax more aggressively. I think it is a future issue. >> Tom wrote: > I see that the topics are indented in the Topic Name column. Does that > show which topics are children of other topics? It is as you have already guessed. >> Dirk Haun wrote: > Not exactly a new complaint :) > http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=968 Thanks for the information. It was the information I was looking for. They have demonstrated that there is a need. >> Dirk Haun wrote: > Looks nice. Topic icons are 48x48 pixels, traditionally. > Would you scale them down to display them in a list? Yes, I did so. I tried some scale. 48x48, 24x24, 20x20, 16x16. As a result, my best choice was 24x24 (half size of 48x48). Thanks -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From taharaxp at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 09:11:42 2012 From: taharaxp at gmail.com (Yoshinori Tahara) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 22:11:42 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: > Tom wrote: > What does the Expand button due in your picture? This is a toggle button to Expand or Fit the admin list table. It is a unique feature of Denim theme. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen From taharaxp at gmail.com Tue Oct 16 11:22:56 2012 From: taharaxp at gmail.com (Yoshinori Tahara) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:22:56 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: Added a Story column. Image: http://minus.com/lug8MVXsklKEg -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Oct 17 03:38:43 2012 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:38:43 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Fwd: RSS-Feed Message-ID: <20121017093843.Horde.Zb1jedjz9kRQfmCDvjslFxA@webmail.df.eu> Forwarding this with the attachment (I hope), since I'm seeing the same thing: Some of the stories show up twice in the RSS feed. I just checked the actual geeklog.rss feed file, and the two stories (Geeklog 2.0.0 Release Candidate 1, New Theme "newspaper_en" Uses Responsive Web Design) are duplicated in the feed - but only these two. In other words, something's wrong with the RSS feeds in 2.0.0 bye, Dirk ----- Forwarded message from Markus Wollschlaeger ----- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:52:44 +0200 From: Markus Wollschlaeger Subject: RSS-Feed To: Dirk Haun Hi Dirk, hast du gemerkt, dass Geeklog.net den RSS-Feed 2 x schreibt bzw. Google in 2 x reinzieht? Ciao, Markus ----- End forwarded message ----- -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Markus Wollschlaeger Subject: RSS-Feed Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:52:44 +0200 Size: 55719 URL: From websitemaster at cogeco.net Wed Oct 17 09:01:53 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 09:01:53 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Fwd: RSS-Feed In-Reply-To: <20121017093843.Horde.Zb1jedjz9kRQfmCDvjslFxA@webmail.df.eu> References: <20121017093843.Horde.Zb1jedjz9kRQfmCDvjslFxA@webmail.df.eu> Message-ID: <00da01cdac67$94adcec0$be096c40$@cogeco.net> Has a bug report been made for this? Those 2 articles have multiple topics so it will be something dealing with that. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: October-17-12 3:39 AM To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net Subject: [geeklog-devel] Fwd: RSS-Feed Forwarding this with the attachment (I hope), since I'm seeing the same thing: Some of the stories show up twice in the RSS feed. I just checked the actual geeklog.rss feed file, and the two stories (Geeklog 2.0.0 Release Candidate 1, New Theme "newspaper_en" Uses Responsive Web Design) are duplicated in the feed - but only these two. In other words, something's wrong with the RSS feeds in 2.0.0 bye, Dirk ----- Forwarded message from Markus Wollschlaeger ----- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:52:44 +0200 From: Markus Wollschlaeger Subject: RSS-Feed To: Dirk Haun Hi Dirk, hast du gemerkt, dass Geeklog.net den RSS-Feed 2 x schreibt bzw. Google in 2 x reinzieht? Ciao, Markus ----- End forwarded message ----- -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ From websitemaster at cogeco.net Wed Oct 17 10:14:43 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 10:14:43 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Fwd: RSS-Feed In-Reply-To: <00da01cdac67$94adcec0$be096c40$@cogeco.net> References: <20121017093843.Horde.Zb1jedjz9kRQfmCDvjslFxA@webmail.df.eu> <00da01cdac67$94adcec0$be096c40$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <00f801cdac71$c173b500$445b1f00$@cogeco.net> Okay the bug is fixed. Now only the article with the default topic will be displayed. Dirk can you also run the script on the language files since the comment feed stuff added a few new text? Once updated I can update Geeklog.net with the most recent changes. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: October-17-12 9:02 AM To: 'Geeklog Development' Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Fwd: RSS-Feed Has a bug report been made for this? Those 2 articles have multiple topics so it will be something dealing with that. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: October-17-12 3:39 AM To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net Subject: [geeklog-devel] Fwd: RSS-Feed Forwarding this with the attachment (I hope), since I'm seeing the same thing: Some of the stories show up twice in the RSS feed. I just checked the actual geeklog.rss feed file, and the two stories (Geeklog 2.0.0 Release Candidate 1, New Theme "newspaper_en" Uses Responsive Web Design) are duplicated in the feed - but only these two. In other words, something's wrong with the RSS feeds in 2.0.0 bye, Dirk ----- Forwarded message from Markus Wollschlaeger ----- Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 00:52:44 +0200 From: Markus Wollschlaeger Subject: RSS-Feed To: Dirk Haun Hi Dirk, hast du gemerkt, dass Geeklog.net den RSS-Feed 2 x schreibt bzw. Google in 2 x reinzieht? Ciao, Markus ----- End forwarded message ----- -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From chipper at llamas.net Wed Oct 17 15:31:24 2012 From: chipper at llamas.net (Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 15:31:24 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site Message-ID: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> Folks, The time has come that I retire my colo and I must ask you to search for a new host for wiki.geeklog.net. I'm not in any rush and will assist in the transfer in any way I can. It's been an honor to be able to help you these last few years. Chip -- ------ **** Warning **** This e-mail message, without warrant or warning, and despite US law as set forth in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, may be subject to monitoring by the United States National Security Agency and/or the Department of Defense. Information contained in this message may be used against any senders or recipients, now or in the future, in a public trial or secret tribunal. Please encrypt anything important. PGP Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6CFA486D From danstoner at gmail.com Thu Oct 18 09:42:23 2012 From: danstoner at gmail.com (Dan Stoner) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:42:23 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> Message-ID: I have a VPS server (Linode) that might be sufficient for this purpose, let me know if there is need. - Dan Stoner On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio wrote: > > Folks, > > The time has come that I retire my colo and I must ask you to search for a > new host for wiki.geeklog.net. I'm not in any rush and will assist in the > transfer in any way I can. > > It's been an honor to be able to help you these last few years. > > Chip > > -- > ------ > **** Warning **** > This e-mail message, without warrant or warning, and despite US law as set > forth in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, may be subject > to monitoring by the United States National Security Agency and/or the > Department of Defense. Information contained in this message may be used > against any senders or recipients, now or in the future, in a public trial > or secret tribunal. > Please encrypt anything important. > PGP Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6CFA486D > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Thu Oct 18 10:23:48 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 10:23:48 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> Message-ID: <01a001cdad3c$309979e0$91cc6da0$@cogeco.net> Thanks Chip for hosting the wiki over the last few years. Thanks Dan for the offer. I will let Dirk handle this since I believe he has dealt with the wiki setup/migration before. I am sure he will be in touch with you soon for more information. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dan Stoner Sent: October-18-12 9:42 AM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site I have a VPS server (Linode) that might be sufficient for this purpose, let me know if there is need. - Dan Stoner On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio wrote: > > Folks, > > The time has come that I retire my colo and I must ask you to search > for a new host for wiki.geeklog.net. I'm not in any rush and will > assist in the transfer in any way I can. > > It's been an honor to be able to help you these last few years. > > Chip > > -- > ------ > **** Warning **** This e-mail message, > without warrant or warning, and despite US law as set forth in the > Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, may be subject to > monitoring by the United States National Security Agency and/or the > Department of Defense. Information contained in this message may be > used against any senders or recipients, now or in the future, in a > public trial or secret tribunal. > Please encrypt anything important. > PGP Key: > http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6CFA486D > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Oct 18 14:13:20 2012 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 20:13:20 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> Message-ID: <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio wrote: > The time has come that I retire my colo and I must ask you to search for a > new host for wiki.geeklog.net. I'm not in any rush and will assist in the > transfer in any way I can. > > It's been an honor to be able to help you these last few years. Chris, thanks a lot for hosting the wiki all those years :) I don't remember any major hiccups - smooth sailing most of the time. Good job :) I was about to ask "any takers?" but it seems we already have one: Dan Stoner wrote: > I have a VPS server (Linode) that might be sufficient for this > purpose, let me know if there is need. Thanks for the offer. I'll get in touch with both of you via email. bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ From cordiste at free.fr Fri Oct 19 10:32:04 2012 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2012 16:32:04 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> Message-ID: Would it be helpfull (interesting, attractive, favorable, refreshing or lovely) to make mediawiki integration for geeklog? Ben 2012/10/18 Dirk Haun : > Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio wrote: > >> The time has come that I retire my colo and I must ask you to search for a >> new host for wiki.geeklog.net. I'm not in any rush and will assist in the >> transfer in any way I can. >> >> It's been an honor to be able to help you these last few years. > > > Chris, thanks a lot for hosting the wiki all those years :) I don't remember any major hiccups - smooth sailing most of the time. Good job :) > > > I was about to ask "any takers?" but it seems we already have one: > > Dan Stoner wrote: > >> I have a VPS server (Linode) that might be sufficient for this >> purpose, let me know if there is need. > > Thanks for the offer. I'll get in touch with both of you via email. > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From taharaxp at gmail.com Sun Oct 21 01:34:48 2012 From: taharaxp at gmail.com (Yoshinori Tahara) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 14:34:48 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: For the sake of clarity, I've added an Image column. And I've added a feature to pop-up a topic image of the actual size. Now, maybe necessary functions are covered. Image: http://minus.com/lbvi44BQpox600 Please approve this draft code to be committed to the repository. Thanks -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sun Oct 21 09:43:34 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2012 09:43:34 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <007601cdaf92$10aa1380$31fe3a80$@cogeco.net> Looks good to me... Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori Tahara Sent: October-21-12 1:35 AM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager For the sake of clarity, I've added an Image column. And I've added a feature to pop-up a topic image of the actual size. Now, maybe necessary functions are covered. Image: http://minus.com/lbvi44BQpox600 Please approve this draft code to be committed to the repository. Thanks -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From danstoner at gmail.com Wed Oct 24 12:28:49 2012 From: danstoner at gmail.com (Dan Stoner) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:28:49 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> Message-ID: I have a copy of the wiki running here: http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/ This should be a 1:1 duplicate of the existing geeklog wiki site. If things seem to be ok at this stage, I want to go ahead and try an upgrade to the latest MediaWiki version. This is all still testing / proof of concept phase. Please report any issues you discover (including performance, etc.). Thanks! - Dan Stoner On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Dirk Haun wrote: > Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio wrote: > >> The time has come that I retire my colo and I must ask you to search for a >> new host for wiki.geeklog.net. I'm not in any rush and will assist in the >> transfer in any way I can. >> >> It's been an honor to be able to help you these last few years. > > > Chris, thanks a lot for hosting the wiki all those years :) I don't remember any major hiccups - smooth sailing most of the time. Good job :) > > > I was about to ask "any takers?" but it seems we already have one: > > Dan Stoner wrote: > >> I have a VPS server (Linode) that might be sufficient for this >> purpose, let me know if there is need. > > Thanks for the offer. I'll get in touch with both of you via email. > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Wed Oct 24 15:31:47 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 15:31:47 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> Message-ID: <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dan Stoner Sent: October-24-12 12:29 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site I have a copy of the wiki running here: http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/ This should be a 1:1 duplicate of the existing geeklog wiki site. If things seem to be ok at this stage, I want to go ahead and try an upgrade to the latest MediaWiki version. This is all still testing / proof of concept phase. Please report any issues you discover (including performance, etc.). Thanks! - Dan Stoner On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Dirk Haun wrote: > Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio wrote: > >> The time has come that I retire my colo and I must ask you to search >> for a new host for wiki.geeklog.net. I'm not in any rush and will >> assist in the transfer in any way I can. >> >> It's been an honor to be able to help you these last few years. > > > Chris, thanks a lot for hosting the wiki all those years :) I don't > remember any major hiccups - smooth sailing most of the time. Good job > :) > > > I was about to ask "any takers?" but it seems we already have one: > > Dan Stoner wrote: > >> I have a VPS server (Linode) that might be sufficient for this >> purpose, let me know if there is need. > > Thanks for the offer. I'll get in touch with both of you via email. > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Oct 24 15:55:56 2012 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:55:56 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> Tom wrote: > Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging in), not even an error. bye, Dirk -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ From rouslan at placella.com Wed Oct 24 16:02:57 2012 From: rouslan at placella.com (Rouslan Placella) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 21:02:57 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> Message-ID: <50884971.4020407@placella.com> Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: > Tom wrote: > >> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. > > > Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging in), not even an error. > > bye, Dirk > > That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). Bye, Rouslan From danstoner at gmail.com Wed Oct 24 20:42:48 2012 From: danstoner at gmail.com (Dan Stoner) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:42:48 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <50884971.4020407@placella.com> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> <50884971.4020407@placella.com> Message-ID: I see some the PHP Fatal errors in the log. [Wed Oct 24 18:38:47 2012] [error] [client ] PHP Fatal error: Call to a member function getCacheTime() on a non-object in <...>/mediawiki-1.13.4/includes/Article.php on line 3387, referer: http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages All the Fatals are on the getCacheTime() function. The existing site is using memcached (I think), whereas I am not (yet?). I thought I disabled it but maybe there are some other cache settings I didn't notice. Pages are working ok for me now (no changes). I actually don't have an editing account. Were all of you who had issues logged into the wiki, or viewing anonymously? I'll poke around... - Dan Stoner On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rouslan Placella wrote: > Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: > >> Tom wrote: >> >>> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. >> >> >> >> Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging in), >> not even an error. >> >> bye, Dirk >> >> > > That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). > > Bye, > Rouslan > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From cordiste at free.fr Thu Oct 25 05:13:32 2012 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:13:32 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> <50884971.4020407@placella.com> Message-ID: Anonymously everything is display but when I logged into the wiki I get blank pages. Ben 2012/10/25 Dan Stoner > I see some the PHP Fatal errors in the log. > > [Wed Oct 24 18:38:47 2012] [error] [client ] PHP Fatal > error: Call to a member function getCacheTime() on a non-object in > <...>/mediawiki-1.13.4/includes/Article.php on line 3387, referer: > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages > > All the Fatals are on the getCacheTime() function. > > > The existing site is using memcached (I think), whereas I am not > (yet?). I thought I disabled it but maybe there are some other cache > settings I didn't notice. Pages are working ok for me now (no > changes). > > > I actually don't have an editing account. Were all of you who had > issues logged into the wiki, or viewing anonymously? > > > I'll poke around... > > - Dan Stoner > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rouslan Placella > wrote: > > Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: > > > >> Tom wrote: > >> > >>> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. > >> > >> > >> > >> Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging in), > >> not even an error. > >> > >> bye, Dirk > >> > >> > > > > That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). > > > > Bye, > > Rouslan > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danstoner at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 09:08:07 2012 From: danstoner at gmail.com (Dan Stoner) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:08:07 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> <50884971.4020407@placella.com> Message-ID: Thanks for the feedback, that helps narrow down the case for reproducing the issue. Could be a bug / interraction between old mediawiki and new PHP... http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/wiki/mediawiki/225396#225396 I'll post back when I have more time to look at it. p.s. Let me know the group's expectations for response time / commitment for these sorts of things. - Dan Stoner On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 5:13 AM, cordiste wrote: > Anonymously everything is display but when I logged into the wiki I get > blank pages. > > Ben > > > 2012/10/25 Dan Stoner >> >> I see some the PHP Fatal errors in the log. >> >> [Wed Oct 24 18:38:47 2012] [error] [client ] PHP Fatal >> error: Call to a member function getCacheTime() on a non-object in >> <...>/mediawiki-1.13.4/includes/Article.php on line 3387, referer: >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages >> >> All the Fatals are on the getCacheTime() function. >> >> >> The existing site is using memcached (I think), whereas I am not >> (yet?). I thought I disabled it but maybe there are some other cache >> settings I didn't notice. Pages are working ok for me now (no >> changes). >> >> >> I actually don't have an editing account. Were all of you who had >> issues logged into the wiki, or viewing anonymously? >> >> >> I'll poke around... >> >> - Dan Stoner >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rouslan Placella >> wrote: >> > Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: >> > >> >> Tom wrote: >> >> >> >>> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging in), >> >> not even an error. >> >> >> >> bye, Dirk >> >> >> >> >> > >> > That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). >> > >> > Bye, >> > Rouslan >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > geeklog-devel mailing list >> > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From websitemaster at cogeco.net Thu Oct 25 09:15:04 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:15:04 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> <50884971.4020407@placella.com> Message-ID: <027101cdb2b2$bf202490$3d606db0$@cogeco.net> Same here except now I can see a few pages while logged in http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:Preferences http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:RecentChanges while others like http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Main_Page http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code I receive a 500 error From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste Sent: October-25-12 5:14 AM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site Anonymously everything is display but when I logged into the wiki I get blank pages. Ben 2012/10/25 Dan Stoner I see some the PHP Fatal errors in the log. [Wed Oct 24 18:38:47 2012] [error] [client ] PHP Fatal error: Call to a member function getCacheTime() on a non-object in <...>/mediawiki-1.13.4/includes/Article.php on line 3387, referer: http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages All the Fatals are on the getCacheTime() function. The existing site is using memcached (I think), whereas I am not (yet?). I thought I disabled it but maybe there are some other cache settings I didn't notice. Pages are working ok for me now (no changes). I actually don't have an editing account. Were all of you who had issues logged into the wiki, or viewing anonymously? I'll poke around... - Dan Stoner On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rouslan Placella wrote: > Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: > >> Tom wrote: >> >>> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. >> >> >> >> Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging in), >> not even an error. >> >> bye, Dirk >> >> > > That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). > > Bye, > Rouslan > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From websitemaster at cogeco.net Thu Oct 25 09:35:06 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 09:35:06 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> Message-ID: <000001cdb2b5$8be88ab0$a3b9a010$@cogeco.net> It is interesting idea but it is something that would have to be maintained... Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste Sent: October-19-12 10:32 AM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site Would it be helpfull (interesting, attractive, favorable, refreshing or lovely) to make mediawiki integration for geeklog? Ben 2012/10/18 Dirk Haun : > Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio wrote: > >> The time has come that I retire my colo and I must ask you to search >> for a new host for wiki.geeklog.net. I'm not in any rush and will >> assist in the transfer in any way I can. >> >> It's been an honor to be able to help you these last few years. > > > Chris, thanks a lot for hosting the wiki all those years :) I don't > remember any major hiccups - smooth sailing most of the time. Good job > :) > > > I was about to ask "any takers?" but it seems we already have one: > > Dan Stoner wrote: > >> I have a VPS server (Linode) that might be sufficient for this >> purpose, let me know if there is need. > > Thanks for the offer. I'll get in touch with both of you via email. > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Thu Oct 25 15:44:34 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 15:44:34 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net - Stop Forum Spam Module Message-ID: <003c01cdb2e9$28e62d30$7ab28790$@cogeco.net> FYI A fix/patch was applied for the Stop Forum Spam Module. This has now been enabled again on Geeklog.net See: http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1488 I also added this feature request to use the SFS module on more than just new user submissions http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=1508 Tom From danstoner at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 23:23:21 2012 From: danstoner at gmail.com (Dan Stoner) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:23:21 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <027101cdb2b2$bf202490$3d606db0$@cogeco.net> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> <50884971.4020407@placella.com> <027101cdb2b2$bf202490$3d606db0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: I've upgraded the test/new wiki to latest MediaWiki 1.19.2 (the existing site runs 1.13.2 which was released in 2009). This solved the 500 error for my account, hopefully also for others. http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/ Clearly I still need to tweak some settings. There is a fair amount of functionality change since the 2009 release. For example, Special:AllPages no longer just shows all pages, one must first pick a range. I noticed some issues with the upgrade that seem to be tied to the content. 1. The Google Summer of Code trademark symbol broke the page display on: http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code I edited out the TM character to make the page content display. I'm not sure of the source of this character issue (OS, Apache, or database?). 2. Some articles were created with raw HTML rather than wikitext. The most notable thing that breaks from this are HTML anchor tags. I think it would be best to edit these stories with wikitext rather than allowing raw HTML. Example of a particularly heinous amount of editing that would be required: http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/ConfigFile14 Comments appreciated. I'm sleepy and my eyes hurt. Be back at it sometime this weekend I think. - Dan Stoner On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Tom wrote: > Same here except now I can see a few pages while logged in > > > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:Preferences > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:RecentChanges > > > > while others like > > > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Main_Page > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code > > > > I receive a 500 error > > > > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste > Sent: October-25-12 5:14 AM > > > To: Geeklog Development > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site > > > > Anonymously everything is display but when I logged into the wiki I get > blank pages. > > Ben > > 2012/10/25 Dan Stoner > > I see some the PHP Fatal errors in the log. > > [Wed Oct 24 18:38:47 2012] [error] [client ] PHP Fatal > error: Call to a member function getCacheTime() on a non-object in > <...>/mediawiki-1.13.4/includes/Article.php on line 3387, referer: > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages > > All the Fatals are on the getCacheTime() function. > > > The existing site is using memcached (I think), whereas I am not > (yet?). I thought I disabled it but maybe there are some other cache > settings I didn't notice. Pages are working ok for me now (no > changes). > > > I actually don't have an editing account. Were all of you who had > issues logged into the wiki, or viewing anonymously? > > > I'll poke around... > > - Dan Stoner > > > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rouslan Placella > wrote: >> Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: >> >>> Tom wrote: >>> >>>> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. >>> >>> >>> >>> Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging in), >>> not even an error. >>> >>> bye, Dirk >>> >>> >> >> That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). >> >> Bye, >> Rouslan >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From danstoner at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 23:24:16 2012 From: danstoner at gmail.com (Dan Stoner) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 23:24:16 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> <50884971.4020407@placella.com> <027101cdb2b2$bf202490$3d606db0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: edit: the existing site runs 1.13.4 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Dan Stoner wrote: > I've upgraded the test/new wiki to latest MediaWiki 1.19.2 (the > existing site runs 1.13.2 which was released in 2009). This solved > the 500 error for my account, hopefully also for others. > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/ > > Clearly I still need to tweak some settings. > > There is a fair amount of functionality change since the 2009 release. > For example, Special:AllPages no longer just shows all pages, one must > first pick a range. > > > I noticed some issues with the upgrade that seem to be tied to the content. > > 1. The Google Summer of Code trademark symbol broke the page display on: > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code > > I edited out the TM character to make the page content display. I'm > not sure of the source of this character issue (OS, Apache, or > database?). > > > 2. Some articles were created with raw HTML rather than wikitext. The > most notable thing that breaks from this are HTML anchor tags. I > think it would be best to edit these stories with wikitext rather than > allowing raw HTML. Example of a particularly heinous amount of editing > that would be required: > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/ConfigFile14 > > Comments appreciated. > > I'm sleepy and my eyes hurt. Be back at it sometime this weekend I think. > > - Dan Stoner > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Tom wrote: >> Same here except now I can see a few pages while logged in >> >> >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:Preferences >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:RecentChanges >> >> >> >> while others like >> >> >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Main_Page >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code >> >> >> >> I receive a 500 error >> >> >> >> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of cordiste >> Sent: October-25-12 5:14 AM >> >> >> To: Geeklog Development >> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site >> >> >> >> Anonymously everything is display but when I logged into the wiki I get >> blank pages. >> >> Ben >> >> 2012/10/25 Dan Stoner >> >> I see some the PHP Fatal errors in the log. >> >> [Wed Oct 24 18:38:47 2012] [error] [client ] PHP Fatal >> error: Call to a member function getCacheTime() on a non-object in >> <...>/mediawiki-1.13.4/includes/Article.php on line 3387, referer: >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages >> >> All the Fatals are on the getCacheTime() function. >> >> >> The existing site is using memcached (I think), whereas I am not >> (yet?). I thought I disabled it but maybe there are some other cache >> settings I didn't notice. Pages are working ok for me now (no >> changes). >> >> >> I actually don't have an editing account. Were all of you who had >> issues logged into the wiki, or viewing anonymously? >> >> >> I'll poke around... >> >> - Dan Stoner >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rouslan Placella >> wrote: >>> Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: >>> >>>> Tom wrote: >>>> >>>>> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging in), >>>> not even an error. >>>> >>>> bye, Dirk >>>> >>>> >>> >>> That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). >>> >>> Bye, >>> Rouslan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> geeklog-devel mailing list >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> From taharaxp at gmail.com Fri Oct 26 09:06:07 2012 From: taharaxp at gmail.com (Yoshinori Tahara) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:06:07 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: <007601cdaf92$10aa1380$31fe3a80$@cogeco.net> References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> <007601cdaf92$10aa1380$31fe3a80$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: Without dissent, generally favorable opinion was obtained. So, I will commit my draft code to the repository. If a problem occurs, I will revert immediately to withdraw the code. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen From websitemaster at cogeco.net Fri Oct 26 09:13:23 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:13:23 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> <50884971.4020407@placella.com> <027101cdb2b2$bf202490$3d606db0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <006e01cdb37b$ad975da0$08c618e0$@cogeco.net> I tried anonymous and logged in under my account and I didn't have any problems or 500 errors when surfing the wiki. Thanks for spending time on this Dan. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dan Stoner Sent: October-25-12 11:24 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site edit: the existing site runs 1.13.4 On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Dan Stoner wrote: > I've upgraded the test/new wiki to latest MediaWiki 1.19.2 (the > existing site runs 1.13.2 which was released in 2009). This solved > the 500 error for my account, hopefully also for others. > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/ > > Clearly I still need to tweak some settings. > > There is a fair amount of functionality change since the 2009 release. > For example, Special:AllPages no longer just shows all pages, one must > first pick a range. > > > I noticed some issues with the upgrade that seem to be tied to the content. > > 1. The Google Summer of Code trademark symbol broke the page display on: > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code > > I edited out the TM character to make the page content display. I'm > not sure of the source of this character issue (OS, Apache, or > database?). > > > 2. Some articles were created with raw HTML rather than wikitext. The > most notable thing that breaks from this are HTML anchor tags. I > think it would be best to edit these stories with wikitext rather than > allowing raw HTML. Example of a particularly heinous amount of editing > that would be required: > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/ConfigFile14 > > Comments appreciated. > > I'm sleepy and my eyes hurt. Be back at it sometime this weekend I think. > > - Dan Stoner > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Tom wrote: >> Same here except now I can see a few pages while logged in >> >> >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:Preferences >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:RecentChanges >> >> >> >> while others like >> >> >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Main_Page >> >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code >> >> >> >> I receive a 500 error >> >> >> >> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net >> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of >> cordiste >> Sent: October-25-12 5:14 AM >> >> >> To: Geeklog Development >> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site >> >> >> >> Anonymously everything is display but when I logged into the wiki I >> get blank pages. >> >> Ben >> >> 2012/10/25 Dan Stoner >> >> I see some the PHP Fatal errors in the log. >> >> [Wed Oct 24 18:38:47 2012] [error] [client ] PHP Fatal >> error: Call to a member function getCacheTime() on a non-object in >> <...>/mediawiki-1.13.4/includes/Article.php on line 3387, referer: >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages >> >> All the Fatals are on the getCacheTime() function. >> >> >> The existing site is using memcached (I think), whereas I am not >> (yet?). I thought I disabled it but maybe there are some other cache >> settings I didn't notice. Pages are working ok for me now (no >> changes). >> >> >> I actually don't have an editing account. Were all of you who had >> issues logged into the wiki, or viewing anonymously? >> >> >> I'll poke around... >> >> - Dan Stoner >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rouslan Placella >> >> wrote: >>> Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: >>> >>>> Tom wrote: >>>> >>>>> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging >>>> in), not even an error. >>>> >>>> bye, Dirk >>>> >>>> >>> >>> That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). >>> >>> Bye, >>> Rouslan >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> geeklog-devel mailing list >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Fri Oct 26 09:51:28 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 09:51:28 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> <007601cdaf92$10aa1380$31fe3a80$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <007b01cdb380$ff9dcd50$fed967f0$@cogeco.net> Thanks Dengen. I will take a look at it this weekend. It will be nice to have a new interface for the Topic Admin. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori Tahara Sent: October-26-12 9:06 AM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager Without dissent, generally favorable opinion was obtained. So, I will commit my draft code to the repository. If a problem occurs, I will revert immediately to withdraw the code. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From cordiste at free.fr Fri Oct 26 12:35:45 2012 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 18:35:45 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site In-Reply-To: <006e01cdb37b$ad975da0$08c618e0$@cogeco.net> References: <20121017193124.GA17254@chipsworld.llamas.net> <724D75AD-0515-4300-8905-8AF0E583E525@haun-online.de> <022801cdb21e$364fe0e0$a2efa2a0$@cogeco.net> <62829677-DEC0-4E92-85EC-DE48937781B3@haun-online.de> <50884971.4020407@placella.com> <027101cdb2b2$bf202490$3d606db0$@cogeco.net> <006e01cdb37b$ad975da0$08c618e0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: Everything is fine here too. Ben 2012/10/26 Tom > I tried anonymous and logged in under my account and I didn't have any > problems or 500 errors when surfing the wiki. > > Thanks for spending time on this Dan. > > Tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dan Stoner > Sent: October-25-12 11:24 PM > To: Geeklog Development > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site > > edit: > the existing site runs 1.13.4 > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:23 PM, Dan Stoner wrote: > > I've upgraded the test/new wiki to latest MediaWiki 1.19.2 (the > > existing site runs 1.13.2 which was released in 2009). This solved > > the 500 error for my account, hopefully also for others. > > > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/ > > > > Clearly I still need to tweak some settings. > > > > There is a fair amount of functionality change since the 2009 release. > > For example, Special:AllPages no longer just shows all pages, one must > > first pick a range. > > > > > > I noticed some issues with the upgrade that seem to be tied to the > content. > > > > 1. The Google Summer of Code trademark symbol broke the page display on: > > > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code > > > > I edited out the TM character to make the page content display. I'm > > not sure of the source of this character issue (OS, Apache, or > > database?). > > > > > > 2. Some articles were created with raw HTML rather than wikitext. The > > most notable thing that breaks from this are HTML anchor tags. I > > think it would be best to edit these stories with wikitext rather than > > allowing raw HTML. Example of a particularly heinous amount of editing > > that would be required: > > > > http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/ConfigFile14 > > > > Comments appreciated. > > > > I'm sleepy and my eyes hurt. Be back at it sometime this weekend I > think. > > > > - Dan Stoner > > > > > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Tom wrote: > >> Same here except now I can see a few pages while logged in > >> > >> > >> > >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages > >> > >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:Preferences > >> > >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:RecentChanges > >> > >> > >> > >> while others like > >> > >> > >> > >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Main_Page > >> > >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Google_Summer_of_Code > >> > >> > >> > >> I receive a 500 error > >> > >> > >> > >> From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > >> [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of > >> cordiste > >> Sent: October-25-12 5:14 AM > >> > >> > >> To: Geeklog Development > >> Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Wiki site > >> > >> > >> > >> Anonymously everything is display but when I logged into the wiki I > >> get blank pages. > >> > >> Ben > >> > >> 2012/10/25 Dan Stoner > >> > >> I see some the PHP Fatal errors in the log. > >> > >> [Wed Oct 24 18:38:47 2012] [error] [client ] PHP Fatal > >> error: Call to a member function getCacheTime() on a non-object in > >> <...>/mediawiki-1.13.4/includes/Article.php on line 3387, referer: > >> http://gwiki.thatlinuxbox.com/index.php/Special:AllPages > >> > >> All the Fatals are on the getCacheTime() function. > >> > >> > >> The existing site is using memcached (I think), whereas I am not > >> (yet?). I thought I disabled it but maybe there are some other cache > >> settings I didn't notice. Pages are working ok for me now (no > >> changes). > >> > >> > >> I actually don't have an editing account. Were all of you who had > >> issues logged into the wiki, or viewing anonymously? > >> > >> > >> I'll poke around... > >> > >> - Dan Stoner > >> > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Rouslan Placella > >> > >> wrote: > >>> Il 10/24/2012 08:55 PM, Dirk Haun ha scritto: > >>> > >>>> Tom wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Was working for a bit until I logged in now I just get a 500 error. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Same here. Or actually, I only see a blank page now (after logging > >>>> in), not even an error. > >>>> > >>>> bye, Dirk > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> That blank page is the error 500 (Quickly revealed by firebug). > >>> > >>> Bye, > >>> Rouslan > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> geeklog-devel mailing list > >>> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > >>> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > >> _______________________________________________ > >> geeklog-devel mailing list > >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> geeklog-devel mailing list > >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > >> > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Oct 27 14:07:56 2012 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 20:07:56 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: <007b01cdb380$ff9dcd50$fed967f0$@cogeco.net> References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> <007601cdaf92$10aa1380$31fe3a80$@cogeco.net> <007b01cdb380$ff9dcd50$fed967f0$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: <9A1B1FDD-2536-43EC-B8A4-5E6963C215EE@haun-online.de> Can I suggest that we stop adding new features now? We're supposedly in the Release Candidate (rc) phase now and adding new stuff at this point will only delay the release any further. I'll run the scripts to update the language files one more time ? bye, Dirk > Thanks Dengen. > > I will take a look at it this weekend. It will be nice to have a new > interface for the Topic Admin. > > Tom > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori > Tahara > Sent: October-26-12 9:06 AM > To: Geeklog Development > Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager > > Without dissent, generally favorable opinion was obtained. > So, I will commit my draft code to the repository. > If a problem occurs, I will revert immediately to withdraw the code. > > -- > Yoshinori Tahara - dengen > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel -- http://www.themobilepresenter.com/ From taharaxp at gmail.com Sat Oct 27 22:22:50 2012 From: taharaxp at gmail.com (Yoshinori Tahara) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 11:22:50 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: <9A1B1FDD-2536-43EC-B8A4-5E6963C215EE@haun-online.de> References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> <007601cdaf92$10aa1380$31fe3a80$@cogeco.net> <007b01cdb380$ff9dcd50$fed967f0$@cogeco.net> <9A1B1FDD-2536-43EC-B8A4-5E6963C215EE@haun-online.de> Message-ID: > Dirk wrote: > Can I suggest that we stop adding new features now? We're supposedly in the Release Candidate (rc) phase now and adding new stuff at this point will only delay the release any further. > > I'll run the scripts to update the language files one more time ? Dirk, I'm sorry to trouble you. And thank you for your time and attention. I will refrain from adding new features. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sun Oct 28 09:45:47 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:45:47 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager In-Reply-To: References: <1ADBB09D-31DE-4D2D-8E00-3F39462D396A@haun-online.de> <003201cdab9e$b8639990$292accb0$@cogeco.net> <007601cdaf92$10aa1380$31fe3a80$@cogeco.net> <007b01cdb380$ff9dcd50$fed967f0$@cogeco.net> <9A1B1FDD-2536-43EC-B8A4-5E6963C215EE@haun-online.de> Message-ID: <001401cdb512$894b3aa0$9be1afe0$@cogeco.net> At least until we start to work on 2.0.1 :-) We needed the updated topic admin list so I am glad it is in there. I tested it out and everything works as expected. The sorting feature is nice as well and makes things easier. Let's finish up on the rest of the bugs so we can get Geeklog 2.0.0rc2 out the door. I hope this will be the last release candidate before the final is released. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori Tahara Sent: October-27-12 10:23 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager > Dirk wrote: > Can I suggest that we stop adding new features now? We're supposedly in the Release Candidate (rc) phase now and adding new stuff at this point will only delay the release any further. > > I'll run the scripts to update the language files one more time . Dirk, I'm sorry to trouble you. And thank you for your time and attention. I will refrain from adding new features. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From ironmax at spacequad.com Sun Oct 28 15:58:41 2012 From: ironmax at spacequad.com (ironmax at spacequad.com) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 15:58:41 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 72, Issue 20 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: ---Rant on-- Ohh brother....how far out of wack is the Demo Next going to be? I was under the impression that NO further features would be created once the final beta version was out. Now here we are flirting and courting new ideas and additions/changes after RC1 was released. We are supposed to be in a bug fix phase! --Okay rant off-- Let me know when I can grab an updated RC1 copy for the demonext.geeklog.net site. Michael -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-request at lists.geeklog.net Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:00 AM To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net Subject: geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 72, Issue 20 ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:45:47 -0400 From: "Tom" Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager To: "'Geeklog Development'" Message-ID: <001401cdb512$894b3aa0$9be1afe0$@cogeco.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At least until we start to work on 2.0.1 :-) We needed the updated topic admin list so I am glad it is in there. I tested it out and everything works as expected. The sorting feature is nice as well and makes things easier. Let's finish up on the rest of the bugs so we can get Geeklog 2.0.0rc2 out the door. I hope this will be the last release candidate before the final is released. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori Tahara Sent: October-27-12 10:23 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager > Dirk wrote: > Can I suggest that we stop adding new features now? We're supposedly in the Release Candidate (rc) phase now and adding new stuff at this point will only delay the release any further. > > I'll run the scripts to update the language files one more time . Dirk, I'm sorry to trouble you. And thank you for your time and attention. I will refrain from adding new features. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sun Oct 28 17:25:54 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:25:54 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 72, Issue 20 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <003001cdb552$d2eaa070$78bfe150$@cogeco.net> I would leave Demo Next the same until RC2 is released as the actual RC1 release/download has not changed. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of ironmax at spacequad.com Sent: October-28-12 3:59 PM To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 72, Issue 20 ---Rant on-- Ohh brother....how far out of wack is the Demo Next going to be? I was under the impression that NO further features would be created once the final beta version was out. Now here we are flirting and courting new ideas and additions/changes after RC1 was released. We are supposed to be in a bug fix phase! --Okay rant off-- Let me know when I can grab an updated RC1 copy for the demonext.geeklog.net site. Michael -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-request at lists.geeklog.net Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 10:00 AM To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net Subject: geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 72, Issue 20 ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 09:45:47 -0400 From: "Tom" Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager To: "'Geeklog Development'" Message-ID: <001401cdb512$894b3aa0$9be1afe0$@cogeco.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At least until we start to work on 2.0.1 :-) We needed the updated topic admin list so I am glad it is in there. I tested it out and everything works as expected. The sorting feature is nice as well and makes things easier. Let's finish up on the rest of the bugs so we can get Geeklog 2.0.0rc2 out the door. I hope this will be the last release candidate before the final is released. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Yoshinori Tahara Sent: October-27-12 10:23 PM To: Geeklog Development Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog New Topic Manager > Dirk wrote: > Can I suggest that we stop adding new features now? We're supposedly in the Release Candidate (rc) phase now and adding new stuff at this point will only delay the release any further. > > I'll run the scripts to update the language files one more time . Dirk, I'm sorry to trouble you. And thank you for your time and attention. I will refrain from adding new features. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sun Oct 28 20:32:36 2012 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 20:32:36 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net comments Message-ID: <003201cdb56c$e4d9b220$ae8d1660$@cogeco.net> With Geeklog 2.0.0 you can now have the comment post form on the same page as the article. I was planning on enabling this on Geeklog.net. Is this fine with everyone? Tom From cordiste at free.fr Mon Oct 29 06:39:49 2012 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:39:49 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net comments In-Reply-To: <003201cdb56c$e4d9b220$ae8d1660$@cogeco.net> References: <003201cdb56c$e4d9b220$ae8d1660$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: +1 Could be fine as a demo ;) Ben 2012/10/29 Tom > With Geeklog 2.0.0 you can now have the comment post form on the same page > as the article. I was planning on enabling this on Geeklog.net. > > Is this fine with everyone? > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From taharaxp at gmail.com Mon Oct 29 09:25:39 2012 From: taharaxp at gmail.com (Yoshinori Tahara) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 22:25:39 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog.net comments In-Reply-To: References: <003201cdb56c$e4d9b220$ae8d1660$@cogeco.net> Message-ID: Naturally, I agree. >From about 4 years ago, I was aiming for it. -- Yoshinori Tahara - dengen From ironmax at spacequad.com Mon Oct 29 10:34:21 2012 From: ironmax at spacequad.com (ironmax at spacequad.com) Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 10:34:21 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] geeklog-devel Digest, Vol 72, Issue 21 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I know that we are supposed to be in a bug fix phase, and this I think this constitutes more of a cosmetic issue than a bug, but its getting to be an irritant more than anything. Because your having to go down to the bottom of the editor to just change the post mode then back up to to enter your message. While in the article editor, can we move the post mode up above the Story Introduction block when you have the config set for Plain Old Text as default. It seems to be fine if you have Advanced Editor set as default though. Example is right on the www.geeklog.net site. You wont see that on the Demonext site as I have it set for the advanced Editor by default. Michael ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I would leave Demo Next the same until RC2 is released as the actual RC1 release/download has not changed. Tom ------------------------------