From tony at tonybibbs.com Sat Dec 21 00:22:24 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2002 23:22:24 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Testing Message-ID: Test, testing, 1, 2, 3 --Tony From langmail at sympatico.ca Sat Dec 21 00:27:30 2002 From: langmail at sympatico.ca (Blaine Lang) Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2002 00:27:30 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Testing References: Message-ID: <006001c2a8b1$a898a910$9a0a10ac@xpbl1> Does this work? Blaine From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Dec 22 04:58:10 2002 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 10:58:10 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Welcome to the Future Message-ID: <20021222095810.6955@smtp.haun-online.de> Gentlemen, I've moved all subscribers of the geeklog-core list over to this list which is now hosted on our own server, geeklog.net. This is now the "true" developers list. Once we move over the other geeklog-devel list from Sourceforge, it will be renamed to geeklog-users. In short: sf.net geeklog.net ------ ----------- geeklog-core geeklog-devel geeklog-devel geeklog-users geeklog-translations geeklog-translations geeklog-cvs geeklog-cvs I've also successfully set up a Geeklog site at pair.com, so we only need to sort out the DNS issues and then we're ready to make the switch ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 23 00:00:26 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2002 23:00:26 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Welcome to the Future References: <20021222095810.6955@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <3E06986A.6010406@tonybibbs.com> I have verified that the www portion of geeklog.net is point to the pair.com servers. Whenever they decide to finally get around to replying to our request on help for setting up a vhost we'll be done. Dirk, have you played much with http://project.geeklog.net? Just wondering if it is good enough to start moving bugs and what not over from sf.net soon. Also, cvs is set up and running but I think I inadvertantly broke chora, the CVS viewer. I'll get that fixed here hopefully before the xmas break. Chora 1.2 is in a final RC state and they do expect it to be the final release so I'll probably just grab a fresh copy of it. --Tony Dirk Haun wrote: > Gentlemen, > > I've moved all subscribers of the geeklog-core list over to this list > which is now hosted on our own server, geeklog.net. > > This is now the "true" developers list. Once we move over the other > geeklog-devel list from Sourceforge, it will be renamed to geeklog-users. > > In short: > > sf.net geeklog.net > ------ ----------- > geeklog-core geeklog-devel > geeklog-devel geeklog-users > geeklog-translations geeklog-translations > geeklog-cvs geeklog-cvs > > > I've also successfully set up a Geeklog site at pair.com, so we only need > to sort out the DNS issues and then we're ready to make the switch ... > > bye, Dirk > > From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Dec 23 04:58:05 2002 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 10:58:05 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Welcome to the Future In-Reply-To: <3E06986A.6010406@tonybibbs.com> References: <3E06986A.6010406@tonybibbs.com> Message-ID: <20021223095805.27204@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony Bibbs wrote: >Whenever they decide to finally get around to >replying to our request on help for setting up a vhost we'll be done. I think I've copied all the extra files (downloads, versionchecker.php, etc.) over from gl.sf.net, so all we would need to do is import the latest backup of the geeklog.sf.net database. >Dirk, have you played much with http://project.geeklog.net? Nope. >Just >wondering if it is good enough to start moving bugs and what not over >from sf.net soon. Which reminds me: We would need to update the documentation accordingly, pointing to the new site and new mailing lists. Anyway, I'll be offline until the weekend. Enjoy your holidays. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 23 14:54:00 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 13:54:00 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Plugin Developers Handbook Message-ID: Has the plugin developers handbook been added to CVS in the 1.3.x tree? If not, it probably should be (I can do it if everybody agrees) Also, for Geeklog 2 I'd like to see this documentation augmented with a SDK that incorporates this documentation and a real-world module that has some exercises to be completed. It'd be nice too, if all the code samples in the documentation would reference actual code in which ever module we use as the sample. Just a forethought on that. Thanks, --Tony From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 23 18:48:47 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:48:47 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mostly working Message-ID: OK, the DNS stuff seems to be figured out. There is only one oddity that I can't figure out. If you type in http://www.geeklog.net and watch closely it redirects to http://qs457.pair.com/geeklog/index.php and then redirects to http://www.geeklog.net/index.php. After that life is good. So my obvious question is why does it do that? Dirk, I'll wait until you reply before I do anything. --Tony From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 23 18:58:04 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 17:58:04 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mostly working In-Reply-To: Message-ID: And, might I add, the new server is fucking fast. Only 0.17 secs to generate the home page! That's compared to 1.09 secs on sf.net. --Tony On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Tony Bibbs wrote: > OK, the DNS stuff seems to be figured out. There is only one oddity that > I can't figure out. If you type in http://www.geeklog.net and watch > closely it redirects to http://qs457.pair.com/geeklog/index.php and then > redirects to http://www.geeklog.net/index.php. After that life is good. > > So my obvious question is why does it do that? > > Dirk, I'll wait until you reply before I do anything. > > --Tony > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From SchoolcraftJ at SytexInc.com Mon Dec 23 22:12:38 2002 From: SchoolcraftJ at SytexInc.com (Schoolcraft, Jeffrey) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:12:38 -0500 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mostly working Message-ID: <4779259BC93E0D409CDDAA32F299FF210B6DB9@mail.sytexinc.com> if you hack off the /geeklog/index.php bit, http://qs457.pair.com/ you get sent to a page that basically says pair.com is cool. I think they do this as a check, to catch 404's. If geeklog index.php didn't exist I think it would hang out on that page as advertising. my guess is they're doing this with mod-rewrite or something, though i'm not sure. whatever you sent after this got quarantined, probably for foul language, who knows. -----Original Message----- From: Tony Bibbs [mailto:tony at tonybibbs.com] Sent: Mon 12/23/2002 6:48 PM To: geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net Cc: Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mostly working OK, the DNS stuff seems to be figured out. There is only one oddity that I can't figure out. If you type in http://www.geeklog.net and watch closely it redirects to http://qs457.pair.com/geeklog/index.php and then redirects to http://www.geeklog.net/index.php. After that life is good. So my obvious question is why does it do that? Dirk, I'll wait until you reply before I do anything. --Tony _______________________________________________ geeklog-devel mailing list geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tony at tonybibbs.com Tue Dec 24 00:50:43 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 23:50:43 -0600 Subject: [geeklog-devel] CVS view back online Message-ID: <3E07F5B3.6090109@tonybibbs.com> OK, I have the CVS view working again at http://cvs.geeklog.net/chora/ Sometime after XMAS I'll figure out how to enable anonymous CVS access and how to do nightly tarballs. After that, CVS support will rival that of what we had at sf.net. Only thing different is this view will do syntax highlighting of PHP code which is nice. Along the same lines, I'll be setting you each up with account on that box here soon. I just need to get disk quotas working before I get too far ahead of myself. --Tony From dirk at haun-online.de Tue Dec 24 03:35:44 2002 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:35:44 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mostly working In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021224083544.31931@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony Bibbs wrote: >So my obvious question is why does it do that? Simple: The Geeklog installation on pair.com currently has $_CONF['site_url'] = 'http://qs457.pair.com/geeklog'; in its config.php. The rest is due to the new (as of 1.3.7) redirect in index.php that tries to address the "www. vs. non-www." problem (where people show up in the Who's Online block but don't get the User Functions block because they configured their site URL as www.mysite.com but used only mysite.com when logging in). So if you change the site_url to geeklog.net (or www.geeklog.net?) it should work as expected. bye, Dirk (on a slow dialup connection ...) -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Tue Dec 24 09:41:41 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 08:41:41 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Mostly working In-Reply-To: <20021224083544.31931@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Yeah, this was happening after I changed that. Now it all seems cool. Maybe it was a caching issue with my browser. --Tony On Tue, 24 Dec 2002, Dirk Haun wrote: > Tony Bibbs wrote: > > >So my obvious question is why does it do that? > > Simple: The Geeklog installation on pair.com currently has > > $_CONF['site_url'] = 'http://qs457.pair.com/geeklog'; > > in its config.php. The rest is due to the new (as of 1.3.7) redirect in > index.php that tries to address the "www. vs. non-www." problem (where > people show up in the Who's Online block but don't get the User Functions > block because they configured their site URL as www.mysite.com but used > only mysite.com when logging in). > > So if you change the site_url to geeklog.net (or www.geeklog.net?) it > should work as expected. > > bye, Dirk (on a slow dialup connection ...) > > > From tony at tonybibbs.com Tue Dec 24 12:37:15 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 11:37:15 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Remaining mailing lists Message-ID: I don't see a convenient way to get the email addresses out of the list for geeklog-devel. Any objections to just sending a message to that list telling them to join the new list? It'll be much simpler. --Tony From me at jasonwhittenburg.com Tue Dec 24 14:48:51 2002 From: me at jasonwhittenburg.com (Jason Whittenburg) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 14:48:51 -0500 (EST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Remaining mailing lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1874.66.156.57.38.1040759331.squirrel@vault.7south.com> That might be best, start with a clean house... :-) Tony Bibbs said: > I don't see a convenient way to get the email addresses out of the list > for geeklog-devel. Any objections to just sending a message to that > list telling them to join the new list? It'll be much simpler. > > --Tony > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel From nightman22 at hotmail.com Tue Dec 24 15:20:58 2002 From: nightman22 at hotmail.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Medeiros?=) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 19:20:58 -0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Remaining mailing lists References: <1874.66.156.57.38.1040759331.squirrel@vault.7south.com> Message-ID: Yeah... that would also be a way of checking who is active / inactive. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jason Whittenburg" To: Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 6:48 PM Subject: Re: [geeklog-devel] Remaining mailing lists > That might be best, start with a clean house... :-) > > > Tony Bibbs said: > > I don't see a convenient way to get the email addresses out of the list > > for geeklog-devel. Any objections to just sending a message to that > > list telling them to join the new list? It'll be much simpler. > > > > --Tony > > > > _______________________________________________ > > geeklog-devel mailing list > > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From nightman22 at hotmail.com Tue Dec 24 18:03:58 2002 From: nightman22 at hotmail.com (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Medeiros?=) Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 22:03:58 -0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] GForge References: <1874.66.156.57.38.1040759331.squirrel@vault.7south.com> Message-ID: Just wanted you to know... GForge 3.0pre7 is out. Grab it @ http://gforge.org/download.php/23/gforge-3.0pre7.tar.bz2 BTW... Merry Christmas :) From dirk at haun-online.de Wed Dec 25 12:55:14 2002 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 18:55:14 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Remaining mailing lists In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20021225175514.21199@smtp.haun-online.de> Tony Bibbs wrote: >I don't see a convenient way to get the email addresses out of the list >for geeklog-devel. Any objections to just sending a message to that list >telling them to join the new list? It'll be much simpler. There are certainly too many people on the geeklog-devel list to transfer them manually. But I'll be moving the geeklog-translations list over manually once I'm back home (i.e. next weekend). bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From dirk at haun-online.de Fri Dec 27 16:11:22 2002 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 22:11:22 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Some people ... Message-ID: <20021227211122.10417@smtp.haun-online.de> Doesn't it give you a warm and fuzzy feeling when you take the Christmas holidays off and then come back to find this in your inbox: >There have been no new articles posted at geeklog.net since Dec. 25. > >Is there some other place where Geeklog news and support is being provided? *sigh* bye, Dirk (who just decided to take the rest of this evening off as well ...) -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From dirk at haun-online.de Sat Dec 28 18:07:52 2002 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 00:07:52 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Minor(?) Security Issue Message-ID: <20021228230752.234@smtp.haun-online.de> Okay, the following security issue was brought to my attention: Any StoryAdmin can change _any_ story on a site, even if s/he only has read access to the story. What they need to do is make a copy of the Admin's story submission form and add the sid (story id) of the story they want to change. With an input field like they could even do this comfortably ... I have been able to reproduce the problem, but haven't looked at the code yet. To quote Kobaz (the guy who found this), from IRC: > in function submitstory in admin/story.php [...] > anyways, if you take a peak > at that function > there is no permission checking at all > that function is where permission checking is most important > if you shove a SEC_hasAccess in there > that will seriously reduce the potential to exploit > there still is other issues besids that > any user can change the group ownership to be any group > well, not any user > any storyadmin [...] > i just wanted to bring it to you guys attention > so theres a few things it shoulc check for, number one if you have write > access, number two, make sure the user is changing the group to a group he > is a member of > and if the user isnt the owner, he shouldnt be able to change owner > permissions either While this problem won't affect most of our hobbyist users, it may have some more severe consequences in corporate use (e.g. when the StoryAdmin for sales can change stories available only to management). Incidentally, this may be a good time for an 1.3.7sr1 release. We could include updated documentation with the new geeklog.net URLs and we could also fix one or two of the other 1.3.7 issues. Specifically, I'm thinking about adding a config option for the daily digest (i.e. to let the site owner choose what the default is - new users will get the digest automatically or not). Also, the redirect in index.php seems to cause problems on some setups. bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://geeklog.info/ From peter at tantalo.net Sun Dec 29 11:23:49 2002 From: peter at tantalo.net (Peter Hopfgartner) Date: 29 Dec 2002 17:23:49 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Getting away from global - Introducing constants Message-ID: <1041179031.625.12.camel@bonobo> Dear Geeklog developers, I would like to use GL in 2 installations, but I we have register-globals enabled. In order to get away from globals, I sent you a first patch, more for the purpose of illustration. This takes away the _SEC_VERBOSE variable and replaces it with a constant (indeed, logically _SEC_VERBOSE is a constant, since it's value is never changed in the code). If you find this usefull, I will do the same with the other *_VERBOSE variables. Please enjoy, Peter Hopfgartner P.S.: The patch was created as diff -Naur old_file new_file -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-const-geeklog-1.3.7-system-lib.security.php Type: application/x-php Size: 6986 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From peter at tantalo.net Sun Dec 29 11:59:32 2002 From: peter at tantalo.net (Peter Hopfgartner) Date: 29 Dec 2002 17:59:32 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] More const patches Message-ID: <1041181175.584.17.camel@bonobo> Here I have the patches that constify the rest of geeklog Peter -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-const-geeklog-1.3.7-public_html-admin-poll.php Type: application/x-php Size: 1679 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-const-geeklog-1.3.7-public_html-admin-user.php Type: application/x-php Size: 2242 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-const-geeklog-1.3.7-public_html-lib-common.php Type: application/x-php Size: 3025 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-const-geeklog-1.3.7-public_html-usersettings.php Type: application/x-php Size: 1503 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-const-geeklog-1.3.7-system-lib.custom.php Type: application/x-php Size: 992 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: patch-const-geeklog-1.3.7-system-lib.sessions.php Type: application/x-php Size: 5463 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: From dirk at haun-online.de Sun Dec 29 17:51:09 2002 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 23:51:09 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Hmm ... Message-ID: <20021229225109.19676@smtp.haun-online.de> Does anyone remember this post: To quote: "INITSOFT offers pre-configured hosting of Open Source projects: Geeklog (1.2.5 & 1.3.x), phpBB, Gallery, Nuke, Post Nuke, osCommerce, and more." When I visited their website, was listed as an example for a "dynamic website" (don't know if it rotates). That site is obviously running Geeklog, although it doesn't say so. I was curious and wanted to know which version was running there. The calendar shows an empty last week for November, so it's not 1.3.7. Guess what - whoever installed that site left the install directory intact and unprotected. So I can call up the install script which tells me it's Geeklog 1.3.5. There's also the info.php script which was added in 1.3.5sr2, so it's at least a secure version. However, configinfo.php is also there, displaying the contents of config.php as a nicely formatted table (fortunately, Jeff left out the database information when he wrote that script) ... I have to admit that I wouldn't know off-hand how to make use of all that information to do any harm to the site (other than running the install script in upgrade mode and possibly damaging the database), but it's certainly not a good thing to make this information available to everyone on the WWW. What would you do? Contact the site owner? She probably doesn't have much technical knowledge anyway. Contact Initsoft? I guess I'll do that but would like to see some comments first ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.tinyweb.de/ From tomw at pigstye.net Sun Dec 29 19:46:47 2002 From: tomw at pigstye.net (Tom Willett) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 00:46:47 +0000 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Hmm ... In-Reply-To: <20021229225109.19676@smtp.haun-online.de> References: <20021229225109.19676@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: <20021230004647.M60095@pigstye.net> I would send the same notification to both. Both need to know. The site owner has the right to know that their provider did not do a good job of securing the site and the Site provider needs to know that they messed up and that the customer knows. I would also check for the pma directory. It wouldn't suprise me if they left that open also. -- Tom Willett tomw at pigstye.net From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 30 10:24:35 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:24:35 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Hmm ... In-Reply-To: <20021229225109.19676@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: Yeah, I'd contact initsoft. If they are offering this as a service, they should install it properly (i.e. lock the installation script). If they don't fix it they could lose a customer, right? --Tony On Sun, 29 Dec 2002, Dirk Haun wrote: > Does anyone remember this post: > > > To quote: "INITSOFT offers pre-configured hosting of Open Source > projects: Geeklog (1.2.5 & 1.3.x), phpBB, Gallery, Nuke, Post Nuke, > osCommerce, and more." > > When I visited their website, was > listed as an example for a "dynamic website" (don't know if it rotates). > That site is obviously running Geeklog, although it doesn't say so. > > I was curious and wanted to know which version was running there. The > calendar shows an empty last week for November, so it's not 1.3.7. > > Guess what - whoever installed that site left the install directory > intact and unprotected. So I can call up the install script which tells > me it's Geeklog 1.3.5. There's also the info.php script which was added > in 1.3.5sr2, so it's at least a secure version. However, configinfo.php > is also there, displaying the contents of config.php as a nicely > formatted table (fortunately, Jeff left out the database information when > he wrote that script) ... > > I have to admit that I wouldn't know off-hand how to make use of all that > information to do any harm to the site (other than running the install > script in upgrade mode and possibly damaging the database), but it's > certainly not a good thing to make this information available to everyone > on the WWW. > > What would you do? Contact the site owner? She probably doesn't have much > technical knowledge anyway. Contact Initsoft? I guess I'll do that but > would like to see some comments first ... > > bye, Dirk > > > From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 30 10:26:56 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 09:26:56 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Hmm ... In-Reply-To: <20021230004647.M60095@pigstye.net> Message-ID: Actually, this is a better suggestion On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Tom Willett wrote: > I would send the same notification to both. Both need to know. The site > owner has the right to know that their provider did not do a good job of > securing the site and the Site provider needs to know that they messed up and > that the customer knows. > > I would also check for the pma directory. It wouldn't suprise me if they > left that open also. > > -- > Tom Willett > tomw at pigstye.net > _______________________________________________ > geeklog-devel mailing list > geeklog-devel at lists.geeklog.net > http://lists.geeklog.net/listinfo/geeklog-devel > From dirk at haun-online.de Mon Dec 30 13:18:35 2002 From: dirk at haun-online.de (Dirk Haun) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 19:18:35 +0100 Subject: [geeklog-devel] Unused files Message-ID: <20021230181835.6669@smtp.haun-online.de> I noticed that we seem to have some files that aren't really used any more: include/upload.class.php This is the old upload class which has now been replaced with system/ classes/upload.class.php, so I assume it's safe to remove it? etc/httpd.conf Any reason why we carry this around? etc/anonymous_user_cleanup.php I assume this is needed to upgrade from very old versions (1.1)? If so, then maybe we could move it to another directory? Just trying to reduce the clutter a bit ... bye, Dirk -- http://www.haun-online.de/ http://www.macosx-faq.de/ From tony at tonybibbs.com Mon Dec 30 14:08:36 2002 From: tony at tonybibbs.com (Tony Bibbs) Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2002 13:08:36 -0600 (CST) Subject: [geeklog-devel] Unused files In-Reply-To: <20021230181835.6669@smtp.haun-online.de> Message-ID: On Mon, 30 Dec 2002, Dirk Haun wrote: > I noticed that we seem to have some files that aren't really used any more: > > include/upload.class.php > This is the old upload class which has now been replaced with system/ > classes/upload.class.php, so I assume it's safe to remove it? Yes, kill it > > etc/httpd.conf > Any reason why we carry this around? It was more for Apache newbies. I doubt this is used much, if at all. > > etc/anonymous_user_cleanup.php > I assume this is needed to upgrade from very old versions (1.1)? If so, > then maybe we could move it to another directory? Yeah, you can do a cvs remove on it as far as I am concerned. It is in the tarballs that really need it and we haven't seen this issue on the lists or in IRC in a *long* time. > > Just trying to reduce the clutter a bit ... > > bye, Dirk > > > From tomw at pigstye.net Mon Dec 30 19:11:24 2002 From: tomw at pigstye.net (Tom Willett) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 00:11:24 +0000 Subject: [geeklog-devel] WYSIWYG Editor Message-ID: <20021231001124.M86542@pigstye.net> I ran across a nice free wysiwyg text editor for