From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Nov 9 13:34:54 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 19:34:54 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] GSoC installer In-Reply-To: <7b42e7470808181024o2c96d09an4b5feac83a2b39da@mail.gmail.com> References: <7b42e7470808181024o2c96d09an4b5feac83a2b39da@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20081109183454.476555678@smtp.haun-online.de> Michael Jervis wrote: >Fatal error: Call to undefined function curl_init() in C:\Program >Files\xamp\geeklog\geeklog-hg-dev\public_html\admin\install\lib-install.php >on line 521 Just ran into this myself again. This needs to be resolved somehow. Okay, I thought, why use cURL when we use HTTP_Request everywhere else? Well, turns out we don't have the path to PEAR at this point. Hmm. Matt, any suggestions? But the fun doesn't stop there. It currently does a check for the site_admin_url, which usually does not end in a slash, e.g. http://example.com/admin Doing a HEAD request on that URL will return a 301 (at least on Apache) for a redirect to admin/ (with the slash). But if the URL is not correct, it could be redirecting somewhere else entirely. So I'd suggest we only accept 200 status codes, to be on the safe side (and add a slash to the URL before we do the request). And now comes the shooting-yourself-in-the-foot bit: I've made a change recently so that the dreaded "Unfortunately, an error has occurred ..." message will come with a 500 status code. Doing a HEAD request for admin/ will fire up Geeklog - which isn't fully installed at this point. Particularly the DB credentials may not be available - and so the request fails with a 500, even though the URL is correct. Do we want to accept a 500 here (if there's something wrong with your server, you wouldn't have gotten that far anyway)? Or do we simply drop the entire URL check again? bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From devel at portalparts.com Wed Nov 12 16:42:02 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:42:02 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] New Data Filtering Class Message-ID: A couple years ago, I added the sanatize.class.php as a first attempt for an OO interface and improvements to our COM_applyFilter. I never really used it nor did anyone else. Over the past months, I have taken up the cause again and have submitted my latest approach into CVS as it's replacement. The filter is a class and allows you to submit an array of variables to be filtered, optionally set the filtering method per variable and return the filtered data into a single associative array. The COM_applyFilter works well for INT and CHAR type filtering but would not handle text that would be expected to include quotes. This new class has support for INT, CHAR and TEXT filtering modes and can easily extended. It would be easy now to add a HTML filter that used the new HTML_purifier pear project. The class has several methods or ways to use it so that you can either load up a lot of data to be filtered or just call it one 1 line like COM_applyFilter works today. While working on AJAX based projects, you need to filter the data first for SQL use and then run stripslashes on the data if your returning the data to your AJAX hander code to update the webpage. To better handle this, I have added methods to return data filtered and prep'ed for DB or Web. The following are my comments from the class file. <<>> /* This class can be used to filter a single variable or an array of data * Three filtering modes are currently supported but the class can easily be extended * Mode int: will return integer value or 0 if NULL or non-integer * Mode char: strong character filter that will remove any HTML or quotes * Mode text: Use for text fields and will use the site HTML filtering functions and user allowable HTML returned as well as quotes * * Data can be returned filtered or optionally prep'ed for DB or Web use * Usage Examples: * $filter = new sanitizer(); * * Example 1: Load up data to be filtered and then call method to return data prep'ed for DB, Web or default format * Better if you have a lot of data to filter and if you want to return it for DB and Web Presentation format $filter = new sanitizer(); $charvars = array( 'id' => $_REQUEST['id'], 'mode' => $_REQUEST['mode'] ); $textvars = array( 'title' => $_REQUEST['movietitle'], // Able to change the key that will be used in filtered return array 'desc' => $_REQUEST['moviedesc'], 'keywords' => $_REQUEST['keywords'], ); // Initialize the filter and load the data and types to be filtered $filter = new nexfilter(); $filter->cleanData('char',$charvars); $filter->cleanData('text',$textvars); $dbData = $filter->getDbData(); // Filtered data is prep'ed for SQL use - addslashes added $webData = $filter->getWebData(); // Filtered data like text filtered data with stripslashes already done $title = $dbData['title']; DB_query("UPDATE {$_TABLES['media']} SET title='{$dbData['title']} WHERE id='{$dbData['id']}'"); * Example 2: Define the variables to be filtered, mode and returns sanitized data * Not able to specify SUPER GLOBAL to filter data from unless you call multiple methods * but you can specify multiple filtering modes. Methods for GET, POST, REQUEST and COOKIE $filter = new sanitizer(); $clean = $filter->cleanPostData(array('movietitle' => 'text', 'id' => 'int')); DB_query("UPDATE {$_TABLES['media']} SET title='{$clean['movietitle']} WHERE id='{$clean['id']}'"); * Example 3: Pass in multiple variables but a single filtering mode $clean = $filter->getCleanData('text', array('title' => $_POST['movietitle'],'desc' => $_POST['moviedesc'] )); * Example 4: Pass in a single variable to sanitize $id = $filter->getCleanData('int',$_GET['id']); * How to extend allowable types - add a new function * Example Type: Int -- function _cleanInt(), so adding a function called _cleanDate could be added for a date filter */ From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Nov 12 17:37:22 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:37:22 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] New Data Filtering Class In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20081112223722.1697331824@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >and have submitted my latest approach into CVS as it's replacement. CVS? bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From devel at portalparts.com Wed Nov 12 17:54:51 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:54:51 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] New Data Filtering Class In-Reply-To: <20081112223722.1697331824@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20081112223722.1697331824@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Guess I missed the memo. I don't recall seeing the meeting invite where we discussed or voted on chucking CVS. Dirk Haun wrote: > Blaine Lang wrote: > > >> and have submitted my latest approach into CVS as it's replacement. >> > > CVS? > > bye, Dirk > > > From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Nov 13 01:10:27 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 07:10:27 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] New Data Filtering Class In-Reply-To: References: <20081112223722.1697331824@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20081113061027.43436153@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >Guess I missed the memo. I don't recall seeing the meeting invite where >we discussed or voted on chucking CVS. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From devel at portalparts.com Thu Nov 13 10:13:54 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 10:13:54 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: I have installed the tortoise Mercurial client and have cloned (or created) my local repository but am not able to commit any updates. No error and it looks like it's committing but when I view the repository the change was not committed - is it in a queue waiting to be approved? I was asked the first time on commit for my username but not password. This morning, I decided to try again and also created the .hgrc file on the server. > Deleted my local clone and created a new local repository > Committed my update and same result - silient commit, no warnings, no prompt for password and no change that I can see to the repository. At this point I am stumped. Dirk Haun wrote: > The conversion is done. Our official Mercurial repository is now up at > > http://project.geeklog.net/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/geeklog/ > > Instructions in the wiki have also been updated: > > http://wiki.geeklog.net/wiki/index.php/Using_Mercurial > > For those that were using the GSoC repository: It's still there but has > moved and was renamed - see the wiki for details. > > Setup notes: > > - We have Mercurial 1.0.2 on the server. I don't think there are any > compatibility issues with older 1.0.x versions, but you may want to > upgrade to that version just in case. > > - If you were using the GSoC repository before, you should remove the > "remotecmd" entry from your local ~/.hgrc file. That special version is > no longer there. > > If you run into any problems, let me know. > > Oh, and I'd still like to have some feedback on that notification issue, > please. When you check something in, please have a look at the messages > that Mercurial is printing out. Any errors regarding notifications there? > > bye, Dirk > > > From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Nov 13 13:10:59 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:10:59 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20081113181059.687238796@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: > Deleted my local clone and created a new local repository > Committed my update and same result - silient commit, no warnings, no > prompt for password and no change that I can see to the repository. > > At this point I am stumped. Sounds like you're only committing to your local repository but not pushing back the changes back to our central repository. If you do a "hg tip", you should see your last commit in your local repository. Keep in mind that every commit and update is now a two-step process: hg commit / hg push and hg pull / hg update. I forgot that you didn't need to use the GSoC repository, but I would have hoped you had some time to play with Mercurial anyway. Btw, where is Aman's code hosted currently? We should also have it in a Mercurial repository on our server. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From devel at portalparts.com Thu Nov 13 16:38:56 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 16:38:56 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <20081113181059.687238796@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081113181059.687238796@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Agree - after reading some more, I see that commit is to my local repository. Tortoise HG uses the command 'Synchronize' which brings up a new dialog with the 'Push' command. So using this panel and method, I get a bit further. Updated my local mercurial.ini file to specify the putty plink program and default remote path [ui] username = blaine Lang ssh = "c:/misc utils/plink.exe" [hooks] precommit.username = [web] push_ssl = True [paths] default-push = ssh://blaine at cvs.geeklog.net//cvsroot/hg/geeklog Settings don't appear to be picked up in the Tortoise Syncronize dialog so I enter the remote path and when I try to PUSH, the client just spins away and an hour later nothing and have to finally terminate the program. See attached. Anyone have this working? Dirk Haun wrote: > Blaine Lang wrote: > > >> Deleted my local clone and created a new local repository >> Committed my update and same result - silient commit, no warnings, no >> prompt for password and no change that I can see to the repository. >> >> At this point I am stumped. >> > > Sounds like you're only committing to your local repository but not > pushing back the changes back to our central repository. > > If you do a "hg tip", you should see your last commit in your local > repository. > > Keep in mind that every commit and update is now a two-step process: hg > commit / hg push and hg pull / hg update. > > I forgot that you didn't need to use the GSoC repository, but I would > have hoped you had some time to play with Mercurial anyway. > > Btw, where is Aman's code hosted currently? We should also have it in a > Mercurial repository on our server. > > bye, Dirk > > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: SNAG-0466.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 55653 bytes Desc: not available URL: From dirk at haun-online.de Thu Nov 13 16:48:41 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 22:48:41 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081113181059.687238796@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20081113214841.973915586@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >Tortoise HG Can't really help you with that one, however: >[paths] >default-push = ssh://blaine at cvs.geeklog.net//cvsroot/hg/geeklog That should go into the .hg/hgrc of your repository. Not sure if it has any effect in the global .hgrc >See attached. That appears to be running "hg serve", i.e. run a tiny webserver so that you can browse your local repository at localhost:8000. Was that on purpose? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ From devel at portalparts.com Thu Nov 13 17:59:06 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 17:59:06 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <20081113214841.973915586@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081113181059.687238796@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081113214841.973915586@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Dirk Haun wrote: > That should go into the .hg/hgrc of your repository. Not sure if it has any effect in the global .hgrc On Windows or Vista - the docs explain that mercurial.ini is used > That appears to be running "hg serve", i.e. run a tiny webserver so that you can browse your local repository at localhost:8000. Was that on purpose? Not at all - that command line is what was generated after I entered the remote path and clicked on Push. I'm ready to go back to CVS now ;) Blaine From devel at portalparts.com Fri Nov 14 09:39:56 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 09:39:56 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: <491CB13A.9050305@portalparts.com> References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081113181059.687238796@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081113214841.973915586@smtp.haun-online.de> <491CB13A.9050305@portalparts.com> Message-ID: Thanks Dirk and Mike - I now have the Mercurial Tortoise client pushing updates back to the main repository. Mike added a section to the Mercurial usage page on the Wiki and I've just added a few notes as well. http://wiki.geeklog.net/wiki/index.php/Using_Mercurial#Windows_Users_-_Secret_Sauce_.28if_you_have_commit_rights.29 I now have 3 versions of Tortoise shell extensions installed as I have projects using CVS, SVN and now Mercurial. I agree Dirk, Mercurial may very well have the best model. Cheers, Blaine From mjervis at gmail.com Fri Nov 14 09:58:27 2008 From: mjervis at gmail.com (mjervis at gmail.com) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:58:27 -0800 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running Message-ID: <0015174c123c2b920a045ba7761b@google.com> On Nov 14, 2008 2:39pm, Blaine Lang wrote: > Mike added a section to the Mercurial usage page on the Wiki and I've just added a few notes as well. I was sure I'd replied to the list. Damn iGoogle gmail gadget is full of bugs since they "upgraded" igoogle. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Nov 15 15:38:08 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:38:08 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial up and running In-Reply-To: References: <20080926120112.1710552216@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081113181059.687238796@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081113214841.973915586@smtp.haun-online.de> <491CB13A.9050305@portalparts.com> Message-ID: <20081115203808.1775572679@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >Mike added a section to the >Mercurial usage page on the Wiki and I've just added a few notes as well. That page was edited by 4 people on one day. Can we have that much activity on other wiki pages, too, please? ;-) >I now have 3 versions of Tortoise shell extensions installed as I have >projects using CVS, SVN and now Mercurial. From what I heard - can't remember if it was during the "Git vs. Hg Shootout" session at the Mentor Summit or in a recent discussion on accu- general - the Tortoise tools for Git and hg are not quite up to par with their CVS and SVN equivalents, so beware. The basic functionality should be there, though. >I agree Dirk, Mercurial may very well have the best model. Small success story of the day: I started working on Feature Request #720, then noticed that I didn't have gdlib built into PHP on this machine. So I pulled the one change I had already committed locally to another machine, completed things there, pushed everything to the central repository, and have now pulled everything back into the repository I started with earlier today: iMac -> iBook -> cvs.geeklog.net -> iMac No conflicts, everything's back in sync. This was only one file, but it would just as well have worked for an entire set of files. Things will get more interesting once there are branches involved ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Nov 15 16:11:11 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 22:11:11 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mercurial and $Id$ Message-ID: <20081115211111.1627752278@smtp.haun-online.de> As you may (or may not) have noticed, Mercurial isn't updating the $Id$ tags, e.g. for the file I changed today: // $Id: upload.class.php,v 1.50 2007/11/25 06:59:56 ospiess Exp $ There's an extension that can supposedly do that, but I haven't got it to work yet. I'm wondering if it's even worth the effort, though. Opinions? bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Fri Nov 21 12:47:14 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:47:14 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] [geeklog-cvs] bad_behavior2: Upgraded to Bad Behavior 2.0.25 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20081121174714.1571600120@smtp.haun-online.de> geeklog-cvs at lists.geeklog.net wrote: >Upgraded to Bad Behavior 2.0.25 Whoops, sorry. I didn't intend this repository to send notifications. bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Nov 23 12:31:46 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 18:31:46 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support Message-ID: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> Guys, what's our commitment to support FCKeditor? The reason I'm asking is that I keep getting complaints from users about things not working. Since I don't use it myself, I often can't really help. Currently, we have 3 open bugs plus 1 feature request for FCKeditor. The biggest issue: It seems image upload through FCKeditor isn't working at all. From what I can see, that's due to 2 problems: - The security fix we made for the upload function seems to effectively disable it (looks like you were right, Justin) - Even if you manage to upload an image (or pick one that's already on the server), the tags are removed from the post by default (that's bug #757). Both issues would need some commitment from someone to fix (securly, that is). I guess what I'm looking for is someone who commits to supporting FCKeditor properly, i.e. looks into bugreports and at least scans the forums for problems people have with it. Because otherwise, I'm close to ripping it out again and provide it as separate "use at your own risk" package. That would be more honest than what we're promising right now ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From WebSiteMaster at cogeco.net Mon Nov 24 09:13:43 2008 From: WebSiteMaster at cogeco.net (Web Site Master) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:13:43 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <001301c94e3e$dc326980$94973c80$@net> I think it would be a mistake to rip it out. While I don't use it on my own sites, clients who don't know html (which is almost all of them) want this type of functionality. If we separate it I can see support being eventually dropped for it. Losing a WYSWYG editor in Geeklog would make it much less desirable for the average user. If the FCKeditor is not working out, is there another WYSWYG editor that could be incorporated into Geeklog instead? Tom -----Original Message----- From: geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net [mailto:geeklog-devel-bounces at lists.geeklog.net] On Behalf Of Dirk Haun Sent: November-23-08 12:32 PM To: geeklog-devel Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support Guys, what's our commitment to support FCKeditor? The reason I'm asking is that I keep getting complaints from users about things not working. Since I don't use it myself, I often can't really help. Currently, we have 3 open bugs plus 1 feature request for FCKeditor. The biggest issue: It seems image upload through FCKeditor isn't working at all. >From what I can see, that's due to 2 problems: - The security fix we made for the upload function seems to effectively disable it (looks like you were right, Justin) - Even if you manage to upload an image (or pick one that's already on the server), the tags are removed from the post by default (that's bug #757). Both issues would need some commitment from someone to fix (securly, that is). I guess what I'm looking for is someone who commits to supporting FCKeditor properly, i.e. looks into bugreports and at least scans the forums for problems people have with it. Because otherwise, I'm close to ripping it out again and provide it as separate "use at your own risk" package. That would be more honest than what we're promising right now ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature database 3632 (20081121) __________ The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com From devel at portalparts.com Mon Nov 24 09:39:11 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:39:11 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Definitely do not consider removing it from the project - that is not something I would support and wanted to make that clear off the top. I have not had a site where it has not worked. All one has to do is enable it and allow the HTML tags. Blaine Dirk Haun wrote: > Guys, > > what's our commitment to support FCKeditor? > > The reason I'm asking is that I keep getting complaints from users about > things not working. Since I don't use it myself, I often can't really help. > > Currently, we have 3 open bugs plus 1 feature request for FCKeditor. The > biggest issue: It seems image upload through FCKeditor isn't working at all. > > >From what I can see, that's due to 2 problems: > > - The security fix we made for the upload function seems to effectively > disable it (looks like you were right, Justin) > > - Even if you manage to upload an image (or pick one that's already on > the server), the tags are removed from the post by default (that's > bug #757). > > Both issues would need some commitment from someone to fix (securly, that is). > > I guess what I'm looking for is someone who commits to supporting > FCKeditor properly, i.e. looks into bugreports and at least scans the > forums for problems people have with it. > > Because otherwise, I'm close to ripping it out again and provide it as > separate "use at your own risk" package. That would be more honest than > what we're promising right now ... > > bye, Dirk > > > From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Nov 24 13:25:37 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:25:37 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >I have not had a site where it has not worked. Try a fresh install of 1.5.1. >All one has to do is enable it and allow the HTML tags. In 1.4.1, when you enabled the advanced editor, it would add the extra HTML tags and attributes to the admin's list of allowed HTML. That functionality is missing from 1.5.0 and 1.5.1 (that's what bug #757 is about). The old behavior made more sense. Why should the user need to know which tags and attributes are supported by FCKeditor? This should all work "with the click of a button", so to speak. >Definitely do not consider removing it from the project - that is not >something I would support and wanted to make that clear off the top. I see that it is a popular feature and certainly wouldn't remove it lightheartedly. But seeing how our current support[1] for it - in a word - sucks, that would be the more honest consequence. bye, Dirk [1] where by "support" I mean things working as shipped, timely response to bug reports, actual user support in the forums -- http://www.geeklog.net/ http://geeklog.info/ From devel at portalparts.com Mon Nov 24 14:43:37 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:43:37 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Dirk Haun wrote: Try a fresh install of 1.5.1. > I have installed 1.5.1 and done many site upgrades - this is not my first month using Geeklog ;) In 1.4.1, when you enabled the advanced editor, it would add the extra HTML tags and attributes to the admin's list of allowed HTML. That functionality is missing from 1.5.0 and 1.5.1 (that's what bug #757 is about). > Yep, I had added that feature several years ago and had not noticed that it was removed with GL 1.5x. Most sites don't want users uploading images anyways, and only thew Site Admin needs to use the Advanced Editor Option. For now, simply enable the option for root to not use html filtering. If it works then it's just a few missing tags. From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Nov 24 15:22:36 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 21:22:36 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20081124202236.198862961@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: > I have installed 1.5.1 and done many site upgrades - this is not my >first month using Geeklog ;) Blaine, believe me - the image upload from within FCKeditor is not working. Our security fix killed it. I first heard it from Justin at the Mentor Summit. He had it already tracked down to the security fix then. > Yep, I had added that feature several years ago and had not noticed >that it was removed with GL 1.5x. Not really "removed" - the extra tags were added in config.php. We don't have config.php any more and nobody noticed that there was no equivalent code to add the tags elsewhere. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/accu/ From devel at portalparts.com Mon Nov 24 15:59:08 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 15:59:08 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: <20081124202236.198862961@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124202236.198862961@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Dirk Haun wrote: > Blaine, believe me - the image upload from within FCKeditor is not > working. Our security fix killed it. I first heard it from Justin at the > Mentor Summit. He had it already tracked down to the security fix then. Just created a story on my test site (UNIX Host) uploaded and used a new image. Story was created as Root with the html filter disabled - works for me. Blaine From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Nov 24 16:46:34 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 22:46:34 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124202236.198862961@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20081124214634.984298820@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >works for me. Can you try it on the demo site, please? It doesn't work for me there or locally - the "progress bar" dialog pops up and stays there forever. It works as expected (locally) as soon as I remove the security fix ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From devel at portalparts.com Mon Nov 24 17:04:49 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:04:49 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: <20081124214634.984298820@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124202236.198862961@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124214634.984298820@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Enabled the 'Skip HTML Filter for Root' Option and was able to upload and use an image in a story http://demo.geeklog.net/ Blaine Dirk Haun wrote: > Blaine Lang wrote: > > >> works for me. >> > > Can you try it on the demo site, please? It doesn't work for me there or > locally - the "progress bar" dialog pops up and stays there forever. > > It works as expected (locally) as soon as I remove the security fix ... > > bye, Dirk > > > From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Nov 24 17:16:44 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 23:16:44 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124202236.198862961@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124214634.984298820@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20081124221644.662055373@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >Enabled the 'Skip HTML Filter for Root' Option and was able to upload >and use an image in a story Fascinating. Don't tell me it depends on the browser ... I was using Firefox 3. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://spam.tinyweb.net/ From devel at portalparts.com Mon Nov 24 17:22:53 2008 From: devel at portalparts.com (Blaine Lang) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:22:53 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: <20081124221644.662055373@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124202236.198862961@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124214634.984298820@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124221644.662055373@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: I was also using FF v3 and just did a 2nd story posting using Safari and that worked. Blaine Dirk Haun wrote: > Blaine Lang wrote: > > >> Enabled the 'Skip HTML Filter for Root' Option and was able to upload >> and use an image in a story >> > > Fascinating. Don't tell me it depends on the browser ... I was using > Firefox 3. > > bye, Dirk > > > From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Nov 25 15:23:08 2008 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 21:23:08 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124202236.198862961@smtp.haun-onli ne.de> <20081124214634.984298820@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124221644.662055373@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20081125202308.1123003319@smtp.haun-online.de> Blaine Lang wrote: >I was also using FF v3 and just did a 2nd story posting using Safari and >that worked. So, does it work for anyone else? If so, what configuration/browser? At least I'm not the only one seeing the upload hanging: Something's fishy here. But what? bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From cordiste at free.fr Wed Nov 26 15:08:49 2008 From: cordiste at free.fr (cordiste) Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 21:08:49 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] FCKeditor support In-Reply-To: <20081125202308.1123003319@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20081123173146.1164905260@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124182537.1711537919@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124214634.984298820@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081124221644.662055373@smtp.haun-online.de> <20081125202308.1123003319@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <364575ed0811261208s16460252t98ae24fb60ee90df@mail.gmail.com> Hello everyone, Yes it's working for me with a XP machine and FF3 or IE7 on demo.geeklog.net . if Skip HTML Filter for Root is set to true :) ::Ben 2008/11/25 Dirk Haun > Blaine Lang wrote: > > >I was also using FF v3 and just did a 2nd story posting using Safari and > >that worked. > > So, does it work for anyone else? If so, what configuration/browser? > > At least I'm not the only one seeing the upload hanging: > > > Something's fishy here. But what? > > bye, Dirk > > > -- > http://www.haun-online.de/ > http://geeklog.info/ > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://eight.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: