From mjervis at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 02:37:47 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 07:37:47 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision Message-ID: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> I'm investigating this issue: http://project.geeklog.net/tracking/view.php?id=726 Which I can't recreate. However. I'm using Apache on Windows. On Windows Apache is not case sensitive. When you approve a user, it sends an email to that user. This is done from admin/moderate.php, calling through to lib-user.php's USER_createAndSendEmail. Through to lib-common.php's COM_mail function. This does: include_once( 'Mail.php' ); include_once( 'Mail/RFC822.php' ); Our current 'path' at this point is /admin. Which contains mail.php. Which is included instead of Pear's Mail.php. And then crashes. Any suggestions how this can be resolved? -- Michael Jervis mjervis at gmail.com 504B03041400000008008F846431E3543A820800000006000000060000007765 62676F642B4F4D4ACF4F0100504B010214001400000008008F846431E3543A82 0800000006000000060000000000000000002000000000000000776562676F64 504B05060000000001000100340000002C0000000000 From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Sep 3 13:52:22 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:52:22 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080903175222.1719231789@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: > include_once( 'Mail.php' ); > include_once( 'Mail/RFC822.php' ); > >Our current 'path' at this point is /admin. Which contains mail.php. >Which is included instead of Pear's Mail.php. And then crashes. Ah, that issue again ... It pops up from time to time on the forums. I have yet to see a proper solution. That affects everybody hosting on Windows (or on a case-insensitive file system). Doing the include_once without any path is the way recommended by PEAR. I have no idea what to do in a case like this ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ From vfuria at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 13:57:44 2008 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 11:57:44 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <20080903175222.1719231789@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> <20080903175222.1719231789@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <8319e2d60809031057p6fc2db4br8d123687bc094836@mail.gmail.com> Wouldn't it be easiest just to rename admin/mail.php? -Vinny On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Dirk Haun wrote: > Michael Jervis wrote: > > > include_once( 'Mail.php' ); > > include_once( 'Mail/RFC822.php' ); > > > >Our current 'path' at this point is /admin. Which contains mail.php. > >Which is included instead of Pear's Mail.php. And then crashes. > > Ah, that issue again ... It pops up from time to time on the forums. I > have yet to see a proper solution. > > That affects everybody hosting on Windows (or on a case-insensitive file > system). Doing the include_once without any path is the way recommended > by PEAR. I have no idea what to do in a case like this ... > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dracul01 at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 16:15:42 2008 From: dracul01 at gmail.com (Damien Hodgkin) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:15:42 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <8319e2d60809031057p6fc2db4br8d123687bc094836@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> <20080903175222.1719231789@smtp.haun-online.de> <8319e2d60809031057p6fc2db4br8d123687bc094836@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <200809031615.42845.dracul01@gmail.com> How about adding a small check to see if your running on a windows system, and then make sure the correct file is included by doing a regex on the file name to make sure it is Mail.php and not mail.php. You can use case to your advantage on a windows system, it's just a matter of how you do it, what tools you utilize and think outside of the four paned window ;) On Wednesday 03 September 2008 01:57:44 pm Vincent Furia wrote: > Wouldn't it be easiest just to rename admin/mail.php? > > -Vinny > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Dirk Haun wrote: > > Michael Jervis wrote: > > > include_once( 'Mail.php' ); > > > include_once( 'Mail/RFC822.php' ); > > > > > >Our current 'path' at this point is /admin. Which contains mail.php. > > >Which is included instead of Pear's Mail.php. And then crashes. > > > > Ah, that issue again ... It pops up from time to time on the forums. I > > have yet to see a proper solution. > > > > That affects everybody hosting on Windows (or on a case-insensitive file > > system). Doing the include_once without any path is the way recommended > > by PEAR. I have no idea what to do in a case like this ... > > > > bye, Dirk > > > > > > -- > > http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From joe at ThrowingDice.com Wed Sep 3 17:04:56 2008 From: joe at ThrowingDice.com (Joe Mucchiello) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:04:56 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <200809031615.42845.dracul01@gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> <20080903175222.1719231789@smtp.haun-online.de> <8319e2d60809031057p6fc2db4br8d123687bc094836@mail.gmail.com> <200809031615.42845.dracul01@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0K6N002FN17ZJW70@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> At 04:15 PM 9/3/2008, Damien Hodgkin wrote: >How about adding a small check to see if your running on a windows >system, and >then make sure the correct file is included by doing a regex on the file name >to make sure it is Mail.php and not mail.php. > >You can use case to your advantage on a windows system, it's just a matter of >how you do it, what tools you utilize and think outside of the four paned >window ;) How would that work? The problem is we want to open the PEAR Mail.php but there is a mail.php in the current working directory. What will a regex do to stop the OS from finding the file mail.php when we ask to open the file Mail.php? It's not like you can rewrite how include_once works. ---- Joe Mucchiello Throwing Dice Games http://www.throwingdice.com From dracul01 at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 17:32:27 2008 From: dracul01 at gmail.com (Damien Hodgkin) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 17:32:27 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <0K6N002FN17ZJW70@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> <200809031615.42845.dracul01@gmail.com> <0K6N002FN17ZJW70@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> Message-ID: <200809031732.27634.dracul01@gmail.com> The regex would allow you to differentiate from the capitalized Mail.php and the lower case mail.php. On Wednesday 03 September 2008 05:04:56 pm Joe Mucchiello wrote: > At 04:15 PM 9/3/2008, Damien Hodgkin wrote: > >How about adding a small check to see if your running on a windows > >system, and > >then make sure the correct file is included by doing a regex on the file > > name to make sure it is Mail.php and not mail.php. > > > >You can use case to your advantage on a windows system, it's just a matter > > of how you do it, what tools you utilize and think outside of the four > > paned window ;) > > How would that work? The problem is we want to open the PEAR Mail.php > but there is a mail.php in the current working directory. What will a > regex do to stop the OS from finding the file mail.php when we ask to > open the file Mail.php? It's not like you can rewrite how include_once > works. > > > ---- > Joe Mucchiello > Throwing Dice Games > http://www.throwingdice.com > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From joe at ThrowingDice.com Wed Sep 3 19:39:48 2008 From: joe at ThrowingDice.com (Joe Mucchiello) Date: Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:39:48 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <200809031732.27634.dracul01@gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> <200809031615.42845.dracul01@gmail.com> <0K6N002FN17ZJW70@mta3.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> <200809031732.27634.dracul01@gmail.com> Message-ID: <0K6N0062Q8E3HK81@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> Would allow who to differentiate? We're talking about a call to include_once. We can't change the implementation. How do you add a regex to the following code to force include_once to only load the capitalized Mail.php in the PEAR directory? At 02:37 AM 9/3/2008, Michael Jervis wrote: > include_once( 'Mail.php' ); > include_once( 'Mail/RFC822.php' ); At 05:32 PM 9/3/2008, Damien Hodgkin wrote: >The regex would allow you to differentiate from the capitalized Mail.php and >the lower case mail.php. > >On Wednesday 03 September 2008 05:04:56 pm Joe Mucchiello wrote: > > At 04:15 PM 9/3/2008, Damien Hodgkin wrote: > > >How about adding a small check to see if your running on a windows > > >system, and > > >then make sure the correct file is included by doing a regex on the file > > > name to make sure it is Mail.php and not mail.php. > > > > > >You can use case to your advantage on a windows system, it's just a matter > > > of how you do it, what tools you utilize and think outside of the four > > > paned window ;) > > > > How would that work? The problem is we want to open the PEAR Mail.php > > but there is a mail.php in the current working directory. What will a > > regex do to stop the OS from finding the file mail.php when we ask to > > open the file Mail.php? It's not like you can rewrite how include_once > > works. ---- Joe Mucchiello Throwing Dice Games http://www.throwingdice.com From dracul01 at gmail.com Wed Sep 3 19:48:20 2008 From: dracul01 at gmail.com (Damien Hodgkin) Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 19:48:20 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <0K6N0062Q8E3HK81@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> <200809031732.27634.dracul01@gmail.com> <0K6N0062Q8E3HK81@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> Message-ID: <200809031948.21228.dracul01@gmail.com> Nevermind Joe, obviously you can't think outside the Windows Box. But just to let you know there are ways, like say IF..ELSE statements, Adding a custom function so your call to include_once would resemble: include_once(custom_function(param1, param2)); A little brainwork goes a long way, PHP can do a lot of things you just have to have the imagination to come up with them. That is why we are "hackers" we solve problems. If I hosted on a Windows box I would gladly hack up a solution, but I don't (can't stand Windows). -- Damien On Wednesday 03 September 2008 07:39:48 pm Joe Mucchiello wrote: > Would allow who to differentiate? We're talking about a call to > include_once. We can't change the implementation. How do you add a > regex to the following code to force include_once to only load the > capitalized Mail.php in the PEAR directory? > > At 02:37 AM 9/3/2008, Michael Jervis wrote: > > include_once( 'Mail.php' ); > > include_once( 'Mail/RFC822.php' ); > > At 05:32 PM 9/3/2008, Damien Hodgkin wrote: > >The regex would allow you to differentiate from the capitalized Mail.php > > and the lower case mail.php. > > > >On Wednesday 03 September 2008 05:04:56 pm Joe Mucchiello wrote: > > > At 04:15 PM 9/3/2008, Damien Hodgkin wrote: > > > >How about adding a small check to see if your running on a windows > > > >system, and > > > >then make sure the correct file is included by doing a regex on the > > > > file name to make sure it is Mail.php and not mail.php. > > > > > > > >You can use case to your advantage on a windows system, it's just a > > > > matter of how you do it, what tools you utilize and think outside of > > > > the four paned window ;) > > > > > > How would that work? The problem is we want to open the PEAR Mail.php > > > but there is a mail.php in the current working directory. What will a > > > regex do to stop the OS from finding the file mail.php when we ask to > > > open the file Mail.php? It's not like you can rewrite how include_once > > > works. > > ---- > Joe Mucchiello > Throwing Dice Games > http://www.throwingdice.com > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 4 14:15:48 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:15:48 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <8319e2d60809031057p6fc2db4br8d123687bc094836@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> <20080903175222.1719231789@smtp.haun-online.de> <8319e2d60809031057p6fc2db4br8d123687bc094836@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080904181548.134249445@smtp.haun-online.de> Vincent Furia wrote: >Wouldn't it be easiest just to rename admin/mail.php? Of course. Until we run into the same sort of problem again with another PEAR package. I'd be interested to learn if the PEAR team has an officially sanctioned / recommended way of handling this. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 4 14:23:01 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 20:23:01 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] OPML? Message-ID: <20080904182301.571315480@smtp.haun-online.de> In ran across OPML again the other day. Can't say I've used it for anything other than moving my feeds between feed readers. Apparently, you can also use it to provide a "bundle" of all the feeds on a website. Should be fairly easy to add. But is anyone going to use it for anything? And speaking of feeds: Now that we have the improvements for the comment handling (Hi Jared!) wouldn't it make sense to either bundle Mike's comment feed plugin - or even build support for comment feeds right into Geeklog? All post-1.5.1, of course. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From mjervis at gmail.com Thu Sep 4 14:41:56 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 19:41:56 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] OPML? In-Reply-To: <20080904182301.571315480@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080904182301.571315480@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809041141u4646e31cs52730dcb4e70ac7a@mail.gmail.com> > Should be fairly easy to add. But is anyone going to use it for anything? Sounds like a ticky-box feature if ever I heard of one. See no need for it myself. The old person obsessed with a site might find it handy to retrieve a list of all feeds just to be sure they have everything... > And speaking of feeds: Now that we have the improvements for the comment > handling (Hi Jared!) wouldn't it make sense to either bundle Mike's > comment feed plugin - or even build support for comment feeds right into > Geeklog? I'd say keep it as a plugin, bundle it in the "uninstalled" default. It's there, people can use it. I don't see any reason to migrate the code into core. Keeping it out keeps core lighter for those who don't want it. Mike From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 4 16:09:36 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 22:09:36 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] OPML? In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809041141u4646e31cs52730dcb4e70ac7a@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080904182301.571315480@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809041141u4646e31cs52730dcb4e70ac7a@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080904200936.578147421@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >I'd say keep it as a plugin, bundle it in the "uninstalled" default. Why uninstalled? As long as you don't create a comment feed, it wouldn't make a difference. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From mjervis at gmail.com Thu Sep 4 16:29:49 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 21:29:49 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] OPML? In-Reply-To: <20080904200936.578147421@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080904182301.571315480@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809041141u4646e31cs52730dcb4e70ac7a@mail.gmail.com> <20080904200936.578147421@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809041329m4bdfe702v148a5a62e491369a@mail.gmail.com> > Why uninstalled? As long as you don't create a comment feed, it wouldn't > make a difference. Avoiding loading unused code? From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Sep 6 15:23:32 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 21:23:32 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Road to 1.5.1 Was: Request to add a new PLG hook - add createUserPrecheck In-Reply-To: <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> >Still - how about September 1 for 1.5.1rc1? Okay, that little nuisance with the FCKeditor uploads threw things off a bit, but I think we're back on course now. Currently, there are only 2 issues related to FCKeditor left open. Anything else that absolutely needs to be addressed in this release? I'll probably update geeklog.net tomorrow morning. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 7 04:24:52 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 10:24:52 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Road to 1.5.1 Was: Request to add a new PLG hook - add createUserPrecheck In-Reply-To: <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> >I'll probably update geeklog.net tomorrow morning. Done. Let me know if you notice any problems. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From mjervis at gmail.com Sun Sep 7 05:09:28 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 10:09:28 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Road to 1.5.1 Was: Request to add a new PLG hook - add createUserPrecheck In-Reply-To: <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> > Done. Let me know if you notice any problems. Looks to be working for me. I'm going to submit an article about left/right block magic for 1.5.1 to explain it to theme developers not reading the developer list and understanding my Commits ;-) I also said I'd focus on bugs, submitted patches and documentation. I've been doing the first two but not the third. So, I'd like to post an article to gather areas where people think the documentation is lacking, but a starting list is good. So, where do "we" think the documentation is lacking (where we is defined as anyone who reads this not just the core team). Cheers, Mike From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 7 07:55:27 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:55:27 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Road to 1.5.1 In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080907115527.2114386121@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >> Done. Let me know if you notice any problems. > >Looks to be working for me. Hmm, something in the forum CSS seems to be conflicting with the standard CSS, regarding the indentation of lists in the What's New and Older Stories blocks. Compare those blocks on versus bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 7 12:56:47 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 18:56:47 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Differences in block rendering (was: Road to 1.5.1) In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >I'm going to submit an article about left/right block magic for 1.5.1 >to explain it to theme developers not reading the developer list and >understanding my Commits ;-) You may also want to add some information for plugin authors. The difference in rendering the What's New block is caused by something in the forum from what I can see. On every page other than the forum, the What's New block is using blockheader-left.thtml and therefore a
for the block header. But in the forum, it seems to be using blockheader.thtml and therefore only
And because of that, this CSS rule is not used: .block-box-left ul, .block-box-right ul { /* do not indent lists in the blocks too much */ margin:0px; padding-left:20px; } Is that a bug in the forum or in the block rendering code? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From mjervis at gmail.com Sun Sep 7 13:05:49 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 18:05:49 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Differences in block rendering (was: Road to 1.5.1) In-Reply-To: <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809071005l7f1d5132y12b7b74c4b9de211@mail.gmail.com> > Is that a bug in the forum or in the block rendering code? I'm edging to a bug in the rendering code caused by a difference in the forum code that the tweaks to the rendering code didn't take account of. Hmm. Will install forums into dev and investigate now. Mike From mjervis at gmail.com Sun Sep 7 13:47:34 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 18:47:34 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Differences in block rendering (was: Road to 1.5.1) In-Reply-To: <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809071047sef907b8h39b3c9df4944f762@mail.gmail.com> > On every page other than the forum, the What's New block is using > blockheader-left.thtml and therefore a > >
> > for the block header. But in the forum, it seems to be using > blockheader.thtml and therefore only > >
OK, freshly updated CVS. Freshly installed 1.5.1cvs. Freshly installed Forum Plugin 2.7.1. The What's New block renders correctly on the left side. No matter which position it's in. It picks up
. So, what version of the forum plugin does Geeklog.net use? And is there anything special in functions.php of Geeklog.net mapping the What's new block to a specific template? Or anything in the forum module changing it with an override? Blaine any ideas? Mike From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 7 13:57:39 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 19:57:39 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Differences in block rendering (was: Road to 1.5.1) In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809071047sef907b8h39b3c9df4944f762@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809071047sef907b8h39b3c9df4944f762@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080907175739.406914988@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >So, what version of the forum plugin does Geeklog.net use? $CONF_FORUM['version'] = '2.7.1'; >And is >there anything special in functions.php of Geeklog.net mapping the >What's new block to a specific template? It's using the Professional theme from CVS. Only header.thtml and footer.thtml are somewhat customized and the stylesheet has additions for the forum and glMessenger plugins. The functions.php is unchanged from CVS. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ From mjervis at gmail.com Sun Sep 7 14:06:19 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 19:06:19 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Differences in block rendering (was: Road to 1.5.1) In-Reply-To: <20080907175739.406914988@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809071047sef907b8h39b3c9df4944f762@mail.gmail.com> <20080907175739.406914988@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809071106q36f4060eu238af1ce97998e69@mail.gmail.com> > It's using the Professional theme from CVS. Only header.thtml and > footer.thtml are somewhat customized and the stylesheet has additions > for the forum and glMessenger plugins. The functions.php is unchanged > from CVS. Traced and cracked, and yes, I need to cover that in the article! lib-custom.php, update CUSTOM_siteFooter, Forum uses this by default and I've had to change the logic in there a bit to pass through the $side to COM_formatBlock. Mike From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 7 14:06:36 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:06:36 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Differences in block rendering (was: Road to 1.5.1) In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809071047sef907b8h39b3c9df4944f762@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809071047sef907b8h39b3c9df4944f762@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080907180636.947932318@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >The What's New block renders correctly on the left side. No matter >which position it's in. It picks up
. Actually, I don't see the effect on geeklog.info either (also with Forum 2.7.1). bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 7 14:12:38 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 20:12:38 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Differences in block rendering (was: Road to 1.5.1) In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809071106q36f4060eu238af1ce97998e69@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809071047sef907b8h39b3c9df4944f762@mail.gmail.com> <20080907175739.406914988@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809071106q36f4060eu238af1ce97998e69@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080907181238.1313350112@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >lib-custom.php, update CUSTOM_siteFooter, Forum uses this by default >and I've had to change the logic in there a bit to pass through the >$side to COM_formatBlock. I guess you meant CUSTOM_showBlocks? I think I see what you mean. Will update the lib-custom.php on geeklog.net. Thanks! bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From mjervis at gmail.com Sun Sep 7 14:13:36 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 19:13:36 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Differences in block rendering (was: Road to 1.5.1) In-Reply-To: <20080907181238.1313350112@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907165647.1018645039@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809071047sef907b8h39b3c9df4944f762@mail.gmail.com> <20080907175739.406914988@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809071106q36f4060eu238af1ce97998e69@mail.gmail.com> <20080907181238.1313350112@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809071113h16bb6cen6785eea7a99f79a9@mail.gmail.com> > I guess you meant CUSTOM_showBlocks? I like to keep you guessing. (oops) Yes. Long day. Mike From mjervis at gmail.com Mon Sep 8 12:21:49 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 17:21:49 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] public_html/images - png's broken Message-ID: <7b42e7470809080921u3a3777b5g196574e8e603b9e1@mail.gmail.com> Is it just me or are the PNGs in public_html/images broken? -- Michael Jervis mjervis at gmail.com 504B03041400000008008F846431E3543A820800000006000000060000007765 62676F642B4F4D4ACF4F0100504B010214001400000008008F846431E3543A82 0800000006000000060000000000000000002000000000000000776562676F64 504B05060000000001000100340000002C0000000000 From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Sep 8 16:05:26 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 22:05:26 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] public_html/images - png's broken In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809080921u3a3777b5g196574e8e603b9e1@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470809080921u3a3777b5g196574e8e603b9e1@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080908200526.835960203@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >Is it just me or are the PNGs in public_html/images broken? They seem fine to me. But that directory is in dire need of a spring cleaning. I guess the entire "admin" directory could go without anyone noticing. And the stuff in "icons" should at least be weeded out ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From mjervis at gmail.com Tue Sep 9 13:09:51 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:09:51 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] public_html/images - png's broken In-Reply-To: <20080908200526.835960203@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470809080921u3a3777b5g196574e8e603b9e1@mail.gmail.com> <20080908200526.835960203@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809091009g1d9c13e0n48721c1be72ce516@mail.gmail.com> Hmm in both my anon checkout and my own account checkout of the repository, those images report as invalid. But the one from my mercurial checkout is fine. Any suggestions? Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: openid_login_icon.png Type: image/png Size: 294 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Sep 9 13:44:03 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 19:44:03 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] public_html/images - png's broken In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809091009g1d9c13e0n48721c1be72ce516@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470809080921u3a3777b5g196574e8e603b9e1@mail.gmail.com> <20080908200526.835960203@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809091009g1d9c13e0n48721c1be72ce516@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080909174403.1652900052@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >Hmm in both my anon checkout and my own account checkout of the >repository, those images report as invalid. Ah, they were not checked in as binary. Try again now. I've only fixed openid_login_icon.png and right_arrow.png - let me know if you find any more. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From mjervis at gmail.com Tue Sep 9 13:49:09 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 18:49:09 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] public_html/images - png's broken In-Reply-To: <20080909174403.1652900052@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470809080921u3a3777b5g196574e8e603b9e1@mail.gmail.com> <20080908200526.835960203@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809091009g1d9c13e0n48721c1be72ce516@mail.gmail.com> <20080909174403.1652900052@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809091049w465572e7w807c5a64dd5372c1@mail.gmail.com> That worked, cheers. On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 18:44, Dirk Haun wrote: > Michael Jervis wrote: > >>Hmm in both my anon checkout and my own account checkout of the >>repository, those images report as invalid. > > Ah, they were not checked in as binary. Try again now. > > I've only fixed openid_login_icon.png and right_arrow.png - let me know > if you find any more. > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://spam.tinyweb.net/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > -- Michael Jervis mjervis at gmail.com 504B03041400000008008F846431E3543A820800000006000000060000007765 62676F642B4F4D4ACF4F0100504B010214001400000008008F846431E3543A82 0800000006000000060000000000000000002000000000000000776562676F64 504B05060000000001000100340000002C0000000000 From WebSiteMaster at cogeco.net Tue Sep 9 14:09:27 2008 From: WebSiteMaster at cogeco.net (Web Site Master) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 14:09:27 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Road to 1.5.1 In-Reply-To: <20080907115527.2114386121@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402.897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907115527.2114386121@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <014d01c912a7$32bff890$983fe9b0$@net> Re: Forum CSS, I noticed that in the forum in the top bar right after New Topic and Post Topic buttons, the text for the page numbers and Subscribe | Printable Version links are now white which is hard to see against the gray background. Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: September-07-08 7:55 AM To: geeklog-devel Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Road to 1.5.1 Michael Jervis wrote: >> Done. Let me know if you notice any problems. > >Looks to be working for me. Hmm, something in the forum CSS seems to be conflicting with the standard CSS, regarding the indentation of lists in the What's New and Older Stories blocks. Compare those blocks on versus bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3423 (20080906) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Sep 9 15:21:46 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:21:46 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Road to 1.5.1 In-Reply-To: <014d01c912a7$32bff890$983fe9b0$@net> References: <7b42e7470808160058k29c15b91w7475190f4f6a7c04@mail.gmail.com> <20080816084402 .897223274@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080906192332.1349004267@smtp.haun-online.de > <20080907082452.109963867@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809070209u7ccb56b1q 8d6b616671bdbb06@mail.gmail.com> <20080907115527.2114386121@smtp.haun-online.de> <014d01c912a7$32bff890$983fe9b0$@net> Message-ID: <20080909192146.1122916413@smtp.haun-online.de> Web Site Master wrote: >I noticed that in the forum in the top bar right after New Topic and Post >Topic buttons, the text for the page numbers and Subscribe | Printable >Version links are now white which is hard to see against the gray >background. Yep, I've noticed that as well. Blaine, something to do with your last change to style.css? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Sep 13 15:27:41 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2008 21:27:41 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Geeklog Devel Assistance In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080913192741.790567576@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >Aman was my GSOC student this year and he really enjoyed working on >Geeklog this summer. Aman and has expressed a desire to stay with the >project, not only to continue working on the Mailman plugin but to help >out with general development. One of the goals of the Summer of Code is to get new people for the participating projects. So of course we welcome further contributions from all of our students - that includes Aman and also Sami and Jared (Hi guys!). So, Aman: Welcome to the team! >Can we grant Aman full team developer credentials and get him to work? @Blaine: See my other email for the technicalities. As far as work is concerned: Right now, we're wrapping up development of Geeklog 1.5.1, so any help there is appreciated (testing, looking into bugreports). I'd like to give the translators another week, so we're looking for September 21/22 as the release date (barring any surprises or problems). Aman, anything specific you'd like to work on? If you don't have any preferences, I'd suggest browsing through our bugtracker to get an idea of the areas that need work. Any questions? Just ask. bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 14 03:56:01 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:56:01 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Beyond 1.5.1 Message-ID: <20080914075601.978144622@smtp.haun-online.de> So, what are our plans once 1.5.1 is out? Obviously, we want to integrate the results of this year's Summer of Code. What else? Here are 3 items from my personal list: 1) Fix the editors. That's bug #653: When you forget to fill out a required field or some other problem occurs when you try to save something, you often end up with an error message and an empty editor form. That has always been bad, but with the introduction of the security tokens (Re: CSRF), you can not simply hit the back button any more to get your content back (you can, but you won't be able to save it due to the expired token). The story editor is one of the few exceptions were things are done right. 2) Find a replacement for kses. We need to come up with a list of requirements first, though. 3) Raise the minimum requirements. Looking at our poll: I'd say it should be acceptable to cut off support for PHP versions below 4.4, which would allow us to get rid of a few things like the PEAR PHP_Compat package. Regarding MySQL, version 4.1 looks like a reasonable minimum requirement, although I'm not quite sure what it would buy us? Any other items considered big + important? And then of course there are lots of things in the bugtracker that we should address. I see quite a few minor issues that just had to be postponed for 1.5.0/1.5.1 for various reasons but should be easy enough to implement. That's actually quite a lot of work already. If we're aiming for a release in, say, December or January, that should keep all of us busy. bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Sep 14 04:09:53 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 10:09:53 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Going Mercurial? Message-ID: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> Another thing that we should decide on before we start with 1.5.2: Are we going to switch to Mercurial? I'd say the benefits of a Distributed Version Control System are obvious. The only questions remaining are which system we're going to use and when to make the switch. So how does Mercurial feel? I guess our SoC students have the most experience with it now - let's hear it, guys. We could of course decide to try out some other system before making a decision. I've expressed my reservations regarding git before, but Bazaar may be a candidate worth considering. If we're unsure, we can stick to CVS for now. But we should have made the switch by the time the next GSoC comes around (should Google decide to run that program again and should we be selected to take part again, of course). bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From mjervis at gmail.com Sun Sep 14 04:51:54 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 09:51:54 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Beyond 1.5.1 In-Reply-To: <20080914075601.978144622@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080914075601.978144622@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809140151qb3344ccpfea789b17b47f4bd@mail.gmail.com> > So, what are our plans once 1.5.1 is out? Firstly, decide on the version number. If we're adding GSoC and a set of features with a 3-4 month cycle, I suggest we aim for 1.5.2, which would imply no other big and disruptive features to integrate. > Obviously, we want to integrate the results of this year's Summer of Code. > 1) Fix the editors. That's bug #653: When you forget to fill out a > 2) Find a replacement for kses. We need to come up with a list of > requirements first, though. > 3) Raise the minimum requirements. +1 on all the above. > Any other items considered big + important? I think that should be driven from the following. > And then of course there are lots of things in the bugtracker that we > should address. I see quite a few minor issues that just had to be > postponed for 1.5.0/1.5.1 for various reasons but should be easy enough > to implement. So, Dirk, if you create a 1.5.2 version in the appropriate drop down, we can start filing anything we think as necessary for that release under that category and get a "roadmap" view of what's on 1.5.2. I think we should then post a public article after 1.5.1's release on the site stating what's going to be in 1.5.2 and post regular updates. I think a good plan would be to aim to get the GSoC stuff commited and only the GSoC (+ maybe minor/trivial bugs) and release a "preview" release of the GSoC functionality (by the end of Oct?) for feedback whilst we concentrate on reducing the list generated in the tracker. And I also suggest that if it's not in the tracker, it's not in 1.5.2. Having a clear list of what's left (bug or features) is essential I think to making progress. Cheers, Mik From mjervis at gmail.com Sun Sep 14 05:14:45 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 10:14:45 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Going Mercurial? In-Reply-To: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809140214k55e52e46p4ea198780befb3b8@mail.gmail.com> > Are we going to switch to Mercurial? > > I'd say the benefits of a Distributed Version Control System are > obvious. The only questions remaining are which system we're going to > use and when to make the switch. > > So how does Mercurial feel? I guess our SoC students have the most > experience with it now - let's hear it, guys. I think we should take the plunge. I'm roughly up to speed with it and it works nicely for me. I don't see a strong reason to try any other products. Migrate the CVS repository to HG, we are then capable of having our own public mirrors with our commits in for people to play with prior to finishing off and pushing to the master. Mike From info at heatherengineering.com Sun Sep 14 10:18:31 2008 From: info at heatherengineering.com (Euan McKay) Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:18:31 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Going Mercurial? In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809140214k55e52e46p4ea198780befb3b8@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809140214k55e52e46p4ea198780befb3b8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: I got used to using Git, but can't see that much difference between the two. I'd say go for it as soon as possible. Euan. On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 18:14, Michael Jervis wrote: >> Are we going to switch to Mercurial? >> >> I'd say the benefits of a Distributed Version Control System are >> obvious. The only questions remaining are which system we're going to >> use and when to make the switch. >> >> So how does Mercurial feel? I guess our SoC students have the most >> experience with it now - let's hear it, guys. > > I think we should take the plunge. I'm roughly up to speed with it and > it works nicely for me. I don't see a strong reason to try any other > products. > > Migrate the CVS repository to HG, we are then capable of having our > own public mirrors with our commits in for people to play with prior > to finishing off and pushing to the master. > > Mike > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From mjervis at gmail.com Tue Sep 16 09:21:42 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 14:21:42 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Interesting bug - path collision In-Reply-To: <20080904181548.134249445@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470809022337i4aa001f0k6a5ddeff772e44b2@mail.gmail.com> <20080903175222.1719231789@smtp.haun-online.de> <8319e2d60809031057p6fc2db4br8d123687bc094836@mail.gmail.com> <20080904181548.134249445@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809160621v34a21d47m36e24151b9749a61@mail.gmail.com> >>Wouldn't it be easiest just to rename admin/mail.php? > > Of course. Until we run into the same sort of problem again with another > PEAR package. Sigh. > I'd be interested to learn if the PEAR team has an officially > sanctioned / recommended way of handling this. Stackoverflow to the rescue: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/63599/including-files-case-sensitively-on-windows-from-php Got a good answer their, since we include our own files with full path, shove PEAR up the list. And in future, check for name conflicts. Mike From mjervis at gmail.com Tue Sep 16 12:04:55 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 17:04:55 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Open Source Etiquette Message-ID: <7b42e7470809160904w6db2bf90s730bdd7315920ae3@mail.gmail.com> On a number of separate channels related to Geeklog development I've recently (well over the last 6 months, 4 separate things have come up) been discussing the etiquette of when to add your name to a copyright header, when to take "ownership" of functions, modules etc. I kept asking Dirk where the article I'd read and I thought discussed when I first started contributing to geeklog was. Neither of us could find it. But I've had a brain wave today as something came up on my radar elsewhere and made a connection... I was referring to ESR's "Homesteading the Noosphere" paper, which is a damned good read that anyone working on open source should read and at least think about even if they don't agree with it all. Original English: http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/homesteading/ German: http://www.phone-soft.com/raymondhomesteading/htn_g.0.html Other translations, and other related essays such as CatB here: http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/cathedral-bazaar/ I read them all a few years back, worth you guys doing the same. -- Michael Jervis mjervis at gmail.com 504B03041400000008008F846431E3543A820800000006000000060000007765 62676F642B4F4D4ACF4F0100504B010214001400000008008F846431E3543A82 0800000006000000060000000000000000002000000000000000776562676F64 504B05060000000001000100340000002C0000000000 From vfuria at gmail.com Wed Sep 17 11:26:16 2008 From: vfuria at gmail.com (Vincent Furia) Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:26:16 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Centralizing distributed version control Message-ID: <8319e2d60809170826u16ac136cke69a14c6f19169f1@mail.gmail.com> Since we're discussing going to Mercurial for version control. Thought this article would be interesting to everyone. Not directly applicable to Geeklog since we don't have a suite of unit tests, but interesting none the less. http://ocaml.janestcapital.com/?q=node/36 -Vinny From komma at ivywe.co.jp Thu Sep 18 10:05:02 2008 From: komma at ivywe.co.jp (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?SXZ5V2UbJEI6IzZwGyhC?=) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 23:05:02 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] plugins.php does not work well In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809160904w6db2bf90s730bdd7315920ae3@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470809160904w6db2bf90s730bdd7315920ae3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48D2600E.2000302@ivywe.co.jp> /admin/plugins.php does not work well on our server. trouble case: site path /db-config.php /public_html/siteconfig.php Display: An error has occurred: 2 - is_dir() [function.is-dir]: open_basedir restriction in effect. File(//plugins/..) is not within the allowed path(s): (//:/usr/share/php/:/tmp/) @ //htdocs/admin/plugins.php line 252 So, we changed... public_html/admin/plugins.php: 251: before: ................................ if (is_dir ($plugins_dir . $dir) && ($dir <> '.') && ($dir <> '..') && ($dir <> 'CVS') && (substr ($dir, 0 , 1) <> '.')) { ................................ after: ................................ if (($dir <> '.') && ($dir <> '..') && is_dir ($plugins_dir . $dir) && ($dir <> 'CVS') && (substr ($dir, 0 , 1) <> '.')) { ................................ Then, it worked well. -- Geeklog Japanese Ivy From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 18 15:15:20 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2008 21:15:20 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] plugins.php does not work well In-Reply-To: <48D2600E.2000302@ivywe.co.jp> References: <7b42e7470809160904w6db2bf90s730bdd7315920ae3@mail.gmail.com> <48D2600E.2000302@ivywe.co.jp> Message-ID: <20080918191520.2120504531@smtp.haun-online.de> IvyWe?? wrote: >2 - is_dir() [function.is-dir]: open_basedir restriction in effect. >File(//plugins/..) is not within the allowed path(s): Okay, that is a problem I hadn't considered when I wrote that check. And it only took 6 years for someone to run into it ;-) Fixed in CVS. Thanks. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From komma at ivywe.co.jp Thu Sep 18 20:47:19 2008 From: komma at ivywe.co.jp (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?SXZ5V2UbJEI6IzZwGyhC?=) Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:47:19 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] plugins.php does not work well In-Reply-To: <20080918191520.2120504531@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <7b42e7470809160904w6db2bf90s730bdd7315920ae3@mail.gmail.com> <48D2600E.2000302@ivywe.co.jp> <20080918191520.2120504531@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <48D2F697.9030806@ivywe.co.jp> Dirk, Thanks! I found the problem yesterday, then hiroron send me the code. > IvyWe?? wrote: > >> 2 - is_dir() [function.is-dir]: open_basedir restriction in effect. >> File(//plugins/..) is not within the allowed path(s): > > Okay, that is a problem I hadn't considered when I wrote that check. And > it only took 6 years for someone to run into it ;-) > > Fixed in CVS. Thanks. Geeklog Japanese Ivy From chipper at llamas.net Wed Sep 24 09:33:19 2008 From: chipper at llamas.net (Chris 'Chipper' Chiapusio) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 09:33:19 -0400 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Beyond 1.5.1 In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809140151qb3344ccpfea789b17b47f4bd@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080914075601.978144622@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809140151qb3344ccpfea789b17b47f4bd@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080924133319.GA13162@chipsworld.llamas.net> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 09:51:54AM +0100, Michael Jervis wrote: >> So, what are our plans once 1.5.1 is out? > >Firstly, decide on the version number. If we're adding GSoC and a set >of features with a 3-4 month cycle, I suggest we aim for 1.5.2, which >would imply no other big and disruptive features to integrate. > >> Obviously, we want to integrate the results of this year's Summer of Code. >> 1) Fix the editors. That's bug #653: When you forget to fill out a >> 2) Find a replacement for kses. We need to come up with a list of >> requirements first, though. >> 3) Raise the minimum requirements. > >+1 on all the above. > If you are going to change PHP and/or MySQL minimum version requirements, isn't that more than a x.x.1 version bump? >> Any other items considered big + important? > >I think that should be driven from the following. > >> And then of course there are lots of things in the bugtracker that we >> should address. I see quite a few minor issues that just had to be >> postponed for 1.5.0/1.5.1 for various reasons but should be easy enough >> to implement. > >So, Dirk, if you create a 1.5.2 version in the appropriate drop down, >we can start filing anything we think as necessary for that release >under that category and get a "roadmap" view of what's on 1.5.2. > >I think we should then post a public article after 1.5.1's release on >the site stating what's going to be in 1.5.2 and post regular updates. Chip -- ------ **** Warning **** This e-mail message, without warrant or warning, and despite US law as set forth in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, may be subject to monitoring by the United States National Security Agency and/or the Department of Defense. Information contained in this message may be used against any senders or recipients, now or in the future, in a public trial or secret tribunal. Please encrypt anything important. PGP Key: http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6CFA486D From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Sep 24 13:34:25 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 19:34:25 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Going Mercurial? In-Reply-To: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20080924173425.262401003@smtp.haun-online.de> FYI: I've asked pair.com to install Mercurial on the server which they kindly did now. It's not officially supported, but should be easier to use now without that somewhat awkward setup we were using until now. I should have some time to do the conversion from CVS on Friday. I'll probably also move some things around while I'm at it. Will update the wiki page accordingly when I'm done. In the meantime, feel free to add things to CVS. Or you may want to wait so that you have something to try out Mercurial with ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From komma at ivywe.co.jp Wed Sep 24 23:31:34 2008 From: komma at ivywe.co.jp (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?SXZ5V2UbJEI6IzZwGyhC?=) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:31:34 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] calendar plugin: Zip code is too small... In-Reply-To: <20080924173425.262401003@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080924173425.262401003@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <48DB0616.5060107@ivywe.co.jp> calendar plugin: Now gl_events zipcode is varchar(5). We Japanese group changes the size of zipcode 5 to 8. Japan ... 8 (ex 186-0082) United States of America ... 5 or 9 Canada ... 6 Republic of Singapore ...6 Zip code is too small, I think. And user account(16) is too small for multi-byte language users, I think. -- Geeklog Japanese Ivy From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 25 13:27:11 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 19:27:11 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] [geeklog-cvs] Geeklog-SoC: Added tag geeklog_1_5_0_stable, -r, 6216 for change... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080925172711.1378947897@smtp.haun-online.de> geeklog-cvs at lists.geeklog.net wrote: >Added tag geeklog_1_5_0_stable, -r, 6216 for changeset d61870af453f Lesson learned: The order of the options matters ... wrong: hg tag geeklog_1_5_0_stable -r 6216 correct: hg tag -r 6216 geeklog_1_5_0_stable bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 25 14:44:04 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:44:04 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] User account names (was: calendar plugin: Zip code is too small...) In-Reply-To: <48DB0616.5060107@ivywe.co.jp> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080924173425.262401003@smtp.haun-online.de> <48DB0616.5060107@ivywe.co.jp> Message-ID: <20080925184404.1735738028@smtp.haun-online.de> IvyWe?? wrote: >And user account(16) is too small for multi-byte language users, I think. Hmm. I was actually thinking (for a while now) how to go about restricting the usernames to pretty much a-z, digits, and a few select other characters (and how to handle a conversion of existing usernames that use other characters). I guess that's the typical closed-minded western view? How are other sites in Japan handling usernames? Do they allow non-ASCII characters? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Sep 25 15:20:12 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 21:20:12 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] [geeklog-cvs] Geeklog-SoC: Test commit: Fixed handling of HTML entities in the... In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20080925192012.1774576169@smtp.haun-online.de> geeklog-cvs at lists.geeklog.net wrote: >description: >Test commit: Fixed handling of HTML entities in the Configuration (bug >#0000710) Still trying to figure out why it never sent any notifications when someone other than myself was pushing something. Found another option that I've overlooked so far. Could someone please push something to the SoC repository? And then tell me if you see something like this on your end: dirk at prospero:soc-work> hg push dhaun at cvs.geeklog.net's password: pushing to ssh://dhaun at cvs.geeklog.net//cvsroot/geeklog/Geeklog-SoC searching for changes remote: adding changesets remote: adding manifests remote: adding file changes remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files remote: notify: sending 1 subscribers 1 changes Thanks. bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From info at heatherengineering.com Thu Sep 25 19:46:44 2008 From: info at heatherengineering.com (Euan McKay) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:46:44 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] User account names (was: calendar plugin: Zip code is too small...) In-Reply-To: <20080925184404.1735738028@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080924173425.262401003@smtp.haun-online.de> <48DB0616.5060107@ivywe.co.jp> <20080925184404.1735738028@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: I set up a few sites for Japanese users, and quite a few users enter their full name as the username, in Japanese (UTF-8). Restricting to latin characters might cause problems with backward compatibility? At least sites with existing non-latin character usernames should be catered for. If you want to get rid of non-latin characters, I think you need to ask yourself: why? If you do so, I wonder if a username is really needed? Can't everything be based off a unique, latin-character-only email address? I'm probably being closed-minded in my own way, but I want to see a registration form with just fields for email address and a user-chosen password, with nickname and full name as options enabled from the configuration panel. But that's not what you asked. ;) Euan. 2008/9/26 Dirk Haun : > IvyWe?? wrote: > >>And user account(16) is too small for multi-byte language users, I think. > > Hmm. I was actually thinking (for a while now) how to go about > restricting the usernames to pretty much a-z, digits, and a few select > other characters (and how to handle a conversion of existing usernames > that use other characters). > > I guess that's the typical closed-minded western view? How are other > sites in Japan handling usernames? Do they allow non-ASCII characters? > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://geeklog.info/ > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From komma at ivywe.co.jp Fri Sep 26 00:25:37 2008 From: komma at ivywe.co.jp (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?SXZ5V2UbJEI6IzZwGyhC?=) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:25:37 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] User account names In-Reply-To: <20080925184404.1735738028@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080924173425.262401003@smtp.haun-online.de> <48DB0616.5060107@ivywe.co.jp> <20080925184404.1735738028@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <48DC6441.5090402@ivywe.co.jp> >> And user account(16) is too small for multi-byte language users, I think. > > Hmm. I was actually thinking (for a while now) how to go about > restricting the usernames to pretty much a-z, digits, and a few select > other characters (and how to handle a conversion of existing usernames > that use other characters). > > I guess that's the typical closed-minded western view? How are other > sites in Japan handling usernames? Do they allow non-ASCII characters? Geeklog allow non-ASCII characters as user account names, so we use non-ASCII characters, too. Geeklog Japanese Ivy From dirk at haun-online.de Fri Sep 26 02:48:48 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 08:48:48 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] User account names In-Reply-To: <48DC6441.5090402@ivywe.co.jp> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080924173425.262401003@smt p.haun-online.de> <48DB0616.5060107@ivywe.co.jp> <20080925184404.1735738028@smtp.haun-online.de> <48DC6441.5090402@ivywe.co.jp> Message-ID: <20080926064848.2136433506@smtp.haun-online.de> IvyWe?? wrote: >Geeklog allow non-ASCII characters as user account names, >so we use non-ASCII characters, too. I meant other, non-Geeklog sites. Is it a common thing to allow Japanese characters in usernames? bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From komma at ivywe.co.jp Fri Sep 26 03:56:05 2008 From: komma at ivywe.co.jp (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?SXZ5V2UbJEI6IzZwGyhC?=) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 16:56:05 +0900 Subject: [geeklog-devel] User account names In-Reply-To: <20080926064848.2136433506@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080914080953.1817150062@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080924173425.262401003@smt p.haun-online.de> <48DB0616.5060107@ivywe.co.jp> <20080925184404.1735738028@smtp.haun-online.de> <48DC6441.5090402@ivywe.co.jp> <20080926064848.2136433506@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <48DC9595.3080703@ivywe.co.jp> Dirk Haun wrote: > I meant other, non-Geeklog sites. Is it a common thing to allow Japanese > characters in usernames? It's a common thing. ex.) XOOPS... allow or not: by configuration mode. But Geeklog don't have the mode. So all Geeklog system allow Japanese characters in usernames. Geeklog Japanese Ivy From dirk at haun-online.de Fri Sep 26 08:01:12 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:01:12 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running Message-ID: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> The conversion is done. Our official Mercurial repository is now up at http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/ Instructions in the wiki have also been updated: http://wiki.geeklog.net/wiki/index.php/Using_Mercurial For those that were using the GSoC repository: It's still there but has moved and was renamed - see the wiki for details. Setup notes: - We have Mercurial 1.0.2 on the server. I don't think there are any compatibility issues with older 1.0.x versions, but you may want to upgrade to that version just in case. - If you were using the GSoC repository before, you should remove the "remotecmd" entry from your local ~/.hgrc file. That special version is no longer there. If you run into any problems, let me know. Oh, and I'd still like to have some feedback on that notification issue, please. When you check something in, please have a look at the messages that Mercurial is printing out. Any errors regarding notifications there? bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Fri Sep 26 08:20:06 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 14:20:06 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Cosmetics (was: Mercurial up and running) In-Reply-To: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20080926122006.706549621@smtp.haun-online.de> Also, the web interface comes in two different styles. Which one do you like better? http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/ vs. http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/gsoc-2008/ bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From mjervis at gmail.com Fri Sep 26 08:21:43 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:21:43 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Cosmetics (was: Mercurial up and running) In-Reply-To: <20080926122006.706549621@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080926122006.706549621@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809260521n177f0051g81bb91f2f78af08e@mail.gmail.com> > Also, the web interface comes in two different styles. Which one do you > like better? > http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/ This one looks nicer. From mjervis at gmail.com Fri Sep 26 08:22:13 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 13:22:13 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809260522r4de61a35i493dec2ea51319bd@mail.gmail.com> > Oh, and I'd still like to have some feedback on that notification issue, > please. When you check something in, please have a look at the messages > that Mercurial is printing out. Any errors regarding notifications there? I will try and push a minor fix tonight to test this. Once I get my environment to work with the new HG up and running. Mike From mjervis at gmail.com Fri Sep 26 15:21:34 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:21:34 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809260522r4de61a35i493dec2ea51319bd@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809260522r4de61a35i493dec2ea51319bd@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809261221q550fe8d4ob97ef40f13e939fd@mail.gmail.com> > I will try and push a minor fix tonight to test this. Once I get my > environment to work with the new HG up and running. It's taking a really, really long time to do the initial check out. It might be tomorrow before I have any test evidence ;-) -- Michael Jervis mjervis at gmail.com 504B03041400000008008F846431E3543A820800000006000000060000007765 62676F642B4F4D4ACF4F0100504B010214001400000008008F846431E3543A82 0800000006000000060000000000000000002000000000000000776562676F64 504B05060000000001000100340000002C0000000000 From mjervis at gmail.com Fri Sep 26 15:48:49 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 20:48:49 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] [geeklog-cvs] Geeklog-SoC: Test commit: Fixed handling of HTML entities in the... In-Reply-To: <20080925192012.1774576169@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080925192012.1774576169@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809261248n5327ab6fj60ad88ee53e9e49a@mail.gmail.com> > dirk at prospero:soc-work> hg push > dhaun at cvs.geeklog.net's password: > pushing to ssh://dhaun at cvs.geeklog.net//cvsroot/geeklog/Geeklog-SoC > searching for changes > remote: adding changesets > remote: adding manifests > remote: adding file changes > remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files > remote: notify: sending 1 subscribers 1 changes C:\Documents and Settings\Michael\My Documents\projects\geeklog\geeklog-hg>hg pu sh pushing to ssh://mjervis at cvs.geeklog.net//cvsroot/hg/geeklog searching for changes remote: Server version: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.0 remote: We claim version: SSH-2.0-PuTTY_Release_0.58 remote: Using SSH protocol version 2 remote: Doing Diffie-Hellman group exchange remote: Doing Diffie-Hellman key exchange remote: Host key fingerprint is: remote: ssh-rsa 1024 17:83:c5:8a:7a:ac:6c:90:48:04:0b:e5:9c:e5:4d:ab remote: Initialised AES-256 client->server encryption remote: Initialised HMAC-SHA1 client->server MAC algorithm remote: Initialised AES-256 server->client encryption remote: Initialised HMAC-SHA1 server->client MAC algorithm remote: Using username "mjervis". remote: Keyboard-interactive authentication refused remote: Sent password remote: Access granted remote: Opened channel for session remote: Started a shell/command remote: Not trusting file /cvsroot/hg/geeklog/.hg/hgrc from untrusted user geekl og2, group users remote: Not trusting file /usr/home/geeklog2/cvsroot/hg/geeklog/.hg/hgrc from un trusted user geeklog2, group users remote: adding changesets remote: adding manifests remote: adding file changes remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files remote: Sent EOF message remote: Server sent command exit status 0 remote: All channels closed. Disconnecting remote: Server closed network connection From dirk at haun-online.de Fri Sep 26 19:00:52 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 01:00:52 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809261221q550fe8d4ob97ef40f13e939fd@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809260522r4de61a35i493dec2ea51319bd@mail.gmail.com> <7b42e7470809261221q550fe8d4ob97ef40f13e939fd@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080926230052.1868585392@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >It's taking a really, really long time to do the initial check out. The repository is something like 22 MB - times two, as every file will also be checked out. That'll take a moment or two, but you only have to do it once. >remote: Not trusting file /usr/home/geeklog2/cvsroot/hg/geeklog/.hg/hgrc >from untrusted user geeklog2, group users Log into your account on cvs.geeklog.net, create a file .hgrc in your home directory that contains [trusted] users = geeklog2 groups = users Not sure if that helps with the email, but it will at least get rid of that message. Need to add that to the wiki. Actually, it should help. The notification stuff is in the .hg/hgrc file. But if it doesn't trust it, it won't use it. I guess ... bye, Dirk P.S. I will be attending BarCamp Stuttgart on Saturday and Sunday - expect delays in my responses . -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From mjervis at gmail.com Sat Sep 27 03:27:08 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (Michael Jervis) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:27:08 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <20080926230052.1868585392@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809260522r4de61a35i493dec2ea51319bd@mail.gmail.com> <7b42e7470809261221q550fe8d4ob97ef40f13e939fd@mail.gmail.com> <20080926230052.1868585392@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <7b42e7470809270027r7d83bca8gcd7d8118ea33b007@mail.gmail.com> > The repository is something like 22 MB - times two, as every file will > also be checked out. That'll take a moment or two, but you only have to > do it once. Yeah it took over an hour all told I think, and I'm on 8 mbps. > Log into your account on cvs.geeklog.net, create a file .hgrc in your > Actually, it should help. The notification stuff is in the .hg/hgrc > file. But if it doesn't trust it, it won't use it. I guess ... That appears to be the fix: pushing to ssh://mjervis at cvs.geeklog.net//cvsroot/hg/geeklog searching for changes remote: Server version: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_5.0 remote: We claim version: SSH-2.0-PuTTY_Release_0.58 remote: Using SSH protocol version 2 remote: Doing Diffie-Hellman group exchange remote: Doing Diffie-Hellman key exchange remote: Host key fingerprint is: remote: ssh-rsa 1024 17:83:c5:8a:7a:ac:6c:90:48:04:0b:e5:9c:e5:4d:ab remote: Initialised AES-256 client->server encryption remote: Initialised HMAC-SHA1 client->server MAC algorithm remote: Initialised AES-256 server->client encryption remote: Initialised HMAC-SHA1 server->client MAC algorithm remote: Using username "mjervis". remote: Keyboard-interactive authentication refused remote: Sent password remote: Access granted remote: Opened channel for session remote: Started a shell/command remote: adding changesets remote: adding manifests remote: adding file changes remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files remote: notify: sending 1 subscribers 1 changes remote: Sent EOF message remote: Server sent command exit status 0 remote: All channels closed. Disconnecting remote: Server closed network connection From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Sep 27 15:57:01 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:57:01 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809270027r7d83bca8gcd7d8118ea33b007@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809260522r4de61a35i493dec2ea51319bd@mail.gmail.com> <7b42e7470809261221q550fe8d4ob97ef40f13e939fd@mail.gmail.com> <20080926230052.1868585392@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809270027r7d83bca8gcd7d8118ea33b007@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20080927195701.430272274@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >That appears to be the fix: Excellent. Thanks, Mike. Did everybody see that? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From cordiste at free.fr Sat Sep 27 15:52:50 2008 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:52:50 +0200 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Cosmetics (was: Mercurial up and running) In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470809260521n177f0051g81bb91f2f78af08e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <20080926122006.706549621@smtp.haun-online.de> <7b42e7470809260521n177f0051g81bb91f2f78af08e@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <364575ed0809271252v10739554l82779206ffe3ed0d@mail.gmail.com> +1 for the first one. ::Ben 2008/9/26 Michael Jervis > > Also, the web interface comes in two different styles. Which one do you > > like better? > > http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/ > > This one looks nicer. > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: