From dirk at haun-online.de Sun May 2 16:25:18 2010 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 22:25:18 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wanted: New home for Blaine's plugins Message-ID: <20100502202518.1427409224@smtp.haun-online.de> For those who haven't seen it yet: Blaine has announced[1] that he's retiring from Geeklog development. Thanks, Blaine, for all your contributions (code and otherwise) to Geeklog over the years. I'm sure your plugins (especially, but not limited to, the Forum) helped a lot in the adoption and success of Geeklog. So now we need to find new homes and maintainers for all those plugins, especially for the popular ones. I have pushed out a security fix for the Forum plugin today[2] but have no intention of continuing the support for it. If anyone wants my changes, they're available[3] but I would suggest you start with the more modern version of the Forum plugin that ships with NexPro[4] instead. I had already started poking around in the File Management plugin a while ago and decided to make that public[5] now. I'll probably do a 1.5.4 release eventually. If anyone wants to help, let me know. bye, Dirk [1] http://www.portalparts.com/article.php?story=geeklog_retirement [2] http://www.geeklog.net/article.php/forum-2.7.3 [3] http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/forum/ [4] http://code.google.com/p/nexpro/source/browse/nexpro [5] http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/filemgmt/ -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From websitemaster at cogeco.net Sun May 2 22:15:12 2010 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Sun, 2 May 2010 22:15:12 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wanted: New home for Blaine's plugins In-Reply-To: <20100502202518.1427409224@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20100502202518.1427409224@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <022b01caea66$76341910$629c4b30$@net> Since the Forum and the File manager are an integral part of most Geeklog sites I think it would be a good idea if we took control over them. I haven't taken a look at the nextpro forum plugin, I am curious to see what has been updated. I would also like to thank Blaine as well for all his hard work and wish him good luck in his future endeavours. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: May-02-10 4:25 PM To: geeklog-devel Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wanted: New home for Blaine's plugins For those who haven't seen it yet: Blaine has announced[1] that he's retiring from Geeklog development. Thanks, Blaine, for all your contributions (code and otherwise) to Geeklog over the years. I'm sure your plugins (especially, but not limited to, the Forum) helped a lot in the adoption and success of Geeklog. So now we need to find new homes and maintainers for all those plugins, especially for the popular ones. I have pushed out a security fix for the Forum plugin today[2] but have no intention of continuing the support for it. If anyone wants my changes, they're available[3] but I would suggest you start with the more modern version of the Forum plugin that ships with NexPro[4] instead. I had already started poking around in the File Management plugin a while ago and decided to make that public[5] now. I'll probably do a 1.5.4 release eventually. If anyone wants to help, let me know. bye, Dirk [1] http://www.portalparts.com/article.php?story=geeklog_retirement [2] http://www.geeklog.net/article.php/forum-2.7.3 [3] http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/forum/ [4] http://code.google.com/p/nexpro/source/browse/nexpro [5] http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/filemgmt/ -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5080 (20100502) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5080 (20100502) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From sam at theleathers.net Mon May 3 09:58:44 2010 From: sam at theleathers.net (Samuel Leathers) Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 09:58:44 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Static Pages Plugin and advanced editor In-Reply-To: <20100430200844.1608772606@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <4BDAE451.8010404@theleathers.net> <4BDAF3E4.5080005@the-howards.net> <4BDAFB2A.7080708@theleathers.net> <20100430200844.1608772606@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <4BDED694.5050402@theleathers.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Dirk, thanks for your reply. I changed it to use the $_USER value instead of doing the extra query. Thanks for letting me know about that. I also moved the { up to the end of the line. I did a diff -u this time, and I'll add a ticket to bugtrack with a suggested patch soon. Just want to make sure I get the diff command correct for the patch. I've attached the latest attempt at making a patch. Also, to generate the patch, I've been copying the original file to _old and then running a diff that way. Is this the best way to do it, or should I have an intact copy of the tree and always do a diff -r? Or better yet, since I'm using the mercurial repo is there some way I can have it generate a diff of the changes I've made so far? Sam On 4/30/10 4:08 PM, Dirk Haun wrote: > Samuel Leathers wrote: > >> Please look it over when you get the chance and give me >> any feedback regarding coding style or functionality. > > Haven't check the functionality, but here are some comments on the patch > itself: > > - Please use unified diffs[1], i.e diff -u, since that provides some > context and improves chances that the patch can be applied when the line > numbers change > > - Our Coding Guidelines[2] ask for the opening { to go at the end of a line > > - When requesting only one value from the db, instead of DB_query > ("SELECT advanced_editor FROM {$_TABLES['userprefs']} WHERE uid = {$_USER > ['uid']};"); use > > DB_getItem($_TABLES['userprefs'], 'advanced_editor', "uid = {$_USER > ['uid']}"); > > - You don't actually need to do that, though, since $_USER > ['advanced_editor'] already contains that value (even for the Anonymous user) > > Sorry for finding so much to criticise for so little code ;-) You may > want to open an issue in our bugtracker for that, btw, as it's a bit > late to include it in 1.7.0 and we don't want it to get lost. > > Thanks for your efforts! > > bye, Dirk > > [1] http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Submitting_Patches > [2] http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Coding_Guidelines > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL3taTAAoJEF7J+Z7XDXx/AgIH/Revf4EDXR1r//Yl2179RbuG SrVUnp7wVdDpRatZgrtMs3SQRxeFVVMxbg5impthfr1iZsHBDfocdmKUtCILGeYr YPWl6rHRePBldjGdYeNwPTCHQ+VO65gVyfookCjYhNB19EQWFlIYjJNKWDZ5FJ7b 1aN9sTOrEmglEgjp7Glemp3NEURp6bAnoj8TsGaOTfv1nctUk2XVlQ2/ZZs1vjGP F2IEPcjJkaQdilvxAG2yrsnl2265ijC0QyfkZdo+iXAcGrMD5ZOLQpiImOR4fioz +/FG9QfXS1o6vH1jEum58pRlkC3Qd0vXGOAlUqJbxSaKyeYumwu++DypnYMOp5k= =gQT9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: adv_edit.patch URL: From sam at theleathers.net Mon May 3 10:37:58 2010 From: sam at theleathers.net (Samuel Leathers) Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 10:37:58 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Static Pages Plugin and advanced editor In-Reply-To: <20100430201757.19466236@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <4BDAE451.8010404@theleathers.net> <011801cae87c$1b843b80$528cb280$@net> <4BDB0194.1010607@theleathers.net> <20100430201757.19466236@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <4BDEDFC6.2030306@theleathers.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 That was the problem. I had followed the instructions on the advanced-editor article on geeklog.net, which happens to be 4 years old! After removing that option from siteconfig.php, that toggle worked fine. Sam On 4/30/10 4:17 PM, Dirk Haun wrote: > Samuel Leathers wrote: > >> In the Users and Submissions -> Submission Settings, if I set the >> Advanced Editor to true, and save, it resets to false. > > It shouldn't do that (and doesn't for me). Are you overwriting that > setting in your siteconfig.php? > > >> I wasn't exactly sure what this is supposed to do, since to get the >> advanced editor to work, you have to manually modify the site config. > > Again, that's not what's supposed to happen. Please note, though, that > there are two options for the Advanced Editor now: The global setting in > the Configuration and the user's setting in My Account. The latter takes > precedence (obviously). > > >> As far as I can tell, it makes no difference if it's set to false, as >> long as advanced editor is set in siteconfig > > You shouldn't set things in the siteconfig.php that are also available > in the Configuration panel. > > Settings in siteconfig.php overwrite those in the Configuration. That's > a feature, necessary for things like root_debug (when you have an error > that prevents you from logging in and changing the setting in the > Configuration). But it shouldn't be used in everyday use or it'll only > cause confusion. > > bye, Dirk > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL3t/GAAoJEF7J+Z7XDXx/aIsH/0ttdvNKKOluElgh3tV7a2Mm AA9rGCxuW/pudywMGMkK424gUQLHL1VMr3E6BcwpQRc9dauoyPWGLSG64Te5N4Yt xTRbXH42WnHQVAy5O8NWbF70dQi/L7N2XKehkQN66AMHGwnPi20uvF76WaI/tyK9 c/2OEJC5mTBUHRThect6KC5SxyjLIKZIPeWWD3OF6AMHROpsXHSWCI3gzpiMwnWY 04F4N42+GENvEyVpmqSVf7z234xbwO2DAeF/wWiyhmn0Sg9ky3GS/fAZmLiBFpZy 6upeG3OaDxbcTPU6lqUEfNXy2rszCHOgJ4HE4PFuim/SFWMFFGQLkBCaDa6Youk= =vvOz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From dirk at haun-online.de Mon May 3 14:03:33 2010 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 3 May 2010 20:03:33 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Static Pages Plugin and advanced editor In-Reply-To: <4BDED694.5050402@theleathers.net> References: <4BDAE451.8010404@theleathers.net> <4BDAF3E4.5080005@the-howards.net> <4BDAFB2A.7080708@theleathers.net> <20100430200844.1608772606@smtp.haun-online.de> <4BDED694.5050402@theleathers.net> Message-ID: <20100503180333.327292232@smtp.haun-online.de> Samuel Leathers wrote: >I changed it to use the $_USER value instead of doing the extra query. Looks good, thanks. Note that I still haven't tried it ;-) >Or better yet, since I'm using the mercurial repo is there some way I >can have it generate a diff of the changes I've made so far? Yep, that would be the easiest way: Remember that you have a fully working repository, i.e. you can commit to it. You won't be able to push back to our repository (you would need an account for that), but you can send us your commit by using "hg export". Then someone with proper access can import and push it. The added bonus is that it would show up with your name and commit message. This is explained on the wiki page about patches: bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From sam at theleathers.net Tue May 4 09:11:57 2010 From: sam at theleathers.net (Samuel Leathers) Date: Tue, 04 May 2010 09:11:57 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Error log in mercurial repository Message-ID: <4BE01D1D.6090207@theleathers.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 One annoyance when writing a patch, is if during testing, I manage to cause an error, error.log shows up in the commit. To fix, I've been doing: hg revert logs/error.log. Is there a reason error.log is in the code repository? Sam -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJL4B0dAAoJEF7J+Z7XDXx/S6sIAIzamNSXZuifbcDXMCsE7w4v oWA4m+EbBosESoy6vffR7+mhU3vcAUEr646NVPcgOkzk3/8wo1K+X5KTRP8VyQQk a1SPeRdErLeZk+cs03fALoSL+1qO47d6xr30yf57z/14sBfJbUHVIbrI7EoSuYsf rElfoI3erelM6PRpA71AAiACMGev72tpWKX2t8H6FecIZGtXCfHEF2V7KtRIzJAc GV+iXRulUcratBIOvMm9JO/rBF5p2GU3mEiLZ69JdrDDNYevRYqPrmQiAiHRSH4t QqUjaZI6f5cJnt36SehvNTnbbfEfCkS/jCTMR8gicUPAqONeOwYTAYYczbNBJpU= =TPEi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From dirk at haun-online.de Thu May 13 04:03:58 2010 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:03:58 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Bugtracker updated Message-ID: <20100513080358.216298743@smtp.haun-online.de> FYI: I've updated Mantis, our bugtracker, to the latest version. I've already run into one issue[1]. Let me know if you notice anything else not working. bye, Dirk [1] http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=11909 -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Thu May 13 04:11:17 2010 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:11:17 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Error log in mercurial repository In-Reply-To: <4BE01D1D.6090207@theleathers.net> References: <4BE01D1D.6090207@theleathers.net> Message-ID: <20100513081117.659633789@smtp.haun-online.de> Samuel Leathers wrote: >Is there a reason error.log is in the code repository? Empty directories are a problem with some version control systems. Mercurial doesn't track empty directories and I think CVS didn't either (or there was some option that you had to use when checking them out - something like that). Also, on some server setups, it's tricky to get the permissions right when the file is to be created from the webserver process. So it makes the setup easier if you start with an existing file. Neither of those are really showstoppers - it's more like tradition at this point ;-) You could add the error.log to your .hgignore - but then you have a modified .hgignore and have to be careful not to check that in. Hmm, can you add .hgignore to .hgignore? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From websitemaster at cogeco.net Thu May 13 10:19:44 2010 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 10:19:44 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Bugtracker updated In-Reply-To: <20100513080358.216298743@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20100513080358.216298743@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <005b01caf2a7$55ea5040$01bef0c0$@net> I tried inputting a Feature Request and received the following error: APPLICATION ERROR #11 A necessary field "Target" was empty. Please recheck your inputs. Please use the "Back" button in your web browser to return to the previous page. There you can correct whatever problems were identified in this error or select another action. You can also click an option from the menu bar to go directly to a new section. I assume it is referring to "Target Version" which I had set to Future. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: May-13-10 4:04 AM To: geeklog-devel Subject: [geeklog-devel] Bugtracker updated FYI: I've updated Mantis, our bugtracker, to the latest version. I've already run into one issue[1]. Let me know if you notice anything else not working. bye, Dirk [1] http://www.mantisbt.org/bugs/view.php?id=11909 -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5110 (20100512) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5112 (20100513) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From dirk at haun-online.de Thu May 13 10:37:46 2010 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 16:37:46 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Bugtracker updated In-Reply-To: <005b01caf2a7$55ea5040$01bef0c0$@net> References: <20100513080358.216298743@smtp.haun-online.de> <005b01caf2a7$55ea5040$01bef0c0$@net> Message-ID: <20100513143746.421296140@smtp.haun-online.de> Tom wrote: >I assume it is referring to "Target Version" which I had set to Future. We had a custom field named "Target" that I introduced before Mantis got its own Target Version field. I guess it was referring to this field - it's still in the database but not displayed any more. We don't need that field any more, so I removed it. Can you try again, please? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ From websitemaster at cogeco.net Thu May 13 11:21:21 2010 From: websitemaster at cogeco.net (Tom) Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 11:21:21 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Bugtracker updated In-Reply-To: <20100513143746.421296140@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20100513080358.216298743@smtp.haun-online.de> <005b01caf2a7$55ea5040$01bef0c0$@net> <20100513143746.421296140@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <006801caf2af$f12d8010$d3888030$@net> It works now. Thanks Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: May-13-10 10:38 AM To: geeklog-devel Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Bugtracker updated Tom wrote: >I assume it is referring to "Target Version" which I had set to Future. We had a custom field named "Target" that I introduced before Mantis got its own Target Version field. I guess it was referring to this field - it's still in the database but not displayed any more. We don't need that field any more, so I removed it. Can you try again, please? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5112 (20100513) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 5112 (20100513) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From rouslan at placella.com Mon May 17 11:43:50 2010 From: rouslan at placella.com (Rouslan Placella) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:43:50 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Can't push. Need mercurial account? Message-ID: <20100517104350.v5iatjdtuokos84c@webmail.opentransfer.com> Hi all, Let me just start by saying that I never used SVN, CVS or HG before, so as far as this goes I'm a noob. Well, I thought I'd try to push a small change to see how I get on and yes, I failed at it miserably. It looks like I need an account to push. And I guess it's reasonable enough not to let anonymous users upload code. So the question is: How do I get one? Thanks, Rouslan Here's the output that I'm getting: ******************************************************************** roccivic at roccivic-pc:/var/www/geeklog-hg/geeklog$ hg tip -vp changeset: 7939:3cfaf8e94d87 branch: HEAD tag: tip user: Rouslan Placella date: Mon May 17 16:05:15 2010 +0100 files: public_html/admin/install/language/english.php description: Minor correction to install language file "english.php" diff -r dfbd40194f57 -r 3cfaf8e94d87 public_html/admin/install/language/english.php --- a/public_html/admin/install/language/english.php Sun May 16 19:43:27 2010 +0200 +++ b/public_html/admin/install/language/english.php Mon May 17 16:05:15 2010 +0100 @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ 11 => 'No backup files found.', 12 => 'The upload limit for this server is ', 13 => '. If your backup file is larger than ', - 14 => ' or if you experience a timeout, then you should upload the file to Geeklog\'s backups directory via FTP.', + 14 => ' or if you are likely to experience a timeout, you should upload the file to Geeklog\'s backups directory via FTP.', 15 => 'Your backups directory is not writable by the web server. Permissions need to be 777.', 16 => 'Migrate', 17 => 'Migrate From Backup', roccivic at roccivic-pc:/var/www/geeklog-hg/geeklog$ hg push pushing to http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/ searching for changes ssl required ******************************************************************** From vfuria at gmail.com Mon May 17 12:34:49 2010 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 10:34:49 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Can't push. Need mercurial account? In-Reply-To: <20100517104350.v5iatjdtuokos84c@webmail.opentransfer.com> References: <20100517104350.v5iatjdtuokos84c@webmail.opentransfer.com> Message-ID: Rouslan, Dirk limits accounts on project.geeklog.net so administration doesn't become a nightmare. See "Submitting Patches" [http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Submitting_Patches] for information on how to submit a patch. One nice thing about Mercurial (assuming you use hg export to submit the patch) is that no matter who pushs your fix to the repository your name will show up as the submitter. If your curious about learning more about Mercurial, hginit[ http://hginit.com] is a good tutorial. -Vinny On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Rouslan Placella wrote: > Hi all, > > Let me just start by saying that I never used SVN, CVS or HG before, so as > far as this goes I'm a noob. > > Well, I thought I'd try to push a small change to see how I get on and yes, > I failed at it miserably. It looks like I need an account to push. And I > guess it's reasonable enough not to let anonymous users upload code. So the > question is: How do I get one? > > Thanks, Rouslan > > Here's the output that I'm getting: > > ******************************************************************** > roccivic at roccivic-pc:/var/www/geeklog-hg/geeklog$ hg tip -vp > changeset: 7939:3cfaf8e94d87 > branch: HEAD > tag: tip > user: Rouslan Placella > date: Mon May 17 16:05:15 2010 +0100 > files: public_html/admin/install/language/english.php > description: > Minor correction to install language file "english.php" > > > diff -r dfbd40194f57 -r 3cfaf8e94d87 > public_html/admin/install/language/english.php > --- a/public_html/admin/install/language/english.php Sun May 16 19:43:27 > 2010 +0200 > +++ b/public_html/admin/install/language/english.php Mon May 17 16:05:15 > 2010 +0100 > @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ > 11 => 'No backup files found.', > 12 => 'The upload limit for this server is ', > 13 => '. If your backup file is larger than ', > - 14 => ' or if you experience a timeout, then you should upload the > file to Geeklog\'s backups directory via FTP.', > + 14 => ' or if you are likely to experience a timeout, you should > upload the file to Geeklog\'s backups directory via FTP.', > 15 => 'Your backups directory is not writable by the web server. > Permissions need to be 777.', > 16 => 'Migrate', > 17 => 'Migrate From Backup', > > roccivic at roccivic-pc:/var/www/geeklog-hg/geeklog$ hg push > pushing to http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/ > searching for changes > ssl required > ******************************************************************** > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From vladvoic at gmail.com Mon May 17 13:00:17 2010 From: vladvoic at gmail.com (Vlad Voicu) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 20:00:17 +0300 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Can't push. Need mercurial account? In-Reply-To: <20100517104350.v5iatjdtuokos84c@webmail.opentransfer.com> References: <20100517104350.v5iatjdtuokos84c@webmail.opentransfer.com> Message-ID: > Well, I thought I'd try to push a small change to see how I get on and yes, > I failed at it miserably. It looks like I need an account to push. And I > guess it's reasonable enough not to let anonymous users upload code. So the > question is: How do I get one? You must be a serious contributor to the geeklog project to get an account with push rights. If you push something that crashes geeklog (I am not saying that you do) all developers will pull that version, and that is a bad thing. So, you need some experience with geeklog. Submit some successful patches, become an important part of the community and I am sure that you will get an account with push rights some day. You always can open a bug in the bug-tracker and attach a patch, or just submit a patch to someone that can review and push your change. Is not recommended though to open a bug just for one line of translation code. Find more lines that need updated and then open a bug or submit your patch. Regards, Vlad. From rouslan at placella.com Mon May 17 13:18:34 2010 From: rouslan at placella.com (Rouslan Placella) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:18:34 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Can't push. Need mercurial account? In-Reply-To: References: <20100517104350.v5iatjdtuokos84c@webmail.opentransfer.com> Message-ID: <20100517121834.6n8auwozfkk48o0k@webmail.opentransfer.com> Thanks Vincent, I thought it was going to be something like this. And it makes perfect sense. I just wanted to give HG a go, but now that I looked at the context of the text that I was about to submit, I noticed that the wording might actually be right... Good thing it didn't go through. Rouslan Quoting Vincent Furia : > Rouslan, > > Dirk limits accounts on project.geeklog.net so administration doesn't become > a nightmare. See "Submitting > Patches" > [http://wiki.geeklog.net/index.php/Submitting_Patches] for information on > how to submit a patch. > > One nice thing about Mercurial (assuming you use hg export to submit the > patch) is that no matter who pushs your fix to the repository your name will > show up as the submitter. > > If your curious about learning more about Mercurial, > hginit[ > http://hginit.com] is a good tutorial. > > -Vinny > > On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 9:43 AM, Rouslan Placella > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Let me just start by saying that I never used SVN, CVS or HG before, so as >> far as this goes I'm a noob. >> >> Well, I thought I'd try to push a small change to see how I get on and yes, >> I failed at it miserably. It looks like I need an account to push. And I >> guess it's reasonable enough not to let anonymous users upload code. So the >> question is: How do I get one? >> >> Thanks, Rouslan >> >> Here's the output that I'm getting: >> >> ******************************************************************** >> roccivic at roccivic-pc:/var/www/geeklog-hg/geeklog$ hg tip -vp >> changeset: 7939:3cfaf8e94d87 >> branch: HEAD >> tag: tip >> user: Rouslan Placella >> date: Mon May 17 16:05:15 2010 +0100 >> files: public_html/admin/install/language/english.php >> description: >> Minor correction to install language file "english.php" >> >> >> diff -r dfbd40194f57 -r 3cfaf8e94d87 >> public_html/admin/install/language/english.php >> --- a/public_html/admin/install/language/english.php Sun May 16 19:43:27 >> 2010 +0200 >> +++ b/public_html/admin/install/language/english.php Mon May 17 16:05:15 >> 2010 +0100 >> @@ -207,7 +207,7 @@ >> 11 => 'No backup files found.', >> 12 => 'The upload limit for this server is ', >> 13 => '. If your backup file is larger than ', >> - 14 => ' or if you experience a timeout, then you should upload the >> file to Geeklog\'s backups directory via FTP.', >> + 14 => ' or if you are likely to experience a timeout, you should >> upload the file to Geeklog\'s backups directory via FTP.', >> 15 => 'Your backups directory is not writable by the web server. >> Permissions need to be 777.', >> 16 => 'Migrate', >> 17 => 'Migrate From Backup', >> >> roccivic at roccivic-pc:/var/www/geeklog-hg/geeklog$ hg push >> pushing to http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/ >> searching for changes >> ssl required >> ******************************************************************** >> _______________________________________________ >> geeklog-devel mailing list >> geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net >> http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel >> >> > From rouslan at placella.com Mon May 17 13:23:41 2010 From: rouslan at placella.com (Rouslan Placella) Date: Mon, 17 May 2010 12:23:41 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Can't push. Need mercurial account? In-Reply-To: References: <20100517104350.v5iatjdtuokos84c@webmail.opentransfer.com> Message-ID: <20100517122341.y4lklzsfogc0k8s4@webmail.opentransfer.com> Well, I'm planning on sticking around. So maybe in due time then. Thanks, Rouslan Quoting Vlad Voicu : >> Well, I thought I'd try to push a small change to see how I get on and yes, >> I failed at it miserably. It looks like I need an account to push. And I >> guess it's reasonable enough not to let anonymous users upload code. So the >> question is: How do I get one? > > You must be a serious contributor to the geeklog project to get an > account with push rights. If you push something that crashes geeklog > (I am not saying that you do) all developers will pull that version, > and that is a bad thing. So, you need some experience with geeklog. > Submit some successful patches, become an important part of the > community and I am sure that you will get an account with push rights > some day. > > You always can open a bug in the bug-tracker and attach a patch, or > just submit a patch to someone that can review and push your change. > Is not recommended though to open a bug just for one line of > translation code. Find more lines that need updated and then open a > bug or submit your patch. > > Regards, > Vlad. > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From cordiste at free.fr Tue May 18 08:51:18 2010 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:51:18 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wanted: New home for Blaine's plugins In-Reply-To: <022b01caea66$76341910$629c4b30$@net> References: <20100502202518.1427409224@smtp.haun-online.de> <022b01caea66$76341910$629c4b30$@net> Message-ID: Some geeklog community members want to know about the future of Blaine's plugins (forum, filemgmt). What can we do and what can we say? There is also - glmenu - gl messenger - Chatter block - FAQ manager - gl Quiz to take care of. ::Ben 2010/5/3 Tom : > Since the Forum and the File manager are an integral part of most Geeklog > sites I think it would be a good idea if we took control over them. I > haven't taken a look at the nextpro forum plugin, I am curious to see what > has been updated. > > I would also like to thank Blaine as well for all his hard work and wish him > good luck in his future endeavours. > > Tom > > > -----Original Message----- > From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net > [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun > Sent: May-02-10 4:25 PM > To: geeklog-devel > Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wanted: New home for Blaine's plugins > > For those who haven't seen it yet: Blaine has announced[1] that he's > retiring from Geeklog development. > > Thanks, Blaine, for all your contributions (code and otherwise) to > Geeklog over the years. I'm sure your plugins (especially, but not > limited to, the Forum) helped a lot in the adoption and success of Geeklog. > > So now we need to find new homes and maintainers for all those plugins, > especially for the popular ones. > > I have pushed out a security fix for the Forum plugin today[2] but have > no intention of continuing the support for it. If anyone wants my > changes, they're available[3] but I would suggest you start with the > more modern version of the Forum plugin that ships with NexPro[4] instead. > > I had already started poking around in the File Management plugin a > while ago and decided to make that public[5] now. I'll probably do a > 1.5.4 release eventually. If anyone wants to help, let me know. > > bye, Dirk > > [1] http://www.portalparts.com/article.php?story=geeklog_retirement > [2] http://www.geeklog.net/article.php/forum-2.7.3 > [3] http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/forum/ > [4] http://code.google.com/p/nexpro/source/browse/nexpro > [5] http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/filemgmt/ > > > -- > http://www.geeklog.net/ > http://geeklog.info/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature > database 5080 (20100502) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > > > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature > database 5080 (20100502) __________ > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. > > http://www.eset.com > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > From dirk at haun-online.de Tue May 18 16:02:30 2010 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:02:30 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Wanted: New home for Blaine's plugins In-Reply-To: References: <20100502202518.1427409224@smtp.haun-online.de> <022b01caea66$76341910$629c4b30$@net> Message-ID: <20100518200230.195517230@smtp.haun-online.de> cordiste wrote: >Some geeklog community members want to know about the future of >Blaine's plugins (forum, filemgmt). What can we do and what can we >say? I've continued working on the File Management plugin. Nothing spectacular - adding support for new APIs (search, plugin comments in the proper section in What's New). Mostly under-the-hood stuff. It's getting close to the point of being ready for release and could use some tests: http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/filemgmt/ Use the "gz" link to download it as a tarball. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/